Andy or anybody: DDI hair 2005 and 2003

[Guest guest]

http://www.kindreason.com/hair2005.jpg

http://www.kindreason.com/hair2003.jpg

Would somebody, Andy or anybody, interpret my

son's hair results from Doctor's Data.

The 2003 file is at the beginning of biomedical

2 years ago.

The 2005 file is after 14 rounds of Andy protocol

DMSA and 2 years of biomedical interventions.

In 2003 the cooper is off the scale. It's very

normal in 2005

In 2005 calcium is very low.

What is the meaning of all this?

[Guest guest]

Hi:

Both tests have the suspicious look to them. In 2003 the mercury was

high, compared with what these kids usually show. Also the usual

suspects like Aluminum were high.

Biomedical treatments are going to help your child a lot but unless

you chelate, nothing will get the mercury out. So it seems to me

that 14 rounds are not enough to remove suficient mercury to show

good mineral transport, under this conditions I don't know how

representative of the body stores these resutls are, and I am not

surprised the test looks suspicious, with all those minerals in the

low areas. I am not sure how much specific information can you take

out of this test except that if you have noticed improvement whith

chelation, it may be your best bet to continue it.

Warmly,

Raquel

> http://www.kindreason.com/hair2005.jpg

>

> http://www.kindreason.com/hair2003.jpg

>

> Would somebody, Andy or anybody, interpret my

> son's hair results from Doctor's Data.

>

> The 2003 file is at the beginning of biomedical

> 2 years ago.

>

> The 2005 file is after 14 rounds of Andy protocol

> DMSA and 2 years of biomedical interventions.

>

> In 2003 the cooper is off the scale. It's very

> normal in 2005

>

> In 2005 calcium is very low.

>

> What is the meaning of all this?

>

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks, Raquel.

Oh yeah, we're not anywhere done with chelation.

I just thought I'd ask about this new test. We'll

being doing that for at least 2 years and maybe

more.

Thank you very much for this feedback.

--- eugui6 <raquelerro@...> wrote:

> Hi:

>

> Both tests have the suspicious look to them. In 2003

> the mercury was

> high, compared with what these kids usually show.

> Also the usual

> suspects like Aluminum were high.

>

> Biomedical treatments are going to help your child a

> lot but unless

> you chelate, nothing will get the mercury out. So it

> seems to me

> that 14 rounds are not enough to remove suficient

> mercury to show

> good mineral transport, under this conditions I

> don't know how

> representative of the body stores these resutls are,

> and I am not

> surprised the test looks suspicious, with all those

> minerals in the

> low areas. I am not sure how much specific

> information can you take

> out of this test except that if you have noticed

> improvement whith

> chelation, it may be your best bet to continue it.

>

> Warmly,

>

> Raquel

>

>

> > http://www.kindreason.com/hair2005.jpg

> >

> > http://www.kindreason.com/hair2003.jpg

> >

> > Would somebody, Andy or anybody, interpret my

> > son's hair results from Doctor's Data.

> >

> > The 2003 file is at the beginning of biomedical

> > 2 years ago.

> >

> > The 2005 file is after 14 rounds of Andy protocol

> > DMSA and 2 years of biomedical interventions.

> >

> > In 2003 the cooper is off the scale. It's very

> > normal in 2005

> >

> > In 2005 calcium is very low.

> >

> > What is the meaning of all this?

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>