Guest guest Posted August 31, 2001 Report Share Posted August 31, 2001 In an effort to clear the decks, here are some questions which I have asked Rae for feedback on: 1) Getting EPA & DHA from dietary Omega 3 is superior to getting it from direct EPA & DHA. 2) The elevated cortisol levels seen in human CRONing is beneficial, is part of the CR effect, should be accepted and not reduced. 3) Bone loss seen in human CRONing is just a adjustment to weight loss and should not be worried about. 4) High fat MUFA CRONing diets are superior to the high carb diet suggested by Dr. Walford. 5) We should follow a Zone like diet instead of that suggested by Dr. Walford. 6) The more you can reduce post meal glucose and insulin levels the better. 7) Attempting to boost T is not seen as beneficial. 8) Attempting to boost GH is likewise not seen as beneficial. 9) In fact, doing anything to influence hormonal levels is anti-CR effect. 10) The rodent data is very applicable to humans despite the failure of adult onset CRONing in primates to generate gene changes. 11) Self centered, neurotic behaviour is to be accepted as part of the CR effect. 12) Some information on his educational background. ======================== Good Health & Long Life, Greg , http://www.ozemail.com.au/~gowatson gowatson@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 At 02:22 AM 10/10/2005 -0000, you wrote: >Hi all, > >I am currently watching one of Dr. TenPenney's vaccine videos and she >talks about how the vaccines create antibodies but since those >antibodies don't have anywhere to go, they can start attacking the >organs (causing autoimmune disorders). My question is this - what is >the difference using this theory between having antibodies from a >vaccine and having antibodies after the actual disease when you have >lifelong immunity? Wouldn't BOTH cause antibodies just " hanging >around " as she says? Why would one attack the body and one not if >they are the same antibodies? the disease has a way to leave in natural conditions - ie. Measles - the rash is measles leaving the body. In vaccinated cases, if no rash, the measles stays in the system and goes around and around and around continually creating more and more antibodies. In the disease the body produces just enough antibodies - they are part of the immune response, not all of it. > >On a related question, for those of you who say that vaccines " Just >don't work " can you clarify what you mean? If the vaccine does >produce antibodies which can be and are tested for, isn't it working? > Do you believe they DONT create antibodies? Would love some >clarfication on this. antibodies are NOT immunity - they are a sign of exposure and the body working but NOT of immunity. I will send info Sheri > >Thanks! > > in Orlando > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.