Re: Mainstream doctor needs to be prooven wrong

April 8, 2006

I give you a lot of credit...I probably would have lost it and ended up in

police custody!

It maybe a lost cause but it would be worth working it if you wanted to...to

at least get the last word.

Ask him to provide a study that wasn't funded by the pharma companies. Ask

him why if we wouldn't believe Marlboro should they say smoking is not harmfull

why we believe the pharma companies when they say the same stupid thing.

Print out studies from Generation Rescue to show him, make him explain all of

that.

Go to archives and print out all the stories you can on kids who are now

recovered...do remove all personal information first. Print out recovery

stories from Generation Rescue.

Print out the Simpsonwood documents...I have seen them on GR site and their

new site...putkidsfirst ???

Tell him the CDC was asked years ago to study chelation is autism and they

refuse to do it. Ask him if he had a child who was diagnosed with a rare cancer

and he met thousands of people who had done a certain treatment and with only a

extreme rare reaction all the kids got better. Would he wait until the CDC got

off their fat lazy butt to study it or would you go for it. Chelation has been

used for many years and rarely is there a problem. They say it isn't safe

because they haven't studied it with autism, not because they have studied it

and found it unsafe. Ask him for studies that prove it doesn't work or is

harmful.

And if all else fails tell him that within a reasonable amount of time you

will be showing him a recovered healthy child and then he can kiss your...!

Wish you well, if you need bail money...I will be willing to pitch in!!!

cuch1986 <cuches@...> wrote:

I had an argument with a doctor at my job. He argued that Thimerosal

is not the cause in the rise of autism (I must have turned purple)

and he sited the below links to proove his case. I almost lost it

when he quoted from the Danish study. I told him that study was

horribly flawed when they changed the criteria of who they allowed

in the study mid stream. He feels Kirby is a quack and again I

must have turned purple. We politely yelled at each other for almost

an hour--I felt at a loss because he was quoting from studies I

never heard of. Has anyone read or saw the below links. I really

want to proove my case that autism is most definately on the rise

and not from better diagnosing and that Thimerosal plays a huge roll

in this.

He also said I should be brought up on charges for doing chelation

with my daughter that it is child abuse. I was floored and said I

think NOT treating her would be the abuse. He stated that just

because you remove the mercury (maybe) you cannot replace the

damaged neurons. I don't even know where to begin with this person

who already has his mindset that Thimerosal is not the cause.

Perhaps it is a lost cause to continue to argue with this man.

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/114/3/584

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/112/3/604

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?

cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstract & list_uids=15342856 & itool=pubmed_

Abstract

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/114/3/793

Thanks so much, looking forward to your responses to this.

Tina

=======================================================

April 8, 2006

One other thing...they can't say there isn't any relationship between all of

this stuff for another good reason...they have never studies the unvaccinated to

know if they have the same disease rate.

You can't say the shots don't cause all this stuff if they don't compare

disease rates in both populations. Print out the Amish studies, explain they

don't have autism. There is also the peds practice in Illinois that doesn't

vaccinate and they have not seen a unvaccinated autistic child in the 30K kids

they have seen.

Ask him why the unvaccinated don't have autism.