a principle of minerals displacement of heavy metals

[Guest guest]

why heavy metals are toxic is that the body cannot distingusih that

well betwen them even thought he difference in operation is

malfunctional as in the case of lead and calcium or they affix too

strongly to sulphur.

since there is a natural flow of minerals through the body all you

have to do is ensure that flow is sustained for the metals to excrete

naturally.

that is the body is naturally leaky and if you keep pouring the right

minerals in they will come out, and becuse the body does not

distinguish that well between good and toxic the toxic comes out as

well.

i think the problem with mercury may be the degree of damage it does

int he body which is not repairable and why anabolics like whey and

ala are so helpful.

there is a discussion on a-m about how well mercury is retained, i

think its a depends thing, fat in the body may well be extremely

retentitive of it, but if the minerals transport flow is impaired

then heavy metala do not leave the body as evidenced by hair tests of

children aged 2 or three who have high silver levels that can have

only come from thier mothers amalgams. i presume they weren't being

breast fed.

the brain may be only moderately retentive of mercury which would

make the issue of mobilisation of mercury in the brain so much more

severe which appears to be the case and the adult chelation boards

bear witness to this. i think the other issue adults have is deep

mercury reseviors in fat.

i have seen extrodinary nueral recovery with amalgmas removed and

selenium and other minerals taken, much quicker than other organs so

that may be a combination of permanent damage and the selenium being

particularly effective in passiviatng mercury in the brain.

paradoxically selenium may retain mercury in the brain but imo that

is preferable to having mercury moving about.

anway the best progress i have seen is slow but steady improvement

over a year or so and there appears to be no upper limit on it.