Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 I took time to peruse Colborn's essay. It is very important. IMO, we cannot ignore the so-called 'background' factors - the many toxins that have entered and that continue to enter the human body. These toxins detract from an organism's detoxification and immunity, thus increasing the likelihood of developing adverse sequelae that manifest as symptoms, traits, or illnesses. Furthermore, Colborn calls attention to institutionalized weaknesses (i) in how toxins are approved, and (ii) in models whereby toxic effects are evaluated. Nutritional and detoxification protocols in autism biomedical therapeutics are likely to be removing far more than heavy metals. The epidemic of thimerosal injections and the overuse of MMR injections have occurred in the context of increased susceptibility induced by the large number of 'background' toxins. The points in Colburn's essay merit attention. Binstock Researcher in Developmental & Behavioral Neuroanatomy [This post may be forwarded hither and yon] * * * * A Case for Revisiting the Safety of Pesticides: A Closer Look at Neurodevelopment Theo Colborn Environ Health Perspect 114:10-17 (2006) http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2005/7940/7940.html http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2005/7940/7940.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.