Guest guest Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Hi Childi, Not likely to avoid the words " claim and comparison " on this " American " board. Please look past what we " Americans " consider to be necessary words to ascertain product efficacy. We simply cannot accomodate all cultures, or there would likely be nothing left to say. Kind regards, Re: [ ] Re: Hi all Moria, Many thanks...am keen to avoid finger pointing...its all about paradigms - words like claim and comparison are often considered not very polite in many anglo cultures worldwide including mine. They are rather used in courts and other dispute centres...my suggestion is that we can remain focused on the facts in a contributing manner ie. what do you think or????????????? rather you claimed etc. Kind Rgds, Chidi moriamerri <moriam@...> wrote: Dear Chidi, I'm glad that you are liking the debate. I gather from your comment that you find something in my message less than " very polite " . Could you please let me know what that was? I'm not trying to be offensive or rude in any way. good wishes, Moria http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/ Mercury Detox: Information, Tools, and Resources > > > > Chidi, > > > > > > > > You are absolutely correct about the problem of normal > chelators > > >and > > > > stimulation of yeast. > > > > Recently there was a product released that >both > > > > doesn't have this problem, it will actually eliminate the > yeast. > > > > > > > > > > > > I feel that people making claims such as these really should be > at > > > least attempting to provide evidence to back the claims. NCD is > so > > > new and unproven that I suspect there is no real evidence that > it does > > > anything beneficial in the human body. It's another one of those > > > things that we can spend lots of money on if we want to turn > ourselves > > > into experimental subjects. > > > > > > J > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 , Pls do not get me wrong. Am keen that we allow co-creation and robust debate etc to go on in a collaborative manner with the right ambience. Am currently at the DAN conference in washington and I remember all the Senior DAN doctors and ARI personnel always recomending that discussions even on a contentious issue as mercury in vaccine role in autism be conducted in a considerate, polite but firm manner. It helps to build the right ambienece and then get cooperation and collaboration from us all. There is is certainly no focus on a specific culture in any manner.. Hope the above clarifies my suggestions....and its only a suggestion so that we can continue in an inclusive colloborative manner with one another in this journey to see what best we can do for our children/future generations. Kind Rgds, Chidi Cochran <Ladyshrink111@...> wrote: Hi Childi, Not likely to avoid the words " claim and comparison " on this " American " board. Please look past what we " Americans " consider to be necessary words to ascertain product efficacy. We simply cannot accomodate all cultures, or there would likely be nothing left to say. Kind regards, Re: [ ] Re: Hi all Moria, Many thanks...am keen to avoid finger pointing...its all about paradigms - words like claim and comparison are often considered not very polite in many anglo cultures worldwide including mine. They are rather used in courts and other dispute centres...my suggestion is that we can remain focused on the facts in a contributing manner ie. what do you think or????????????? rather you claimed etc. Kind Rgds, Chidi moriamerri <moriam@...> wrote: Dear Chidi, I'm glad that you are liking the debate. I gather from your comment that you find something in my message less than " very polite " . Could you please let me know what that was? I'm not trying to be offensive or rude in any way. good wishes, Moria http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/ Mercury Detox: Information, Tools, and Resources > > > > Chidi, > > > > > > > > You are absolutely correct about the problem of normal > chelators > > >and > > > > stimulation of yeast. > > > > Recently there was a product released that >both > > > > doesn't have this problem, it will actually eliminate the > yeast. > > > > > > > > > > > > I feel that people making claims such as these really should be > at > > > least attempting to provide evidence to back the claims. NCD is > so > > > new and unproven that I suspect there is no real evidence that > it does > > > anything beneficial in the human body. It's another one of those > > > things that we can spend lots of money on if we want to turn > ourselves > > > into experimental subjects. > > > > > > J > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.