Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 Just making sure you were aware that i was " kidding " . I couldn't resist the name....lol Oh!!!! > > I do believe the cat thing is going to stir up as much > > controversy as the Dr Maeses thing.. > > > > > > > SPONSORD LINKS > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2005 Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 YES AND I SAID I WOULD CONTINUE TO RETAIN THE NAME BUT WOULD LIMIT MY EXPERT ADVICE TO PERSONAL EMAILS. CATMAMA Robin <robinreed@...> wrote: Just making sure you were aware that i was "kidding". I couldn't resist the name....lol Oh!!!!> > I do believe the cat thing is going to stir up as much> > controversy as the Dr Maeses thing..> > > > > > > Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 Here--here! Robin thanks for the feline support. Catmama Robin <robinreed@...> wrote: I guess that when the title refers to 'CATS' you should skip it if it irritates you so much. We were all being helpful to someone who asked for help. I thought that this site was for support, and not just for lap-band, although I would agree that a majority of it should be. But I myself, have learned alot of things about cats that I did not even know. And had all of the mesagges been pm'd I never would have known. Maybe some of those NON-CAT owners will see that a feline is a great non-judgemental companion to help you through the good & the bad times as well. So I guess what I am saying is....if you read the messages that specifically state 'cat' in them, and you feel like you need to hack up a hairball, then you deserve it! But don't take it out on the few people who had knowledge of cats, and tried to be helpful in here just because you failed to read the message content header. > Does anyone who has a cat realize how boring it is to read ,,read,,read,,about everybody's cat if you don't have a cat..Can't the cat talk be done privatly..I am soooo saturated by cat stories I think I may cough up a hair ball!!!> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:46:44 -0700 (PDT)> From: carla pundsack <bighotcatmama@y...>> Subject: Re: Re: Cats for Jody/cat tales> > > I prefer male cats to females too. My cat Patches who had a lot of Siamese blood was a howler and she even climbed the living room drapes when she went in to heat. We had to have her spayed right away. She always seemed to be emotioanlly distraught. and two other ..... Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 I agree --I'm as curious as a cat (uh-oh) about that. Catmama " D. Pifferrer" <flor_bellas@...> wrote: What was the Dr. Maeses thing? From: bradshawtravels@...Reply- To: Subject: Re: Digest Number 346Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 18:37:49 EDT Oh!!!! I do believe the cat thing is going to stir up as much controversy as the Dr Maeses thing.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 Same here, I have cats, but I =am on here to read about the lap band and with so many of us it is hard to find the articles that have meaning, can ya'll please email privately if you are talking about other stuff then the band. Thanks can't keep up with the important emails alone. much less all the other ones thrown in. Tracie B. Re: Re: Cats for Jody/cat talesI prefer male cats to females too. My cat Patches who had a lot of Siamese blood was a howler and she even climbed the living room drapes when she went in to heat. We had to have her spayed right away. She always seemed to be emotioanlly distraught. and two other .... SINCERELY,ROSALIE CODY __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Hi: Someone had mentioned they purchased the Rampopo (sp) beer at Whole Foods in the East Bay. Have you tried it? Do you like it? Please advise, Louise --- wrote: > There are 10 messages in this issue. > > Topics in this digest: > > 1. Absorption tests > From: Rohlfs > <kellyr@...> > 2. Re: food co-ops etc. > From: Rohlfs > <kellyr@...> > 3. GLUTEN FREE BAKERY > From: " gfbakery " <gfbakery@...> > 4. Re: Spice coffee shop > From: " M. Mulrooney " > <@...> > 5. Re: food co-ops etc. > From: " Rosie " <coopertr@...> > 6. Re: Celiac Disease & Nephrotic Syndrome > From: Dan Pollak <dan.apo@...> > 7. Re: Re: Celiac Disease & Nephrotic Syndrome > From: " Rosie " <coopertr@...> > 8. Re: Re: Celiac Disease & Nephrotic Syndrome > From: flatcat9@... > 9. RE: Absorption tests > From: " Barella " > <lisabarella@...> > 10. Statement from Kupper - Executive > Director - Gluten Intolerance Group > From: " M. " > <@...> > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:18:21 -0800 > From: Rohlfs <kellyr@...> > Subject: Absorption tests > > , > The other test is a urine test that measure xylose. > I found info on xylose > at > http://www.innvista.com/health/nutrition/essensug/xylose.htm > > > > At 05:21 PM 2/16/2006, Barella wrote: > >Sharon, > >Just got back from Stanford in December and met > with Dr. Gray and Dr. > >Plye there to have another biopsy. Dr. Pyle issued > a fecal fat tests, a > >test that measures the amount of fat in your stool > over a 72 hour period. > >You have to consume 80-100 grams of fat per day and > go to the bathroom in a > >bucket for 3 days. This was my 3rd test (like > this) so it is not that hard > >to do and well worth it. The fat grams in the > sttol are quantified and then > >if you are less than 7.5 (some say 5.0 grams) then > you are considered to be > >NORMALLY absorbing. Remember, if you are loosing > lots of fat then you are > >loosing fat soluable vitamins and minerals. Let me > know if that helps. > > > >--------------------------------------------------------- > > A. Barella > >Ph.D. Student in Exercise & Sport Psychology > >Graduate Research and Teaching Assistant > >Department of Exercise and Sport Science > >The University of North Carolina at Greensboro > >Room 250 HHP Building > >Greensboro, NC 27402 > >Email: lisabarella@... > >Phone/Cell (with VM): (336) 253-5539 > >Fax: (336) 545-4486 > > > > " There are two primary choices in life: to accept > conditions as they exist, > >or accept the responsbility for changing them " - > Denis Waitley > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Sharon Wood <swoodsf@...> > > >Reply- > > > > > >Subject: RE: [ ] View of the McD's > issue from a celiac expert > > >Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:52:06 -0800 (PST) > > > > > >How are absorption rates tested, and is that > something we should ask for > > >regularly? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Sharon Wood > > > > > >Newbury <pknewbury@...> wrote: > > > A couple of years ago the Celiac Sprue > Research Foundation at > > >Stanford University was doing preliminary tests > to determine the best way > > >to find out if celiacs had been affected by > gluten. An incidental finding > > >was that most of the celiacs whose absorption was > tested while they were on > > >a strict GF diet had slightly below-normal > absorption. In other words, > > >their intestines were not absorbing nutrients as > well as an average person. > > > This is expected in celiacs who are consuming > gluten, but the assumption > > >before had been that absorption would return to > normal after a period of > > >years on the GF diet; for unknown reasons, these > celiacs, while greatly > > >improved, had not returned completely to normal. > Interestingly, they also > > >found that the first sign of gluten-exposure was > lowered absorption rates. > > > > > > Keep in mind that this was a small sample and > that they weren't studying > > >this particular phenomenon; this was just an > interesting result that Dr. > > >Gray mentioned in his speech at the conference a > couple of years ago. I > > >would truly like to see more research done on > this subject; I think it > > >raises interesting issues for celiacs. > > > > > > Let me know if you have further questions. > > > > > > Pam Newbury > > >Santa Cruz Celiac Support Group > > >831-423-6904 > > >pknewbury@... > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > >From: > > >[mailto: ]On Behalf > Of flatcat9@... > > >Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 11:57 AM > > > > > >Subject: Re: [ ] View of the McD's > issue from a celiac expert > > > > > > > > >Pam, I'm sorry, but I don't understand. Can you > rephrase so I can follow > > >properly? > > >H. > > >In a message dated 2/12/06 8:13:45 AM, > pknewbury@... writes: > > > > > > > > > One issue that is important to consider in > this is that celiacs who > > >strictly adhere to the GF diet have been shown to > have lower-than-normal > > >absorption; I have wondered if this is due to > just such assumptions that > > >products are safe when they really are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.