Guest guest Posted May 10, 2008 Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Hi , welcome to the group. I see that Molly already pointed out that these risks are addressed in the FDA approval. I wanted to add that my daughter wore a starband for 5 mo and was on time or early for every milestone including walking before she graduated at 10 mo. Of course all kids are different, and I'm not saying this this to brag - just to let you know that from my experience banding really has no negative impact on children. I would say the only downside is it gets a bit smelly, and you get some funny looks from strangers when you take your baby out in their band. I would also add that you should go to an experienced helmet/band provider since the results really depend on them knowing their stuff. take care. -christine sydney 2 yrs starband grad > > Hello All, > > I am new to this group. My daughter is diagnosed with a mild plagio. There is a little facial asymmetry too associated with the plagio which I am concerned about. I have researching about the helmet and I found the FDA approval for this device at: > http://www.cranialtech.com/FDA_approval.html > > There is paragraph in the approval on the risks and the third risk about impairment of brain growth really got me worried. I wanted to know what the mother's with experience think about this. > > With a mild plagio its so difficult to decide whether to opt for the helmet or not.. > > ----Snippet---- > > FDA identified the following risks to health associated with this > type of device: (1) Skin irritation, skin breakdown and subsequent > infection due to excessive pressure on the skin; (2) head and neck > trauma due to alteration of the functional center of mass of the head > and the additional weight of the device especially with an infant who > is still developing the ability to control his/her head and neck > movements; (3) impairment of brain growth and development from > mechanical restriction of cranial growth; (4) asphyxiation due to > mechanical failure, poor fit, and/or excessive weight that alters the > infant's ability to lift the head; (5) eye trauma due to mechanical > failure, poor construction and/or inappropriate fit; and (6) contact > dermatitis due to the materials used in the construction of the device. > ---Snippet---- > > > Looking forward to your inputs, > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.