Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 In a message dated 23/06/2006 14:39:20 GMT Daylight Time, Ladyshrink111@... writes: Has anyone noticed that the reaction you get to the chelators changes over time? For instance, has anyone been chelating a child and over time noticed that they went from being better " on " the chelators to no difference or even being worse when " on " a round? >>>Yes, and then back again - as in every time you just think you have sussed it out, everything changes again....................... Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 Yes, we went from being not great on a round, to being better on round than off, to being variable depending on the round. I think it depends on what you're pulling at the time. Barb [ ] Calling all long-term chelation experts Has anyone noticed that the reaction you get to the chelators changes over time? For instance, has anyone been chelating a child and over time noticed that they went from being better " on " the chelators to no difference or even being worse when " on " a round? I do know that each chelation round is a little different, but would like to hear either way if your child changed from being better either way to being better or not different the other way. Thanks, in advance, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 > > Has anyone noticed that the reaction you get to the chelators changes over time? For instance, has anyone been chelating a child and over time noticed that they went from being better " on " the chelators to no difference or even being worse when " on " a round? n has always been better " on " . When he has had a few rounds in a row of not getting that lift, I raised the dosage and the lift came back. Being worse on-round has always meant yeast for him. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 > > > > Has anyone noticed that the reaction you get to the chelators changes > over time? For instance, has anyone been chelating a child and over > time noticed that they went from being better " on " the chelators to no > difference or even being worse when " on " a round? > > n has always been better " on " . When he has had a few rounds in a > row of not getting that lift, I raised the dosage and the lift came > back. Being worse on-round has always meant yeast for him. > > Nell > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 We seem to be having that happen here, though I have not figured out what it means exactly. Anne > > Has anyone noticed that the reaction you get to the chelators changes over time? For instance, has anyone been chelating a child and over time noticed that they went from being better " on " the chelators to no difference or even being worse when " on " a round? > > I do know that each chelation round is a little different, but would like to hear either way if your child changed from being better either way to being better or not different the other way. > > Thanks, in advance, > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 In a message dated 23/06/2006 22:08:46 GMT Daylight Time, Ladyshrink111@... writes: And Mandi, is my brain completely gone or do I remember several posts from you saying Sam always improves when you take a break from chelation? I really have to start writing things down :-( >>Yes thats right and I have noticed it in other posts over the years too. When I mean stop I mean more than 3 weeks, past the time when we would normally have done another round and then some more. But in the past 3-4 months we are now seeing gains each round which we have never done before in 100+ rounds and we are still chelating but not so many rounds since we started NCD because we had low minerals after messing with EDTA, in fact only 2 rounds since we started NCD and the last of those he was waaay more emotional on round but that might have been too higher dose of LA - we were trialling the OTC TD-RLA - its strong stuff! (we did it with oral DMSA) Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 In a message dated 23/06/2006 23:38:01 GMT Daylight Time, lanellici@... writes: > we were trialling the OTC TD-RLA - its strong stuff! (we did it with oral DMSA) What's TD-RLA? >>>Transdermal R-Lipoic Acid - the Health Pro Labs OTC comes with some added Milk Thistle NAC and Selenomethionine. It is targetted at Diabetics not ASD. I spoke to the developer (during Autism One) at length regarding frequent dosing -he was very recently aware of it - mentioned by somebody else?, I guess it wasn't you then LOL This is the same chap I asked to go and make a TD Bentofiamine (?sp) They told me it was 20 x stronger than ALA for same amount of mgs, although the web site says 2 x. 2oz pot contains 48 doses of 50mg which is 5 pumps. I told them I was using 50mg oral ALA and the chap said 2.5 pumps - I am hopeless at Math and never tried to work this out but it looks all wrong to me. I did 2.5 pumps per dose but would do 1x pump per dose next time round. I need to find out exactly how much NAC is in there. We had yeast but we hadn't done DMSA in 5 weeks so I expected that anyways. He has had a great week until today when he was head butting at school and being mr grumpy but that all disappeared at lunchtime and he was fine in the afternoon, seems a tad impulsive to me this evening although happy and alert - maybe bacteria, time will tell. Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 Thanks, Barb, Nell, Ruth, Anne and Mandi. I am noticing what Ruth and Anne talk about, she has consistently been better " on " than off. In the beginning you could tell 8 hours later for sure that the chelators had kicked in. We had some rounds where there was no discernible difference, but now there is a slight decline while " on " round. She is slightly quieter, more subdued (not a bad thing for her most of the time) and slightly more " dreamy " , I guess, just a little harder to get her attention which has been great. Reminds me of the way she was on just Ala, but not nearly as bad and she retains her great social skills. Then two days later she is returned to her previous bubbly self. I, too would love to know why. And Mandi, is my brain completely gone or do I remember several posts from you saying Sam always improves when you take a break from chelation? I really have to start writing things down :-( [ ] Re: Calling all long-term chelation experts > > > > Has anyone noticed that the reaction you get to the chelators changes > over time? For instance, has anyone been chelating a child and over > time noticed that they went from being better " on " the chelators to no > difference or even being worse when " on " a round? > > n has always been better " on " . When he has had a few rounds in a > row of not getting that lift, I raised the dosage and the lift came > back. Being worse on-round has always meant yeast for him. > > Nell > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 I have always assumed it was tied to the sulfur issue, but heck, I don't know which end is up any more. He is changing too fast... Anne > > > > > > Has anyone noticed that the reaction you get to the chelators > changes > > over time? For instance, has anyone been chelating a child and > over > > time noticed that they went from being better " on " the chelators > to no > > difference or even being worse when " on " a round? > > > > n has always been better " on " . When he has had a few rounds > in a > > row of not getting that lift, I raised the dosage and the lift > came > > back. Being worse on-round has always meant yeast for him. > > > > Nell > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 In a message dated 24/06/2006 02:42:54 GMT Daylight Time, Ladyshrink111@... writes: Do you still have to dose it every 3 hours? >>>I did - wouldn't want to be messing with frequency, its still LA Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 > she has consistently been better " on " than off. In the beginning you could tell 8 hours later for sure that the chelators had kicked in. With n I could tell from the first dose, either DMSA or ALA. Since that was true even from the very first round when the amount of metals pulled would've been miniscule, there must be some other action going on. I don't think it's the sulfur because nothing else has the same effect. I have no idea what to make of any of it. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 > > we were trialling the OTC TD-RLA - its strong stuff! (we did it with oral DMSA) What's TD-RLA? Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 Same here, that effect from the first round, third day, Ala doesn't do it, only dmsa and dmsa reduces sulfur, I think. Td-dmps, also, almost immediately, hmmm. [ ] Re: Calling all long-term chelation experts > she has consistently been better " on " than off. In the beginning you could tell 8 hours later for sure that the chelators had kicked in. With n I could tell from the first dose, either DMSA or ALA. Since that was true even from the very first round when the amount of metals pulled would've been miniscule, there must be some other action going on. I don't think it's the sulfur because nothing else has the same effect. I have no idea what to make of any of it. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 Reduced form of Ala, or R-Ala, instead of S-Ala. Lots of drs, scientists reporting that only R-Ala can chelate, lots of them. [ ] Re: Calling all long-term chelation experts > > we were trialling the OTC TD-RLA - its strong stuff! (we did it with oral DMSA) What's TD-RLA? Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 I really don't know what stopping and getting better means, either, but that would confuse me even more than I am now, which is considerable. How long does it keep getting better? Re: [ ] Re: Calling all long-term chelation experts In a message dated 23/06/2006 22:08:46 GMT Daylight Time, Ladyshrink111@... writes: And Mandi, is my brain completely gone or do I remember several posts from you saying Sam always improves when you take a break from chelation? I really have to start writing things down :-( >>Yes thats right and I have noticed it in other posts over the years too. When I mean stop I mean more than 3 weeks, past the time when we would normally have done another round and then some more. But in the past 3-4 months we are now seeing gains each round which we have never done before in 100+ rounds and we are still chelating but not so many rounds since we started NCD because we had low minerals after messing with EDTA, in fact only 2 rounds since we started NCD and the last of those he was waaay more emotional on round but that might have been too higher dose of LA - we were trialling the OTC TD-RLA - its strong stuff! (we did it with oral DMSA) Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 > I spoke to the developer (during Autism One) at length regarding frequent > dosing -he was very recently aware of it - mentioned by somebody else?, I > guess it wasn't you then LOL This is the same chap I asked to go and make a TD > Bentofiamine (?sp) Oh right, gotcha. LOL he was one guy I didn't get to . > > They told me it was 20 x stronger than ALA for same amount of mgs, although > the web site says 2 x. > > 2oz pot contains 48 doses of 50mg which is 5 pumps. > > I told them I was using 50mg oral ALA and the chap said 2.5 pumps - I am > hopeless at Math and never tried to work this out but it looks all wrong to me. Do you mean 50 mgs is 5 pumps? If the website's right then 2.5 pumps = 50 mgs of old ALA, but way off if it's 20x stronger > He has had a great week Anything in particular different? until today when he was head butting at school and > being mr grumpy but that all disappeared at lunchtime and he was fine in the > afternoon Love when that happens! This is all very exciting! Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 Do you still have to dose it every 3 hours? [ ] Re: Calling all long-term chelation experts > I spoke to the developer (during Autism One) at length regarding frequent > dosing -he was very recently aware of it - mentioned by somebody else?, I > guess it wasn't you then LOL This is the same chap I asked to go and make a TD > Bentofiamine (?sp) Oh right, gotcha. LOL he was one guy I didn't get to . > > They told me it was 20 x stronger than ALA for same amount of mgs, although > the web site says 2 x. > > 2oz pot contains 48 doses of 50mg which is 5 pumps. > > I told them I was using 50mg oral ALA and the chap said 2.5 pumps - I am > hopeless at Math and never tried to work this out but it looks all wrong to me. Do you mean 50 mgs is 5 pumps? If the website's right then 2.5 pumps = 50 mgs of old ALA, but way off if it's 20x stronger > He has had a great week Anything in particular different? until today when he was head butting at school and > being mr grumpy but that all disappeared at lunchtime and he was fine in the > afternoon Love when that happens! This is all very exciting! Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2006 Report Share Posted June 24, 2006 Hi Mandi and , Do either of you have a link for the TD r-la? I'm using DMSA. I have some ALA capsules, but have been hesitant to use it. The talk about heartburn-like symptoms have me a bit concerned. I'm still dealing with canker sores from DMSA. Thanks, Orelindel > > > In a message dated 24/06/2006 02:42:54 GMT Daylight Time, > Ladyshrink111@... writes: > > Do you still have to dose it every 3 hours? > > > > >>>I did - wouldn't want to be messing with frequency, its still LA > > Mandi x > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2006 Report Share Posted June 24, 2006 > They said if I was using 50mg ALA then I would need 10mg of RLA which is the > one pump I will do next time. Maybe I was jetlagged - plannign to ring them > for a chat next week when my brain is in gear and will report back. Ask him how it's stronger -- does it mean that the bond is tighter and there's less picking up and dropping? Or that somehow more metals are picked up? Or what? I was lying in bed last night waiting for the 4 am alarm to ring thinking about this, lol. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2006 Report Share Posted June 24, 2006 In a message dated 24/06/2006 10:57:14 GMT Daylight Time, whatmattersmost@... writes: Do either of you have a link for the TD r-la? I'm using DMSA. I have some ALA capsules, but have been hesitant to use it. The talk about heartburn-like symptoms have me a bit concerned. >>>I havent; actually read much about folks having these problems, although I am aware of the warning. We use Kirkman flavoured caps, which taste nice and works well here- Sam takes it out a cap with or without food without issue. I would try that first. TD's are for folks who really have no other way to get the stuff in. I used it on Sam because he can handle the change after 4 years of chelation and I don't want anybody going in with a'full' dose of this TD stuff - we can't get TD ALA Rx here in UK and I plan to sell it in my on-line store with some idea of what a 'dose' does Good luck Mandi in UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2006 Report Share Posted June 24, 2006 In a message dated 24/06/2006 12:51:34 GMT Daylight Time, lanellici@... writes: > one pump I will do next time. Maybe I was jetlagged - plannign to ring them > for a chat next week when my brain is in gear and will report back. Ask him how it's stronger -- does it mean that the bond is tighter and there's less picking up and dropping? Or that somehow more metals are picked up? Or what? I was lying in bed last night waiting for the 4 am alarm to ring thinking about this, lol. >>>OK will do - I want to know exactly how much of the other stuff is in there, will report back Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2006 Report Share Posted June 25, 2006 > > Has anyone noticed that the reaction you get to the chelators changes over time? For instance, has anyone been chelating a child and over time noticed that they went from being better " on " the chelators to no difference or even being worse when " on " a round? This was my son because of mineral toxicity. While mineral toxic, he was better " on " round. Once the mineral problem was resolved, he was worse " on " round because minerals were pulled. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2006 Report Share Posted June 25, 2006 Dana..when figuring out mineral toxic..did you figure this out via RBC MInerals or other route of evaluation...I see improvements on chelating days with my son and worse on off days but his RBC minerals are showing he is fine...although saying that maybe it's time to redo test..;-) I have 2 kids one recovered and been doing DAN for gee 8+ yrs now...would love to know more from you about this..thanks Sandy > > > > Has anyone noticed that the reaction you get to the chelators > changes over time? For instance, has anyone been chelating a child > and over time noticed that they went from being better " on " the > chelators to no difference or even being worse when " on " a round? > > > This was my son because of mineral toxicity. While mineral toxic, he > was better " on " round. Once the mineral problem was resolved, he was > worse " on " round because minerals were pulled. > > Dana > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2006 Report Share Posted June 26, 2006 Hello justa litle information I wanted to share in case some of you are not yet aware,... Very good links at the bottom of this email and the links are in royal blue,... Good luck to you all and god bless omputers That Can Read Minds May Help Fight Autism By Highfield, for the Telegraph.co.uk. http://tinyurl.com/pd4gn Visitors to a major science exhibition are to help teach computers how to read confusion, mirth and other expressions. It is hoped that this will lead to the development of ways to help people with autism recognise emotions. The thousands of visitors to next week's Royal Society summer science exhibition are being invited to take part in research with " emotionally aware " computers designed to mind-read by analysing facial expressions. The developers hope that one day smart adverts based on their technology will be able to tell when passers-by look glum and try to sell them something cheering, from an anti-depressant to a holiday. They are also working with colleagues in America to develop a headset version of the system to help people who find it difficult to read others' facial expressions and emotions, as happens with autism and Asperger's syndrome. The headset would interpret other people's moods and communicate them to the wearer. A prototype has been developed at the University of Cambridge and will be unveiled at the exhibition in London. , professor of computer technology at the university, said: " Imagine a computer that could pick the right emotional moment to try to sell you something, a future in which mobile telephones, cars and websites could read our minds and react to our moods. " The computer program takes data from a camera to locate and track 24 facial " feature points " , such as the edge of the nose, the eyebrows and the corners of the mouth. So far, 20 key facial movements, such as a nod or shake of the head, a raise of the eyebrow or pull on the corner of the mouth, have been linked to underlying emotions, using actors to indicate different facial expressions to the computer. The team is refining the system with " real " people's expressions and hopes that the exhibition will generate valuable new data to improve the program's ability to read faces. Prof said: " The system can cope with the variation in people's facial composition, for example if you have a round or thin face or if you wear glasses or have a beard. " However, there are small variations in the way people express the same emotion. My colleagues working at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are fine-tuning the system by testing it with real people's reactions to everyday life using cameras attached to neck-braces. " The technology is also being developed for use in cars to improve driver safety. The team is recording the faces of volunteers in driving conditions and monitoring facial movements to identify more complex expressions linked to confusion, boredom or tiredness. " We are working with a major car company and it is possible that this technology could feature in cars within five years, " Prof said. . The exhibition, which is held at the Royal Society, is free and runs from July 3 to 6. http://my.waiora.com/home.php?230323 http://www.besttestimonials.com/ orelindel <whatmattersmost@...> wrote: Hi Mandi and , Do either of you have a link for the TD r-la? I'm using DMSA. I have some ALA capsules, but have been hesitant to use it. The talk about heartburn-like symptoms have me a bit concerned. I'm still dealing with canker sores from DMSA. Thanks, Orelindel > > > In a message dated 24/06/2006 02:42:54 GMT Daylight Time, > Ladyshrink111@... writes: > > Do you still have to dose it every 3 hours? > > > > >>>I did - wouldn't want to be messing with frequency, its still LA > > Mandi x > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2006 Report Share Posted June 27, 2006 > > Dana..when figuring out mineral toxic..did you figure this out via RBC > MInerals or other route of evaluation... Every time I tried to give my son minerals, especially calcium or iron, he would get hyper and regress. Selenium was required. He did okay with a little zinc. Certain supplements required magnesium. Otherwise all the other minerals caused problems. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.