Guest guest Posted August 4, 2001 Report Share Posted August 4, 2001 I received a private query about sucralose. I thought it might be beneficial to post the answer for the benefit of all newbies. Sucralose is sold in supermarkets now and is under the brand name Splenda. It is the sweetner of choice for cronies. It's sold loose by the box or in packets just like sugar or other artifical sweetners. Zero calories and considered safe for consumption. (Warren , on the main list, buys it in bulk for those who want to order large quantities). That said, many of us don't use a lot of it in recipes but might use fruit or allfruit type preserves instead to add extra nutrients. I prefer: unsweetened applesauce, blueberry allfruit (no sugar), or very ripe bananas for sweetners in dessert recipes (See the archives for Chessy poo cake recipe for example). For coffee and tea, I do use Splenda. For other desserts I buy non-sugar ice cream (now available with Healthy Choice and Edy's) and non-sugar ice pops (about 7 cal) (I only eat a small amt of ice cream a day) and I chew non-sugar gum (zero cal) for a sweet craving when I need to. The non-sugar gum is highly recommended to get you through to mealtime and for a sweet tooth. Lately I'm finding green tea (hot or iced) with a bit of Splenda (you only need a bit as Splenda quite sweet) helps before meals to give me a full feeling. Again zero calories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2005 Report Share Posted January 31, 2005 What is the evidence of any danger? Sounds like a scare tactic to get consumers back buying SUGAR which is dangerous to good health. (I'd be surprised if there wasn't sugar industry money behind the suits.) Since when has marketing ever had anything to do with reality? JR -----Original Message----- From: Rodney [mailto:perspect1111@...] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 4:46 PM Subject: [ ] Splenda/Sucralose jfi " J & J Faces Lawsuits Over Splenda Marketing Monday, January 31, 2005 WASHINGTON — & (JNJ) is facing a raft of lawsuits over a marketing campaign related to its artificial sweetener Splenda, which accuse the company of misleading buyers to believe Splenda is a natural product. Splenda, which has enjoyed rapid sales growth on the back of a boom in low-carbohydrate eating in the last couple of years, is marketed by J & J's McNeil Nutritionals Worldwide division with the line: " Splenda No Calorie Sweetener is made from sugar, so it tastes like sugar. " But the Sugar Association says the marketing pitch does not accurately reflect the end product and is misleading because it gives the impression that Splenda contains natural sugar. McNeil faces three class-action suits from individuals, one from the Sugar Association and one from Merisant Worldwide Inc, the maker of rival low-calorie sweetener products including Equal and Canderel. " & is misinforming consumers about the reality of the chlorinated product Splenda, " said , counsel for the Sugar Association, whose lawsuit seeks aunspecified damages, a nationwide injunction and corrective advertising. " We feel the public needs to be aware that Splenda is an artificial chemical sweetener. Splenda is created with chlorine, and the final product does not have sugar in it, " he said. Splenda's Web Site (http://www.splenda.com) says the product is made " through a patented process that starts with sugar and converts it to a no calorie, noncarbohydrate sweetener. The process selectively replaces three hydrogen-oxygen groups on the sugar molecule with three chlorine atoms. " A spokeswoman for McNeil Nutritional told Reuters that the lawsuits had no merit. " Consumers are utilizing no-calorie sweeteners versus other sweeteners like sugar, and you would have to draw your own conclusions about why now these efforts are being launched. " said Neufang, director of communications for McNeil, " We have never represented Splenda as being natural, " she said. Splenda has just over 50 percent of the U.S. market for low calorie sweeteners, based on dollar volume, according to data collected by IRI and made available to Reuters by McNeil. It is used in products which include Kool-Aid Jammers 10 tropical Punch drink, produced by Kraft Foods. " Obviously, any organization that represents the sugar growers of the world would like to have people know what they are buying when they are buying a sweetener, " said Dan Collister, attorney at Squire, and Dempsey, acting for the Sugar Association. Separately, the Texas Consumer Association said on Monday it had asked the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to investigate the Splenda marketing campaign. " With consumers across the country concerned about their health and trying to eat more natural foods, it is alarming that McNeil is engaged in an underhanded campaign to confuse consumers into believing Splenda is natural, " commented Haverlah, president of the Texas Consumer Association. Haverlah said she was working with the Consumer Federation Network and was not associated with the groups bringing suits against Splenda. No one from Merisant was available for comment. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.