Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 Is the home you are living in a home that you are the first owners? I wonder if perhaps there was a mercury spill (from a thermometer or fluorescent lighting that broke) in the home prior to your inhabiting it, and perhaps there is ongoing exposure?? I don't know how long spills remain - perhaps someone else might know. W > > The water has been tested and no significant mercury was detected. > Mercury has also turned up in his blood, but a DMSA challenge revealed > nothing in the urine, neither pre- or post-challenge. > > Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body > working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other opinions, > though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly > high), but then more than doubled between then and October when this > test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was > transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur diet). > > Thoughts? > > regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 Glutathione is suppose to move mercury. Maybe all your past chelations finnaly got through to the mercury. Holmes told us high readings are not a bad thing in themselves because it means it is out of the body. It took her a while before she started seeing high readings as well. FWIW. > > > The water has been tested and no significant mercury was detected. > > Mercury has also turned up in his blood, but a DMSA challenge > revealed > > nothing in the urine, neither pre- or post-challenge. > > > > Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body > > working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other opinions, > > though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly > > high), but then more than doubled between then and October when this > > test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was > > transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur > diet). > > > > Thoughts? > > > > regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 He definitely has a mercury problem. Additionally to the high mercury he also meets two of the counting rules. I would make sure there is no current exposure (maybe consider doing a blood test). I would send the message number to Andy Cutler and ask him to comment, before starting chelation. I would also start with much lower doses of chelator than even Andy tends to recommend and I would not chelate until you have elimminated any potential current exposure. Dagmar. [ ] Mercury in DDI hair test - holy crap! Dear list denizens: What do you make of these hair results from my two-year-old son? They're from Doctor's Data. ELEMENT RESULT / RR COLOR ------------------------------------ Aluminum 7.1 < 8.0 (high G) Antimony .024 < .066 (low G) Arsenic .13 < .080 (mid Y) Beryllium .01 < .02 (no line) Bismuth .041 < .13 (low-mid G) Cadmium .036 < 0.15 (low G) Lead .13 < 1.0 (low G) Mercury 5.2 < .40 (RED, LITERALLY OFF THE CHART) Platinum .003 < .005 (no line) Thallium .001 < .01 (no line) Thorium .001 < .005 (no line) Uranium .006 < .06 (low G) Nickel .04 < .4 (low G) Silver .04 < .2 (low G) Tin .19 < .3 (mid-high G) Titanium .52 < 1.0 (mid G) ELEMENT RESULT (RR) COLOR --------------------------------------- Calcium 115 (125-370) Y low Magnesium 16 (12-30) G low Sodium 19 (12-90) G low Potassium 16 (12-40) G low Copper 6.2 (8-16) R low Zinc 160 (100-190) G high Manganese .08 (.2-.55) R low Chromium .37 (.26-.5) no line Vanadium .045 (.03-.1) G low Molybdenum .047 (.05-.13) Y low Boron 1.1 (.6-4.0) G low Iodine .54 (.25-1.3) no line Lithium .015 (.007-.023) G high Phosphorus 154 (160-250) Y low Selenium .9 (.95-1.7) Y low Strontium .04 (.16-1.0) R low Sulfur 44000 (45500-53000) Y low Barium .10 (.16-.8) Y low Cobalt .003 (.013-.035) R low Iron 7.6 (8-19) Y low Germanium .049 (.045-.065) G low Rubidium .019 (.016-.18) G low Zirconium .57 (.040-1.0) G high ELEMENTS RATIOS EXPECTED RANGE ------------------------------------------- Ca/Mg 7.19 4-30 Ca/P 0.747 .8-8 Na/K 1.19 .5-10 Zn/Cu 25.8 4-20 Zn/Cd >999 >800 Note that this child has a perfect diet. No grains, no sugars, no soy, no casein. Lots of good veggies, some meats, some fruits (generally only pear and certain kinds of apple). All foods are organic. The water has been tested and no significant mercury was detected. Mercury has also turned up in his blood, but a DMSA challenge revealed nothing in the urine, neither pre- or post-challenge. Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other opinions, though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly high), but then more than doubled between then and October when this test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur diet). Thoughts? regards, ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 Are you chelating this child? If so, that could/would/should cause the mercury in hair to increase as his body excretes it. How many vaccines has he had? How recently? Any fish in the diet? Do parents have mercury amalgam dental fillings, tattoos, or industrial exposure to mercury? Live near coal-fired power plant? S Dear list denizens:<BR> ELEMENT RESULT / RR COLOR<BR> ------------------------------------<BR> Mercury 5.2 < .40 (RED, LITERALLY OFF THE CHART)<BR> Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body<BR> working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other opinions,<BR> though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly<BR> high), but then more than doubled between then and October when this<BR> test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was<BR> transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur diet).<BR> <BR> Thoughts?<BR> <BR> regards, <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> </tt> <br><br> <tt> =======================================================<BR> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 > > Dear list denizens: > > What do you make of these hair results from my two-year-old son? > They're from Doctor's Data. I make of it that your son is mercury toxic. good wishes, Moria p.s. gluatatione is not a chelating agent. > > ELEMENT RESULT / RR COLOR > ------------------------------------ > Aluminum 7.1 < 8.0 (high G) > Antimony .024 < .066 (low G) > Arsenic .13 < .080 (mid Y) > Beryllium .01 < .02 (no line) > Bismuth .041 < .13 (low-mid G) > Cadmium .036 < 0.15 (low G) > Lead .13 < 1.0 (low G) > Mercury 5.2 < .40 (RED, LITERALLY OFF THE CHART) > Platinum .003 < .005 (no line) > Thallium .001 < .01 (no line) > Thorium .001 < .005 (no line) > Uranium .006 < .06 (low G) > Nickel .04 < .4 (low G) > Silver .04 < .2 (low G) > Tin .19 < .3 (mid-high G) > Titanium .52 < 1.0 (mid G) > > ELEMENT RESULT (RR) COLOR > --------------------------------------- > Calcium 115 (125-370) Y low > Magnesium 16 (12-30) G low > Sodium 19 (12-90) G low > Potassium 16 (12-40) G low > Copper 6.2 (8-16) R low > Zinc 160 (100-190) G high > Manganese .08 (.2-.55) R low > Chromium .37 (.26-.5) no line > Vanadium .045 (.03-.1) G low > Molybdenum .047 (.05-.13) Y low > Boron 1.1 (.6-4.0) G low > Iodine .54 (.25-1.3) no line > Lithium .015 (.007-.023) G high > Phosphorus 154 (160-250) Y low > Selenium .9 (.95-1.7) Y low > Strontium .04 (.16-1.0) R low > Sulfur 44000 (45500-53000) Y low > Barium .10 (.16-.8) Y low > Cobalt .003 (.013-.035) R low > Iron 7.6 (8-19) Y low > Germanium .049 (.045-.065) G low > Rubidium .019 (.016-.18) G low > Zirconium .57 (.040-1.0) G high > > ELEMENTS RATIOS EXPECTED RANGE > ------------------------------------------- > Ca/Mg 7.19 4-30 > Ca/P 0.747 .8-8 > Na/K 1.19 .5-10 > Zn/Cu 25.8 4-20 > Zn/Cd >999 >800 > > Note that this child has a perfect diet. No grains, no sugars, no soy, > no casein. Lots of good veggies, some meats, some fruits (generally > only pear and certain kinds of apple). All foods are organic. > > The water has been tested and no significant mercury was detected. > Mercury has also turned up in his blood, but a DMSA challenge revealed > nothing in the urine, neither pre- or post-challenge. > > Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body > working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other opinions, > though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly > high), but then more than doubled between then and October when this > test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was > transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur diet). > > Thoughts? > > regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 " > p.s. gluatatione is not a chelating agent. " I know that. I almost put " chelating agent " in quotes (like I did just now). But glutathione is a substance that promotes natural detoxification, and as such it's the only thing I can think of (in addition to the increased sulfur) that could account for the increased mercury in the hair over his test in June. cheers, d. > > > > Dear list denizens: > > > > What do you make of these hair results from my two-year-old son? > > They're from Doctor's Data. > > I make of it that your son is mercury toxic. > > good wishes, > Moria > > p.s. gluatatione is not a chelating agent. > > > > > > > > ELEMENT RESULT / RR COLOR > > ------------------------------------ > > Aluminum 7.1 < 8.0 (high G) > > Antimony .024 < .066 (low G) > > Arsenic .13 < .080 (mid Y) > > Beryllium .01 < .02 (no line) > > Bismuth .041 < .13 (low-mid G) > > Cadmium .036 < 0.15 (low G) > > Lead .13 < 1.0 (low G) > > Mercury 5.2 < .40 (RED, LITERALLY OFF THE CHART) > > Platinum .003 < .005 (no line) > > Thallium .001 < .01 (no line) > > Thorium .001 < .005 (no line) > > Uranium .006 < .06 (low G) > > Nickel .04 < .4 (low G) > > Silver .04 < .2 (low G) > > Tin .19 < .3 (mid-high G) > > Titanium .52 < 1.0 (mid G) > > > > ELEMENT RESULT (RR) COLOR > > --------------------------------------- > > Calcium 115 (125-370) Y low > > Magnesium 16 (12-30) G low > > Sodium 19 (12-90) G low > > Potassium 16 (12-40) G low > > Copper 6.2 (8-16) R low > > Zinc 160 (100-190) G high > > Manganese .08 (.2-.55) R low > > Chromium .37 (.26-.5) no line > > Vanadium .045 (.03-.1) G low > > Molybdenum .047 (.05-.13) Y low > > Boron 1.1 (.6-4.0) G low > > Iodine .54 (.25-1.3) no line > > Lithium .015 (.007-.023) G high > > Phosphorus 154 (160-250) Y low > > Selenium .9 (.95-1.7) Y low > > Strontium .04 (.16-1.0) R low > > Sulfur 44000 (45500-53000) Y low > > Barium .10 (.16-.8) Y low > > Cobalt .003 (.013-.035) R low > > Iron 7.6 (8-19) Y low > > Germanium .049 (.045-.065) G low > > Rubidium .019 (.016-.18) G low > > Zirconium .57 (.040-1.0) G high > > > > ELEMENTS RATIOS EXPECTED RANGE > > ------------------------------------------- > > Ca/Mg 7.19 4-30 > > Ca/P 0.747 .8-8 > > Na/K 1.19 .5-10 > > Zn/Cu 25.8 4-20 > > Zn/Cd >999 >800 > > > > Note that this child has a perfect diet. No grains, no sugars, no > soy, > > no casein. Lots of good veggies, some meats, some fruits (generally > > only pear and certain kinds of apple). All foods are organic. > > > > The water has been tested and no significant mercury was detected. > > Mercury has also turned up in his blood, but a DMSA challenge > revealed > > nothing in the urine, neither pre- or post-challenge. > > > > Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body > > working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other > opinions, > > though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly > > high), but then more than doubled between then and October when > this > > test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was > > transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur > diet). > > > > Thoughts? > > > > regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 , Do you think perhaps by boosting his own ability and the fact he is so little the mercury hasn't dug in to his system and it is being pulled jsut by boosting his own glutathione levels? I think it is what happened to my son, we are doing Jill protocol and my son's glutathione levels increased significantly, and so has his recovery? What has his behaviors been like? Less autisitc, is it visible from his behaviors? If it is visible by behviors you are on your way! Colleen > > > > > > Dear list denizens: > > > > > > What do you make of these hair results from my two-year-old son? > > > They're from Doctor's Data. > > > > I make of it that your son is mercury toxic. > > > > good wishes, > > Moria > > > > p.s. gluatatione is not a chelating agent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ELEMENT RESULT / RR COLOR > > > ------------------------------------ > > > Aluminum 7.1 < 8.0 (high G) > > > Antimony .024 < .066 (low G) > > > Arsenic .13 < .080 (mid Y) > > > Beryllium .01 < .02 (no line) > > > Bismuth .041 < .13 (low-mid G) > > > Cadmium .036 < 0.15 (low G) > > > Lead .13 < 1.0 (low G) > > > Mercury 5.2 < .40 (RED, LITERALLY OFF THE CHART) > > > Platinum .003 < .005 (no line) > > > Thallium .001 < .01 (no line) > > > Thorium .001 < .005 (no line) > > > Uranium .006 < .06 (low G) > > > Nickel .04 < .4 (low G) > > > Silver .04 < .2 (low G) > > > Tin .19 < .3 (mid-high G) > > > Titanium .52 < 1.0 (mid G) > > > > > > ELEMENT RESULT (RR) COLOR > > > --------------------------------------- > > > Calcium 115 (125-370) Y low > > > Magnesium 16 (12-30) G low > > > Sodium 19 (12-90) G low > > > Potassium 16 (12-40) G low > > > Copper 6.2 (8-16) R low > > > Zinc 160 (100-190) G high > > > Manganese .08 (.2-.55) R low > > > Chromium .37 (.26-.5) no line > > > Vanadium .045 (.03-.1) G low > > > Molybdenum .047 (.05-.13) Y low > > > Boron 1.1 (.6-4.0) G low > > > Iodine .54 (.25-1.3) no line > > > Lithium .015 (.007-.023) G high > > > Phosphorus 154 (160-250) Y low > > > Selenium .9 (.95-1.7) Y low > > > Strontium .04 (.16-1.0) R low > > > Sulfur 44000 (45500-53000) Y low > > > Barium .10 (.16-.8) Y low > > > Cobalt .003 (.013-.035) R low > > > Iron 7.6 (8-19) Y low > > > Germanium .049 (.045-.065) G low > > > Rubidium .019 (.016-.18) G low > > > Zirconium .57 (.040-1.0) G high > > > > > > ELEMENTS RATIOS EXPECTED RANGE > > > ------------------------------------------- > > > Ca/Mg 7.19 4-30 > > > Ca/P 0.747 .8-8 > > > Na/K 1.19 .5-10 > > > Zn/Cu 25.8 4-20 > > > Zn/Cd >999 >800 > > > > > > Note that this child has a perfect diet. No grains, no sugars, no > > soy, > > > no casein. Lots of good veggies, some meats, some fruits (generally > > > only pear and certain kinds of apple). All foods are organic. > > > > > > The water has been tested and no significant mercury was detected. > > > Mercury has also turned up in his blood, but a DMSA challenge > > revealed > > > nothing in the urine, neither pre- or post-challenge. > > > > > > Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body > > > working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other > > opinions, > > > though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly > > > high), but then more than doubled between then and October when > > this > > > test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was > > > transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur > > diet). > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 > Arsenic .13 < .080 (mid Y) > Mercury 5.2 < .40 (RED, LITERALLY OFF THE CHART) Look at all potential sources of exposures http://www.danasview.net/metals.htm > Copper 6.2 (8-16) R low One of my kids does well with copper supplementation. > Selenium .9 (.95-1.7) Y low My kids do well with adding selenium. > The water has been tested and no significant mercury was detected. > Mercury has also turned up in his blood, but a DMSA challenge revealed > nothing in the urine, neither pre- or post-challenge. I would say this indicates current exposures. Adding selenium and vitamins C and E can help. Along with removing sources of the exposures. > Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body > working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other opinions, > though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly > high), but then more than doubled between then and October when this > test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was > transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur diet). Perhaps the supplements are allowing his body to remove the mercury. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 My 2 yo son had even higher level of mercury in his hair. He also had high level in his blood. You need to find his source of exposure, it could be so many things. You could test other family members to see if they also have high levels, that can help to determine possible sources. For us, it was seafood. I started chelation once I found out about the source so I was sure he was no more exposed. I did 3 months of DMSA and then added ALA. He has made tremendous progress (from non verbal to speaking in full sentences in a few months). Good luck, > > Dear list denizens: > > What do you make of these hair results from my two-year-old son? > They're from Doctor's Data. > > ELEMENT RESULT / RR COLOR > ------------------------------------ > Aluminum 7.1 < 8.0 (high G) > Antimony .024 < .066 (low G) > Arsenic .13 < .080 (mid Y) > Beryllium .01 < .02 (no line) > Bismuth .041 < .13 (low-mid G) > Cadmium .036 < 0.15 (low G) > Lead .13 < 1.0 (low G) > Mercury 5.2 < .40 (RED, LITERALLY OFF THE CHART) > Platinum .003 < .005 (no line) > Thallium .001 < .01 (no line) > Thorium .001 < .005 (no line) > Uranium .006 < .06 (low G) > Nickel .04 < .4 (low G) > Silver .04 < .2 (low G) > Tin .19 < .3 (mid-high G) > Titanium .52 < 1.0 (mid G) > > ELEMENT RESULT (RR) COLOR > --------------------------------------- > Calcium 115 (125-370) Y low > Magnesium 16 (12-30) G low > Sodium 19 (12-90) G low > Potassium 16 (12-40) G low > Copper 6.2 (8-16) R low > Zinc 160 (100-190) G high > Manganese .08 (.2-.55) R low > Chromium .37 (.26-.5) no line > Vanadium .045 (.03-.1) G low > Molybdenum .047 (.05-.13) Y low > Boron 1.1 (.6-4.0) G low > Iodine .54 (.25-1.3) no line > Lithium .015 (.007-.023) G high > Phosphorus 154 (160-250) Y low > Selenium .9 (.95-1.7) Y low > Strontium .04 (.16-1.0) R low > Sulfur 44000 (45500-53000) Y low > Barium .10 (.16-.8) Y low > Cobalt .003 (.013-.035) R low > Iron 7.6 (8-19) Y low > Germanium .049 (.045-.065) G low > Rubidium .019 (.016-.18) G low > Zirconium .57 (.040-1.0) G high > > ELEMENTS RATIOS EXPECTED RANGE > ------------------------------------------- > Ca/Mg 7.19 4-30 > Ca/P 0.747 .8-8 > Na/K 1.19 .5-10 > Zn/Cu 25.8 4-20 > Zn/Cd >999 >800 > > Note that this child has a perfect diet. No grains, no sugars, no soy, > no casein. Lots of good veggies, some meats, some fruits (generally > only pear and certain kinds of apple). All foods are organic. > > The water has been tested and no significant mercury was detected. > Mercury has also turned up in his blood, but a DMSA challenge revealed > nothing in the urine, neither pre- or post-challenge. > > Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body > working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other opinions, > though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly > high), but then more than doubled between then and October when this > test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was > transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur diet). > > Thoughts? > > regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2004 Report Share Posted December 31, 2004 I strongly doubt that he's getting ongoing exposure. His symptoms appeared while we were living in Spain. We moved back to the US in March, and his first hair test was in June. Also, we've tested the water, only give him organic food, don't live near any major plants, have had no accidents with thermometers or flourescent lights, and no one in the family (on either side of the Atlantic) is ill. We've also removed all common household toxins. Chlorine-free diapers, all-natural cleaning products, no dryer sheets. I suspect that his mercury was something he got in utero and during nursing. Lots of amalgams (in my wife), lots of large-body ocean fish (before we knew better), and of couse, the entire complement of vaccinations. According to some of the docs I've spoken with, mercury will also appear in the blood if it's on its way out. > > > > Dear list denizens: > > > > What do you make of these hair results from my two-year-old son? > > They're from Doctor's Data. > > > > ELEMENT RESULT / RR COLOR > > ------------------------------------ > > Aluminum 7.1 < 8.0 (high G) > > Antimony .024 < .066 (low G) > > Arsenic .13 < .080 (mid Y) > > Beryllium .01 < .02 (no line) > > Bismuth .041 < .13 (low-mid G) > > Cadmium .036 < 0.15 (low G) > > Lead .13 < 1.0 (low G) > > Mercury 5.2 < .40 (RED, LITERALLY OFF THE CHART) > > Platinum .003 < .005 (no line) > > Thallium .001 < .01 (no line) > > Thorium .001 < .005 (no line) > > Uranium .006 < .06 (low G) > > Nickel .04 < .4 (low G) > > Silver .04 < .2 (low G) > > Tin .19 < .3 (mid-high G) > > Titanium .52 < 1.0 (mid G) > > > > ELEMENT RESULT (RR) COLOR > > --------------------------------------- > > Calcium 115 (125-370) Y low > > Magnesium 16 (12-30) G low > > Sodium 19 (12-90) G low > > Potassium 16 (12-40) G low > > Copper 6.2 (8-16) R low > > Zinc 160 (100-190) G high > > Manganese .08 (.2-.55) R low > > Chromium .37 (.26-.5) no line > > Vanadium .045 (.03-.1) G low > > Molybdenum .047 (.05-.13) Y low > > Boron 1.1 (.6-4.0) G low > > Iodine .54 (.25-1.3) no line > > Lithium .015 (.007-.023) G high > > Phosphorus 154 (160-250) Y low > > Selenium .9 (.95-1.7) Y low > > Strontium .04 (.16-1.0) R low > > Sulfur 44000 (45500-53000) Y low > > Barium .10 (.16-.8) Y low > > Cobalt .003 (.013-.035) R low > > Iron 7.6 (8-19) Y low > > Germanium .049 (.045-.065) G low > > Rubidium .019 (.016-.18) G low > > Zirconium .57 (.040-1.0) G high > > > > ELEMENTS RATIOS EXPECTED RANGE > > ------------------------------------------- > > Ca/Mg 7.19 4-30 > > Ca/P 0.747 .8-8 > > Na/K 1.19 .5-10 > > Zn/Cu 25.8 4-20 > > Zn/Cd >999 >800 > > > > Note that this child has a perfect diet. No grains, no sugars, no > soy, > > no casein. Lots of good veggies, some meats, some fruits (generally > > only pear and certain kinds of apple). All foods are organic. > > > > The water has been tested and no significant mercury was detected. > > Mercury has also turned up in his blood, but a DMSA challenge > revealed > > nothing in the urine, neither pre- or post-challenge. > > > > Our doc believes that the lower minerals are a result of the body > > working so hard to detoxify itself. I'd like to hear other opinions, > > though. His hair mercury level in June was 2.5 µ/g (also alarmingly > > high), but then more than doubled between then and October when this > > test was taken. The only chelating agent used during that time was > > transdermal glutathione (+ epsom salts baths and a high-sulfur > diet). > > > > Thoughts? > > > > regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.