Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: National Educators Association Priorities

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I can tell you that that is unequivitably NOT TRUE. The national Education

Association is dedicated to fostering the fact that every child has the right to

a quality basic public education. The part about gays and other things that

those that are against the NEA would like for you all to know is that we support

those in government that support public also tend to support those causes. But

please understand, the NEA only supports platform for public education.

( ) National Educators Association Priorities

Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

" before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win

popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_ca

se_of_nea_priorities

Full article below:

The curious case of NEA priorities

By Alan Sears

Friday, August 25, 2006

It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the same

statistics we do.

Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who can't

read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into lifelong

service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong down

blind brain alleys.

Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or eager

to move their child into alternative educational settings.

Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child Left

Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered this

summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut out

for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one: where

do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many incredible

challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the NEA.

They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the real

challenges of education.

Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular support

for homosexual " marriage. "

That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

our kids need to know - more than math, geography, grammar, science,

or computer skills - is what men and men see in each other, why women

and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

those who practice homosexual behavior.

You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

grader, can't you?

Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking the

matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest teacher's

union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks - at every

grade level, and in every public school, in every school district in

America.

Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What if

children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

information presented by a zealous instructor?

Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions - in

which case the group that wants to exert the most significant impact

on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or children...

or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

which case... ditto.

Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

priority for this organization as the political agenda of those who

engage in homosexual behavior.

Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters of

homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educational

Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

agenda to children by warning that:

" Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in accord

with Biblical precepts. "

But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines . how do they

justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

children with homosexual advocacy?

How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from campus,

while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

will be no rest until families all over the country not only

acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot win

at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in the

departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan Administration,

is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal alliance

defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

training, funding, and litigation.

Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

Lynn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And after reading the full article I can tell you he really doesn't know what he

is talking about because NO DUES MONEY goes to support a candidate. It is

illegal for that to happen. The dues monies go to promote public education as

well as to research those teaching programs that work and to help educate

teachers on the programs that DO work.

( ) National Educators Association Priorities

Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

" before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win

popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_ca

se_of_nea_priorities

Full article below:

The curious case of NEA priorities

By Alan Sears

Friday, August 25, 2006

It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the same

statistics we do.

Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who can't

read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into lifelong

service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong down

blind brain alleys.

Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or eager

to move their child into alternative educational settings.

Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child Left

Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered this

summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut out

for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one: where

do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many incredible

challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the NEA.

They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the real

challenges of education.

Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular support

for homosexual " marriage. "

That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

our kids need to know - more than math, geography, grammar, science,

or computer skills - is what men and men see in each other, why women

and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

those who practice homosexual behavior.

You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

grader, can't you?

Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking the

matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest teacher's

union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks - at every

grade level, and in every public school, in every school district in

America.

Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What if

children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

information presented by a zealous instructor?

Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions - in

which case the group that wants to exert the most significant impact

on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or children...

or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

which case... ditto.

Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

priority for this organization as the political agenda of those who

engage in homosexual behavior.

Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters of

homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educational

Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

agenda to children by warning that:

" Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in accord

with Biblical precepts. "

But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines . how do they

justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

children with homosexual advocacy?

How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from campus,

while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

will be no rest until families all over the country not only

acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot win

at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in the

departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan Administration,

is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal alliance

defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

training, funding, and litigation.

Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

Lynn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading this I went to the NEA's website and found this......

NEA:National Education Association

Great Public Schools for Every Child

Back to Issues in Education

NEA Reconfirms Stance Against Discrimination

A smear campaign launched by the American Family Association

asserted that the National Education Association was set to " endorse

homosexual marriage " at the 2006 Representative Assembly.

Either the group is intentionally misleading the public, or didn't

bother to check their information, but NEA has no plans to endorse

same sex marriage and never did. At the Representative Assembly in

Orlando, FL, more than 9,000 educators tackled critical issues

facing public schools, teachers and students. That included multiple

proposals to clarify existing resolutions and address diversity,

discrimination, and civil unions.

" Religious conservatives are using misinformation and smear

campaigning to attack two of their favorite targets at once:

marriage rights and public education, " said Reg Weaver, NEA

president. " But delegates came to Florida to take care of business,

and advocate for the welfare of their students. Campaigns of

misinformation didn't derail that. "

>

> Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

>

>

>

> " before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is

win

> popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

>

>

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_c

a

> se_of_nea_priorities

>

>

>

> Full article below:

>

>

>

> The curious case of NEA priorities

> By Alan Sears

> Friday, August 25, 2006

>

>

> It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

> country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

>

> Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the

same

> statistics we do.

>

>

>

> Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who

can't

> read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

> groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into

lifelong

> service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

>

> Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

> children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

> music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong

down

> blind brain alleys.

>

>

>

> Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

> are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or

eager

> to move their child into alternative educational settings.

>

>

>

> Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child

Left

> Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered

this

> summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut

out

> for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one:

where

> do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

>

>

>

> Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many

incredible

> challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the

NEA.

> They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the

real

> challenges of education.

>

>

>

> Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

> else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular

support

> for homosexual " marriage. "

>

>

>

> That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

> our kids need to know – more than math, geography, grammar,

science,

> or computer skills – is what men and men see in each other, why

women

> and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

> those who practice homosexual behavior.

>

>

>

> You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

> grader, can't you?

>

> Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking

the

> matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest

teacher's

> union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

> tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

> lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks – at every

> grade level, and in every public school, in every school district

in

> America.

>

>

>

> Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

>

> What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

> reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

> doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

> who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

> children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What

if

> children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

> information presented by a zealous instructor?

>

>

>

> Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions – in

> which case the group that wants to exert the most significant

impact

> on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

> real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or

children...

> or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

> which case... ditto.

>

>

>

> Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

> priority for this organization as the political agenda of those

who

> engage in homosexual behavior.

>

> Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

> has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters

of

> homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

> member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight

Educational

> Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

> agenda to children by warning that:

>

>

>

> " Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

> doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in

accord

> with Biblical precepts. "

>

> But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines … how do they

> justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

> creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

> they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

> children with homosexual advocacy?

>

>

>

> How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from

campus,

> while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

> visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

>

>

>

> Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

> representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

> d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

> indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

> will be no rest until families all over the country not only

> acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

>

>

>

> It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot

win

> at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

> generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

>

> Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in

the

> departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan

Administration,

> is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal

alliance

> defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

> training, funding, and litigation.

>

> Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

>

>

> Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

>

> http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

>

> Lynn

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading this I went to the NEA's website and found this......

NEA:National Education Association

Great Public Schools for Every Child

Back to Issues in Education

NEA Reconfirms Stance Against Discrimination

A smear campaign launched by the American Family Association

asserted that the National Education Association was set to " endorse

homosexual marriage " at the 2006 Representative Assembly.

Either the group is intentionally misleading the public, or didn't

bother to check their information, but NEA has no plans to endorse

same sex marriage and never did. At the Representative Assembly in

Orlando, FL, more than 9,000 educators tackled critical issues

facing public schools, teachers and students. That included multiple

proposals to clarify existing resolutions and address diversity,

discrimination, and civil unions.

" Religious conservatives are using misinformation and smear

campaigning to attack two of their favorite targets at once:

marriage rights and public education, " said Reg Weaver, NEA

president. " But delegates came to Florida to take care of business,

and advocate for the welfare of their students. Campaigns of

misinformation didn't derail that. "

>

> Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

>

>

>

> " before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is

win

> popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

>

>

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_c

a

> se_of_nea_priorities

>

>

>

> Full article below:

>

>

>

> The curious case of NEA priorities

> By Alan Sears

> Friday, August 25, 2006

>

>

> It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

> country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

>

> Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the

same

> statistics we do.

>

>

>

> Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who

can't

> read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

> groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into

lifelong

> service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

>

> Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

> children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

> music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong

down

> blind brain alleys.

>

>

>

> Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

> are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or

eager

> to move their child into alternative educational settings.

>

>

>

> Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child

Left

> Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered

this

> summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut

out

> for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one:

where

> do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

>

>

>

> Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many

incredible

> challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the

NEA.

> They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the

real

> challenges of education.

>

>

>

> Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

> else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular

support

> for homosexual " marriage. "

>

>

>

> That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

> our kids need to know – more than math, geography, grammar,

science,

> or computer skills – is what men and men see in each other, why

women

> and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

> those who practice homosexual behavior.

>

>

>

> You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

> grader, can't you?

>

> Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking

the

> matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest

teacher's

> union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

> tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

> lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks – at every

> grade level, and in every public school, in every school district

in

> America.

>

>

>

> Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

>

> What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

> reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

> doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

> who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

> children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What

if

> children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

> information presented by a zealous instructor?

>

>

>

> Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions – in

> which case the group that wants to exert the most significant

impact

> on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

> real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or

children...

> or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

> which case... ditto.

>

>

>

> Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

> priority for this organization as the political agenda of those

who

> engage in homosexual behavior.

>

> Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

> has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters

of

> homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

> member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight

Educational

> Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

> agenda to children by warning that:

>

>

>

> " Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

> doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in

accord

> with Biblical precepts. "

>

> But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines … how do they

> justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

> creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

> they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

> children with homosexual advocacy?

>

>

>

> How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from

campus,

> while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

> visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

>

>

>

> Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

> representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

> d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

> indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

> will be no rest until families all over the country not only

> acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

>

>

>

> It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot

win

> at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

> generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

>

> Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in

the

> departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan

Administration,

> is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal

alliance

> defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

> training, funding, and litigation.

>

> Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

>

>

> Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

>

> http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

>

> Lynn

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactally right. Some would equivicate a stand against discrimination as

a stand for an endorsement of this issue. Please try to keep them seperate.

( ) Re: National Educators Association Priorities

After reading this I went to the NEA's website and found this......

NEA:National Education Association

Great Public Schools for Every Child

Back to Issues in Education

NEA Reconfirms Stance Against Discrimination

A smear campaign launched by the American Family Association

asserted that the National Education Association was set to " endorse

homosexual marriage " at the 2006 Representative Assembly.

Either the group is intentionally misleading the public, or didn't

bother to check their information, but NEA has no plans to endorse

same sex marriage and never did. At the Representative Assembly in

Orlando, FL, more than 9,000 educators tackled critical issues

facing public schools, teachers and students. That included multiple

proposals to clarify existing resolutions and address diversity,

discrimination, and civil unions.

" Religious conservatives are using misinformation and smear

campaigning to attack two of their favorite targets at once:

marriage rights and public education, " said Reg Weaver, NEA

president. " But delegates came to Florida to take care of business,

and advocate for the welfare of their students. Campaigns of

misinformation didn't derail that. "

>

> Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

>

>

>

> " before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is

win

> popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

>

>

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_c

a

> se_of_nea_priorities

>

>

>

> Full article below:

>

>

>

> The curious case of NEA priorities

> By Alan Sears

> Friday, August 25, 2006

>

>

> It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

> country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

>

> Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the

same

> statistics we do.

>

>

>

> Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who

can't

> read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

> groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into

lifelong

> service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

>

> Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

> children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

> music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong

down

> blind brain alleys.

>

>

>

> Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

> are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or

eager

> to move their child into alternative educational settings.

>

>

>

> Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child

Left

> Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered

this

> summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut

out

> for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one:

where

> do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

>

>

>

> Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many

incredible

> challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the

NEA.

> They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the

real

> challenges of education.

>

>

>

> Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

> else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular

support

> for homosexual " marriage. "

>

>

>

> That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

> our kids need to know - more than math, geography, grammar,

science,

> or computer skills - is what men and men see in each other, why

women

> and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

> those who practice homosexual behavior.

>

>

>

> You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

> grader, can't you?

>

> Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking

the

> matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest

teacher's

> union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

> tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

> lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks - at every

> grade level, and in every public school, in every school district

in

> America.

>

>

>

> Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

>

> What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

> reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

> doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

> who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

> children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What

if

> children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

> information presented by a zealous instructor?

>

>

>

> Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions - in

> which case the group that wants to exert the most significant

impact

> on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

> real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or

children...

> or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

> which case... ditto.

>

>

>

> Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

> priority for this organization as the political agenda of those

who

> engage in homosexual behavior.

>

> Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

> has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters

of

> homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

> member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight

Educational

> Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

> agenda to children by warning that:

>

>

>

> " Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

> doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in

accord

> with Biblical precepts. "

>

> But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines . how do they

> justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

> creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

> they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

> children with homosexual advocacy?

>

>

>

> How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from

campus,

> while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

> visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

>

>

>

> Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

> representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

> d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

> indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

> will be no rest until families all over the country not only

> acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

>

>

>

> It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot

win

> at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

> generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

>

> Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in

the

> departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan

Administration,

> is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal

alliance

> defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

> training, funding, and litigation.

>

> Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

>

>

> Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

>

> http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

>

> Lynn

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I went to the NEA to take a look. They are doing something about gay

marriage but they never do exactly specify what they concluded. They apparently

did have a conference to discuss it and discuss the problems of kids and

teachers who are gay, lesbian, cross dressers etc. I can't remember the list of

all the " names " they are discussing. Then they said they are making resolutions

from that but don't specify what. Then they have a statement saying that the

conservative " Christian right " is doing a smear campaign against them and that

the gay marriage thing is not true. So I am not sure what is true since they

never did say what WAS true instead. Maybe when they come out with what they

discussed and decided at their conference, we will understand it better. If it

is there, I couldn't find it but I honestly did not spend A LOT of time looking

since who has the time to wade through all the bureaucracy?

I also found, lol, a whole article dedicated to Wal-Mart. The NEA doesn't like

Wal-Mart! I wonder what that really has to do with public education? Nada. It

has to do with unions and that Wal-Mart is thriving without unions. Not about

kids learning math. I wasn't even looking for that either.

Roxanna

( ) National Educators Association Priorities

Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

" before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win

popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_ca

se_of_nea_priorities

Full article below:

The curious case of NEA priorities

By Alan Sears

Friday, August 25, 2006

It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the same

statistics we do.

Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who can't

read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into lifelong

service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong down

blind brain alleys.

Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or eager

to move their child into alternative educational settings.

Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child Left

Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered this

summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut out

for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one: where

do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many incredible

challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the NEA.

They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the real

challenges of education.

Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular support

for homosexual " marriage. "

That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

our kids need to know - more than math, geography, grammar, science,

or computer skills - is what men and men see in each other, why women

and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

those who practice homosexual behavior.

You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

grader, can't you?

Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking the

matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest teacher's

union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks - at every

grade level, and in every public school, in every school district in

America.

Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What if

children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

information presented by a zealous instructor?

Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions - in

which case the group that wants to exert the most significant impact

on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or children...

or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

which case... ditto.

Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

priority for this organization as the political agenda of those who

engage in homosexual behavior.

Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters of

homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educational

Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

agenda to children by warning that:

" Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in accord

with Biblical precepts. "

But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines . how do they

justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

children with homosexual advocacy?

How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from campus,

while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

will be no rest until families all over the country not only

acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot win

at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in the

departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan Administration,

is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal alliance

defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

training, funding, and litigation.

Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

Lynn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NEA has a PAC and they DO contribute to candidates. That might be what is

being referred to in this article?

Roxanna

( ) National Educators Association Priorities

Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

" before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win

popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_ca

se_of_nea_priorities

Full article below:

The curious case of NEA priorities

By Alan Sears

Friday, August 25, 2006

It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the same

statistics we do.

Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who can't

read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into lifelong

service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong down

blind brain alleys.

Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or eager

to move their child into alternative educational settings.

Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child Left

Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered this

summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut out

for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one: where

do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many incredible

challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the NEA.

They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the real

challenges of education.

Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular support

for homosexual " marriage. "

That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

our kids need to know - more than math, geography, grammar, science,

or computer skills - is what men and men see in each other, why women

and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

those who practice homosexual behavior.

You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

grader, can't you?

Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking the

matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest teacher's

union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks - at every

grade level, and in every public school, in every school district in

America.

Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What if

children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

information presented by a zealous instructor?

Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions - in

which case the group that wants to exert the most significant impact

on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or children...

or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

which case... ditto.

Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

priority for this organization as the political agenda of those who

engage in homosexual behavior.

Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters of

homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educational

Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

agenda to children by warning that:

" Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in accord

with Biblical precepts. "

But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines . how do they

justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

children with homosexual advocacy?

How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from campus,

while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

will be no rest until families all over the country not only

acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot win

at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in the

departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan Administration,

is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal alliance

defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

training, funding, and litigation.

Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

Lynn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do have a PAC but he specifically said dues. The PAC is NOT dues and not

every member takes part in the PAC. This is just part of getting the story wrong

that puts a bad name for the NEA.

I'm going to kind of go back to the Wal Mart deal you stated in another email.

The " problem " the NEA has with Wal Mart is how they use their non union

sentiments to blast unions, including the teacher's union. Let's face it. Every

group has to spend some time on self preservation. I will also say that the NEA

is learning from some of Wal mart's example especially that of loyalty. Also

what many people don't realize about wal mart is there are many of their

employees don't get a living wage and still pay out the nose for their benefits.

I saw a recent Time magazine article that addressed the living wage and how Wal

mart was blasting that. What it said at the end is that one of the best wal

marts in the country was around Phoenix where the wage was up to a living wage

by law. They are planning on expanding...just opposite of what wal mart was

saying would happen with rising the minimum wage.

as to the discrimination..sorry combining emails here... many groups place the

NEA's nondiscrimination stand as accepting gay rights to marriage. The basic

stand is that we treat no one different because of race, color or creed, ability

or lifestyle. Some of the conferences may have been based on how these students

and teachers are treated in schools. I am just guessing there because I have not

seen the report from the Orlando house of delegates. Based on what I heard at

other state gatherings that is pretty much what might have been worked on.

Mostly because our membership is so diverse in conservative vs liberal, democrat

vs republican vs green vs independent, the NEA takes a stand on how issues

pertain to education. If a person is being discriminated or set apart because of

any of these, it effects their education or ability to give a quality education.

I will stand on what I posted earlier.. Every child has a right to a quality

basic public education.

Sorry about the length of the off topic item but I really think it is important

to get the story straight. I am proud to say I am a teacher that holds the same

moral values as many of you. I am also proud to say that I am a member of our

local and state organizations making me a member of NEA.

( ) National Educators Association Priorities

Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

" before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win

popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_ca

se_of_nea_priorities

Full article below:

The curious case of NEA priorities

By Alan Sears

Friday, August 25, 2006

It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the same

statistics we do.

Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who can't

read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into lifelong

service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong down

blind brain alleys.

Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or eager

to move their child into alternative educational settings.

Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child Left

Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered this

summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut out

for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one: where

do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many incredible

challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the NEA.

They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the real

challenges of education.

Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular support

for homosexual " marriage. "

That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

our kids need to know - more than math, geography, grammar, science,

or computer skills - is what men and men see in each other, why women

and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

those who practice homosexual behavior.

You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

grader, can't you?

Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking the

matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest teacher's

union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks - at every

grade level, and in every public school, in every school district in

America.

Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What if

children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

information presented by a zealous instructor?

Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions - in

which case the group that wants to exert the most significant impact

on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or children...

or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

which case... ditto.

Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

priority for this organization as the political agenda of those who

engage in homosexual behavior.

Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters of

homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educational

Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

agenda to children by warning that:

" Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in accord

with Biblical precepts. "

But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines . how do they

justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

children with homosexual advocacy?

How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from campus,

while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

will be no rest until families all over the country not only

acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot win

at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in the

departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan Administration,

is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal alliance

defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

training, funding, and litigation.

Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

Lynn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And blasting unions means what to education? I don't care if a person likes

walmart or not. That isn't really what we discuss here. I just thought it was

interesting that not everything on the NEA agenda is about educating children.

As for the gay marriage stuff - we don't know what they decided because it

wasn't on the website. So it's hard to tell what was discussed and how it

relates to education. I guess we will have to wait and see.

I have no clue what the writer meant as far as dues. For all I know, there are

dues to be in the PAC - whether they are voluntarily paid or not. I'm not in

the NEA. But if your PAC takes a position, it is pretty much assumed that this

is the position for the NEA. If you are in the NEA, it's assumed you agree with

the basic ideas being put forth by the NEA. So I don't think it's like a

separate thing at all. It's just a nice way to have a PAC and still be the NEA,

that's all.

Roxanna

( ) National Educators Association Priorities

Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

" before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win

popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_ca

se_of_nea_priorities

Full article below:

The curious case of NEA priorities

By Alan Sears

Friday, August 25, 2006

It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the same

statistics we do.

Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who can't

read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into lifelong

service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong down

blind brain alleys.

Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or eager

to move their child into alternative educational settings.

Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child Left

Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered this

summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut out

for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one: where

do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many incredible

challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the NEA.

They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the real

challenges of education.

Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular support

for homosexual " marriage. "

That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

our kids need to know - more than math, geography, grammar, science,

or computer skills - is what men and men see in each other, why women

and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

those who practice homosexual behavior.

You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

grader, can't you?

Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking the

matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest teacher's

union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks - at every

grade level, and in every public school, in every school district in

America.

Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What if

children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

information presented by a zealous instructor?

Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions - in

which case the group that wants to exert the most significant impact

on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or children...

or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

which case... ditto.

Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

priority for this organization as the political agenda of those who

engage in homosexual behavior.

Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters of

homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educational

Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

agenda to children by warning that:

" Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in accord

with Biblical precepts. "

But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines . how do they

justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

children with homosexual advocacy?

How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from campus,

while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

will be no rest until families all over the country not only

acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot win

at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in the

departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan Administration,

is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal alliance

defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

training, funding, and litigation.

Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

Lynn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brother is a teacher. It is mandatory (before he gets his check) that

dues are taken out. One due is for PSEA who negotiates contracts for ALL

teachers. He wanted to be an independent and wasn't allowed to negotiate

his own contract. There are also dues for NEA to support PSEA and national

interests. He doesn't have a choice, this is mandatory. Maybe it's a union

school district.

Stef

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you have there is called collective bargaining. The teacher's union in that

school is the bargaining agent for all teachers in that district. The reason for

this is so that an administrator can't hire 2 teachers at the same time with the

same credits and credentials and decide to pay the other more than the other

just because he or she may like their looks. In the old days men got paid more

than marred women because the women were told their pay was not important to

their household. If he chose not to join the union but as you say still has dues

taken out, that means that association was able to have what is called fair

share put into the contract and he has a prorated amount taken out for what it

costs the local to negotiate that contract. I don't know what the formula for

that prorating is or what they use to calculate that cost.

RE: ( ) National Educators Association Priorities

My brother is a teacher. It is mandatory (before he gets his check) that

dues are taken out. One due is for PSEA who negotiates contracts for ALL

teachers. He wanted to be an independent and wasn't allowed to negotiate

his own contract. There are also dues for NEA to support PSEA and national

interests. He doesn't have a choice, this is mandatory. Maybe it's a union

school district.

Stef

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And blasting unions means what to education?

Absolutely nothing. But as I stated before it may have been something to do

" housekeeping " details like self preservation. Other organizations do campaigns

that help with their preservation and image that don't necessarily focus on

their specific agenda.

As for the PAC....the PAC is not a membership thing. I carry no card that says

I'm a member of a PAC. Whether I contribute to the PAC or not I still have my

PSEA card. And with agreeing the basic ideas of the NEA..I stated that position

before..... A quality basic public education for all children. That is the stand

of NEA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, the stand of the NEA is a little bit more than just that.

Roxanna

Re: ( ) National Educators Association Priorities

And blasting unions means what to education?

Absolutely nothing. But as I stated before it may have been something to do

" housekeeping " details like self preservation. Other organizations do campaigns

that help with their preservation and image that don't necessarily focus on

their specific agenda.

As for the PAC....the PAC is not a membership thing. I carry no card that says

I'm a member of a PAC. Whether I contribute to the PAC or not I still have my

PSEA card. And with agreeing the basic ideas of the NEA..I stated that position

before..... A quality basic public education for all children. That is the stand

of NEA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, unfortunately that is what other groups who have something against the

NEA want you to believe. Those who are especially pro voucher want you to

believe it is more than that.

Re: ( ) National Educators Association Priorities

>

>

> And blasting unions means what to education?

>

> Absolutely nothing. But as I stated before it may have been something to

> do " housekeeping " details like self preservation. Other organizations do

> campaigns that help with their preservation and image that don't

> necessarily focus on their specific agenda.

>

> As for the PAC....the PAC is not a membership thing. I carry no card that

> says I'm a member of a PAC. Whether I contribute to the PAC or not I still

> have my PSEA card. And with agreeing the basic ideas of the NEA..I stated

> that position before..... A quality basic public education for all

> children. That is the stand of NEA.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's too bad he can't work at his job without being forced to comply with

whatever these other people want from him.

Roxanna

RE: ( ) National Educators Association Priorities

My brother is a teacher. It is mandatory (before he gets his check) that

dues are taken out. One due is for PSEA who negotiates contracts for ALL

teachers. He wanted to be an independent and wasn't allowed to negotiate

his own contract. There are also dues for NEA to support PSEA and national

interests. He doesn't have a choice, this is mandatory. Maybe it's a union

school district.

Stef

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/436 - Release Date: 9/1/2006

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not involved with another group that is pushing anything. I just went to

the NEA website and got all the information I have been discussing. Maybe you

should go there and read more about what you support. No more excuses!

Wouldn't that be nice?

Roxanna

Re: ( ) National Educators Association Priorities

>

>

> And blasting unions means what to education?

>

> Absolutely nothing. But as I stated before it may have been something to

> do " housekeeping " details like self preservation. Other organizations do

> campaigns that help with their preservation and image that don't

> necessarily focus on their specific agenda.

>

> As for the PAC....the PAC is not a membership thing. I carry no card that

> says I'm a member of a PAC. Whether I contribute to the PAC or not I still

> have my PSEA card. And with agreeing the basic ideas of the NEA..I stated

> that position before..... A quality basic public education for all

> children. That is the stand of NEA.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I had explained to the email from this person is that Pennsylvania has

what is called collective bargaining. One group bargains for the whole

professional staff. That way it eliminates discrimination from

administrators who might give someone a higher wage than someone of equal

time and education just because of how they look or if a spouse is employed.

The reason for the dues is what they call fair shair. Since the association

bargains contracts, researches teaching strategies and has people who give

inservices on these strategies all for the benefit of ALL professional

employees, a formula is given to those who choose not to join to pay for

what is done for them. Fair Share must be negotiated into a contract. From

the sounds this school district did.

They don't " want " anything from him. Collective bargaining is the law and

benefits all professional employees. Fair share is something that was fought

long and hard for because non members were able to benefit from the

association's work at no cost before the fair share law came into being. He

might think he could do better on his own in bargaining his own contract but

most likely not. Therre is research out there but I do not have that at my

fingertips at the moment.

RE: ( ) National Educators Association Priorities

>

>

> My brother is a teacher. It is mandatory (before he gets his check) that

> dues are taken out. One due is for PSEA who negotiates contracts for ALL

> teachers. He wanted to be an independent and wasn't allowed to negotiate

> his own contract. There are also dues for NEA to support PSEA and

> national

> interests. He doesn't have a choice, this is mandatory. Maybe it's a

> union

> school district.

>

> Stef

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> No virus found in this incoming message.

> Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/436 - Release Date: 9/1/2006

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not mean that you were involved and I'm sorry if I gave you that idea.

What I meant was that there are other organizations that are very anti

public education that want you to believe the NEA has more on their plate

than just a Quality Basic Public Education. I did look at the website just

as a refresher and saw only one thing that made me want to think that they

needed to re focus like the wal mart issue. As I read the whole article, I

know folks like you all don't want to hear about the ability to organize and

I think that really didn't need to be made a public argument. But the rest

is what I call the domino effect. The Anti Public education stand of the

Waltons is well known and that needed to be said. Any tax monies put into

private institutions takes away that much for the public schools. The

poverty level of the workers there is easy to document. Poverty and

education come hand in hand otherwise those on free and reduced lunches

would not be a sub group for our PSSA's. Poor families can't afford health

care or child care. Sometimes the children go hungry. One needs food and

good food to think and learn. Failure of one sub group puts a whole school

district on the warning list for no child left behind.

One nice thing about belonging to the NEA. I don't have to agree with

everything they take a stand on. I believe in Public Education but I also

believe in the rights of those who want to go elsewhere or to home school to

do just that. I also know that for some of you I will not change your minds,

I can only report on what is told to me and my interpretation on what I

read. That is where it becomes hard because we all look at things from

different perspectives. Excuses? No but what would be nice is if lawmakers

and yes even some educators would realize as we do (we meaning you folks in

here) that all children do not learn at the same rate or in the same

fashion. No one way or test works for all kids. Now wouldn't that be nice?

Now, I think I have been OT long enough on the NEA. I have been enjoying

some of the posts that you all have had. I burn inside when I hear about a

colleague (another teacher) being absolutely uncooperative with you all as

parents. Sometimes they think they know everything! I too went through that

with some of the people I worked with when my son went through school! I

also hope that some of the advice I give from an educators perspective has

been useful to you all. I also smile when you talk about your children

because I can say been there done that to many of the things you write

about. I will tell you it doesn't end. But I do want to wish for all of you

a happy, safe and successful school year for your children AND to you!

Re: ( ) National Educators Association Priorities

>I am not involved with another group that is pushing anything. I just went

>to the NEA website and got all the information I have been discussing.

>Maybe you should go there and read more about what you support. No more

>excuses! Wouldn't that be nice?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw your post the first time. No need to keep repeating.

Roxanna

RE: ( ) National Educators Association Priorities

>

>

> My brother is a teacher. It is mandatory (before he gets his check) that

> dues are taken out. One due is for PSEA who negotiates contracts for ALL

> teachers. He wanted to be an independent and wasn't allowed to negotiate

> his own contract. There are also dues for NEA to support PSEA and

> national

> interests. He doesn't have a choice, this is mandatory. Maybe it's a

> union

> school district.

>

> Stef

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ----------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> No virus found in this incoming message.

> Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/436 - Release Date: 9/1/2006

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find this post to be very homophobic and I am dumbfounded as to

why you would post something like this on this listserv. It's a fact

of life that kids with gay parents go to public school and they

probably get teased about it. You may not agree with the 'lifestyle'

but the teachers can't ignore ANY child being bullied. They need to

know how to handle the situation constructively.

And to throw walmart and the union debate into it? What are we

trying to start a fire here? Sheesh!!!

I don't come here to hear someone start a political debate & then

get mad because someone chimes in with a dissenting opinion. I come

here to find out how to help my child and get support.

>

> Please tell me it isn't so! This truly disturbed me:

>

>

>

> " before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is

win

> popular support for homosexual " marriage. " "

>

>

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanSears/2006/08/25/the_curious_c

a

> se_of_nea_priorities

>

>

>

> Full article below:

>

>

>

> The curious case of NEA priorities

> By Alan Sears

> Friday, August 25, 2006

>

>

> It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the

> country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

>

> Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the

same

> statistics we do.

>

>

>

> Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who

can't

> read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards

> groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into

lifelong

> service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

>

> Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America's

> children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated

> music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong

down

> blind brain alleys.

>

>

>

> Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who

> are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or

eager

> to move their child into alternative educational settings.

>

>

>

> Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in " No Child

Left

> Behind, " and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered

this

> summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut

out

> for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one:

where

> do we start, when it comes to fixing America's schools?

>

>

>

> Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many

incredible

> challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the

NEA.

> They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the

real

> challenges of education.

>

>

>

> Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything

> else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular

support

> for homosexual " marriage. "

>

>

>

> That's right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what

> our kids need to know – more than math, geography, grammar,

science,

> or computer skills – is what men and men see in each other, why

women

> and women fall in love, and what our government and society " owes "

> those who practice homosexual behavior.

>

>

>

> You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third

> grader, can't you?

>

> Of course not. The NEA didn't think so. That's why they're taking

the

> matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world's largest

teacher's

> union elects to endorse same-sex " marriage, " they're not talking

> tacit support. They're talking posters and projects, classroom

> lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks – at every

> grade level, and in every public school, in every school district

in

> America.

>

>

>

> Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

>

> What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for

> reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator

> doesn't want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those

> who promote homosexual behavior? What if parents don't want their

> children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What

if

> children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the

> information presented by a zealous instructor?

>

>

>

> Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions – in

> which case the group that wants to exert the most significant

impact

> on America's teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no

> real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or

children...

> or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in

> which case... ditto.

>

>

>

> Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a

> priority for this organization as the political agenda of those

who

> engage in homosexual behavior.

>

> Actually, that's not anything new for the teachers' union. The NEA

> has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters

of

> homosexual behavior. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a

> member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight

Educational

> Network), and once defended NEA's force-feeding of the homosexual

> agenda to children by warning that:

>

>

>

> " Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral

> doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in

accord

> with Biblical precepts. "

>

> But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines … how do they

> justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they're against teaching

> creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can

> they favor sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young

> children with homosexual advocacy?

>

>

>

> How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from

campus,

> while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom

> visits featuring homosexual and transgender " role models? "

>

>

>

> Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the

> representative of America's teachers, in favor of a new raison

> d'etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even

> indulgence in, homosexual behavior. For the union's leaders, there

> will be no rest until families all over the country not only

> acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

>

>

>

> It's as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot

win

> at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next

> generation... one vulnerable child at a time.

>

> Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in

the

> departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan

Administration,

> is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal

alliance

> defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy,

> training, funding, and litigation.

>

> Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. .

>

>

> Please write the NEA and tell them if you disagree!

>

> http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/contact.html

>

> Lynn

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW did you guys watch that 20/20 show last Friday about the schools in the

USA? ( very compareable to the ones in Canada too if you ask me..) without

competition.. I believe our school system will continue to fail our children

-- Re: ( ) National Educators Association Priorities

I am not involved with another group that is pushing anything. I just went

to the NEA website and got all the information I have been discussing.

Maybe you should go there and read more about what you support. No more

excuses! Wouldn't that be nice?

Roxanna

Re: ( ) National Educators Association

Priorities

>

>

> And blasting unions means what to education?

>

> Absolutely nothing. But as I stated before it may have been something to

> do " housekeeping " details like self preservation. Other organizations do

> campaigns that help with their preservation and image that don't

> necessarily focus on their specific agenda.

>

> As for the PAC....the PAC is not a membership thing. I carry no card

that

> says I'm a member of a PAC. Whether I contribute to the PAC or not I

still

> have my PSEA card. And with agreeing the basic ideas of the NEA..I

stated

> that position before..... A quality basic public education for all

> children. That is the stand of NEA.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...