Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Meaning of high mercury in blood

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi Dave,

Thank you for your interest. The results of the blood analysis of my

friend were 18 mcg/dl of Hg. (the reference of the lab was: no exposed

people <10, exposed people <15, quantification limit: 5) Additionally,

he obtained 23 mcg/dl of lead.

The result of a similar Hg analysis of samples taken one day after

this one were 14 mcg/dl.

Some days before the analysis he went to the dentist for a dental work

non related with amalgam removal. The dentist was not mercury-free. I

don't know if this can justify this levels.

The employed technique was atomic absorption spectrophotometry. I have

no idea if this measures Hg in plasma or RBC.

>

> .

>

> I'm curious about your friend's situation, since I'm dealing with

> someone who may have ongoing exposure, and i'm trying to figure out if

> getting a blood test might be a way of detecting it. What kind of test

> is this? Is it plama or RBC? Was it ordered by an MD or some other

> route? Can you tell me how high the mercury was? What is the range

> that is usually accepted above which is considered " high " ?

>

> Thanks -

> Dave.

>

>

> Posted by: " " JuliusLulaby@...

> Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:40 am (PDT)

>

> Hi,

>

> I have a friend with high mercury in blood in spite of the removal of

> amalgams several years ago. I would say that this means that there is

> a hidden source of mercury somewhere which is still intoxicating him.

> Is this true or maybe there could be some other reason?

>

> Thanks in advance,

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks .

I know 23mcg/dl is quite high for lead. I believe this means that he is

dealing with ongoing exposure. Has he looked into what the sources

might be? You might consider telling him to take a lot of calcium and

avoid both vitamin D and the sun, until he can eliminate his exposures.

It looks like they are using similar ranges for mercury as for lead.

When I asked Andy about testing for ongoing exposure, he said that it is

hard to test the person. He suggested that the only way would be to

test once, and then a second time when they have been away from the

exposure for a month. Comparison would give some idea. For some

reason, he didn't think that testing once would be enough, even to

identify lack of exposure. I'm not sure I understand why - it seemed to

me that if the results are low enough, then that should be indicative.

Dave.

----------------------

Posted by: " " JuliusLulaby@...

Fri May 2, 2008 11:04 am (PDT)

Hi Dave,

Thank you for your interest. The results of the blood analysis of my

friend were 18 mcg/dl of Hg. (the reference of the lab was: no exposed

people <10, exposed people <15, quantification limit: 5) Additionally,

he obtained 23 mcg/dl of lead.

The result of a similar Hg analysis of samples taken one day after

this one were 14 mcg/dl.

Some days before the analysis he went to the dentist for a dental work

non related with amalgam removal. The dentist was not mercury-free. I

don't know if this can justify this levels.

The employed technique was atomic absorption spectrophotometry. I have

no idea if this measures Hg in plasma or RBC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...