Guest guest Posted April 27, 2003 Report Share Posted April 27, 2003 Hi , Could you please look at 38611 and 38616 and comment. And I have one more question since I posted the above. We just started chelating (Round 1 this weekend) and I was wondering if we needed to stop chelating when we introduce a new enzyme? I was looking at the site as to what to expect when you start a new enzyme and it seemed that some of the reactions you see with enzymes could be the same if you were chelating, ie increased stimming. Thank you for your thoughts and take care, Becky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2003 Report Share Posted April 28, 2003 >>> Could you please look at 38611 and 38616 and comment. These two are different threads. Is this correct? I will start with 38611 and these questions below. The other replies were good, so just add this on for further info. >>>since a pediatrician said the peptides test were inaccurate. Correct. Even Dr. Tim Buie said to skip 'em. Just eliminate the food and see if the person gets better. Eliminate it for one month (for any food). If there is no positive change, put it back and go on to the next one you suspect. He also said that it was important to challenge ANY food eliminated every 6 months. Dairy and grains should not be singled out as either more problematic or less problematic than any other foods. People get too hung up on the casein and gluten. You should consider other foods equally for reactions: corn, potatoes, oils, beets, etc. Whatever you eat the most of can cause you to be sensitized to it (and not tolerate it)...but the gut can heal or the nerves can become de-sensitized within 6 months, and so challenging is good. It is important to keep a variety of foods in the diet, not just do mostly all soy, or all rice, or all of anything. His talk was mostly on the nerve physiology of the gut and how symptoms can actually be due to sensory issues (what needs to be addressed) and not food reactions/'allergies' (not elimining tons of food on end). >>>We recently had the peptide test done and it came out negative for casein and gluten despite three minor infractions last year (communion at church.) These tests are inaccurate to begin with. >>>One of Dana's or 's post stated that not all kids need to be on the diet, Right. Some people with autism don't have any gut problems or digestion problems at all. Of those that do, people might be helped by any number of diets, nothing particular makes GFCF stand out over others. Some people get really ill on GFCF...so it isn't a 100% safe alternative...and there are no long-term studies on the effects of this. I don't think it is astronomically more of a risk than others, but it definitely isn't risk-free for everyone. >>>>so my question is, what is the indication (medical tests, and/or behavioral signs) that one should be on the diet, therefore one should take enzymes to try to get off the diet? There aren't any concrete ones that apply for everyone. No tests. In fact, my son that responded well to eliminating dairy, and did fabulous on Peptizyde never showed any digestive problems at all ever in his life. My Gut Son had terrible gut problems with stuff coming out all over the place, but his behavior was relatively acceptable or just mildly intolerable. Either behavior and/or physical signs are valid, in my view, because individuals just expresss discomfort or physical problems differently. One note: Try to not think of enzymes as exactly like diet. Enzymes end up doing much more than simply food breakdown, and they are probably affecting various components of health at the same time. Many people note responding to a diet do really well with enzymes. On the other hand, even with regular enzyme use, some people still need to adjust or follow a diet. So it isn't an exact exchange. >>>If I did not see any behavioral changes does that mean that the diet is not working or should I take it that since his stools are softer, the diet is working?? Either of these is valid - physical or behavioral. I would say that since you saw all that change mentioned earlier (but I didn't copy here), food has an effect on your son and at least some of the changes were positive. Given that looking at diet and/or enzymes would be worthwhile to pursue. >>>He suggested No-Fenol since it has a tendency to loosen the stools Fiber digesting enzymes such what No-Fenol contains, and proteases like Peptizyde favor this. >>>Should I increase the No-Fenol to 1 capsule at each meal? You can certainly try this. I would. It sounds as though things are going in the right direction. My son who has all the elimination problems did improve on No-Fenol in this way. >>>therefore can I use the No-Fenol instead of the GFCF diet? No. The GFCF diet targets proteins and starches (casein and gluten are the specific proteins in question) and No-Fenol targets fibers. Totally different substances. Only Peptizyde is used regularly instead of the GFCF diet, and it does a fine job for most people. A few people still need to stay on the diet for unknown reasons. >>>Devin mentioned that the other enzymes (ZP and AFP) had the carbohydrate enzymes in them so may not be a benefit for our son but suggested Peptizyde. What would be the benefit of adding Peptizyde? Would that help to get him off the GFCF? Yes. Peptizyde tackles the proteins, casein and gluten and is a good replacement for the GFCF diet for most people. >>> I guess I am wondering if the GFCF didn't have much of an effect on him, does he really have a problem with digesting gluten and casein? The GFCF diet is not an exact indicator of whether you have an problem digesting gluten and casein. I will explain what I mean. You might try a GFCF diet and see improvement for reasons besides the casein molecule, or the gluten protein molecule. Eliminating dairy may help you because you are lactose intolerant (not casein), or have high histamine (dairy may increase histamine levels), or cannot digest coal-tar (a preservative in dairy added vitamin palmitate A), or one of the other proteins or components of milk. You might actually have a problem with digesting carbohydrates in general. Taking out dairy and grains may reduce the total carb low in the person's diet. Many people going GFCF are actually reducing prime sources of barley malt which is the problem, or drastically reducing artificial colorings and flavorings by default. On the other hand, about 50% of people seeing no improvement, or nothing significant, do quite well and see great success with Peptizyde. Or they might try another diet, see little or no results, and do very well with other enzymes. >>>>How long does it take for an intolerance/reaction to show up after reintroducing gluten and/or casein? Depends on the person and food. For my son a dairy reaction emerged 2-3 hours later (like clockwork) in the form of migraine pain. For my younger son, a reaction was constipation the next day or two. >>>And I have one more question since I posted the above. We just started chelating (Round 1 this weekend) and I was wondering if we needed to stop chelating when we introduce a new enzyme? I don't feel one does...in fact, it would be better to keep with whatever you are doing and concentrate on the chelation. That has enough side-effects as it is. The enzymes may help support the body and provide nutrition during chelation. If supplements in chelation schemes are taken orally the enzymes may help the body maximize them (help them be absorbed better). It may also enhance elimination and so help toxins leaving the body. Many of the chelation agents do not draw the enzymes through the stomach of small intestine so the interaction is minimal if it happens ever. >>>>I was looking at the site as to what to expect when you start a new enzyme and it seemed that some of the reactions you see with enzymes could be the same if you were chelating, ie increased stimming. I would same that same. When you start enzymes, you are not only starting a process of releasing more nutrients into the body (food digestion and absorption), but you are enhancing the cleaning out of waste, inflammation, pathogens, and toxins - so there might be a detox reaction. Chelation is essentially a detox reaction as well. Inability to process phenols is a 'detox' process. Yeast and bacteria die-off are detoxing. All of these tend to have the same set of possible reactions to them. Granted the toxins and exact mechanisms are different, but you might see a similar pattern of reactions in a person. Does this help, or only confuse the issue more? The summary response would be: Try Peptizyde with the No-Fenol...off the GFCF diet if you are already off. After that, you can try taking out first dairy, and then grains and see if there is any more improvement. If you are on the GFCF now, still try Peptizyde and No-Fenol, then slowly trial with dairy and then gluten and see if the improvements hold. Some people get much better with dairy and grains in the diet, so that is a possibility too. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.