Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 In a message dated 2/29/2008 9:18:31 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, azami@... writes: I told my sons Dr. that I wanted him to get Tithers before his MMR booster (he'll be 4 in August). The Dr. said that even if the Tithers are positive, it doesn't mean the first shot won't wear off later. What would you do? If the tithers are psoitive, does this mean they have to write it on his records and he won't need another shot, or will the ask for tithers again next year... or even every year for that matter? If he comes out as having immunities to MMR, it shouldn't matter NOW! All you do is simply tell the Dr. that since the titers are fine and show immunity NOW, then you won't be getting the 2nd booster done yet. If it " wears off " later, you will check on it then Becky **************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/ 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 In a message dated 2/29/2008 2:08:05 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, azami@... writes: ....how do schools handle titers on the record? Do they ask the child to be check on a regular basis? ahhh good question. I would just assume they would mark that they had immunity to whatever the virus is Becky **************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/ 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 Thanks Becky, but I guess my question is...how do schools handle titers on the record? Do they ask the child to be check on a regular basis? Re: [ ] MMR Tithers In a message dated 2/29/2008 9:18:31 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, azamibellsouth (DOT) net writes: I told my sons Dr. that I wanted him to get Tithers before his MMR booster (he'll be 4 in August). The Dr. said that even if the Tithers are positive, it doesn't mean the first shot won't wear off later. What would you do? If the tithers are psoitive, does this mean they have to write it on his records and he won't need another shot, or will the ask for tithers again next year... or even every year for that matter? If he comes out as having immunities to MMR, it shouldn't matter NOW! All you do is simply tell the Dr. that since the titers are fine and show immunity NOW, then you won't be getting the 2nd booster done yet. If it " wears off " later, you will check on it then Becky ************ **Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living. aol.com/video/ how-to-please- your-picky- eater/rachel- campos-duffy/ 2050827?NCID= aolcmp0030000000 2598) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 Not Becky, but I'm sure that varies widely by school. I'm sure some schools will periodically ask for titers, but I assume most will give you a pass going forward. I didn't think to ask our school (!), but it wouldn't have changed my choice. In fact, I may periodically do titers anyway, as I do want my child to be immune. in NJ > > Thanks Becky, but I guess my question is...how do schools handle titers on the record? Do they ask the child to be check on a regular basis? > > > > Re: [ ] MMR Tithers > > > In a message dated 2/29/2008 9:18:31 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > azamibellsouth (DOT) net writes: > > I told my sons Dr. that I wanted him to get Tithers before his MMR booster > (he'll be 4 in August). The Dr. said that even if the Tithers are positive, it > doesn't mean the first shot won't wear off later. What would you do? If the > tithers are psoitive, does this mean they have to write it on his records and > he won't need another shot, or will the ask for tithers again next year... > or even every year for that matter? > > If he comes out as having immunities to MMR, it shouldn't matter NOW! All > you do is simply tell the Dr. that since the titers are fine and show immunity > NOW, then you won't be getting the 2nd booster done yet. If it " wears off " > later, you will check on it then > > > Becky > > ************ **Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. > (http://living. aol.com/video/ how-to-please- your-picky- eater/rachel- campos-duffy/ > 2050827?NCID= aolcmp0030000000 2598) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 I worked in employee heath at a hospital a few years back. Part of my job was tracking compliance. All employees were required to show immunity to measles, mumps and rubella. Most adults who had only one MMR did not have immunity to measles and for some mumps didn't take. Rubella is just a one shot, but since they combined they you just get extra with the second. Many of the older employees had immunity to M and M but not R. The hospital offered the MMR or the single rubella vaccine, but according to the nurse the measles and mumps single were not available anymore. I knew that wasn't the case, but it turns out they were far too expensive to be cost effective for a budget crunched non-profit hospital. HepB was offered and highly encouraged, but not required. CDC and JHACO guidelines as of 2005 were that once a titer is shown positive you are considered immune. For adult hospital employees there was no retesting. The only exception to receiving the vaccine was if you had a doctor's note stating you were immunocompromised and could not receive the vaccine. In the charts I had to review I only saw three out of 1500 employees who had doctors notes. Reasons on the three were HIV+ status, allergic reaction to first shot as child and undergoing chemotherapy. If an employee came in with shot records showing two MMRs they were considered immune. If they didn't have records titers were drawn and if that showed immunity they were fine. We never retested employees except by their request. Miche Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 Is there any reason why immunity would wear off faster in a child? And is there an amount of time after the vaccine that must pass before you are considered " permanently " immune? I had always thought immunity was forever until 's bus driver got the mumps. And since then, I've heard various stories about various illnesses in adulthood. Perhaps the answer is different for each illness... in NJ > > I worked in employee heath at a hospital a few years back. Part of my job > was tracking compliance. All employees were required to show immunity to > measles, mumps and rubella. Most adults who had only one MMR did not have > immunity to measles and for some mumps didn't take. Rubella is just a one > shot, but since they combined they you just get extra with the second. Many > of the older employees had immunity to M and M but not R. The hospital > offered the MMR or the single rubella vaccine, but according to the nurse > the measles and mumps single were not available anymore. I knew that wasn't > the case, but it turns out they were far too expensive to be cost effective > for a budget crunched non-profit hospital. HepB was offered and highly > encouraged, but not required. > > CDC and JHACO guidelines as of 2005 were that once a titer is shown positive > you are considered immune. For adult hospital employees there was no > retesting. The only exception to receiving the vaccine was if you had a > doctor's note stating you were immunocompromised and could not receive the > vaccine. In the charts I had to review I only saw three out of 1500 > employees who had doctors notes. Reasons on the three were HIV+ status, > allergic reaction to first shot as child and undergoing chemotherapy. If an > employee came in with shot records showing two MMRs they were considered > immune. If they didn't have records titers were drawn and if that showed > immunity they were fine. We never retested employees except by their > request. > > Miche > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.