Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 All of this comes from people not reading my book Amalgam Illness: Diagnosis and Treatment closely enough, then talking as if they came up with the consideration. I talk about this problem in the book - which is the first place it was mentioned and discussed - and about how to avoid it. Andy . . . . . . . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 In a message dated 25/08/2005 11:51:38 GMT Daylight Time, drcward@... writes: For those who dont have your book can you tell us about it here please ANDY? thanks >>>I think Andy does enough for free - buy the book - its well worth the money! Mandi in UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 For those who dont have your book can you tell us about it here please ANDY? thanks andrewhallcutler <AndyCutler@...> wrote: All of this comes from people not reading my book Amalgam Illness: Diagnosis and Treatment closely enough, then talking as if they came up with the consideration. I talk about this problem in the book - which is the first place it was mentioned and discussed - and about how to avoid it. Andy . . . . . . . . . . ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 >>WHen do you feel it is safe to begin using ALA, along with other forms of chelation, like DMPS? After doing my own research, I thought the potential risks of OTHER chelators were worse than the potential risks of ALA. So I used ALA and no other chelators. > This is based on a little known information that if your blood has high mercury as it is, So far as I know, we are not concerned as much about the blood having high levels of mercury, but the brain and other tissues. And I read frequently here on this list, not to use ALA within about three months of amalgam removal and/or other mercury exposures, because the mercury would still be in the blood. > One function that ALA will not do is to remove mercury out of the body. At the end of ALA chelation, my son tolerated all foods and no longer had any gut yeast issues. So I believe the ALA removed mercury from the " relevant places " . > This is why people with Autism react violently when they use ALA. My son never did, and his dx is " classic Kanner's autism " , severe, low functioning. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 > > In a message dated 25/08/2005 11:51:38 GMT Daylight Time, > drcward@y... writes: > > For those who dont have your book can you tell us about it here please ANDY? > thanks > > > > > >>>I think Andy does enough for free - buy the book - its well worth the > money! > > Mandi in UK Mandi, I agree he does plenty, I agree the book is a steal for the price -- HOWEVER -- I HAVE the book and I thought the answer Andy gave was confusing and too terse to interpret -- I have a GUESS as to what he might be referring to -- and I'm not exactly unfamiliar with his theories....... good wishes, Moria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Hi Dana.. I was just passing info on the was posted and is currently being discussed on the Willis site. I don't have the knowledge to answer this completely You can get and answer at willis. The men to ask for is Ted and Tony. http://www./group/Williss Tara _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of danasview Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:03 AM Subject: [ ] Re: ALA - ANDY/Et al >>WHen do you feel it is safe to begin using ALA, along with other forms of chelation, like DMPS? After doing my own research, I thought the potential risks of OTHER chelators were worse than the potential risks of ALA. So I used ALA and no other chelators. > This is based on a little known information that if your blood has high mercury as it is, So far as I know, we are not concerned as much about the blood having high levels of mercury, but the brain and other tissues. And I read frequently here on this list, not to use ALA within about three months of amalgam removal and/or other mercury exposures, because the mercury would still be in the blood. > One function that ALA will not do is to remove mercury out of the body. At the end of ALA chelation, my son tolerated all foods and no longer had any gut yeast issues. So I believe the ALA removed mercury from the " relevant places " . > This is why people with Autism react violently when they use ALA. My son never did, and his dx is " classic Kanner's autism " , severe, low functioning. Dana ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2005 Report Share Posted August 28, 2005 > Hi Dana.. I was just passing info on the was posted and is currently being > discussed on the Willis site. I was not asking questions, just giving my info and opinion. I don't have time to start reading yet another message board. But thanks for the info, perhaps it will help someone else. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.