whey is high in glutamine?

[Guest guest]

glutamine increases villi length. bascially my improvements recently

with whey also seem to tally with more glutamine. as far as i can see

whey has a reasoanable amount of glutamine. and probably more

advantgeously its co factors. striaght amino acid suppelmentation is

cofactorless and trouble imo. low temp roast juices are also high in

glutmaine and co factors9esp b vits).........anyway its weird to have

accidently ended up on a bodybuilding diet but confirms me in that

putting on shoulder muscle for both male and female is a very positve

sign.

" 1. The amino acid L-glutamine (1500 mg/day, a maximum for your child

would be 3000 mg/day) that also reduces blood and brain ammonia

levels. Experiments with various animal models have demonstrated that

the provision of glutamine can result in better nitrogen homeostasis,

with conservation of skeletal muscle. This leads to better ability to

learn, to retain, and to recall. There is also considerable evidence

that glutamine can enhance the barrier function of the gut.

Furthermore, it is now known that the gut produces large amounts of a

vital antioxidant, glutathione, when adequate glutamine is present.

Glutamine is the principal metabolic fuel for small intestine

enterocytes, lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts (major players

in the immune function). Supplemental use of glutamine increases

intestinal villus height, stimulates the gut's mucosal, cellular

proliferation, and maintains mucosal integrity. It also prevents

intestinal hyperpermeability and bacterial translocation, which may

be involved in sepsis and the development of multiple organ failure-

AL, Altern Med Rev, 1999 Aug, 4:4, 239-48.

L-glutamine is essential for the synthesis of the mucoproteins

present in the mucous secretions of the GI tract. These secretions

are responsible for protecting the lining of the GI tract. In

addition to protective qualities, L-glutamine administration has been

known to actually improve mucosal structure and healing '

willis Williss/message/5343

[Guest guest]

Although you have had really good success with whey, there are a

number of 'health groups' that find whey to be detrimental as far as

good health. I wonder if there are qualifiers out on whey....like for

whom it might help and for whom it might not be a good idea. I know

Elaine of SCD is very much against it. Have you run into reasons why?

Thanks,

.

[Guest guest]

one of the fundamental divides when you cross it is understanding

that there are inherent errors in the group(collective) problem

solving process which makes groups being of such and such an opinion

a surety for it being wrong.

it still staggers to me to see what is happening on pecan bread, moms

and kids limping on in half solutions because the group requires a

certain approach and the high gain boundary is not allowed to be

explored.

its a little lesson of life that you can't hide from trauma and it

has a way of finding you and if you don't flinch at meeting it in

daily life you take less damage overall and survive better.

enough preaching )

anyway

i do think scd allows a better tolerance of the lactose in whey but

eileen prunster who posts on here occasionally is scd emphasis

somewhat rather than scd and has been getting exceptional results

with herself and her family who are just starting seem to be

responding well.

i think kids who were bottle rather than breast feed(like me) get

developmentally attuned to the high growth facotrs in bovine dairy

and actualy need the whey to be normal.

the whey you use is very important.

my whole aprroach is like building a house with very solid

foundations............... every piece is handfitted and tested for

weight yield and you just add and add and everything added has

synergies and one day the jigsaw is substanially complete.

elaine's daughter had some issues in later years which indicate

insufficencies in her approach, lactose which she dislikes is a

problem if you are not in a synergenic supplement regieme and to be

fair its only things like optizinc which make something like whey

possible.

so really its the supplements of recent years that have changed the

game.........enzymes, optizinc, selenomethione/methylselenocysteine

...molybdenum, vitamin d(though thats not new but sscd studiously

ignores it)......non inorganic magnesium........looking at what

supplements were i can understand her being put off them but it has

all changed and age unfortunately prevents her keeping up so pure scd

will be going the way of banting..........

none of the supplement suppliers are up to speed on the new forms

either.

its really important to get that the anabolic side of things which

bovine growth factors seem to be abundant in is the missing piece.

unfortunatley i cna see dan getting into the medical version which

will be to shoot kids full of steriods but hopefully that is a year

or two away.

what people don't undertsand about a medical approach is it is

referenced on the body working 90% well and ten% needs fixing which

is the nature of illness. autism is a failure of construction, the

whole house has to be built and medical standards of deficit are far

to high for the medical approach to work with autism. a good example

is lead which with autism even lowish levels compared to a normal

population are inhibiting.

> Although you have had really good success with whey, there are a

> number of 'health groups' that find whey to be detrimental as far

as

> good health. I wonder if there are qualifiers out on whey....like

for

> whom it might help and for whom it might not be a good idea. I know

> Elaine of SCD is very much against it. Have you run into reasons

why?

>

> Thanks,

> .