Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Actually what happens here is that on Thursday mornings, my granddaughter, 5.0, likes to open the messages and read me the posts as I am cleaning my office. Imagine my surprise. In the interest of fairness, I did re read the posts, and you are correct, the first post from might arguably be appropriate. But the following posts, discussing what would warm what, was pure titillation, maybe for your benefit, but had nothing to do with Autism or mercury poisoning and they were/have always been considered inappropriate for this list. Is that your interest here? You have a young boy with ASD? Please be considerate and keep discussions of sexual issues confined to the appropriate boards. This is not it. Re: [ ] I was not induced... > >> > >> > >> > >>Just correcting one little fact: > >> > >> Littleton wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>and also was prescribed for good erections (moves the smooth muscles of > >>> > >>> > >the > > > > > >>>penis). > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>There are no muscles of any kind in the penis. Erections are about blood > >>flow, and the temporary narrowing of the vessels at the base of the > >>penis to keep the blood trapped there for a certain amount of time. It's > >>strictly 'hydraulic', there are no muscles involved. Exercise of the > >>PC-muscles can increase the potential for erections, but it's an > >>indirect process. > >> > >>Regards, > >> > >> de Vries > >> > >> > >> > >>======================================================= > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 For different reasons, I agree with . I have problems taking certain images out of my mind.... , not appropriate. Too personal. I personally don't even care if this discussion belongs to this list or not. But I do care about the fact that I read about 's erections. I really don't care for that. Valentina > Actually what happens here is that on Thursday mornings, my granddaughter, 5.0, likes to open the messages and read me the posts as I am cleaning my office. Imagine my surprise. > > In the interest of fairness, I did re read the posts, and you are correct, the first post from might arguably be appropriate. But the following posts, discussing what would warm what, was pure titillation, maybe for your benefit, but had nothing to do with Autism or mercury poisoning and they were/have always been considered inappropriate for this list. > > Is that your interest here? You have a young boy with ASD? > > Please be considerate and keep discussions of sexual issues confined to the appropriate boards. This is not it. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Based on that thinking, should we stop talking about poo also? _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Valentina Scharpf Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:50 PM Subject: Re: [ ]Sara/was:/was: I was not induced. (pg rating) For different reasons, I agree with . I have problems taking certain images out of my mind.... , not appropriate. Too personal. I personally don't even care if this discussion belongs to this list or not. But I do care about the fact that I read about 's erections. I really don't care for that. Valentina > Actually what happens here is that on Thursday mornings, my granddaughter, 5.0, likes to open the messages and read me the posts as I am cleaning my office. Imagine my surprise. > > In the interest of fairness, I did re read the posts, and you are correct, the first post from might arguably be appropriate. But the following posts, discussing what would warm what, was pure titillation, maybe for your benefit, but had nothing to do with Autism or mercury poisoning and they were/have always been considered inappropriate for this list. > > Is that your interest here? You have a young boy with ASD? > > Please be considerate and keep discussions of sexual issues confined to the appropriate boards. This is not it. > ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 But the following posts, discussing what would warm what, was pure titillation, maybe for your benefit, but had nothing to do with Autism or mercury poisoning FWIW, I didn't read it that way at all. To me it seemed like a fairly technical physiology discussion. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 No, she searches for and likes the ones about poo :-) Thats appropriate humor for a just turned 5! Re: [ ]Sara/was:/was: I was not induced. (pg rating) For different reasons, I agree with . I have problems taking certain images out of my mind.... , not appropriate. Too personal. I personally don't even care if this discussion belongs to this list or not. But I do care about the fact that I read about 's erections. I really don't care for that. Valentina > Actually what happens here is that on Thursday mornings, my granddaughter, 5.0, likes to open the messages and read me the posts as I am cleaning my office. Imagine my surprise. > > In the interest of fairness, I did re read the posts, and you are correct, the first post from might arguably be appropriate. But the following posts, discussing what would warm what, was pure titillation, maybe for your benefit, but had nothing to do with Autism or mercury poisoning and they were/have always been considered inappropriate for this list. > > Is that your interest here? You have a young boy with ASD? > > Please be considerate and keep discussions of sexual issues confined to the appropriate boards. This is not it. > ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 , Cochran wrote: >But the following posts, discussing what would warm what, was pure titillation, maybe for your benefit, > They most certainly were not. As Nell has pointed out too, it was a factual, technical discussion. I resent your implication that they were anything else. Also, as you rightly point out that this is a list primarily aimed at *parents* of children with autism, that certainly disqualifies a five year old from being the intended audience of anything posted to this list. Regards, de Vries Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 I'd also like to add that I am extremely grateful that adults do stay on our list. I often wonder what benefit they might gain other than knowing that they've tried to help others. One of the best things about autism treatment is that, for the most part, we are fairly unmoderated. We cover a lot more than chelation/autism/mercury poisoning and that is to everyone's benefit. Sometimes what we choose to write might be offensive to some. The recent circumcision thread would be an example. However, IMO, if a post is possibly helpful to even one of the thousands on our list but offends many more, so be it. We can all hit the delete button. When I post answers, I ask myself, " Could this benefit anyone out there? " If the answer is yes, then I post. I'd hate to think that some people would also ask themselves, " Could this possibly offend anyone who might read it? " and then hit delete instead, because if we all did that, we wouldn't accomplish much here. There is a big difference between offensive and dangerous. Dangerous posts need moderating. Offensive posts, for the most part, probably just need deleting by those who find them so. Anita > > But the following posts, discussing what would warm what, was pure > titillation, maybe for your benefit, but had nothing to do with Autism > or mercury poisoning > > FWIW, I didn't read it that way at all. To me it seemed like a fairly > technical physiology discussion. > > Nell > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Funny enough about this thread, I have to point out that Bio Ray only carries 8 products 1. ndf (chelator) 2. ndf+ (chelator) 3. red rooster (reproductive system tonic) 4. lady passion (reproductive system tonic) 5. loving energy (reproductive system tonic) 6. silver and clove (anti-parasitic) 7. mouth magic (alkalizer) 8. liver life (liver formula) According to dr. ray this is what you need to detox mercury, along with alkalizers to keep the pH up, and the eat right diet. Now, we have to see that there is some correlation there between detox and the reproductive system. Let’s keep in mind that the formulas that stimulate <censored> also stimulate the peristaltic motion of the bowels. BTW, the descriptions he used (warm the <censored>) are directly from dr. ray’s packaging, not his own doing. The point is, he wasn’t trying to titillate, he was trying to educate. HYPERLINK " mailto:addison@... " addison@... -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.4/255 - Release Date: 2/9/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.4/255 - Release Date: 2/9/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 I adore Nell and respect her opinion more than I can say, but, if you think you are right, why are you pulling someone else's opinion in? I didn't do that. I respect your right to have an opinion...... you should too and realize it is strong enough to stand on its own. I won't discuss or argue the point further, do what you have to, and so will I. Re: [ ]Sara/was:/was: I was not induced. (pg rating) , Cochran wrote: >But the following posts, discussing what would warm what, was pure titillation, maybe for your benefit, > They most certainly were not. As Nell has pointed out too, it was a factual, technical discussion. I resent your implication that they were anything else. Also, as you rightly point out that this is a list primarily aimed at *parents* of children with autism, that certainly disqualifies a five year old from being the intended audience of anything posted to this list. Regards, de Vries ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Very well said, Anita! As the mother of a five year old little boy who also happens to be nonverbal with an ASD diagnosis, I can fully appreciate the openness of this conversation. If you don't want to be offended, please don't read any further!! My son will hump, masturbate, or whatever else you want to call it. He often does have an erection for hours, and can even urinate with an erection. I have always been puzzled as to why. Thank goodness for the little bit of insight from 's experience as a child! BTW, what else are we supposed to call a penis? That is it's name. I didn't find the topic/thread/posts offensive in the least. And we all have the ability to delete these posts. I for one, am very grateful to have read them. Thank you ! , mom to Drake > > > > But the following posts, discussing what would warm what, was pure > > titillation, maybe for your benefit, but had nothing to do with > Autism > > or mercury poisoning > > > > FWIW, I didn't read it that way at all. To me it seemed like a fairly > > technical physiology discussion. > > > > Nell > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.