Guest guest Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Hi , I know some will differ with me here, but I see no reason to see a DAN doctor at this point if apraxia is your only concern. My first son with global dyspraxia has made tremendous progress without seeing a DAN doctor. However, I " doctor " him myself, and he takes a couple of beneficial supplements, and we also do a few dietary things (see my post today about artificials and dairy). I think detox and gut health are important for all children, and I think there are some inexpensive steps you can take to encourage those without the assistance of a DAN doctor. --Epsom salts baths provide magnesium sulfate, which is a natural way to encourage detox. The 4-A's book by Bock (read this book!) has some other recommendations, including drinking more water. --Some supplements that may be helpful: fish oil, vitamin E, carnitine, CoQ10, and probiotics come to mind immediately. Introduce one at a time so that you can (attempt to) see what effect they have. Some might be initially negative as your child adjusts, but if the adjustment period drags on, stop the supplement and ask " why? " . --Since the recent addition of mB12 shots to the baby's regimen has been highly successful, I think they are one of the DAN protocol items that I would recommend you seek out and try. Perhaps your regular pediatrician would be willing to prescribe these? They are not a radical thing... Check out www.neubrander.com for a lot of information, including the best places to buy the shots once you have a prescription. I think there is also dosing information that might be useful to your pediatrician. It's based on weight. --Try to eat a " clean " diet, important for all, even with no food intolerances. The less bad stuff that comes in, the less that needs to be detoxed out. Kids develop problems when they are exposed to more toxins than their bodies can quickly get rid of. I am not at all trying to be negative when I say the following: apraxia is all you can see right now, but it may not be all there is. For awhile, we thought that was our son's only problem. Then we uncovered the low tone. Then a problem with artificials. Then a dairy problem. Then minor auditory processing issues (greatly affected by the dairy, but we didn't know). Once they start school, more is asked of them, and that's when a lot of people (not just kids with apraxia, but all kids) exhibit other stuff. For so so so so so long, I missed the connections between physical symptoms, speech, tone, processing, and behavior. For example, my son had soft BM's for years and congestion for six month of the year. When we solved those two problems, we saw TREMENDOUS gains. Luckily, we didn't ignore those medical issues (deemed unimportant by several doctors), or my son would probably still be receiving services. So if your child has any minor medical issues that seem unrelated, do not stop until you get real solutions. They may help resolve the apraxia. A great DAN can be helpful on this end, but with we went the mainstream medical route. (Probably why it took so long...) Because of the above, I think it's malpractice for a developmental pediatrician to refuse to see your child because he " just " has apraxia! First of all, apraxia is a neurological condition, which should be his first tip off that it is a big deal. Secondly, he is assuming that all parents are observant and educated in child development. That is not true! I detected my son's low tone by a parent-friendly tip in " The Late Talker " book: Does your child feel heavier than he should for his weight? He did! So even though my pediatrician and my very good SLP said he did not have low tone, I took him for an OT evaluation. Before the OT even started the official evaluation, she said, " I can already tell he has low tone by the way he is sitting on the floor. " It had never even occurred to me that his weird way of sitting was a developmental sign. (It wasn't the obvious, " W " position. It was a wide, bent-knee straddle with a right tilt. I've never seen it before or since on another child.) For a doctor to assume that parents and therapists can see what you need a trained medical doctor to see is crazy! (That said, we haven't gotten no useful informaton from our developmental pediatrican, who we like and comes highly recommended. She didn't " see " anything new.) I would suggest you try to find a different developmental pediatrician, and if money is no object, see Dr. Agin in NYC. Alternatively, an integrative physician or a DAN would be helpful, especially if you can find a good, in-plan one. As I said before, it doesn't seem that the expense of a DAN doctor is merited at this time. My bias is always for a doctor who can do stuff rather than write reports. That's why we do take our baby to a DAN, and we take both boys to NACD for development of home therapy programs. Hope that helps! in NJ > > My son is 3yrs 3mos, with the Dx of Apraxia. We have known for > about 10 mos. We have no other soft signs or anything. Just the > Verbal and Oral Apraxia. He has been developmentally on target or > ahead with everything else. He is becoming fluent with sign language > and is making continual progress in language. > > 1. The Dev Ped at Children's Hosp in Denver has declined to see him > multiple times because we have ONLY speech concerns. And will only > see him if a SP has addtional concerns of other soft signs or > delays. So should I still try and get him to be seen? Is it worth > it if we don't have any other concerns developementally? > > 2. Given, that at this stage we aren't seeing any additional > concerns would it be wise to see a DAN Dr? Given that it is obvious > he doesn't have any form of Autism. Sensory Integration or anything. > I am unsure if we need to be concerned about heavy metals and such. > > 3. We tried going Dairy free for 2weeks and saw no change, was that > not long enough to see a differnce or is GFCF something that needs to > be done when you see additional things with the Apraxia? > > Thanks for any insight. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 I love this post. There is nothing like finding tone on your own. I found the tone issue the same way, via The Late Talker. What is troublesome about your story and mine is that the geneticist said that while he suspected genetically all was fine, the tone issues in both kids (shocker to find this in my daughter who really is NT and has great balance, athleticism, etc) he directed me to double check vision and heart stuff as tone may speak to issues there. We are covered on vision as they just went but the heart thing is a new appt for this. > > > > My son is 3yrs 3mos, with the Dx of Apraxia. We have known for > > about 10 mos. We have no other soft signs or anything. Just the > > Verbal and Oral Apraxia. He has been developmentally on target or > > ahead with everything else. He is becoming fluent with sign > language > > and is making continual progress in language. > > > > 1. The Dev Ped at Children's Hosp in Denver has declined to see > him > > multiple times because we have ONLY speech concerns. And will only > > see him if a SP has addtional concerns of other soft signs or > > delays. So should I still try and get him to be seen? Is it worth > > it if we don't have any other concerns developementally? > > > > 2. Given, that at this stage we aren't seeing any additional > > concerns would it be wise to see a DAN Dr? Given that it is obvious > > he doesn't have any form of Autism. Sensory Integration or > anything. > > I am unsure if we need to be concerned about heavy metals and such. > > > > 3. We tried going Dairy free for 2weeks and saw no change, was > that > > not long enough to see a differnce or is GFCF something that needs > to > > be done when you see additional things with the Apraxia? > > > > Thanks for any insight. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 I get the vision thing, but tell me more about the heart. has had a full workup by the CHOP cardiologist () twice due a benign heart murmur. (For some reason, they want us to " keep an eye on it " every couple of years, but I couldn't drag any pertinent information out of the doctor as to why.) > > I love this post. There is nothing like finding tone on your own. I > found the tone issue the same way, via The Late Talker. What is > troublesome about your story and mine is that the geneticist said > that while he suspected genetically all was fine, the tone issues in > both kids (shocker to find this in my daughter who really is NT and > has great balance, athleticism, etc) he directed me to double check > vision and heart stuff as tone may speak to issues there. We are > covered on vision as they just went but the heart thing is a new appt > for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 It was not a big conversation and I was zoned out that day (translation: depressed...not that I wanted a genetic problem but somehow I wanted what I always want and is truly unfair of me to expect: THE ANSWER) but I am pretty sure what he was getting at is the heart is a muscle and if you have tone issues in other muscles it could present in the heart as well. Both of my kids had murmurs. For it was benign and the follow up within days of her birth and declared fine. She was followed up on again when she kept turning blue (what we now suspect were lead poisoning incidents) and declared fine and no murmur was present. For his heart numbers were bad from the beginning...likely a comorbid thing with the fact that he was not breathing right from the stridors. He was floppy and I now realize messed up. Yes, the guilt of all I missed pushes me to look in all dark corners these days. At three months he was declared fine heartwise. He turned blue on me and the last time the cardiologist cleared him...that was in Oct. Since bith kids see two different cardiologists I am consolidating and going to 's who seemed more thorough. My dad is low tone, had rheumatic fever as a kid and a heart murmur. He lived a hard life and still never had heart stuff until his early fevers. He does everything he is not supposed to both heartwise and diabetes wise (type 2) and somehow has thus far, at near 70, escaped the wrath. I am not messing with this...I will follow up. I will ask her to recheck carnitine levels as much has happened since they were last checked. I do think though the fish oil doe help with this, correct. Any new info I'll post. > > > > I love this post. There is nothing like finding tone on your own. I > > found the tone issue the same way, via The Late Talker. What is > > troublesome about your story and mine is that the geneticist said > > that while he suspected genetically all was fine, the tone issues in > > both kids (shocker to find this in my daughter who really is NT and > > has great balance, athleticism, etc) he directed me to double check > > vision and heart stuff as tone may speak to issues there. We are > > covered on vision as they just went but the heart thing is a new appt > > for this. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 Dear , thanks for your reply. It gives me some things to consider. We are already on a pretty wholesome diet (whole foods) and little or no artificial anything including dyes and others. But what do you mean by " clean diet? " I agree that as time goes on, we may see some additional concerns and frankly I am surprised that there isn't anything else obvious to my untrained eye at the time being. I will say that my son has very soft BMs. We took him to a GI Dr and they said that it was just " toddlers diarreah " (sp?) and that it should pass as he potty trains and can hold his poop in longer. THat and he tends to get red or flushed cheeks often and is the first to get sick in the home and tends to have runny noses a lot, especially in the winter. So I wouldn't be suprised if there was something. All standardized allergy tests have come back normal. Though I was prepared for them to do that, despite that there may be something anyhow. > > Because of the above, I think it's malpractice for a developmental > pediatrician to refuse to see your child because he " just " has > apraxia! First of all, apraxia is a neurological condition, which > should be his first tip off that it is a big deal. Secondly, he is > assuming that all parents are observant and educated in child > development. That is not true! I detected my son's low tone by a > parent-friendly tip in " The Late Talker " book: Does your child feel > heavier than he should for his weight? He did! So even though my > pediatrician and my very good SLP said he did not have low tone, I > took him for an OT evaluation. Before the OT even started the > official evaluation, she said, " I can already tell he has low tone by > the way he is sitting on the floor. " It had never even occurred to > me that his weird way of sitting was a developmental sign. (It > wasn't the obvious, " W " position. It was a wide, bent-knee straddle > with a right tilt. I've never seen it before or since on another > child.) For a doctor to assume that parents and therapists can see > what you need a trained medical doctor to see is crazy! (That said, > we haven't gotten no useful informaton from our developmental > pediatrican, who we like and comes highly recommended. She > didn't " see " anything new.) > We haven't noticed anything that you mentioned as low tone. And he is seeing and occupational therapist through the school 4 days a week, and she was working at Children's Hospital before her position there and she hasn't noticed it either. Is the NACD the one where it has an office in Utah? We are possibly moving to Salt Lake City for a new job for my husband, so perhaps we can look into that given that we may have to start all over again with new resources for my son in UT. Thanks , Right now any information is of help! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 You may have some luck looking at two books: Is this your Child by Doris Rapp. Deals with allergy and the red cheek thing is in there. I forget the culprit. More importantly there are solutions in there. Feast without Yeast helps with dietary approach. One thing I will say, one of the best GFCF responders I know of is a kid who was diagnosed epileptic and dyspraxic. Turns out she is celiac. When her mom did this diet she just started letting the kids have whatever they wanted at school until after the winter break and started full on GFCF on winter break. For two weeks they were GFCF at home and not at school and the mom says they saw what can best be described as " suballergies " showing up. It was crazy and finally the kids sel-limited. Her typical kid is doing better in school, etc. Not telling you this to get you to do the diet. What I am saying is it may be more telling not to go cold turkey. It really helped her family. She kept a log and brought it all to the neuro and he was thrilled that she uncovered this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 just my personal experience, my son (who is almost 8) had soft/loose/diarrhea for almost three years, along with extremely picky eater, red cheeks (like the people who live in high-altitude), coarse skins, cracked finger nails. his pedi and GI doctor all think he was fine, since he does not look malnutritioned (his weight/height are normal or above average). His BM and other symptoms did not improve until we put him on GC/CF/SF/CornFree diet along with probiotics/vitamins/fish oils. His allergy only show he is allergic to eggs. long story short, try to do some food elimination test to see whether you can improve his condition. I will start with diary product, as it is relatively easier to do (than take gluten out, it is said that gluten can impact your body for up to six months after you eat it, while casine's impact is much shorter, also gluten is in anywhere, almost). yujie --- <kindredmamma@...> wrote: > Dear , thanks for your reply. It gives me some > things to > consider. > > We are already on a pretty wholesome diet (whole > foods) and little or > no artificial anything including dyes and others. > But what do you > mean by " clean diet? " > I agree that as time goes on, we may see some > additional concerns and > frankly I am surprised that there isn't anything > else obvious to my > untrained eye at the time being. > > I will say that my son has very soft BMs. We took > him to a GI Dr and > they said that it was just " toddlers diarreah " (sp?) > and that it > should pass as he potty trains and can hold his poop > in longer. THat > and he tends to get red or flushed cheeks often and > is the first to > get sick in the home and tends to have runny noses a > lot, especially > in the winter. So I wouldn't be suprised if there > was something. All > standardized allergy tests have come back normal. > Though I was > prepared for them to do that, despite that there may > be something > anyhow. > > > > > Because of the above, I think it's malpractice for > a developmental > > pediatrician to refuse to see your child because > he " just " has > > apraxia! First of all, apraxia is a neurological > condition, which > > should be his first tip off that it is a big deal. > Secondly, he is > > assuming that all parents are observant and > educated in child > > development. That is not true! I detected my > son's low tone by a > > parent-friendly tip in " The Late Talker " book: > Does your child > feel > > heavier than he should for his weight? He did! > So even though my > > pediatrician and my very good SLP said he did not > have low tone, I > > took him for an OT evaluation. Before the OT even > started the > > official evaluation, she said, " I can already tell > he has low tone > by > > the way he is sitting on the floor. " It had never > even occurred to > > me that his weird way of sitting was a > developmental sign. (It > > wasn't the obvious, " W " position. It was a wide, > bent-knee > straddle > > with a right tilt. I've never seen it before or > since on another > > child.) For a doctor to assume that parents and > therapists can see > > what you need a trained medical doctor to see is > crazy! (That > said, > > we haven't gotten no useful informaton from our > developmental > > pediatrican, who we like and comes highly > recommended. She > > didn't " see " anything new.) > > > > We haven't noticed anything that you mentioned as > low tone. And he > is seeing and occupational therapist through the > school 4 days a > week, and she was working at Children's Hospital > before her position > there and she hasn't noticed it either. > > Is the NACD the one where it has an office in Utah? > We are possibly > moving to Salt Lake City for a new job for my > husband, so perhaps we > can look into that given that we may have to start > all over again > with new resources for my son in UT. > > Thanks , > Right now any information is of help! > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________\ ____ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search. http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 Hi , Yes, the NACD is based in Ogden, UT and they have another office in West Chester, PA (where we go). Additionally, they travel to about a dozen cities every three months to see clients. Sounds like you are already eating a " clean diet " -- all natural is the base, and avoiding bad additives like MSG and HFCS, buying organic when possible, buying meat and dairy without hormones or antibiotics, blah, blah, blah. We are far from perfect on this score, but we try our best. I'm bad about the meat, because it is SO much more money than regular, but since we're eating more meat now, we probably should clean that up, too. What is the OT working on 4x/week? That sounds like a lot if there are no tone or sensory problems. Not a bad thing, just curious. Regarding the BM's and congestion -- unfortunately, that was what we were told. We saw two different GI's and had all the labs run. Various people kept coming up with different reasons why he couldn't get potty trained for BM's (toddler diarrhea, hypotonia, immature boy, you're not trying hard enough, etc.) Then I started him on the digestive enzymes. He potty trained OVERNIGHT for BM's and has never had an accident. I now think the loose BM's were at least partially explained by dairy intolerance. (He had milk, cheese, and yogurt every day.) His gut is healthier now due to probiotics, enzymes, fish oil, and dairy free diet. The congestion is one of our wackier stories -- we cured that using homeopathy, but since I'm not a " believer " I can't really explain how the guy did it. Nevertheless, the congestion has never come back after that treatment, even when on dairy. My friend and I jokingly call him the witchdoctor. I'm all for whatever works, as long as it's harmless. When he started giving us mercury and arsenic to cure his gut, I bailed out. Too scary. What effect did the dairy free trial have? Did anything change, for better or for worse? Are you taking any supplements for the gut? This is a very important component of general health, separate from apraxia, and if the loose BM's continue much longer, I think they are a message from his body. For some kids, it is as simple as drinking a lot of juice or eating a lot of fruit (my daughter -- big fruit head). For others, it could be a sign of food intolerance. Still another option is yeast, which is really all guesswork in my opinion. Some signs are obvious, but most are subtle, especially in kids without autism. (www.danasview.net has a list of yeast signs, but keep in mind that her kids have autism. Not all are generally applicable, e.g. stimming.) Labwork can be helpful, but it is still open to interpretation. It is not black and white. If you haven't already done so, you may want to consider a good probiotic. I honestly believe we should probably all be on probiotics these days. Culturelle is a good quality brand and can be found in a lot of different stores. (I even bought it at Sam's Club once.) Keeping a food diary might also help identify food intolerances. This did not help us initially with , and in hindsight I think we were struggling with yeast. That's why we tried the enzymes. The ones we use cover lots of different foods, and also help with yeast. Once they worked for us, we at least narrowed down the possibilities. It can take awhile to figure these things out, but it is well worth it. in NJ > > Dear , thanks for your reply. It gives me some things to > consider. > > We are already on a pretty wholesome diet (whole foods) and little or > no artificial anything including dyes and others. But what do you > mean by " clean diet? " > I agree that as time goes on, we may see some additional concerns and > frankly I am surprised that there isn't anything else obvious to my > untrained eye at the time being. > > I will say that my son has very soft BMs. We took him to a GI Dr and > they said that it was just " toddlers diarreah " (sp?) and that it > should pass as he potty trains and can hold his poop in longer. THat > and he tends to get red or flushed cheeks often and is the first to > get sick in the home and tends to have runny noses a lot, especially > in the winter. So I wouldn't be suprised if there was something. All > standardized allergy tests have come back normal. Though I was > prepared for them to do that, despite that there may be something > anyhow. > > > > > Because of the above, I think it's malpractice for a developmental > > pediatrician to refuse to see your child because he " just " has > > apraxia! First of all, apraxia is a neurological condition, which > > should be his first tip off that it is a big deal. Secondly, he is > > assuming that all parents are observant and educated in child > > development. That is not true! I detected my son's low tone by a > > parent-friendly tip in " The Late Talker " book: Does your child > feel > > heavier than he should for his weight? He did! So even though my > > pediatrician and my very good SLP said he did not have low tone, I > > took him for an OT evaluation. Before the OT even started the > > official evaluation, she said, " I can already tell he has low tone > by > > the way he is sitting on the floor. " It had never even occurred to > > me that his weird way of sitting was a developmental sign. (It > > wasn't the obvious, " W " position. It was a wide, bent-knee > straddle > > with a right tilt. I've never seen it before or since on another > > child.) For a doctor to assume that parents and therapists can see > > what you need a trained medical doctor to see is crazy! (That > said, > > we haven't gotten no useful informaton from our developmental > > pediatrican, who we like and comes highly recommended. She > > didn't " see " anything new.) > > > > We haven't noticed anything that you mentioned as low tone. And he > is seeing and occupational therapist through the school 4 days a > week, and she was working at Children's Hospital before her position > there and she hasn't noticed it either. > > Is the NACD the one where it has an office in Utah? We are possibly > moving to Salt Lake City for a new job for my husband, so perhaps we > can look into that given that we may have to start all over again > with new resources for my son in UT. > > Thanks , > Right now any information is of help! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 I'm somewhat confused by DAN! doctor qualifications. It seems that they do not even have to be MDs!!! Why would a parent completely change thier child's diet and add or subtract all kinds of suppliments without the involvement of a medical doctor (it would seem preferable to seek out a pediatrician of some sort). Yujie: Did you start with the suppliments only? Did you add the diets one at a time? It seems that it would be hard to say what might have worked individually? Did you consult a MD before removing foods from your child's diet? : If the allergy tests came back normal, why are you still considering special diets? I think it's great that you are on a wholesome diet! It would probably do everyone good to eat less artificial stuff. But, would you consult your pediatrician before trying any of these diets? Definately, mommy instinct should always be on alert. But, why should we add extra stress to our already complicated lives by questioning every weird poop (haven't we all had these occasionally?) If your doctor is telling you thse are normal toddler things, why not ask other mom's with " normal " toddlers to see if they have experienced similar things. Then maybe ask mom's of school age children if their toddlers experienced similar issues, and how long it took to " grow out of " . Just my random thoughts, Kate > > > Dear , thanks for your reply. It gives me some > > things to > > consider. > > > > We are already on a pretty wholesome diet (whole > > foods) and little or > > no artificial anything including dyes and others. > > But what do you > > mean by " clean diet? " > > I agree that as time goes on, we may see some > > additional concerns and > > frankly I am surprised that there isn't anything > > else obvious to my > > untrained eye at the time being. > > > > I will say that my son has very soft BMs. We took > > him to a GI Dr and > > they said that it was just " toddlers diarreah " (sp?) > > and that it > > should pass as he potty trains and can hold his poop > > in longer. THat > > and he tends to get red or flushed cheeks often and > > is the first to > > get sick in the home and tends to have runny noses a > > lot, especially > > in the winter. So I wouldn't be suprised if there > > was something. All > > standardized allergy tests have come back normal. > > Though I was > > prepared for them to do that, despite that there may > > be something > > anyhow. > > > > > > > > Because of the above, I think it's malpractice for > > a developmental > > > pediatrician to refuse to see your child because > > he " just " has > > > apraxia! First of all, apraxia is a neurological > > condition, which > > > should be his first tip off that it is a big deal. > > Secondly, he is > > > assuming that all parents are observant and > > educated in child > > > development. That is not true! I detected my > > son's low tone by a > > > parent-friendly tip in " The Late Talker " book: > > Does your child > > feel > > > heavier than he should for his weight? He did! > > So even though my > > > pediatrician and my very good SLP said he did not > > have low tone, I > > > took him for an OT evaluation. Before the OT even > > started the > > > official evaluation, she said, " I can already tell > > he has low tone > > by > > > the way he is sitting on the floor. " It had never > > even occurred to > > > me that his weird way of sitting was a > > developmental sign. (It > > > wasn't the obvious, " W " position. It was a wide, > > bent-knee > > straddle > > > with a right tilt. I've never seen it before or > > since on another > > > child.) For a doctor to assume that parents and > > therapists can see > > > what you need a trained medical doctor to see is > > crazy! (That > > said, > > > we haven't gotten no useful informaton from our > > developmental > > > pediatrican, who we like and comes highly > > recommended. She > > > didn't " see " anything new.) > > > > > > > We haven't noticed anything that you mentioned as > > low tone. And he > > is seeing and occupational therapist through the > > school 4 days a > > week, and she was working at Children's Hospital > > before her position > > there and she hasn't noticed it either. > > > > Is the NACD the one where it has an office in Utah? > > We are possibly > > moving to Salt Lake City for a new job for my > > husband, so perhaps we > > can look into that given that we may have to start > > all over again > > with new resources for my son in UT. > > > > Thanks , > > Right now any information is of help! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ ______________ > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > Find them fast with Search. http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 I haven't met a highly qualified DAN! and both my DANS! are MD's too. The reason they became DAN! doctors was so they could really learn to treat the underlying issues of their patients neurological disorders. To me stress comes from having children that are affected and the peace comes from helping them recover. Recovering them in a year beats years of IEPs, speech therapy, OT etc. However, these therapies are still instrumental in rehabilitation. Personally, I had pediatricians tell me that the chronic diarreah was a toddler thing. Ummmm..no it isn't. I have cared for many toddlers and this was not the norm. I didn't consult my pediatrician when I started feeding my kids all the processed baby cerals, and other snacks, so I didn't find it necessary to get his blessing. I figured I knew best. Now I have two talking, very normal sounding 4 year olds, within 10 months of eating organic fruits, vegetables, and meats. mykitkate wrote: > I'm somewhat confused by DAN! doctor qualifications. It seems that > they do not even have to be MDs!!! Why would a parent completely > change thier child's diet and add or subtract all kinds of > suppliments without the involvement of a medical doctor (it would > seem preferable to seek out a pediatrician of some sort). > > Yujie: Did you start with the suppliments only? Did you add the > diets one at a time? It seems that it would be hard to say what > might have worked individually? Did you consult a MD before removing > foods from your child's diet? > > : If the allergy tests came back normal, why are you still > considering special diets? I think it's great that you are on a > wholesome diet! It would probably do everyone good to eat less > artificial stuff. But, would you consult your pediatrician before > trying any of these diets? > > Definately, mommy instinct should always be on alert. But, why > should we add extra stress to our already complicated lives by > questioning every weird poop (haven't we all had these > occasionally?) If your doctor is telling you thse are normal toddler > things, why not ask other mom's with " normal " toddlers to see if they > have experienced similar things. Then maybe ask mom's of school age > children if their toddlers experienced similar issues, and how long > it took to " grow out of " . > > Just my random thoughts, > > Kate > > >> >> >>> Dear , thanks for your reply. It gives me some >>> things to >>> consider. >>> >>> We are already on a pretty wholesome diet (whole >>> foods) and little or >>> no artificial anything including dyes and others. >>> But what do you >>> mean by " clean diet? " >>> I agree that as time goes on, we may see some >>> additional concerns and >>> frankly I am surprised that there isn't anything >>> else obvious to my >>> untrained eye at the time being. >>> >>> I will say that my son has very soft BMs. We took >>> him to a GI Dr and >>> they said that it was just " toddlers diarreah " (sp?) >>> and that it >>> should pass as he potty trains and can hold his poop >>> in longer. THat >>> and he tends to get red or flushed cheeks often and >>> is the first to >>> get sick in the home and tends to have runny noses a >>> lot, especially >>> in the winter. So I wouldn't be suprised if there >>> was something. All >>> standardized allergy tests have come back normal. >>> Though I was >>> prepared for them to do that, despite that there may >>> be something >>> anyhow. >>> >>> >>>> Because of the above, I think it's malpractice for >>>> >>> a developmental >>> >>>> pediatrician to refuse to see your child because >>>> >>> he " just " has >>> >>>> apraxia! First of all, apraxia is a neurological >>>> >>> condition, which >>> >>>> should be his first tip off that it is a big deal. >>>> >>> Secondly, he is >>> >>>> assuming that all parents are observant and >>>> >>> educated in child >>> >>>> development. That is not true! I detected my >>>> >>> son's low tone by a >>> >>>> parent-friendly tip in " The Late Talker " book: >>>> >>> Does your child >>> feel >>> >>>> heavier than he should for his weight? He did! >>>> >>> So even though my >>> >>>> pediatrician and my very good SLP said he did not >>>> >>> have low tone, I >>> >>>> took him for an OT evaluation. Before the OT even >>>> >>> started the >>> >>>> official evaluation, she said, " I can already tell >>>> >>> he has low tone >>> by >>> >>>> the way he is sitting on the floor. " It had never >>>> >>> even occurred to >>> >>>> me that his weird way of sitting was a >>>> >>> developmental sign. (It >>> >>>> wasn't the obvious, " W " position. It was a wide, >>>> >>> bent-knee >>> straddle >>> >>>> with a right tilt. I've never seen it before or >>>> >>> since on another >>> >>>> child.) For a doctor to assume that parents and >>>> >>> therapists can see >>> >>>> what you need a trained medical doctor to see is >>>> >>> crazy! (That >>> said, >>> >>>> we haven't gotten no useful informaton from our >>>> >>> developmental >>> >>>> pediatrican, who we like and comes highly >>>> >>> recommended. She >>> >>>> didn't " see " anything new.) >>>> >>>> >>> We haven't noticed anything that you mentioned as >>> low tone. And he >>> is seeing and occupational therapist through the >>> school 4 days a >>> week, and she was working at Children's Hospital >>> before her position >>> there and she hasn't noticed it either. >>> >>> Is the NACD the one where it has an office in Utah? >>> We are possibly >>> moving to Salt Lake City for a new job for my >>> husband, so perhaps we >>> can look into that given that we may have to start >>> all over again >>> with new resources for my son in UT. >>> >>> Thanks , >>> Right now any information is of help! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________ > >> Looking for last minute shopping deals? >> Find them fast with Search. >> > http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 for my son, who has autism (non-verbal), we started the diet seriously (whole family) when he was almost five. we did not do the diet in a scientific way, ie, take one " allergic " food source away one at a time. so, you might be right that he might only have the reaction due to the preservatives/colorings/pestcide/MSG/.../ but we achieve what we want, a healthy eater with a regular BM, no more waking up at night screaming, no more bloated tummy and mood swings the diet (and to that extent the supplement) alone is not enough, but it is the foundation, IMO, to a better kid. I don't know how your regular MDs are, but mine are generally two subtypes (as they are basically the same: THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO kind of MDs), one subgroup are sympathetic, listening to what I say/do, and if I want to slow down my younger son's shots, s/he will follow. another subgroup, bascially telling me that I am wasting my time/money as the " mainstream/scientific " world has proven that autism is a multi-gene disorder (one recent doctor's words " <your son's situation is> like you bought a computer, the hardware is bad, no matter what you put through the keyboard, it is not going to change anything, the computer is broken...) my DAN said is right, if she prescribed psychotic drug/stimulant to my son, she is mainstream, because it is approved by FDA, if she gave vitamines, she is out there... so, I don't know why I should trust traditional MDs... yujie ps, my DAN is a MD (pediatrician specialized in ADHD) before she left the mainstream field --- mykitkate <mykitkate@...> wrote: > I'm somewhat confused by DAN! doctor qualifications. > It seems that > they do not even have to be MDs!!! Why would a > parent completely > change thier child's diet and add or subtract all > kinds of > suppliments without the involvement of a medical > doctor (it would > seem preferable to seek out a pediatrician of some > sort). > > Yujie: Did you start with the suppliments only? Did > you add the > diets one at a time? It seems that it would be hard > to say what > might have worked individually? Did you consult a > MD before removing > foods from your child's diet? > > : If the allergy tests came back normal, why > are you still > considering special diets? I think it's great that > you are on a > wholesome diet! It would probably do everyone good > to eat less > artificial stuff. But, would you consult your > pediatrician before > trying any of these diets? > > Definately, mommy instinct should always be on > alert. But, why > should we add extra stress to our already > complicated lives by > questioning every weird poop (haven't we all had > these > occasionally?) If your doctor is telling you thse > are normal toddler > things, why not ask other mom's with " normal " > toddlers to see if they > have experienced similar things. Then maybe ask > mom's of school age > children if their toddlers experienced similar > issues, and how long > it took to " grow out of " . > > Just my random thoughts, > > Kate > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 Hi Kate, Perhaps you didn't read the whole thread? The original poster was following your advice and asking for experienced moms to comment on her personal situation. I responded with our experience, which to sum it up again is " two GI's, an allergist, and our regular pediatrician all said it was normal poop and we have no allergies -- right up until the minute I solved the problem myself overnight with perfectly safe, over-the-counter enzymes. Then the two that I kept in touch with (hated the other two) said, basically, 'great! Don't know why those are working, but they are safe, so go for it.' Since then, we have discovered on our own that artificials and dairy are both problems for our son. " I think this personal information is relevant and was delivered respectfully. Regarding DAN doctors, ours is a well-respected family practitioner medical doctor who has been in practice since the 70's. Check out www.stocktonfp.com if you would like to check his credentials. Every DAN practitioner that I have seen mentioned here is a medical doctor, and I know that because they are well known in the community. While I don't read every post, I think that says something about the choices of the people in this group. Honestly, what kind of bozo goes to a practitioner without knowing their qualifications first? Furthermore, people often get a team of qualified individuals to assist them with specific aspects of the program that has been designed by the medical doctor. For example, Kim, Dr. Freedenfeld's nurse, helps us with how to get the supplements into our child, where we can get prescriptions filled correctly, and always answers my repeat questions like " tell me again why this supplement is recommended? " If we were on one of the more restrictive diets (we're not, because our medical doctor has not deemed this necessary based on his lengthy study of our labwork and medical reports), we would be able to consult with a nutritionist to help us. You know what confuses me? Why your post is full of criticism for other moms and their choices, but offers no solutions or suggestions. Not one dangerous practice was mentioned or suggested, so safety is not a concern. If you know better than us, we would love to hear to your suggestions. You may email me offline or post here. in NJ > > I'm somewhat confused by DAN! doctor qualifications. It seems that > they do not even have to be MDs!!! Why would a parent completely > change thier child's diet and add or subtract all kinds of > suppliments without the involvement of a medical doctor (it would > seem preferable to seek out a pediatrician of some sort). > > Yujie: Did you start with the suppliments only? Did you add the > diets one at a time? It seems that it would be hard to say what > might have worked individually? Did you consult a MD before removing > foods from your child's diet? > > : If the allergy tests came back normal, why are you still > considering special diets? I think it's great that you are on a > wholesome diet! It would probably do everyone good to eat less > artificial stuff. But, would you consult your pediatrician before > trying any of these diets? > > Definately, mommy instinct should always be on alert. But, why > should we add extra stress to our already complicated lives by > questioning every weird poop (haven't we all had these > occasionally?) If your doctor is telling you thse are normal toddler > things, why not ask other mom's with " normal " toddlers to see if they > have experienced similar things. Then maybe ask mom's of school age > children if their toddlers experienced similar issues, and how long > it took to " grow out of " . > > Just my random thoughts, > > Kate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 , " haven't " Was that a typo? > > I'm somewhat confused by DAN! doctor qualifications. It seems that > > they do not even have to be MDs!!! Why would a parent completely > > change thier child's diet and add or subtract all kinds of > > suppliments without the involvement of a medical doctor (it would > > seem preferable to seek out a pediatrician of some sort). > > > > Yujie: Did you start with the suppliments only? Did you add the > > diets one at a time? It seems that it would be hard to say what > > might have worked individually? Did you consult a MD before removing > > foods from your child's diet? > > > > : If the allergy tests came back normal, why are you still > > considering special diets? I think it's great that you are on a > > wholesome diet! It would probably do everyone good to eat less > > artificial stuff. But, would you consult your pediatrician before > > trying any of these diets? > > > > Definately, mommy instinct should always be on alert. But, why > > should we add extra stress to our already complicated lives by > > questioning every weird poop (haven't we all had these > > occasionally?) If your doctor is telling you thse are normal toddler > > things, why not ask other mom's with " normal " toddlers to see if they > > have experienced similar things. Then maybe ask mom's of school age > > children if their toddlers experienced similar issues, and how long > > it took to " grow out of " . > > > > Just my random thoughts, > > > > Kate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 late talkers don't always take years of therapy...some don't even need any because in 75% of the cases it's developmental and they will just start talking. There are also tons of archives from parents who have a child that was diagnosed apraxic or PDD who just did speech therapy and gave fish oils who have children that were mainstreamed and talking fine by kindergarten. It's pretty simple. I don't understand why you feel you need to see a Dan - especially since you say that you haven't met a highly qualified Dan and both your Dan people are MDs (as we know some are not) For those just starting out -here's another Dan who also doesn't appear to be qualified no less highly qualified http://www.kevinleitch.co.uk/wp/?p=584 from Left Brain Right Brain May also want to check this out before you choose a Dan http://www.kevinleitch.co.uk/wp/?p=545 (click on the link " Dan doctors " and then click on US or UK) Again many of us including me never went this route. I only took my children to see highly qualified medical doctors. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 , EXCELLENT response! I could not have said it better. Thank you! Yvette in NJ mom to Alyssa former 23 weeker will be 8 y.o. 3/3/08 FINALLY dx'd this year with high functioning Autism & ADD [ ] Re: question about DAN Dr and Dev Ped. and GFCF Diet (long response) Hi Kate, Perhaps you didn't read the whole thread? The original poster was following your advice and asking for experienced moms to comment on her personal situation. I responded with our experience, which to sum it up again is " two GI's, an allergist, and our regular pediatrician all said it was normal poop and we have no allergies -- right up until the minute I solved the problem myself overnight with perfectly safe, over-the-counter enzymes. Then the two that I kept in touch with (hated the other two) said, basically, 'great! Don't know why those are working, but they are safe, so go for it.' Since then, we have discovered on our own that artificials and dairy are both problems for our son. " I think this personal information is relevant and was delivered respectfully. Regarding DAN doctors, ours is a well-respected family practitioner medical doctor who has been in practice since the 70's. Check out www.stocktonfp.com if you would like to check his credentials. Every DAN practitioner that I have seen mentioned here is a medical doctor, and I know that because they are well known in the community. While I don't read every post, I think that says something about the choices of the people in this group. Honestly, what kind of bozo goes to a practitioner without knowing their qualifications first? Furthermore, people often get a team of qualified individuals to assist them with specific aspects of the program that has been designed by the medical doctor. For example, Kim, Dr. Freedenfeld's nurse, helps us with how to get the supplements into our child, where we can get prescriptions filled correctly, and always answers my repeat questions like " tell me again why this supplement is recommended? " If we were on one of the more restrictive diets (we're not, because our medical doctor has not deemed this necessary based on his lengthy study of our labwork and medical reports), we would be able to consult with a nutritionist to help us. You know what confuses me? Why your post is full of criticism for other moms and their choices, but offers no solutions or suggestions. Not one dangerous practice was mentioned or suggested, so safety is not a concern. If you know better than us, we would love to hear to your suggestions. You may email me offline or post here. in NJ > > I'm somewhat confused by DAN! doctor qualifications. It seems that > they do not even have to be MDs!!! Why would a parent completely > change thier child's diet and add or subtract all kinds of > suppliments without the involvement of a medical doctor (it would > seem preferable to seek out a pediatrician of some sort). > > Yujie: Did you start with the suppliments only? Did you add the > diets one at a time? It seems that it would be hard to say what > might have worked individually? Did you consult a MD before removing > foods from your child's diet? > > : If the allergy tests came back normal, why are you still > considering special diets? I think it's great that you are on a > wholesome diet! It would probably do everyone good to eat less > artificial stuff. But, would you consult your pediatrician before > trying any of these diets? > > Definately, mommy instinct should always be on alert. But, why > should we add extra stress to our already complicated lives by > questioning every weird poop (haven't we all had these > occasionally?) If your doctor is telling you thse are normal toddler > things, why not ask other mom's with " normal " toddlers to see if they > have experienced similar things. Then maybe ask mom's of school age > children if their toddlers experienced similar issues, and how long > it took to " grow out of " . > > Just my random thoughts, > > Kate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 YEP a typo! Should have read that I haven't met a DAN! that was not highly qualified! Thanks ! bigcheech91 wrote: > , > > " haven't " Was that a typo? > > > > > >> I haven't met a highly qualified DAN! and both my DANS! are MD's >> > too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 " especially since you say that you haven't met a highly qualified Dan and both your Dan people are MDs (as we know some are not) " This was a typo! It should have read " All the DANS! I met have been highly qualified. " My DANS! are MDs and this is true. Why do I choose DANS!? I take my kids to them for the same reason I take my son to see a hs pediatric cardiologist. Specialists. I never just dismiss anything as just developmental delay. From years of studying children with developmental delays, there is usually an underlying condition that should be addressed. Usually it is metabolic. But I want to know more than what, I want to know why. And I also want to fix that why. I worked with doctors in Japan for many years that were not called DANS but basically addressed the problem from the bottom up like our DAN doctors. I learned how important it was to do this. Another point about using regualar MDs verses DAN! MDs, is that NOT ONE regular MD or pediatrician ever told me about supplementing with fish oils. They took on the wait and see approach. NOT GOOD. However, in contrast, both DAN! MDs suggested the fish oil supplements first. So that alone should give you some faith in these people verses regular MDs or Peds. They also said don't wait on therapy and push and push until you get what you need for your child. Both our DAN! MDs push for the therapy but take the slow and steady route for diet and supplements. If I felt the fish oils were enough for my guys then that is where I would stop. But for me, it is not enough. For other kids, it may be. I really don't want to look back and have any regrets. The first supplement I used with my kids was the fish oils. My one son had a terrible reaction to it. He became very spacey and disconnected. Everyone thought he was having absent seizures. It scared me a bit. I took him off of it and waited and it happened again. We have now reintroduced it and so far, so good. But my kids had gut issues. They were pale and thin with dark circles. Although cherbuic in personality, they were not in features. Now that the gut issues are so much better, the oils seem to be tolerated. I know lots of kids that had a dx of apraxia. I also know that they, through some EI gained speech and are indistinguable from their peers. I have one myself that is now 13. Late talker. Only jibberish by 3. He had diet interventions which we only did for about two years and the early NACD therapy. He is smart, calm, loving, and very athletic. I also know that he has struggled with gut issues for a number of years after his diet became more westernized. His issues were not as obvious as my twins.Until I finally addressed his gut issues this year through diet, this boy had been overweight despite rigorous exercise everday. He is now a healthy weight and feels so much better. He still has his cherubic face. A few other boys on my sons hockey team were also late talkers and they did well with just speech therapy. However, I can't shake from my mind that two suffer from chronic bladder infections and and one from asthma. It doesn't sit right with me. And this summer, a dear friend lost her eight year old daughter to lymphoma. She once had a dx of childhood apraxia and then diagnosed, once she gained speech, with high functioning autism. There are too many dots that connect and not to mention the strong association with apraxic children and a parent with celiac disease or another autoimmune disorder. As far as bad DANS!, I think it goes without saying that in every profession, you will find the good, the bad and the ugly. So pointing out DANS that are questionable is not reasonable. There have been many highly educated MDs that have had questionable practises. We both know that there are too many of them to list. Does my DAN! call the shots. NO! In the end, I do. I have decided that no one will tell me what to do with my children. I decide in the end They order tests and guide me, but I, and only I, decide what is best for my kids. I also want to point out that many of the children on this board have more than just apraxia. These people may be helped tremendously by a DAN! MD. You should definitely encourage parents to talk to their pediatricians about the fish oils although I am sure they would get a better response from a DAN! MD. Most parents can get to a very reputable DAN! through other boards that have had experience with many of them. I always see a list of recommendations. Its awesome. However, I do not take my children to any doctor, be it an MD, pediatrician, cardiologist, unless I have researched about them. If I meet them, I usually know if they are right for my kids and if not, I don't go back. And the bottom line to the question as to why /*I */use a DAN! MD, is because my mommy gut tells me to.. Thats all.... . kiddietalk wrote: > late talkers don't always take years of therapy...some don't > even need any because in 75% of the cases it's developmental and they > will just start talking. There are also tons of archives from > parents who have a child that was diagnosed apraxic or PDD who just > did speech therapy and gave fish oils who have children that were > mainstreamed and talking fine by kindergarten. It's pretty > simple. > > I don't understand why you feel you need to see a Dan - > especially since you say that you haven't met a highly qualified Dan > and both your Dan people are MDs (as we know some are not) > > For those just starting out -here's another Dan who also doesn't > appear to be qualified no less highly qualified > http://www.kevinleitch.co.uk/wp/?p=584 from Left Brain Right Brain > > May also want to check this out before you choose a Dan > http://www.kevinleitch.co.uk/wp/?p=545 > (click on the link " Dan doctors " and then click on US or UK) > > Again many of us including me never went this route. I only took my > children to see highly qualified medical doctors. > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 I have said that if the basics didn't work I probably would have explored more for Tanner and that included seeing a Dan medical doctor. What bothers me is that any time anyone brings up the down sides- such as the lack of consistency in that anyone can be called a Dan doctor -the expense some complain they can't afford -the complexity -the few on board who follow this approach vehemently defend it almost blindly to what is posted. It was like when I first posted here about the death of that little boy from chelation... instead of horror about it and sadness -the Dan fans posted a slew of emails defending Dan! A child is dead and where was the compassion?!! (it's in the archives) When a speech pathologist is bad -we don't defend speech pathology - we try to help and advise the parent and her child. Also if a speech pathologist hurts a child he or she would be reported and probably lose their license. I've been posting a website that is strong on the other side which I did not write which lists concerns -it includes the above point and to the extreme. Please feel free to debate what's on the other side as we should all be open minded even if we don't agree with all that is said. As parents who use this approach I would guess you'd want to know what it says -as it also advises whom to avoid. What I've said is that most here did not need to go to a more complex expensive route as a fact. But for those that do and it helps them, or they believe it helps -great. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 I really can't handle this misinformation. In 2005 there was a boy who died from an IV push where the wrong drug was administered. Human error. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which also investigated the boy's death, has said he was given a synthetic amino acid called Disodium EDTA instead of Calcium Disodium EDTA. Both are odorless, colorless liquids and may have been confused. Chelation did not cause this child's death. A very unfortunate medical error was to blame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 It's pretty > simple. I find that statement a bit too simple. NOTHING about apraxia, speech therapy and raising a delayed child is simple. > > I don't understand why you feel you need to see a Dan - > especially since you say that you haven't met a highly qualified Dan > and both your Dan people are MDs (as we know some are not) > Yikes. I am so glad I found this board many moons ago BEFORE I did the DAn thing. 7 months of speech made minimal gains and now 3 months of DAN have augmented that and brought us ever so close to NT. And I have one of those " DAN people who is NOT an MD. " Perhaps she learns so much by osmosis and just spending time with Dr Bock, Dr Neubrander and others. > Again many of us including me never went this route. I only took my > children to see highly qualified medical doctors. > My highly qualified medical doctors ( " best in the state! " ) gave my son continuous, unnecessary rounds of antibiotics that ruined his gut, never once made me feel validated when I talked about a speech delay and poo-pooed me when I said I wanted to call Early Intervention ( " well, its available if you really think you need it " ) Even though I didn't need referrals to specialists, I was told he didn't need an ENT and had to ask firmly for their suggestion. Some people may never understand why I pushed and pushed til I got what I felt my son needed. Some people may never understand " me " for always waiting for that 'other shoe' (autism) to drop. Some people may never " see " what I saw in my son that made the hair on the back of my neck stand up. But I truly don't care. I'm a little offended by that response. While some may not believe the DAN protocol would work, and true, it has not worked for every child, why discredit it so summarily? I feel that we gave our son all the necessary tools and he did the best he could with him. DAn has done volumes for him and its something he does along with ST. He happens to have thrived MORe on DAn than on ST, but I'm not discrediting ST nor am I removing it from his regime. I would have thought that with all the attention to and advance with developmental delays, conceding that there are various ways to treat and work with a child that could actually work. Lord knows we have enough documentation on this board alone for all kinds of stuff. Tina in NJ On a mission for (2 1/2) Questing for better health for Jack (6) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.