Guest guest Posted November 27, 2006 Report Share Posted November 27, 2006 They've obviously been brainwashed and are trying to cover themselves. Save the letter and consider sending a copy any of various organizations and people who know the truth. If you wish to send them something, there are many medical dictionaries, chemistry books, and other sources which state that mercury is poisonous. Or you could send them a copy of Evidence of Harm, but seems more worthwhile to send a copy to someone who would actually read it. Consider directing your energy into something positive, as this seems like hitting one's head against a brink wall. We know the brick wall doesn't belong there, but it is. If there's someone at your local TV station who does investigative reporting that you trust to report the truth you could send it to them with your thoughts. Consider sending the Health Dept. the challenge for an doctor to take the current vaccine regimen for some big amount of money. Nobody will do it so far. Or better yet have the TV station present them with the challenge and report their reponse on the air... S S <p>I received this ridiculous letter from the AR Dept of health in response to<br> my letter questioning the current flu vaccine push (to pregnant women and<br> children as well!). Please, could any of you help me refute some of the<br> points of this letter? I cannot let this stand without a rebuttal. I just<br> want to be sure that I am speaking with facts & not just emotion. Thanks so<br> much for any help you can provide,<br> <br> <br> Dear Mr. and Mrs Elsass,<br> The Arkansas Division of Health is very sorry that you have a child with<br> autism. Our highest mission at the Arkansas Division of Health is<br> protecting the health and well being of all Americans, starting with our<br> children. We would never recommend any vaccine be given to children or any<br> person if there were sound, scientific evidence it could be harmful. <br> Please let me reassure you that autism has nothing to do with anything you<br> did or with vaccines. As you probably know, it is believed that autism is<br> multi-factorial and many researchers are working to find out the causes. <br> We agree that mercury is a potentially harmful substance, but mercury is<br> also a naturally occurring element found in low levels in air, soil, and<br> water-and also, as a result, it can make its way, in small or trace amounts,<br> into many food items, including infant formula and breast milk. It's<br> difficult or impossible to reduce children's exposure to those sources, and<br> that's why CDC and others have encouraged the removal of thimerosal from<br> vaccines. A recent study sponsored by the NIAID and conducted at the<br> University of Rochester assessed mercury levels in 40 infants who received<br> vaccines containing thimerosal and 21 infants who received thimerosal-free<br> vaccines. The scientists measured the level of mercury in the infants'<br> blood, urine and stool up to 28 days after vaccination. They found that 1)<br> infants who were given vaccines with thimerosal had levels of mercury well<br> below the safe level of 29 nmol/L (this level is set ten times lower than<br> the level at which mercury begins to cause neurological problems) and 2) the<br> body seems to be able to get rid of thimerosal (ethyl mercury) via the<br> gastrointestinal tract (stools) much quicker than it gets rid of methyl<br> mercury.<br> Today, with the exception of some types of influenza vaccine, none of the<br> routinely recommended childhood vaccines contain thimerosal as a<br> preservative. <br> <br> Numerous, repeated, scientifically rigorous studies involving hundreds of<br> thousands of children have found no relationship between thimerosal and<br> autism. In 2004, the Institute of Medicine reviewed a large amount of<br> literature on autism, thimerosal, and MMR. They found no association<br> between vaccines, thimerosal and autism. The committee based their<br> conclusions on the whole body of the evidence, including toxicology studies,<br> not just epidemiological studies. Vaccine safety has always been a very<br> important concern for the medical profession. <br> A study was done in the United Kingdom because of a rapid increase in autism<br> case. The only vaccine in the UK's childhood immunization program that<br> contained thimerosal was DTP. All other vaccines (OPV, BCG, MMR, Hib, menC)<br> added to the program since the 1950's are and have always been thimerosal<br> free. If thimerosal in vaccines were causing autism, we would expect to see<br> a simultaneous increase in both thimerosal exposure and autism cases.<br> However, from the 1950's on, there was no increase in the amount of<br> thimerosal UK children were receiving from vaccines, yet there was a jump in<br> autism cases in the 1980's.<br> As we're looking for answers related to the causes and effective treatment<br> for autism, we have to also be careful to base our health recommendations<br> on the best available science that we have in front of us, and today the<br> best available science indicates to us that vaccines save lives, and that's<br> a very, very important message for all of us to remember. <br> We know for certain that children today live longer and healthier because of<br> the vaccines they receive in childhood. Just to put this in context, before<br> the Childhood Immunization Program was present in the United States, 13- to<br> 20,000 kids developed paralytic polio every year. Before measles vaccines,<br> almost everyone in the country got measles when they were child, and about<br> 450 children died every year from measles. Before rubella, epidemics of<br> rubella occurred and sometimes up to 20,000 children were born with<br> congenital rubella syndrome with 2,000 deaths and more than 1,000<br> miscarriages.<br> <br> I hope this addresses some of your concerns as well as answer some of your<br> questions.<br> <br> If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me.<br> <br> <br> <br> Sincerely,<br> <br> <br> <br> L. Snow M. D.<br> Medical Director<br> Communicable Disease/Immunizatio<wbr>ns<br> Arkansas Division of Health<br> 501-661-2169<br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2006 Report Share Posted November 27, 2006 First let me say that this " safe level " they refer to for mercury was originally designed for adults, not infants. Secondly, just because something occurs naturally in the enviornment does not make it safe. Lead occurs naturally but we know that is not safe, same wiht mercury. So that is just Stupid Logic there. There are tons of scientific research on the detrimental effects of mercury on humans. Next the body could get rid of methylmercury via the instestinal tract if the children ATE the vaccine and provided their detox system was developed, which it isn't. That is not the case here, it is injected and never sees the intestinal tract. Injection exposure by passes the bodies natural protective detox mechanisms. Why is it not safe for pregnant women to eat fish, but they can have Hg injected? Also, there are not numerous studies refuted the damage of mercury. More like a few fixed ones they keep using over and over again. the statement that " none of children's vaccines contain mercury " is false. Thimerosal is still used to manufacture vaccines, the companies tell you that. The claim is that " it is removed before the final product but could still contain traces " . Read the package inserts for vaccines, it says that right on it. The statement that all vaccines given in UK since 1950 have been thimerosal free except the DPT is also false. They also increased their vaccine schedule in the 1980's when autism rates climbed. Also why is there suddenly tons of cases of autims in third world countries now, following the generous wide scale plan to provide vaccines to third world infants? Also the reason so many kids got all those disease before vaccines, was due to poor sanitation, poor nutrition, etc. This is the typical beaurocratic crap they feed to everyone to avoid the panic and too avoid admiting guilt. Refer to the book Evidence of Harm. There are many sites to that have studies contrary to this letter. Most studies they refer to are falsifies, or the results misinterpreted. Remember that anytime you deal with these cronies they are paid to say all this. They probably don't vaccinate their own kids. Most docs don't either. There is only a 14% chance a child will even get the flu. Ask them why ethylene glycol is ok to put in the shots...or formaldehyde, aluminum, benzethonium chloride. Here is some good info: " experts at the CDC estimat theat 36.000 people per year die from the flu. According their website most weakend immune systems already. " People with weakend immune systems are not candidate for vaccination according to the patient insert for the flu vaccine. " Dr. Walter Ornstein, director in 2003 of the CDC's National Immunization Program, made the agency's goals clear in a slide presentation in june 2003. The agency would " increase vaccine demand " by " enhancing " its communication efforts and extending it's vaccine campaign past the end of December, when the flu vaccination typically winds down across the nation. Why one might ask? $450 million in additional profits in a single flu season. > > I received this ridiculous letter from the AR Dept of health in response to > my letter questioning the current flu vaccine push (to pregnant women and > children as well!). Please, could any of you help me refute some of the > points of this letter? I cannot let this stand without a rebuttal. I just > want to be sure that I am speaking with facts & not just emotion. Thanks so > much for any help you can provide, > > > Dear Mr. and Mrs Elsass, > The Arkansas Division of Health is very sorry that you have a child with > autism. Our highest mission at the Arkansas Division of Health is > protecting the health and well being of all Americans, starting with our > children. We would never recommend any vaccine be given to children or any > person if there were sound, scientific evidence it could be harmful. > Please let me reassure you that autism has nothing to do with anything you > did or with vaccines. As you probably know, it is believed that autism is > multi-factorial and many researchers are working to find out the causes. > We agree that mercury is a potentially harmful substance, but mercury is > also a naturally occurring element found in low levels in air, soil, and > water-and also, as a result, it can make its way, in small or trace amounts, > into many food items, including infant formula and breast milk. It's > difficult or impossible to reduce children's exposure to those sources, and > that's why CDC and others have encouraged the removal of thimerosal from > vaccines. A recent study sponsored by the NIAID and conducted at the > University of Rochester assessed mercury levels in 40 infants who received > vaccines containing thimerosal and 21 infants who received thimerosal-free > vaccines. The scientists measured the level of mercury in the infants' > blood, urine and stool up to 28 days after vaccination. They found that 1) > infants who were given vaccines with thimerosal had levels of mercury well > below the safe level of 29 nmol/L (this level is set ten times lower than > the level at which mercury begins to cause neurological problems) and 2) the > body seems to be able to get rid of thimerosal (ethyl mercury) via the > gastrointestinal tract (stools) much quicker than it gets rid of methyl > mercury. > Today, with the exception of some types of influenza vaccine, none of the > routinely recommended childhood vaccines contain thimerosal as a > preservative. > > Numerous, repeated, scientifically rigorous studies involving hundreds of > thousands of children have found no relationship between thimerosal and > autism. In 2004, the Institute of Medicine reviewed a large amount of > literature on autism, thimerosal, and MMR. They found no association > between vaccines, thimerosal and autism. The committee based their > conclusions on the whole body of the evidence, including toxicology studies, > not just epidemiological studies. Vaccine safety has always been a very > important concern for the medical profession. > A study was done in the United Kingdom because of a rapid increase in autism > case. The only vaccine in the UK's childhood immunization program that > contained thimerosal was DTP. All other vaccines (OPV, BCG, MMR, Hib, menC) > added to the program since the 1950's are and have always been thimerosal > free. If thimerosal in vaccines were causing autism, we would expect to see > a simultaneous increase in both thimerosal exposure and autism cases. > However, from the 1950's on, there was no increase in the amount of > thimerosal UK children were receiving from vaccines, yet there was a jump in > autism cases in the 1980's. > As we're looking for answers related to the causes and effective treatment > for autism, we have to also be careful to base our health recommendations > on the best available science that we have in front of us, and today the > best available science indicates to us that vaccines save lives, and that's > a very, very important message for all of us to remember. > We know for certain that children today live longer and healthier because of > the vaccines they receive in childhood. Just to put this in context, before > the Childhood Immunization Program was present in the United States, 13- to > 20,000 kids developed paralytic polio every year. Before measles vaccines, > almost everyone in the country got measles when they were child, and about > 450 children died every year from measles. Before rubella, epidemics of > rubella occurred and sometimes up to 20,000 children were born with > congenital rubella syndrome with 2,000 deaths and more than 1,000 > miscarriages. > > I hope this addresses some of your concerns as well as answer some of your > questions. > > If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > L. Snow M. D. > Medical Director > Communicable Disease/Immunizations > Arkansas Division of Health > 501-661-2169 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2006 Report Share Posted November 27, 2006 There is no factual scientific bases for any of the " facts " and quotes asserted in the letter. The people being quoted and the quoted studies are not reputable, and their assertions have been refuted by credible scientific documentation. I will provide more details on this when I have time to reference pertinent documentation. In the meantime, There is credible evidence by peer-reviewed studies and clinical experience that autism is commonly caused by toxic metal exposures, in particular vaccines containing high levels of mercury. The mechanisms by which toxic metals cause condiitions including autism are documented in the medical literature.( Likewise there is credible scientific documentation that some cases of autism are caused by MRI vaccinations that contain no mercury. Though this is not pertinent to the issue here) www.flcv.com/kidshg.html There is also large scale clinical evidence that those with mercury related autism, commoly recover with proper detoxification, from records of large numbers of autism patients treated by autism treatment clinics and the Pfieffer Clinic. And from clinical experience of those participating in this forum over time. Contrary to the letter's claim, there is documentation that neurological damage occurs at levels far below those recieved by children who received a full round of required vaccinations, containing mercury. See the above review study, and I can provide more specific documentation. There has never been any study that has documented a safe level of exposure to mercury, however small, that is safe for all children. There is documentation that some children are more susceptible than others, and experience serious adverse effects at extremely low levels of exposure. www.home.earthlink.net/suscept.html Regarding Flu shots, it is a matter of record that flu shots commonly contain high lievels of extremely neurotoxic substances, mercury, aluminum, organochlorine compound,etc. And while there is no clredible evidence that flu shots have more benefical effects than adverse effects, there is credible evidence that flu shot cause significant adverse effects to significant numbers of people- including Alzheimer's, ALS, MS, Guilliame Barr Syndrome(sp?), It has been documented by studies and clinical experience of some of the most credible doctors dealing with such conditions, that those who get several flu shots with mercury more than double their risk of contracting these conditions. Such as Dr. Fudenburg, whose crediblity is better than that of anyone being quoted in the letter. Bernie Windham, Research Director, Dams Intl more later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2006 Report Share Posted November 27, 2006 I got looked at today like I had 13 heads when I asked to see the insert for a tetanus shot that a client got. The nurse said she didn't have it, that it was a multi-dose vial. So then I asked how much thimerosal or mercury was in it. She said " I don't know, it's good for 10 years. " This is an adult client who wants the flu shot every year, so I just wanted to see what reaction I would get from clinic staff (and let them know I know), since I'm not in a position to change the client's mind... One of my coworker got the same look when she asked about ingredients in the flu shot. The ones she asked tried to change the subject by naming off the different types of flu it's supposed to protect against. S S _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2006 Report Share Posted November 27, 2006 It looks like you got the pro-mercury pro-vaccine partnerships auto-response. Here are a few links you might be interested in: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/331/7529/1412?ijkey=FXyhZx2lyNbaVLE & keytype=\ ref http://www.whale.to/a/yazflu.html http://www.seniorjournal.com/Spotlights/FLU2004/5-02-15FluShotsQuestioned.htm Here is the study the NIAID does like too much: http://www.ehponline.org/members/2005/7712/7712.pdf Here is a link to a study which claims the NIAID supplied the study with a thimerosal-containing placebo. Last line of the first paragraph under the " methods " header sub header " preparation of vaccines " . http://www.jci.org/cgi/content/full/98/10/2308 Since they mentioned this among other things here's a link to the last of the official statistics gathered from the Iowa mumps outbreak. http://www.idph.state.ia.us/adper/common/pdf/mumps/mumps_update_093006.pdf As you can see half of the cases had two-shot MMR history. You may also note that 30% of the mumps victims were placed in the " unknown " category and left there. HTH [ ] please help me refute flu vaccine info I received this ridiculous letter from the AR Dept of health in response to my letter questioning the current flu vaccine push (to pregnant women and children as well!). Please, could any of you help me refute some of the points of this letter? I cannot let this stand without a rebuttal. I just want to be sure that I am speaking with facts & not just emotion. Thanks so much for any help you can provide, Dear Mr. and Mrs Elsass, The Arkansas Division of Health is very sorry that you have a child with autism. Our highest mission at the Arkansas Division of Health is protecting the health and well being of all Americans, starting with our children. We would never recommend any vaccine be given to children or any person if there were sound, scientific evidence it could be harmful. Please let me reassure you that autism has nothing to do with anything you did or with vaccines. As you probably know, it is believed that autism is multi-factorial and many researchers are working to find out the causes. We agree that mercury is a potentially harmful substance, but mercury is also a naturally occurring element found in low levels in air, soil, and water-and also, as a result, it can make its way, in small or trace amounts, into many food items, including infant formula and breast milk. It's difficult or impossible to reduce children's exposure to those sources, and that's why CDC and others have encouraged the removal of thimerosal from vaccines. A recent study sponsored by the NIAID and conducted at the University of Rochester assessed mercury levels in 40 infants who received vaccines containing thimerosal and 21 infants who received thimerosal-free vaccines. The scientists measured the level of mercury in the infants' blood, urine and stool up to 28 days after vaccination. They found that 1) infants who were given vaccines with thimerosal had levels of mercury well below the safe level of 29 nmol/L (this level is set ten times lower than the level at which mercury begins to cause neurological problems) and 2) the body seems to be able to get rid of thimerosal (ethyl mercury) via the gastrointestinal tract (stools) much quicker than it gets rid of methyl mercury. Today, with the exception of some types of influenza vaccine, none of the routinely recommended childhood vaccines contain thimerosal as a preservative. Numerous, repeated, scientifically rigorous studies involving hundreds of thousands of children have found no relationship between thimerosal and autism. In 2004, the Institute of Medicine reviewed a large amount of literature on autism, thimerosal, and MMR. They found no association between vaccines, thimerosal and autism. The committee based their conclusions on the whole body of the evidence, including toxicology studies, not just epidemiological studies. Vaccine safety has always been a very important concern for the medical profession. A study was done in the United Kingdom because of a rapid increase in autism case. The only vaccine in the UK's childhood immunization program that contained thimerosal was DTP. All other vaccines (OPV, BCG, MMR, Hib, menC) added to the program since the 1950's are and have always been thimerosal free. If thimerosal in vaccines were causing autism, we would expect to see a simultaneous increase in both thimerosal exposure and autism cases. However, from the 1950's on, there was no increase in the amount of thimerosal UK children were receiving from vaccines, yet there was a jump in autism cases in the 1980's. As we're looking for answers related to the causes and effective treatment for autism, we have to also be careful to base our health recommendations on the best available science that we have in front of us, and today the best available science indicates to us that vaccines save lives, and that's a very, very important message for all of us to remember. We know for certain that children today live longer and healthier because of the vaccines they receive in childhood. Just to put this in context, before the Childhood Immunization Program was present in the United States, 13- to 20,000 kids developed paralytic polio every year. Before measles vaccines, almost everyone in the country got measles when they were child, and about 450 children died every year from measles. Before rubella, epidemics of rubella occurred and sometimes up to 20,000 children were born with congenital rubella syndrome with 2,000 deaths and more than 1,000 miscarriages. I hope this addresses some of your concerns as well as answer some of your questions. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, L. Snow M. D. Medical Director Communicable Disease/Immunizations Arkansas Division of Health 501-661-2169 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 I should know better than to jump into this discussion, but the assertions made beg the issue of what is credible. If the people quoted are not reputable, what is the operative definition of reputable? Dr Fudenberg has had licensing problems with the State of South Carolina for over ten years, and I believe he has inactivated his license. During the course of his communication with the medical board he reported that he had authorized nurses in his office to sign his name to prescriptions. To suggest that none of the other authors approaches this level of credibility is kind of a stretch. Jim ________________________________ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Bernard Windham Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 2:40 PM autism treatment Subject: [ ] re: please help me refute flu vaccine info There is no factual scientific bases for any of the " facts " and quotes asserted in the letter. The people being quoted and the quoted studies are not reputable, and their assertions have been refuted by credible scientific documentation. I will provide more details on this when I have time to reference pertinent documentation. In the meantime, There is credible evidence by peer-reviewed studies and clinical experience that autism is commonly caused by toxic metal exposures, in particular vaccines containing high levels of mercury. The mechanisms by which toxic metals cause condiitions including autism are documented in the medical literature.( Likewise there is credible scientific documentation that some cases of autism are caused by MRI vaccinations that contain no mercury. Though this is not pertinent to the issue here) www.flcv.com/kidshg.html There is also large scale clinical evidence that those with mercury related autism, commoly recover with proper detoxification, from records of large numbers of autism patients treated by autism treatment clinics and the Pfieffer Clinic. And from clinical experience of those participating in this forum over time. Contrary to the letter's claim, there is documentation that neurological damage occurs at levels far below those recieved by children who received a full round of required vaccinations, containing mercury. See the above review study, and I can provide more specific documentation. There has never been any study that has documented a safe level of exposure to mercury, however small, that is safe for all children. There is documentation that some children are more susceptible than others, and experience serious adverse effects at extremely low levels of exposure. www.home.earthlink.net/suscept.html Regarding Flu shots, it is a matter of record that flu shots commonly contain high lievels of extremely neurotoxic substances, mercury, aluminum, organochlorine compound,etc. And while there is no clredible evidence that flu shots have more benefical effects than adverse effects, there is credible evidence that flu shot cause significant adverse effects to significant numbers of people- including Alzheimer's, ALS, MS, Guilliame Barr Syndrome(sp?), It has been documented by studies and clinical experience of some of the most credible doctors dealing with such conditions, that those who get several flu shots with mercury more than double their risk of contracting these conditions. Such as Dr. Fudenburg, whose crediblity is better than that of anyone being quoted in the letter. Bernie Windham, Research Director, Dams Intl more later This is a confidential message intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you receive this message in error, please forward it to the correct person(s), or delete it immediately. Email is not guaranteed secure or error-free; therefore, VMRC does not accept liability for transmission-related error or omission in the content of this message. http://www.vmrc.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 During the course of his communication with the medical board he reported that he had authorized nurses in his office to sign his name to prescriptions. -------------------------------- Anyone who's ever read Dr. Herman's posts can either accept his giant fonts considerately or decline to read them because they're just too big and make your eyes hurt. Maybe the nurses in his office sign for him because he can't see too well. Unless the prescriptions have been traced to Rush Limbaugh I don't see what's the problem with this? Actually having a nurse sign for him or being honest enough to admit he needs some help getting things done? I mean would you discredit a " genius " like Hawking for his failure do his own long hand? Andy Wakefield has also had a lot of licensing problems yet we don't think any less of him. He really messed up when he biopsied the measles lesions. He threw away a brilliant career and has been in court a lot more than anybody responsible for mercury poisoning American children. There's a big difference between disagreeing with somebody's position and attack their credibility based on a disability they might have. Take somebody like the late vaccine guru Dr. Maurice Hilleman. In 1991 he wrote a memo to Dr. Gordon , President of Merck Vaccines some eight years before it was " discovered that there was mercury in vaccines inxs of federal standards. http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.10.pdf Hilleman either A) flunked chemistry deliberately misguided , or C) was a pompus ass who had no idea what the heck he was writing about. At the bottom of page three he tells that group three mercurials are one-tenth as toxic as either the methyl or ethyl mercury salts. Supposing that this information quoted from a 1969 symposium on allowable mercury exposures per cubic feet of air was true, Hilleman still got it wrong because he states that thimerosal is a phenyl mercurial substance. He wrote " most important thimerosal is a phenyl mercurial. " He even underscored the word phenyl. And he is the most quoted guy vaccinology has. To this day, ethylmercury, the kind in thimerosal, has not been proven to be anything more than a neurotoxic chemical compound. How is a writing desk like a raven? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2006 Report Share Posted December 1, 2006 I was afraid when I started down this road that I might be misunderstood, but I am happy to pursue this line with you in hopes that we can come to some common ground. In the first place, my response was sparked by Bernard Windham's blanket assertion that 'the people being quoted and the studies are not reputable' and '(the) credibility (of Dr Fudenberg) is better than that of anyone being quoted in the letter'. I agree with you that there is a big difference between disagreeing with someone's position and with attacking their credibility, and I hope you would apply that judgment to Bernard Windham's allegations. The prescription issue may be more meaningful to me than most, since I write prescriptions for a living and am very familiar with the rules. It is permissible and often practiced to have office staff write the body of a prescription. It is probably legal, although not best practice, to even allow staff to write in the name of the patient. But the doctor has to sign it. If the doctor does not sign it personally (not a stamp), there is a presumption that the doctor has not reviewed and approved of the content. Most likely this presumption is what led to problems in South Carolina. The reference to Rush Limbaugh is ironic. It was not my intent to trash Dr Fudenberg, but like Rush, he also admitted in the course of his proceedings to obtaining and using controlled drugs by other than legal means. The notion that he did what he did because of poor vision is tenable but is obviously speculation. My point in raising the issue at all is to suggest that whatever his motives or his character his conduct has not been unassailable. Consequently, as I said, it is a stretch to suggest that his credibility is better than that of all of the authors of all of the studies that have not found evidence of a harmful effect from mercury in vaccines. I'd like to go into more detail with you about the Merck memo. I had not seen this before and I appreciate your providing the link. It's not clear to me, though, exactly what it is supposed to illustrate. The author notes that at the time it was written both the US CDC and the Swedish State Bacteriogical Laboratory did not regard thimerosal to be a significant health risk. He notes that a vaccine schedule providing 200 mcg of mercury over six months would provide 87 times the daily limit, but it would take 180 days for this to occur. It leaves unsaid and unstudied the relative risk in large boluses at intervals compared to a steady intake, but that is even now (2006) not entirely clear. Finally, I'm not sure of the point regarding a phenylmercurial. Thimerosal certainly appears to be a phenylmercurial; it has an ethylmercury moiety connected by a sulfur bridge to an aromatic acid. I didn't flunk chemistry, but I haven't been in a classroom in over 20 years. Did you believe that thimerosal is not a phenylmercurial? Why IS a writing desk like a raven? Sorry to run so long. Please get back to me when you have a chance. Jim ________________________________ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Kerbob Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:45 PM Subject: Re: [ ] re: please help me refute flu vaccine info During the course of his communication with the medical board he reported that he had authorized nurses in his office to sign his name to prescriptions. -------------------------------- Anyone who's ever read Dr. Herman's posts can either accept his giant fonts considerately or decline to read them because they're just too big and make your eyes hurt. Maybe the nurses in his office sign for him because he can't see too well. Unless the prescriptions have been traced to Rush Limbaugh I don't see what's the problem with this? Actually having a nurse sign for him or being honest enough to admit he needs some help getting things done? I mean would you discredit a " genius " like Hawking for his failure do his own long hand? Andy Wakefield has also had a lot of licensing problems yet we don't think any less of him. He really messed up when he biopsied the measles lesions. He threw away a brilliant career and has been in court a lot more than anybody responsible for mercury poisoning American children. There's a big difference between disagreeing with somebody's position and attack their credibility based on a disability they might have. Take somebody like the late vaccine guru Dr. Maurice Hilleman. In 1991 he wrote a memo to Dr. Gordon , President of Merck Vaccines some eight years before it was " discovered that there was mercury in vaccines inxs of federal standards. http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.10.pdf <http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.10.pdf> Hilleman either A) flunked chemistry deliberately misguided , or C) was a pompus ass who had no idea what the heck he was writing about. At the bottom of page three he tells that group three mercurials are one-tenth as toxic as either the methyl or ethyl mercury salts. Supposing that this information quoted from a 1969 symposium on allowable mercury exposures per cubic feet of air was true, Hilleman still got it wrong because he states that thimerosal is a phenyl mercurial substance. He wrote " most important thimerosal is a phenyl mercurial. " He even underscored the word phenyl. And he is the most quoted guy vaccinology has. To this day, ethylmercury, the kind in thimerosal, has not been proven to be anything more than a neurotoxic chemical compound. How is a writing desk like a raven? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2006 Report Share Posted December 3, 2006 > it is a stretch to suggest that his credibility > is better than that of all of the authors of all of the studies that > have not found evidence of a harmful effect from mercury in vaccines. Credibility issues are hard, it is more helpful to read the studies and realize, as any legitimtae technical person will who puts the time in to figuing out what they did and what they are saying, that they generally either prove nothing or are consistent with the theory that vaccines cause autism. The papers then contain editorial blather unrelated to the actual data presented which is all most people in the liberal art of medicine read. > Finally, > I'm not sure of the point regarding a phenylmercurial. Thimerosal > certainly appears to be a phenylmercurial; it has an ethylmercury moiety > connected by a sulfur bridge to an aromatic acid. I didn't flunk > chemistry, but I haven't been in a classroom in over 20 years. Did you > believe that thimerosal is not a phenylmercurial? Thimerosal is not a phenylmercurial, it is an ethylmercurial. The R-mercurial phrasing implies a direct bond between carbon and mercury, not one through a sulfur or other atom. This has chemical as well as linguistic significance. > Actually having a nurse sign for him or > being honest enough to admit he needs some help getting things done? As Dr. Popplewell said, the law requires the doctor to review the prescription and sign it. I know of doctors in Washington who were disciplined for doing otherwise as well. Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2006 Report Share Posted December 4, 2006 You do make splendid points concerning the legality and propriety of self-signing scripts.I don't think it was intentional, but you did sort of describe yourself as a Colonel Klink allopath. I had a chuckle, then dismissed the thought. To the contrary I believe you are here reading and monitoring and answering because ultimately you are kind and devoted. I personally have searched hundreds of articles. I have read studies. I have endured page after page of transcripts. In many items I've come across is researching your assertion I have seen that because of the broad government review of all the mercurials in many places thimerosal is grouped in the literature with assorted phenylmercurials. The Merck Memo from 1991 is document proof that vaccine manufacturers were aware and equally concerned about thimerosal, the ethylmercury preservative in their vaccines. These folks weren't operating with blinders on either. The memo mentions several countries were finding thimerosal unacceptable due to it's neurotoxicity. Sweden, for example removed thimerosal from vaccines that year, if I am not mistaken. I hope that you can find time to gobble up a lot of the information on the www.putchildrenfirst.org web site. I had absolutely nothing to do with it. I have always felt though and expressed to people I talk with that I am sure that everything will be alright if we put our children first. Unfortunately for liability reasons neither government nor the vaccine marketplace is able and willing to do this. Instead we parents are basically on our own. We can't even get these authorities to fund the appropriate research. I suppose the most grating thing I see going on today is the lack of a scientific approach. There's too much guessing going on and who has the guts to roll the dice. Honestly if it weren't for FOIA we'd be really stuck. Imagine if you can trying to treat your own sick child based entirely on a controversy. It's been seven years since government rang the alarm bell. Today these critical partnerships have greatly benefited by successfully encouraging this controversy. Painting " parents " as crazy is part of that. I think what disturbs the average parent of a vaccine-injured child is we know we have the ability and the right to topple the vaccine marketplace for what they've knowingly done to our children. In closing I would like to say that it took forty years for the Japanese government to " officially " disclose what happened to the villagers of Minamata Bay and another eight years to compensate the relatives of the victims of the worse industrial mercury poisoning incident in history. I have very little doubt the American government intends to never disclose what they know about what happened to our children. Re: [ ] re: please help me refute flu vaccine info During the course of his communication with the medical board he reported that he had authorized nurses in his office to sign his name to prescriptions. -------------------------------- Anyone who's ever read Dr. Herman's posts can either accept his giant fonts considerately or decline to read them because they're just too big and make your eyes hurt. Maybe the nurses in his office sign for him because he can't see too well. Unless the prescriptions have been traced to Rush Limbaugh I don't see what's the problem with this? Actually having a nurse sign for him or being honest enough to admit he needs some help getting things done? I mean would you discredit a " genius " like Hawking for his failure do his own long hand? Andy Wakefield has also had a lot of licensing problems yet we don't think any less of him. He really messed up when he biopsied the measles lesions. He threw away a brilliant career and has been in court a lot more than anybody responsible for mercury poisoning American children. There's a big difference between disagreeing with somebody's position and attack their credibility based on a disability they might have. Take somebody like the late vaccine guru Dr. Maurice Hilleman. In 1991 he wrote a memo to Dr. Gordon , President of Merck Vaccines some eight years before it was " discovered that there was mercury in vaccines inxs of federal standards. http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.10.pdf <http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.10.pdf> Hilleman either A) flunked chemistry deliberately misguided , or C) was a pompus ass who had no idea what the heck he was writing about. At the bottom of page three he tells that group three mercurials are one-tenth as toxic as either the methyl or ethyl mercury salts. Supposing that this information quoted from a 1969 symposium on allowable mercury exposures per cubic feet of air was true, Hilleman still got it wrong because he states that thimerosal is a phenyl mercurial substance. He wrote " most important thimerosal is a phenyl mercurial. " He even underscored the word phenyl. And he is the most quoted guy vaccinology has. To this day, ethylmercury, the kind in thimerosal, has not been proven to be anything more than a neurotoxic chemical compound. How is a writing desk like a raven? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2006 Report Share Posted December 4, 2006 Also, thimerosal free vaccine are in fact still manufactured with thimerosal, although no additional thimerosal is added. On 12/4/06, Kerbob <robertbloch@...> wrote: > > You do make splendid points concerning the legality and propriety of > self-signing scripts.I don't think it was intentional, but you did sort of > describe yourself as a Colonel Klink allopath. I had a chuckle, then > dismissed the thought. To the contrary I believe you are here reading and > monitoring and answering because ultimately you are kind and devoted. > > I personally have searched hundreds of articles. I have read studies. I > have endured page after page of transcripts. In many items I've come across > is researching your assertion I have seen that because of the broad > government review of all the mercurials in many places thimerosal is grouped > in the literature with assorted phenylmercurials. > > The Merck Memo from 1991 is document proof that vaccine manufacturers were > aware and equally concerned about thimerosal, the ethylmercury preservative > in their vaccines. These folks weren't operating with blinders on either. > The memo mentions several countries were finding thimerosal unacceptable due > to it's neurotoxicity. Sweden, for example removed thimerosal from vaccines > that year, if I am not mistaken. > > I hope that you can find time to gobble up a lot of the information on the > www.putchildrenfirst.org web site. I had absolutely nothing to do with it. > I have always felt though and expressed to people I talk with that I am sure > that everything will be alright if we put our children first. Unfortunately > for liability reasons neither government nor the vaccine marketplace is able > and willing to do this. Instead we parents are basically on our own. We > can't even get these authorities to fund the appropriate research. > > I suppose the most grating thing I see going on today is the lack of a > scientific approach. There's too much guessing going on and who has the guts > to roll the dice. Honestly if it weren't for FOIA we'd be really stuck. > > Imagine if you can trying to treat your own sick child based entirely on a > controversy. It's been seven years since government rang the alarm bell. > Today these critical partnerships have greatly benefited by successfully > encouraging this controversy. Painting " parents " as crazy is part of that. > > I think what disturbs the average parent of a vaccine-injured child is we > know we have the ability and the right to topple the vaccine marketplace for > what they've knowingly done to our children. > > In closing I would like to say that it took forty years for the Japanese > government to " officially " disclose what happened to the villagers of > Minamata Bay and another eight years to compensate the relatives of the > victims of the worse industrial mercury poisoning incident in history. > > I have very little doubt the American government intends to never disclose > what they know about what happened to our children. > > Re: [ ] re: please help me refute flu vaccine info > > During the course of his communication with the medical board he > reported that he had authorized nurses in his office to sign his name to > prescriptions. > -------------------------------- > Anyone who's ever read Dr. Herman's posts can either accept his giant > fonts considerately or decline to read them because they're just too big > and make your eyes hurt. Maybe the nurses in his office sign for him > because he can't see too well. > > Unless the prescriptions have been traced to Rush Limbaugh I don't see > what's the problem with this? Actually having a nurse sign for him or > being honest enough to admit he needs some help getting things done? I > mean would you discredit a " genius " like Hawking for his failure > do his own long hand? > > Andy Wakefield has also had a lot of licensing problems yet we don't > think any less of him. He really messed up when he biopsied the measles > lesions. He threw away a brilliant career and has been in court a lot > more than anybody responsible for mercury poisoning American children. > > There's a big difference between disagreeing with somebody's position > and attack their credibility based on a disability they might have. > > Take somebody like the late vaccine guru Dr. Maurice Hilleman. In 1991 > he wrote a memo to Dr. Gordon , President of Merck Vaccines some > eight years before it was " discovered that there was mercury in vaccines > inxs of federal standards. > > http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.10.pdf > <http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.10.pdf> > > Hilleman either A) flunked chemistry deliberately misguided , > or C) was a pompus ass who had no idea what the heck he was writing > about. At the bottom of page three he tells that group three > mercurials are one-tenth as toxic as either the methyl or ethyl mercury > salts. Supposing that this information quoted from a 1969 symposium on > allowable mercury exposures per cubic feet of air was true, Hilleman > still got it wrong because he states that thimerosal is a phenyl > mercurial substance. He wrote " most important thimerosal is a phenyl > mercurial. " He even underscored the word phenyl. > > And he is the most quoted guy vaccinology has. > > To this day, ethylmercury, the kind in thimerosal, has not been proven > to be anything more than a neurotoxic chemical compound. > > How is a writing desk like a raven? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2006 Report Share Posted December 5, 2006 > > I have very little doubt the American government intends to never disclose what they know about what happened to our children. I wish you weren't right, but I think you are. The only way would be if one party could use it to beat the other party's head in, and since both parties are complicit thanks to pharma money, that's not happening. I do think, maybe over-optimistically, that eventually the science will make it impossible to deny any longer. But by then we'll be underwater from global warming and have even worse problems to solve. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2006 Report Share Posted December 5, 2006 There was a video clip in one of the previous posts on this. They showed an a new vaccine package just purchased, the labelled said it contained thimerosal and expired in 2007. We are being lied too. > > > > You do make splendid points concerning the legality and propriety of > > self-signing scripts.I don't think it was intentional, but you did sort of > > describe yourself as a Colonel Klink allopath. I had a chuckle, then > > dismissed the thought. To the contrary I believe you are here reading and > > monitoring and answering because ultimately you are kind and devoted. > > > > I personally have searched hundreds of articles. I have read studies. I > > have endured page after page of transcripts. In many items I've come across > > is researching your assertion I have seen that because of the broad > > government review of all the mercurials in many places thimerosal is grouped > > in the literature with assorted phenylmercurials. > > > > The Merck Memo from 1991 is document proof that vaccine manufacturers were > > aware and equally concerned about thimerosal, the ethylmercury preservative > > in their vaccines. These folks weren't operating with blinders on either. > > The memo mentions several countries were finding thimerosal unacceptable due > > to it's neurotoxicity. Sweden, for example removed thimerosal from vaccines > > that year, if I am not mistaken. > > > > I hope that you can find time to gobble up a lot of the information on the > > www.putchildrenfirst.org web site. I had absolutely nothing to do with it. > > I have always felt though and expressed to people I talk with that I am sure > > that everything will be alright if we put our children first. Unfortunately > > for liability reasons neither government nor the vaccine marketplace is able > > and willing to do this. Instead we parents are basically on our own. We > > can't even get these authorities to fund the appropriate research. > > > > I suppose the most grating thing I see going on today is the lack of a > > scientific approach. There's too much guessing going on and who has the guts > > to roll the dice. Honestly if it weren't for FOIA we'd be really stuck. > > > > Imagine if you can trying to treat your own sick child based entirely on a > > controversy. It's been seven years since government rang the alarm bell. > > Today these critical partnerships have greatly benefited by successfully > > encouraging this controversy. Painting " parents " as crazy is part of that. > > > > I think what disturbs the average parent of a vaccine-injured child is we > > know we have the ability and the right to topple the vaccine marketplace for > > what they've knowingly done to our children. > > > > In closing I would like to say that it took forty years for the Japanese > > government to " officially " disclose what happened to the villagers of > > Minamata Bay and another eight years to compensate the relatives of the > > victims of the worse industrial mercury poisoning incident in history. > > > > I have very little doubt the American government intends to never disclose > > what they know about what happened to our children. > > > > Re: [ ] re: please help me refute flu vaccine info > > > > During the course of his communication with the medical board he > > reported that he had authorized nurses in his office to sign his name to > > prescriptions. > > -------------------------------- > > Anyone who's ever read Dr. Herman's posts can either accept his giant > > fonts considerately or decline to read them because they're just too big > > and make your eyes hurt. Maybe the nurses in his office sign for him > > because he can't see too well. > > > > Unless the prescriptions have been traced to Rush Limbaugh I don't see > > what's the problem with this? Actually having a nurse sign for him or > > being honest enough to admit he needs some help getting things done? I > > mean would you discredit a " genius " like Hawking for his failure > > do his own long hand? > > > > Andy Wakefield has also had a lot of licensing problems yet we don't > > think any less of him. He really messed up when he biopsied the measles > > lesions. He threw away a brilliant career and has been in court a lot > > more than anybody responsible for mercury poisoning American children. > > > > There's a big difference between disagreeing with somebody's position > > and attack their credibility based on a disability they might have. > > > > Take somebody like the late vaccine guru Dr. Maurice Hilleman. In 1991 > > he wrote a memo to Dr. Gordon , President of Merck Vaccines some > > eight years before it was " discovered that there was mercury in vaccines > > inxs of federal standards. > > > > http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.10.pdf > > <http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.10.pdf> > > > > Hilleman either A) flunked chemistry deliberately misguided , > > or C) was a pompus ass who had no idea what the heck he was writing > > about. At the bottom of page three he tells that group three > > mercurials are one-tenth as toxic as either the methyl or ethyl mercury > > salts. Supposing that this information quoted from a 1969 symposium on > > allowable mercury exposures per cubic feet of air was true, Hilleman > > still got it wrong because he states that thimerosal is a phenyl > > mercurial substance. He wrote " most important thimerosal is a phenyl > > mercurial. " He even underscored the word phenyl. > > > > And he is the most quoted guy vaccinology has. > > > > To this day, ethylmercury, the kind in thimerosal, has not been proven > > to be anything more than a neurotoxic chemical compound. > > > > How is a writing desk like a raven? > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.