Re: not start ALA at first?

[Guest guest]

No, , you don't have to wait. That's primarily for people who recently had

amalgams removed. You may begin ALA right away, with or without the combo of

DMSA.

-------------- Original message --------------

From: " jjcox22 " <jjcox22@...>

> My daughter's hair test showed a lot of metal (aluminum, antimony,

> bismuth, cadmium, lead, nickel, silver, tin, titanium).

>

> I don't know how or when she was exposed to these.

>

> She meets the counting rules.

>

> Since I don't know how or when she was exposed, does that mean I have

> to wait 3 months to use the ALA? She has not had any vaccines for a

> year.

>

> Is ALA contraindicated until 3 months post exposure of other metals or

> just mercury?

>

> Could there be other sources of mercury besides vaccines?

>

> Thanks!

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> =======================================================

>

[Guest guest]

>

> My daughter's hair test showed a lot of metal (aluminum, antimony,

> bismuth, cadmium, lead, nickel, silver, tin, titanium).

>

> I don't know how or when she was exposed to these.

Check for sources here

http://www.danasview.net/metals.htm

> Since I don't know how or when she was exposed, does that mean I have

> to wait 3 months to use the ALA? She has not had any vaccines for a

> year.

You are probably okay to start ALA now, unless she recently had her

fillings removed.

> Could there be other sources of mercury besides vaccines?

Yes, like dental fillings.

Dana