Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 I just got results back from a lactate/pyruvate test my neurologist ran. Lactic acid reference range was 0.4-2.0 mmol/L, and my level appears normal at 0.7. The reference range for pyruvate is listed as 0.30-0.70 mg/dL, and my level is listed as 0.03 L. I don't understand why the units for the reference range (mg/dL) appear different from the units for my reading (L). Should I ignore that? If so, does that mean that I have very low pyruvate? If so, can anybody help interpret the results? (My primary care doc's out of town, and my neurologist strangely told me the results were fine before they even came back yet, so I was hoping to get some thoughts from this forum). Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 The L stands for Low, not the units measured. My kids have low pyruvate levels, and I know a few more on this list do also. Cindy-GA Lactate/pyruvate test interpretation? I just got results back from a lactate/pyruvate test my neurologist ran. Lactic acid reference range was 0.4-2.0 mmol/L, and my level appears normal at 0.7. The reference range for pyruvate is listed as 0.30-0.70 mg/dL, and my level is listed as 0.03 L. I don't understand why the units for the reference range (mg/dL) appear different from the units for my reading (L). Should I ignore that? If so, does that mean that I have very low pyruvate? If so, can anybody help interpret the results? (My primary care doc's out of town, and my neurologist strangely told me the results were fine before they even came back yet, so I was hoping to get some thoughts from this forum). Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 I thought mito people had high pyruvate, or is it different for everyone? Kim > The L stands for Low, not the units measured. > My kids have low pyruvate levels, and I know a few more on this list do also. > Cindy-GA > Lactate/pyruvate test interpretation? > > > > > I just got results back from a lactate/pyruvate test my neurologist > ran. Lactic acid reference range was 0.4-2.0 mmol/L, and my level > appears normal at 0.7. The reference range for pyruvate is listed as > 0.30-0.70 mg/dL, and my level is listed as 0.03 L. I don't understand > why the units for the reference range (mg/dL) appear different from the > units for my reading (L). Should I ignore that? If so, does that mean > that I have very low pyruvate? If so, can anybody help interpret the > results? (My primary care doc's out of town, and my neurologist > strangely told me the results were fine before they even came back yet, > so I was hoping to get some thoughts from this forum). Thanks! > > > > > > > Please contact mito-owner with any problems or questions. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 Hi, I was told its different for everyone and it depends on how their bodies are managing things at that time. Our daughters range from low to normal at times.. to extremely high and the ratios between the two are always off though. Thats also how we know when she is having major issues. Her labs come back with high levels when shes in crisis... fighting infections.. anything that makes her crash. Kimberley --- klaga5 wrote: > > I thought mito people had high pyruvate, or is it > different for > everyone? > Kim > > > > The L stands for Low, not the units measured. > > My kids have low pyruvate levels, and I know a few > more on this > list do also. > > Cindy-GA > > Lactate/pyruvate test > interpretation? > > > > > > > > > > I just got results back from a lactate/pyruvate > test my > neurologist > > ran. Lactic acid reference range was 0.4-2.0 > mmol/L, and my > level > > appears normal at 0.7. The reference range for > pyruvate is > listed as > > 0.30-0.70 mg/dL, and my level is listed as 0.03 > L. I don't > understand > > why the units for the reference range (mg/dL) > appear different > from the > > units for my reading (L). Should I ignore that? > If so, does that > mean > > that I have very low pyruvate? If so, can > anybody help interpret > the > > results? (My primary care doc's out of town, and > my neurologist > > strangely told me the results were fine before > they even came > back yet, > > so I was hoping to get some thoughts from this > forum). Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please contact mito-owner with > any problems or > questions. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 With mito, lactate and pyruvate (lactate precursor) are usually increased. A deciliter (DL) is the same as .1 liter. 1 deciliter = 0.1 liter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 Lactate and pyruvate levels in an individual vary from day to day and depend a whole lot upon the health of the individual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.