Guest guest Posted July 8, 2003 Report Share Posted July 8, 2003 Would love to hear what ARI sends you in response. I'm sure Rimland and Pangborn are writing up another " Danger " " Fraud " " scam " " harmful " " Intolerable! " article as we speak. You should get your child what helps him, Rose. > I thought it might be interesting to ask ARI about the Phenol Assist, > given their dirty-doings last year, and I recall they had hyper > charges against No-Fenol on their website last time I checked. Now I > can't find that. Did they remove it? If so, it's obvious they got the > point. I stopped subscribing to the ARI newsletter after they > published a warning on No-Fenol, as what they were saying was that > you would put your child at terrible risk to even try the product. > Anyway, I thought I would demand that they make an retraction to the > damage they did to Devin, or to denounce Kirkman's in similar > fashion, but can't find any current information on their website. If > I am just not locating it, please inform. I think Rimland and > Panghorn should be called on this.... > > I must add that No-Fenol unfortunately was not tolerated by my child. > However, I did not find it any more or less problematic than B-6 or B- > 5-P, which also causes terrible reactions. I just thought the ARI > should be called on it, and really hated what they did in respect to > this. > > ly--and don't throw eggs--I am intrigued enough with the phenol > companion to give it a try. I also now try to avoid Kirkman's because > of the sad chapter, but am still trying to get something to help my > son... If it help, I'll probably try to duplicate the ingredients > rather than buy from them. > > Rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.