Guest guest Posted March 21, 2005 Report Share Posted March 21, 2005 Dear : Thank you! Now I'm really freaked out. We don't want any of those problems. He already has some - like seizures, tachycardia, etc. Oh, it looks like there is no good solution for this problem. Thanks for the help. Cindy > > From Nurse's Drug Guide 2004 pub by Prentice Hall > > Tourette's Disorder > Child: PO (oral) 0.05-0.75 mg/kg/d in 2-3 divided doses > > USES: Management of manifestation sof psychotic disorders and for control of > tics and vocal utterances of Gilles de la Tourette's dyndrome; for treatment of > agitated states in acute and chronic psychoses. Used for short-term treatment > of hyperactive children and for severe behaviorproblems in children of > combative, explosive hyperexcitability. > > CONTRAINDICATIONS: Parkinson's disease, parkinsonism, seizure > disorders, coma; alcoholism; severe mental depression, CNS depression, > thyrotoxicosis. Safe for use during pregnancy (category C), lactation or in > children <3y is not established. > CAUTIOUS USE: Older adult or debilitated patients, urinary retention, > glaucoma, severe cardiovascular disorders; patients receiving > anticonvulsant, anticoagulant or lithium therapy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 Cindy, I really don't think that Haldol would be a good idea for a child with mito. It increases oxidative stress in the brain and inhibits Complex I. Also have you ever tested glutathione levels? If glutathione levels are not adequate there is more risk with Haldol. Neurochem Int. 2001 Apr;38(5):425-35 Protein thiol oxidation by haloperidol results in inhibition of mitochondrial complex I in brain regions: comparison with atypical antipsychotics. Balijepalli S, Kenchappa RS, Boyd MR, Ravindranath V. Department of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bangalore 560 029, India. Usage of 'typical' but not 'atypical' antipsychotic drugs is associated with severe side effects involving extrapyramidal tract (EPT). Single dose of haloperidol caused selective inhibition of complex I in frontal cortex, striatum and midbrain (41 and 26%, respectively) which was abolished by pretreatment of mice with thiol antioxidants, alpha-lipoic acid and glutathione isopropyl ester, and reversed, in vitro, by disulfide reductant, dithiothreitol. Prolonged administration of haloperidol to mice resulted in complex I loss in frontal cortex, hippocampus, striatum and midbrain, while chronic dosing with clozapine affected only hippocampus and frontal cortex. Risperidone caused complex I loss in frontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum but not in midbrain from which extrapyramidal tract emanates. Inhibition of the electron transport chain component, complex I by haloperidol is mediated through oxidation of essential thiol groups to disulfides, in vivo. Further, loss of complex I in extrapyramidal brain regions by anti-psychotics correlated with their known propensity to generate side-effects involving extra-pyramidal tract. Life Sci. 2000 Feb 25;66(14):1345-50 Mitochondrial ultrastructure and density in a primate model of persistent tardive dyskinesia. Eyles DW, Pond SM, Van der Schyf CJ, Halliday GM. Queensland Centre for Schizophrenia Research, Wolston Park Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. Eyles@... The use of neuroleptic drugs to treat schizophrenia is almost invariably associated with extrapyramidal movement disorders. One of these disorders, tardive dyskinesia (TD), can persist long after neuroleptic withdrawal suggesting that permanent neurological damage is produced. However, there appears to be no convincing pathology of TD and its pathogenesis remains unknown. Findings that neuroleptics interfere with normal mitochondrial function and produce mitochondrial ultrastructural changes in the basal ganglia of patients and animals suggest that mitochondrial dysfunction plays a role in TD. We have established a model for persistent TD in baboons that appears to involve compromised mitochondrial function. In this study, we evaluated two animals treated for 41 weeks with a derivative of haloperidol and two treated with vehicle only. Treatment was then withdrawn and the animals observed for a further 17-18 weeks. Treated animals developed abnormal orofacial signs that were consistent with TD. These symptoms persisted during the drug-free period. The animals were euthanased, the brains perfused-fixed then post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and the caudate and putamen prepared for electron microscopy. Regardless of whether mitochondria were located in neural soma, excitatory terminals, glia or in non-somal neuropil there was no consistent difference either in size or number between treated and control animals. Thus, even if mitochondria in striatal neurons undergo ultrastructural alterations during neuroleptic therapy, these changes do not persist after drug withdrawal. Neuropharmacology. 1999 Apr;38(4):567-77 Inhibition of mitochondrial complex I by haloperidol: the role of thiol oxidation. Balijepalli S, Boyd MR, Ravindranath V. Department of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India. We have examined the effects of a variety of classical and atypical neuroleptic drugs on mitochondrial NADH ubiquinone oxido-reductase (complex I) activity. Sagittal slices of mouse brain incubated in vitro with haloperidol (10 nM) showed time- and concentration-dependent inhibition of complex I. Similar concentrations of the pyridinium metabolite of haloperidol (HPP+) failed to inhibit complex I activity in this model; indeed, comparable inhibition was obtained only at a 10000-fold higher concentration of HPP+ (100 microM). Treatment of brain slices with haloperidol resulted in a loss of glutathione (GSH), while pretreatment of slices with GSH and alpha-lipoic acid abolished haloperidol-induced loss of complex I activity. Incubation of mitochondria from haloperidol treated brain slices with the thiol reductant, dithiothreitol, completely regenerated complex I activity demonstrating thiol oxidation as a feasible mechanism of inhibition. In a comparison of different neuroleptic drugs, haloperidol was the most potent inhibitor of complex I, followed by chlorpromazine, fluphenazine and risperidone while the atypical neuroleptic, clozapine (100 microM) did not inhibit complex I activity in mouse brain slices. The present studies support the view that classical neuroleptics such as haloperidol inhibit mitochondrial complex I through oxidative modification of the enzyme complex. Neuroleptic medications inhibit complex I of the electron transport chain. Burkhardt C, JP, Lim YH, Filley CM, WD Jr. Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver. Neuroleptic medications are prescribed to millions of patients, but their use is limited by potentially irreversible extrapyramidal side effects. Haloperidol shows striking structural similarities to the neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine, which produces parkinsonism apparently through inhibition of NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. We now report that haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and thiothixene inhibit complex I in vitro in rat brain mitochondria. Clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic reported to have little or no extrapyramidal toxicity, also inhibits complex I, but at a significantly higher concentration. Neuroleptic treated patients have significant depression of platelet complex I activity similar to that seen in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Complex I inhibition may be associated with the extrapyramidal side effects of these drugs. Induction of reactive oxygen species in neurons by haloperidol. Sagara Y. The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA. Haloperidol (HP) is widely prescribed for schizophrenia and other affective disorders but has severe side effects such as tardive dyskinesia. Because oxidative stress has been implicated in the clinical side effects of HP, rat primary cortical neurons and the mouse hippocampal cell line HT-22 were used to characterize the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other cellular alterations caused by HP. Primary neurons and HT-22 cells are equally sensitive to HP with an IC50 of 35 microM in the primary neurons and 45 microM in HT-22. HP induces a sixfold increase in levels of ROS, which are generated from mitochondria but not from the metabolism of catecholamines by monoamine oxidases. Glutathione (GSH) is an important antioxidant for the protection of cells against HP toxicity because (1) the intracellular GSH decreases as the ROS production increases, (2) the exogenous addition of antioxidants, such as beta-estradiol and vitamin E, lowers the level of ROS and protects HT-22 cells from HP, and (3) treatments that result in the reduction of the intracellular GSH potentiate HP toxicity. The GSH decrease is followed by the increase in the intracellular level of Ca2+, which immediately precedes cell death. Therefore, HP causes a sequence of cellular alterations that lead to cell death and the production of ROS is the integral part of this cascade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.