Re: lose weight

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 9/10/2004 9:10:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,

darrenh1974@... writes:

I would like tips on dieting and exercise whilst dealing with PA

Hi...I find I do better with no gluten (wheat, rye, barley) in my diet...the

benefit in addition to feeling better is that I lost 25 pounds when I cut

gluten out of my diet...

[Guest guest]

My husband had the same problem. He stopped losing weight by eating lots of

brown rice with every meal and mixing chicken and brown rice (he had previously

not been mixing the two). He also eats a lot of food - about 50% brown rice and

50% vegetables (with chicken once a day). Also, if you can tolerate it, eat

fatty meat.

Good luck.

Keen

lose weight

Hi, I am afraid about my health.

I lose 30 pounces in 8 months...

I very skin now and afraid.

Do you have suggestion to take weight?

I dont know if I eat enough?

Josée

[Guest guest]

thanks

Keen Venables <kvenables@...> wrote: My husband had the same

problem. He stopped losing weight by eating lots of brown rice with every meal

and mixing chicken and brown rice (he had previously not been mixing the two).

He also eats a lot of food - about 50% brown rice and 50% vegetables (with

chicken once a day). Also, if you can tolerate it, eat fatty meat.

Good luck.

Keen

lose weight

Hi, I am afraid about my health.

I lose 30 pounces in 8 months...

I very skin now and afraid.

Do you have suggestion to take weight?

I dont know if I eat enough?

Josée

[Guest guest]

Hi. You can try keeping a calorie log of everything that you eat. That

would allow you to know how many calories you are getting in a day.

To increase calories, you can add olive oil to a lot of things - or

maybe canola, which would be acceptable. They have very little

saturated fats.

It can actually be difficult to gain weight without eating a lot of

sugar and refined carbs, or tons of sat fat or trans fat. Naturally,

you'd want to exercise while gaining so that you put on muscle and not

just unhealthy fat. Having eggs, meat and 1% milk as protein and

calorie sources should help.

Thursday, May 18, 2006, 2:37:40 PM, e wrote:

J> Hi, I am afraid about my health.

J> I lose 30 pounces in 8 months...

J> I very skin now and afraid.

J> Do you have suggestion to take weight?

J> I dont know if I eat enough?

J> Josée

--

Regards,

A.B.

[Guest guest]

oops, I always forget that lots of people have problems with the milk

sugar.

But canned nuts are a great idea for calories and protein.

Thursday, May 18, 2006, 2:37:40 PM, e wrote:

J> Hi, I am afraid about my health.

J> I lose 30 pounces in 8 months...

J> I very skin now and afraid.

J> Do you have suggestion to take weight?

J> I dont know if I eat enough?

J> Josée

--

Regards,

A.B.

[Guest guest]

Have you tried taking enzymes like pancreatin or some others? It

sounds like you are not absorbing your food, so these may help. It

also may help to cleanse the colon as well.

>

> Hi, I am afraid about my health.

> I lose 30 pounces in 8 months...

> I very skin now and afraid.

> Do you have suggestion to take weight?

> I dont know if I eat enough?

> Josée

>

[Guest guest]

>

> D> Cold-processed whey is a specific anti-wasting tool

>

> nobody is talking here about sick people who are wasting because of

> inability to assimilate nutrition.

I agree it has nothing to do with assimilation issues; people gain

lean tissue mass with whey regardless.

> D> mentioned in

> D> the PDR for prescription drugs. It's acknowledged to be superior

> D> to eggs or meat as a lean tissue gainer.

>

> It's plain silly to suggest that whey should be used to replace meat

> and/or eggs.

I didn't suggest that whey would be a replacement for meat, only that

is is a better gainer than eggs, meat, carbs or trans fats.

> Why don't you go over to a newsgroup with athletes,

> bodybuilders etc (who spend a great portion of their lives concerned

> with their muscle mass) and try to tell them they should never eat

> eggs or meat, only whey.

Your comment has nothing to do with my reply to a question on how to

gain lean tissue. And agin, if you check my post I didn't say or

imply people should " only " use whey protein.

> Whey can be useful as a protein *supplement*. It also can be high

> priced.

It can also be low priced, particularly if it's been boiled; even

boiled whey is more bioavailable than eggs or meat.

> Do you happen to be selling high-priced whey, Duncan?

Not really; two of my undenatured wheys are very low priced, and two

are higher but still much cheaper than the one in the PDR for

prescription drugs listed as an ani-wasting tool.

> Does it

> also magically cure all ills?

You'd be surprised how many diseases are linked to low glutathione

and disappear when glutathione production is increased.

Here are prewritten queries linked into the PubMed service of the

National Library of Medicine.

http://members.shaw.ca/duncancrow/GSH_medline.html

Note also the link to the FDA slide show at the bottom right that

explains how it all works. This will be of particular importance to

people with systemic illness, chronic infection, degenerative or " no

cure " illness, and those with an overactive or underactive immune

system or leaky gut syndrome.

OK, there are many prewritten queries already made into PubMed, and

when you get to PubMed site you can do your own searches too.

> It's funny that humans somehow managed to live over the ages without

> high-priced whey.

It's only funny to someone who doen't know the value the ancients

placed on whey. Here are two sayings that were handed down through

the ages from ancient Italy: If everyone drank more whey, the doctors

would be bankrupt; if you want to live a long time, eat your

vegetables and drink whey. These people managed on what probably was

an inadequate diet that included raw whey and milk.

Most of us today do not drink raw whey or raw milk.

Today, we have the opportunity to get closer to " optimal " as opposed

to " inadequate " diets. And the fact that centenarians measured ALL

had higher than usual glutathione levels did not escape the

scientific community. Antioxidant pool maintenance is a key to

graceful aging.

> >> To increase calories, you can add olive oil to a lot of things -

or

> >> maybe canola, which would be acceptable. They have very little

> >> saturated fats.

>

> D> Polyunsaturated fats

>

> olive oil is mainly monounsaturated, not PUFA. Didn't you know that?

I have the chart in front of me; it's also published on my website on

the coconut oil page where it is the second link in the

references:http://members.shaw.ca/duncancrow/coconut-

oil.html#references

Here's the worksheet (there's a snapshot of the sheet at the link

above for people who can't open an excel spreadsheet):

http://members.shaw.ca/duncancrow/OilAnalysis.xls

Not only does the worksheet give the exact components of several

food oils, it calculates the personal lipid peroxidation index of

the oils, and you personal peroxidation index from the oils you eat

in a day. Olive oil is 10 times as oxidizing as coconut oil for

example.

OK, this source also says that olive oil is 7.9% linoleic acid, an

omega-6, although this undoubtably varies a little. The bulk of the

oil is monounsaturated as you point out, but that alone doesn't

counteract the inflammatory property of the omega-6. This is why one

still gets a degree of inflammation even on an olive oil diet; you

get LESS heart disease, as opposed to NO heart disease on such a

diet, and people fall into that by missing seemingly unimportant

details such as this one.

One needs some omega-6 oil but not very much, yet people harbor the

common belief that olive oil is a good oil at any amount. In my view

its more accurate to say it's the least bad for you of the pourable

oils. The mechanisms of inflammation caused by the omega-6 oils are

detailed in the bestselling book Inflammation Nation by Floyd

Chilton. This inflammation process caused by omega-6 oil is a

separate avenue of disease than peroxidation of the oil.

> D> have high concentrations of omega-6

> D> essential fatty acids;

>

> that's why I said that canola is maybe " acceptable " , not ideal.

Much less than acceptable, I wouldn't recommend canola as a food oil

at all.

> D> Lean muscle mass and saturated fats are what your body should be

> D> storing as food (muscle is an excellent storage vehicle);

>

> that's a good one: build muscle to use as food? so you burn it as

fuel

> and no longer have the muscle.

Yeah, haw, haw! Whod've thunk your muscles were in a state of

turnover just as fat cells are? Seriously, muscle is actually a

better source of stored energy and it's more balanced, being chock-

full of recyclable amino acids, minerals, glycoproteins, essential

fatty acids etc that you just don't get in decent concentrations in

fat.

> And then carry saturated fat around

> your belly and internal organs to use as a food source!?!

> So in your plan, you burn your muscle as fuel, but build up

> dangerous

> body fat. Then the body fat is constantly secreting inflammatory

> substances, which you were so concerned about before but not now.

No, I didn't mention building 'dangerous' body fat or that your

stored fat is a source of inflammation. Must have been someone else.

Put into another context, people and livestock who get a lot of

unsaturated fat become fat by storing it up in their nice, marbeled

meat. This stored fat may contribute to more inflammation than is

normal, but it will eventually disappear. Most people burn up quite a

bit of saturated fat while they're burning muscle, yes, but the body

prefers to use up the fat first.

> Glycogen in the muscles and liver is really the preferred stored

fuel.

> Fat is useful only for any possible periods of famine, which don't

> really occur anymore.

That's not entirely true; one needs only to look at the science of

body building to know about fat-burning exercises. Glycogen is only

stored in small amounts compared to the amount of body fat that even

lean people carry. Glycogen is made from fat AND/OR muscle, and its

purpose is for bursts of energy. All the cells except some brain

cells and cancer cells can also use fat directly in the long-term,

thus the fat-burning exercises, which actually release about 50% more

energy than glucose.

> D> for

> D> more on the cholesterol myths, see the aptly titled " The

> D> Cholesterol Myths " by Uffe Ravnskov, who has about 80 documents

> D> on related aspects in peer review, with references.

>

> So you think people should eat a can of lard a day to become

healthy?

No, I think your just testing my patience and your sarcastic comment

can be ignored.

> >> It can actually be difficult to gain weight without eating a lot

of

> >> sugar and refined carbs, or tons of sat fat or trans fat.

>

> D> I don't think fat and plasticized oil

>

> who said anything about consuming plasticized oil?

Just me observing that trans fats are a type of plastic by virtue of

being not really food though they're made out of oil.

>

> D> is the preferred kind of

> D> weight gain. The correct effort can just as easily yield lean,

> D> toned muscle.

>

> if you say it's easy, then you are clearly " misinformed " .

Back at you; having been there, done that with quite a few clients

now, I'd lead with examples from my four newpaper articles of a few

years ago that summarize Brad King's Fat Wars approach. I've used the

approach on many clients; it did what it was supposed to, in

overweight AND in underweight people.

http://zeek.ca/4u/topics.php?op=viewtopic & topic=9

Please, now show me yours.

>

> D> Duncan Crow

>

>

> --

>

> A.B.

>

Duncan Crow

[Guest guest]

B17 is Laetrile. Although the most common source is from apricot seeds, B17 is found in most fruit seeds.

Many people dry the papaya seeds and put them in a pepper mill and use them to season their food for its papain benefit.

mjh

I gather it works as well. it is mentionedalso that the seeds of the papaya contain B17, butdon't take all the seeds in one shot as they havelaetrile which might be harmful. Go read on thesubject yourself and see if it is good for you aswell.See AOL's top rated recipes and easy ways to stay in shape for winter.

[Guest guest]

Hi all,

From cures for cancergroup is an email from one of its

members saying that stevia can make you lose weight

and also help in healing cancer. According to her, put

white stevia powder in a blender and fill the blender

halfway. Blend until 20 counts. By this time the

water would have foamed. Let it settle. After which

you will see sediments at the bottom - filth from

water. This water is now pure clean water and helps

people lose lots of weight and also heal or slow down

cancer. I am sure this is compatible with LDN.

Also yesterday, i did a google on papaya as a cancer

cure. Google " papaya cancer cure " go to the very

first article with a ?. Don't be afraid to go to it,

i went and it did not damange my computer system.

There is a wealth of information there. There are

apparently lots of info on papain - papaya's enzyme -

which rids the body of mucuous - one of cancer's food,

and removes the protective covering of the cancer cell

so the immune system can go for the ca cells itself

and KILL them. Switzerland has filed a patent for it.

Take three died papaya leaves and boil in a liter of

water for around half an hour until it is around 500

ml. A Mr. Stan Sheldon took 6 TBSPs thee times a day

and also took 1 tsp of molasses each time. In two

months he was healed of his double lung cancer.

Although it is said not to take too much of this

potent tea, others took it staggered as much as they

could drink and claim they were healed in two weeks.

If you have no available leaves, look for the green

hard papaya = unripe = wash it well, remove the peel

and boil it with its oozing milk which contains lots

of papain. I gather it works as well. it is mentioned

also that the seeds of the papaya contain B17, but

don't take all the seeds in one shot as they have

laetrile which might be harmful. Go read on the

subject yourself and see if it is good for you as

well.