Guest guest Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 Did anyone else see Imus this morning? Apparently, the Wall Street Journal has written a not so nice article about his ranch. Imus was furious and going on about 'what could the motive of such lies possibly be'. Admittedly, I now am a chronic conspiracy theorist, but does this bother anyone else? Could there be a conspiracy to smear and discredit Imus for his recent autism/vaccine advocacy and awareness campaign? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 I thought the same thing... things that make you go hummmmmm............... I am sure it is! > Did anyone else see Imus this morning? Apparently, the Wall Street > Journal > has written a > not so nice article about his ranch. Imus was furious and going on about > 'what could the motive of such lies possibly be'. Admittedly, I now am a > chronic conspiracy theorist, but does > this bother anyone else? Could there be a conspiracy to smear and > discredit > Imus for his > recent autism/vaccine advocacy and awareness campaign? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 I thought that too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 me three. > > I thought that too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 What did the WSJ article say about Imus' ranch? wrote: >Did anyone else see Imus this morning? Apparently, the Wall Street Journal >has written a >not so nice article about his ranch. Imus was furious and going on about >'what could the motive of such lies possibly be'. Admittedly, I now am a >chronic conspiracy theorist, but does >this bother anyone else? Could there be a conspiracy to smear and discredit >Imus for his >recent autism/vaccine advocacy and awareness campaign? > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 > What did the WSJ article say about Imus' ranch? > > http://money.cnn.com/2005/03/24/news/newsmakers/imus/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 Don could be getting some political pay-backs for defending us " powerless " parents. You also have to figure that there are hungry groups of what I call NPO jackels that love to raid high-dollar charities in the same sort of way that gangsters used to bump people in running the " victimless " numbers rackets off. The NPO jackels have all kinds of connections in government and they know all the laws and legal loopholes that work to their benefit. They beat things to death and are ruthlessly evil. Once they smear and discredit the founders they move in and destroy the " movement " turning it into a useless administration money pit. SEE APOSTASY. [ ] Imus and Wall Street Journal Did anyone else see Imus this morning? Apparently, the Wall Street Journal has written a not so nice article about his ranch. Imus was furious and going on about 'what could the motive of such lies possibly be'. Admittedly, I now am a chronic conspiracy theorist, but does this bother anyone else? Could there be a conspiracy to smear and discredit Imus for his recent autism/vaccine advocacy and awareness campaign? ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 In addition to being in my opinion somewhat of a stretch of available facts, I find it interesting that a quick phone call to Eliot Spitzer's office, which this article desperately needed for credibility purposes, might have made this entire piece a moot point. To me, it read like a writer under deadline pressure desperately trying to make a point, but not having enough substantiated facts in hand to support it. And like most of us in the autism community, I rarely take anybody's word for it these days, not doctor nor reporter. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 > > In addition to being in my opinion somewhat of a stretch of available > facts, I find it interesting that a quick phone call to Eliot > Spitzer's office, which this article desperately needed for > credibility purposes, might have made this entire piece a moot point. > To me, it read like a writer under deadline pressure desperately > trying to make a point, but not having enough substantiated facts in > hand to support it. And like most of us in the autism community, I > rarely take anybody's word for it these days, not doctor nor reporter. > > Bill Last August, GSK, the second largest pharmaceutical company, settled a suit filed by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, alleging the company failed to publish negative studies about unapproved use of its antidepressant Paxil. Merck & Co. announced in September that it was pulling Vioxx from the market because of double the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients taking the drug for more than 18 months. The Vioxx recall was the largest drug recall by a drug company of all time. Spitzer just filed suit against Merck, I dont think Spitzer had anything to do with this, I think the wall street journal is desperate to discredit Imus for reporting on thimerosal. Imus came to our rescue, we need to come to his. Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.