Guest guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I am an attorney but not in this. I think there is one on the board. My laypersons understanding as it came up with us is that the law allows you to request it but whether you can show cause depends. If you can get documentation that your child requires something other than the services they can provide then you can get what you want. This is a newer area in the preschool setting as most of these integrated programs were set up for cost containment and the schools fight pretty hard now. I do recall reading of a burden of proof change. Meaning they now, once again, must show they can provide services. If so, that is helpful but be prepared to do battle. I don't have the time or patience and am homeschooling but my kid is light and I would have never made the right showing and he would have had to then unlearn the crap they did. No thanks. There are attorneys and moms way more schooled in this and there is a good folder on this board to help you. I hope someone better at this jumps in. Best wishes! > > > > Hi Janice, > > > > > > > > You have put it so well. The system has tried to fail our kids. > But our > > kids are strugglers. > > > > > > > > Thank you for guiding me to NACD. I just received the set of CD's > from > > them, and I am looking forward to hearing them. Our kids are > brilliant; > > there is so much locked wisdom in there. I yet have to find that > key to > > unlock it. I am hoping NACD will be it. I pray to God that it > is. Having > > said that I see some parents on this group are from NJ, and seem to > be > > working with NACD. Can you please share your experience with the > PA office? > > I will really appreciate it. > > > > > > > > Before I end this e-mail, I just have to add a tad bit to the > discussion of > > how some professionals don't understand our kids. One of the > doctors who > > our son sees mentioned the other day in a much generalized fashion > that with > > autism comes the disability of not being able to understand any > physical, > > mental, and emotional changes. Just a few minutes later after this > comment > > from her, our son just turned around and said Dr. your new haircut > looks > > cool, it looks like you got an tan, and why are you so happy today > while you > > were so sad the last time I was here. THEY STILL DON " T GET IT. I > used to > > cry when professionals made comments like this earlier, > underestimating our > > child. But now I just know that they don't know enough. And while > they > > think my child needs work, they need it more. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Ambika > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > From: > > [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Janice > > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:39 PM > > > > Subject: Re:[ ] Re: Apraxia and Slow Processing > > > > > > > > , > > > > Because we have older children and have experienced the 'stupidity' > of the > > 'system', we have a better understanding of the word 'slow' and the > > insidious nature to which many of the professionals out there use > it..... It > > is a one way ticket to special education..... and 'opportunities' > class.... > > > > I say... Run Forest, RUN! Yes, I do jokingly call my boy Forest > Gump.... but > > I have to run myself for he gives me a chase & a threat at my joke. > (yes, he > > does get it!) > > > > In the educational system, SLOW processing is not used in a nice > way.... > > Usually people use the word 'slow' to mean mental retardation of > some sort. > > In actuality, Marks original IQ tests in grade 2, described him as > being > > borderline mentally handicapped with regards to non-verbal > persuits. I have > > it in black and white.... Unbelievable! > > > > Now, once they state this about your child at the tender age of 8, > it is > > assumed to be never-changing and a testament to that childs > abilities.... > > FOREVER!!! That is your child's life-promise as per the educational > system. > > This is a BAAAAAAD thing for it forever limits your child within > the system. > > > > This is sooooo wrong! > > > > I listened to these people who encouraged me to do 'nothing' for my > child > > and so my child did not improve. As soon as I researched and found > help for > > my child, everything turned around and he got better. His IQ has > definately > > changed and someday (when I have extra $$$), I shall have him > retested to > > prove it! > > > > So.... Liz and all of you with little ones..... if you wonder why > , > > myself and others 'react' so reflexively to the word slow as though > we have > > been back-handed across the face.... this is the reason. We have > had such > > aweful experiences with the system and with others (usually > complete idiots) > > who assume that our kids are stupid. They only see what is in front > of them > > and perform the 'easy' diagnosis. They do not look beneath the > surface to > > the diamond that sparkles and glows beneath the rough exterior.... > our > > children are truly.... diamonds in the rough! > > > > Janice > > Mother of Mark, 13 > > > > [sPAM][ ] Re: Apraxia and Slow Processing > > > > Liz there is much in the archives and in research about self- > > fulfilling prophecies and the research of Dr. Rosenthal. Please > > don't assume that it's OK because your child is younger to say your > > child is " slow " in three areas! There is a huge problem with many > > here assuming that apraxia and processing disorders co exist or > that > > children with apraxia have slow receptive/cognitive processing > skills > > which is also a sign of mental retardation. And the fact so many > > today are accepting this is very sad. Perhaps unlike the children > > here from over the years like my son Tanner -the children in the > > group today won't be mainstreamed. Is that the belief? Because > > belief becomes reality and you get to choose now. Your child's > > future depends in some part on your belief. Isn't it a mother and > > father's instinct to raise our child up? > > > > And to answer the question about therapy for another diagnosis > > working. Many here with autistic children found some of the methods > > used for apraxia to work as well. The Kaufman Kit can be used by > any > > late talker- even one that isn't apraxic. > > > > We tried various therapies for Tanner that are used for deaf > children > > including learning sign -that doesn't mean Tanner is deaf. Just > > because a therapy helps doesn't mean a child has the diagnosis that > > therapy was originally designed for. > > > > Please do some homework on the awesome Dr. Rosenthal and the > > work he has done. You will also find much about him in the > > archives. Sadly if you believe your child to be slow..in three > areas > > no less -you 'are' probably going to find out you are right. When > > nobody else believed in Tanner Glenn and I did and guess who proved > > everyone but us wrong -not us -but Tanner did! I loved sharing the > whole > > story with Dr. Rosenthal because he is brilliant and he is the one > > that inspired me. And I saw it work. They could have been right and > > Tanner would have been in special ed today. > > http://www.cherab. > > <http://www.cherab.org/information/familiesrelate/letter.html> > > org/information/familiesrelate/letter.html > > > > I know some of you don't understand this -but again don't assume > the > > worst and don't underestimate those that can't verbally prove you > > wrong...yet. Sometimes it's best to be wrong and if you believe > > apraxia and slow processing of receptive or cognitive skills go > hand > > in hand -then you 'are' wrong. Apraxia is not a cognitive disorder. > > > > And even if in your child's case you were right and for example > one's > > child has co existing mental retardation with the apraxia -you are > > still best to believe in your child and give the benefit of the > > doubt. Look at Robin's daughter -it's a hard pill to > swallow > > to be wrong -or assume others are right with bogus diagnosis about > > your child - years down the road. > > http://www.cherab. <http://www.cherab.org/news/.html> > > org/news/.html > > > > And while for ethical reasons Dr. Rosenthal's research was done in > > the positive -in speaking with him he agrees that it works both > > ways. If that's the case why think anything but the positive? > > > > http://www.facultyd > > <http://www.facultydirectory.ucr.edu/cgi- > bin/pub/public_individual.pl?facult > > y=534> irectory.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/pub/public_individual.pl? faculty=534 > > http://www.pineforg > > <http://www.pineforge.com/newman4study/resources/rosenthal1.htm> > > e.com/newman4study/resources/rosenthal1.htm > > http://www.psichi. > <http://www.psichi.org/pubs/articles/article_121.asp> > > org/pubs/articles/article_121.asp > > http://www.accel- <http://www.accel- > team.com/pygmalion/prophecy_01.html> > > team.com/pygmalion/prophecy_01.html > > http://www.musicedm > > <http://www.musicedmagic.com/class-management/classroom-vision- and- > the-self- > > fulfilling-prophecy.html> > > agic.com/class-management/classroom-vision-and-the-self- fulfilling- > prophecy. > > html > > http://www.motivati > > <http://www.motivation-tools.com/workplace/social_prejudice.htm> > > on-tools.com/workplace/social_prejudice.htm > > > > tons more -just google it or search the archives here > > > > ===== > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I'm curious why do you think it is not the least restrictive environment? Are you thinking your son needs more or less services then being offered at the school? If you are asking for more services it might be difficult to get, especially since you are opting to send him only 2 days currently. Some districts are great to work with and others are brutal......best of luck. <sbutler@...> wrote: Hi everyone - I have a question about the IEP process for preschoolers. has been recieving services through early on for 1 year now, and now that he is turning 3, we move to the public school. He will be going to the Early Childhood Special Education Preschool class. They ofter the class 5 days a week, but he will only be going for 2 because he goes to a private Preschool 2 days a week and really, i just feel that 5 days a week at this age is a bit much and i've been told that Fridays are a " Wash " anyway, meaning he wouldn't recieve any speech therapy on that day even if he was there. My question is there - can I legally request that he recieve services in any other setting? I do not feel that the class he is going to is the least restrictive environment, but they aren't offering me any options. What can I do? He does have severe verbal apraxia, but it's in the pure form, there are no motor delays, sensory issues, etc. He did test low on the cognitive test, but they told me it was because it was standardized and since he couldn't verbally answer the questions they were automatically marked missed, even though there are no obvious cognitive delays when you speak with him. Should i request a different test? I think that he qualified for this class because he scored low in two area's, which meets their requirments. thanks for any advice/help. u [sPAM][ ] Re: Apraxia and Slow Processing > > Liz there is much in the archives and in research about self- > fulfilling prophecies and the research of Dr. Rosenthal. Please > don't assume that it's OK because your child is younger to say your > child is " slow " in three areas! There is a huge problem with many > here assuming that apraxia and processing disorders co exist or that > children with apraxia have slow receptive/cognitive processing skills > which is also a sign of mental retardation. And the fact so many > today are accepting this is very sad. Perhaps unlike the children > here from over the years like my son Tanner -the children in the > group today won't be mainstreamed. Is that the belief? Because > belief becomes reality and you get to choose now. Your child's > future depends in some part on your belief. Isn't it a mother and > father's instinct to raise our child up? > > And to answer the question about therapy for another diagnosis > working. Many here with autistic children found some of the methods > used for apraxia to work as well. The Kaufman Kit can be used by any > late talker- even one that isn't apraxic. > > We tried various therapies for Tanner that are used for deaf children > including learning sign -that doesn't mean Tanner is deaf. Just > because a therapy helps doesn't mean a child has the diagnosis that > therapy was originally designed for. > > Please do some homework on the awesome Dr. Rosenthal and the > work he has done. You will also find much about him in the > archives. Sadly if you believe your child to be slow..in three areas > no less -you 'are' probably going to find out you are right. When > nobody else believed in Tanner Glenn and I did and guess who proved > everyone but us wrong -not us -but Tanner did! I loved sharing the whole > story with Dr. Rosenthal because he is brilliant and he is the one > that inspired me. And I saw it work. They could have been right and > Tanner would have been in special ed today. > http://www.cherab. > <http://www.cherab.org/information/familiesrelate/letter.html> > org/information/familiesrelate/letter.html > > I know some of you don't understand this -but again don't assume the > worst and don't underestimate those that can't verbally prove you > wrong...yet. Sometimes it's best to be wrong and if you believe > apraxia and slow processing of receptive or cognitive skills go hand > in hand -then you 'are' wrong. Apraxia is not a cognitive disorder. > > And even if in your child's case you were right and for example one's > child has co existing mental retardation with the apraxia -you are > still best to believe in your child and give the benefit of the > doubt. Look at Robin's daughter -it's a hard pill to swallow > to be wrong -or assume others are right with bogus diagnosis about > your child - years down the road. > http://www.cherab. <http://www.cherab.org/news/.html> > org/news/.html > > And while for ethical reasons Dr. Rosenthal's research was done in > the positive -in speaking with him he agrees that it works both > ways. If that's the case why think anything but the positive? > > http://www.facultyd > <http://www.facultydirectory.ucr.edu/cgi- bin/pub/public_individual.pl?facult > y=534> irectory.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/pub/public_individual.pl?faculty=534 > http://www.pineforg > <http://www.pineforge.com/newman4study/resources/rosenthal1.htm> > e.com/newman4study/resources/rosenthal1.htm > http://www.psichi. <http://www.psichi.org/pubs/articles/article_121.asp> > org/pubs/articles/article_121.asp > http://www.accel- <http://www.accel- team.com/pygmalion/prophecy_01.html> > team.com/pygmalion/prophecy_01.html > http://www.musicedm > <http://www.musicedmagic.com/class-management/classroom-vision-and- the-self- > fulfilling-prophecy.html> > agic.com/class-management/classroom-vision-and-the-self-fulfilling- prophecy. > html > http://www.motivati > <http://www.motivation-tools.com/workplace/social_prejudice.htm> > on-tools.com/workplace/social_prejudice.htm > > tons more -just google it or search the archives here > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Hi : We are going through the same thing right now, and I am working with an advocate to see how far I want to push the issue with the school district. We have chosen not to send my son Adam to the SPED preschool program and to keep him at his private preschool 2 full days per week. He will be getting speech therapy 2 hours per week paid for by the district, but that was a fight. My understanding, after consulting with the advocate and reading slaw and numerous other sites is that a program of typical peers is the LRE. It becomes more complicated with the preschool level because most school districts do not have public preschool classes with just typical children. I observed at the public SPED preschool, and it was not an appropriate setting for Adam. Adam did very well on all aspects of testing, except the expressive language piece. Basically, my understanding is that first the team must develop the IEP. Then, the team must decide on placement for implementing the IEP. If the IEP can be implemented in a regular classroom, even with supportive services, then I believe that is the LRE. I brought up the idea of placement at the private preschool during the IEP meeting and it was immediately shot down. All the SPED director kept saying was that their program was appropriate for Adam. Since the meeting, I have learned more about LRE, and am planning to write a letter to the SPED department asking for another meeting to discuss placement. I am in agreement with the IEP goals, but now that I understand LRE, and have clear in my mind all the reasons Adam should be placed in a regular preschool, I want to meet with them again to discuss this issue. The team needs to come up with the IEP goals, then discuss where your child can successfully work on these goals...is it a regular classroom, perhaps with drop-in speech therapy at the public school? If so, how will your child's speech therapy goals be carried over into the private preschool classroom. The private preschool will be responsible for carrying out the goals...are they willing and able to do that? I believe my son needs to be with typical peers whom he can learn from and model his language after. He has the ability to be educated with typical peers, and is not a distraction to the classroom in anyway. We have been implementing his speech therapy goals into the preschool classroom...it has taken some work to educate the teachers at the private preschool about apraxia, but they really care and truly appreciate my input and want to help Adam succeed. Placement/LRE is important to discuss, but prepare for resistance, mainly I think because at the preschool level the public school has nothing to offer in the district except an integrated SPED classroom. Find an advocate in your area to work with. The advocate I have spoken with told me I may need to contact a lawyer at some point to discuss the legalities further, since she is not a lawyer. These are helpful sites: http://www.nessasiegel.com/reimbursement_private.htm http://www.bridges4kids.org/IEP/Placement.html http://www.wrightslaw.com/info/lre.osers.memo.idea.htm slaw From Emotions to Advocacy is a book I recommend to begin to understand federal regulation and your rights regarding Special Education and IDEA. Sincerely, Holly, mother to Adam, 3 years old, moderate apraxia (we live in NH) > > Hi everyone - I have a question about the IEP process for preschoolers. has been recieving services through early on for 1 year now, and now that he is turning 3, we move to the public school. He will be going to the Early Childhood Special Education Preschool class. They ofter the class 5 days a week, but he will only be going for 2 because he goes to a private Preschool 2 days a week and really, i just feel that 5 days a week at this age is a bit much and i've been told that Fridays are a " Wash " anyway, meaning he wouldn't recieve any speech therapy on that day even if he was there. > > My question is there - can I legally request that he recieve services in any other setting? I do not feel that the class he is going to is the least restrictive environment, but they aren't offering me any options. What can I do? He does have severe verbal apraxia, but it's in the pure form, there are no motor delays, sensory issues, etc. He did test low on the cognitive test, but they told me it was because it was standardized and since he couldn't verbally answer the questions they were automatically marked missed, even though there are no obvious cognitive delays when you speak with him. Should i request a different test? I think that he qualified for this class because he scored low in two area's, which meets their requirments. > > > thanks for any advice/help. > > u > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 So helpful. Confirms out decision to go out of district. In the integrated preschool even the so called typical kids have speech issues so I was hard-pressed to believe my kid was going to pick up good speech, the only real issue left for him, there. No thanks. > > > > Hi everyone - I have a question about the IEP process for > preschoolers. has been recieving services through early on for > 1 year now, and now that he is turning 3, we move to the public > school. He will be going to the Early Childhood Special Education > Preschool class. They ofter the class 5 days a week, but he will > only be going for 2 because he goes to a private Preschool 2 days a > week and really, i just feel that 5 days a week at this age is a bit > much and i've been told that Fridays are a " Wash " anyway, meaning he > wouldn't recieve any speech therapy on that day even if he was there. > > > > My question is there - can I legally request that he recieve > services in any other setting? I do not feel that the class he is > going to is the least restrictive environment, but they aren't > offering me any options. What can I do? He does have severe verbal > apraxia, but it's in the pure form, there are no motor delays, > sensory issues, etc. He did test low on the cognitive test, but they > told me it was because it was standardized and since he couldn't > verbally answer the questions they were automatically marked missed, > even though there are no obvious cognitive delays when you speak with > him. Should i request a different test? I think that he qualified > for this class because he scored low in two area's, which meets their > requirments. > > > > > > thanks for any advice/help. > > > > u > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 There are a very few legal decisions finding that a private preschool with mainstream peers is the appropriate placement (with supports). It is a burgeoning area and I would encourage anyone who sees this as the least restrictive, appropriate environment for their child to seek payment for the placement and the supports through their IEP, and if denied, and they have the ability, to seek special education counsel to pursue this further. Good referral websites for attorneys and advocates are at COPAA.org and wrightslaw.org (they provide state specific referrals). Asher, Esq. Asher, Gaughran LLP 223 Katonah Avenue Katonah, New York 10536 asher@... T: (914) 232-1150 F: (914) 232-1144 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail The information contained in this email message and any attachments is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sec. 2510-2521, is legally privileged, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender at (914) 232-1150 or by reply email, and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 , You can always request that the service be given somewhere other than the school. The school (I don't think) has to provide it in other locations, however some schools may (probably depends on the child, situation, and district). In the district where I work, a parent asked for PT services in her home (her child does not attend our school sped prek prog), the director of sped said ok to her request. That totally surprised me. We've had kids before who were " walk-in " speech kids (they only rec'd ST from our district and their parents brought them to the SLP), we may give them special ed instruction in their home or at their daycare/private prek, but never other related services, so this was huge to me. It never hurts to ask! By the way, it's nice to meet another parent who feels 5 days a week for a 3 yr old is too much! Same may not like me for saying it, but it's how I feel. I said the same thing about my son who just turned 3. He'll be attending a prvate prek 2 days a week for 2 1/2 hrs and get his ST privately (paid for by the school district). Bonnie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 My son gets his services at a typical preschool including an aide. We got a big sales pitch about how great the sped preschool would be for him, but it was awful. When school is not in session we had all his services provided at home. They started to argue about providing services in our home, but our advocate shot them down pretty quickly. It wasn't a difficult argument since he gets ST, PT, OT and VT and he would have spent so much time on the road going from one facility to another. I didn't fight for them to pay for 's preschool, but I know they pay for at least partially for some kids based on the need for developing social skills. Everything is negotiable, just depends how hard you want to fight:-) > > There are a very few legal decisions finding that a private preschool with mainstream peers is the appropriate placement (with supports). It is a burgeoning area and I would encourage anyone who sees this as the least restrictive, appropriate environment for their child to seek payment for the placement and the supports through their IEP, and if denied, and they have the ability, to seek special education counsel to pursue this further. Good referral websites for attorneys and advocates are at COPAA.org and wrightslaw.org (they provide state specific referrals). > > Asher, Esq. > Asher, Gaughran LLP > 223 Katonah Avenue > Katonah, New York 10536 > asher@... > > T: (914) 232-1150 > F: (914) 232-1144 > > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > The information contained in this email message and any attachments is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sec. 2510-2521, is legally privileged, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender at (914) 232-1150 or by reply email, and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 In NY you would also have the option of having your child home for therapies and " preschool " - they don't have to go to a preschool building. My daughter still gets all her services at home and she's over 3. I am not comfortable with sending a diapered, non-verbal child to any school setting. She is always with a parent. Also, don't know what the deal is there but here " low in two areas " or more just means you qualify for services, either home or in school. Darlene > > Hi everyone - I have a question about the IEP process for preschoolers. has been recieving services through early on for 1 year now, and now that he is turning 3, we move to the public school. He will be going to the Early Childhood Special Education Preschool class. They ofter the class 5 days a week, but he will only be going for 2 because he goes to a private Preschool 2 days a week and really, i just feel that 5 days a week at this age is a bit much and i've been told that Fridays are a " Wash " anyway, meaning he wouldn't recieve any speech therapy on that day even if he was there. > > My question is there - can I legally request that he recieve services in any other setting? I do not feel that the class he is going to is the least restrictive environment, but they aren't offering me any options. What can I do? He does have severe verbal apraxia, but it's in the pure form, there are no motor delays, sensory issues, etc. He did test low on the cognitive test, but they told me it was because it was standardized and since he couldn't verbally answer the questions they were automatically marked missed, even though there are no obvious cognitive delays when you speak with him. Should i request a different test? I think that he qualified for this class because he scored low in two area's, which meets their requirments. > > > thanks for any advice/help. > > u > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 Thankls to Dr. Agin > > > > Hi everyone - I have a question about the IEP process for > preschoolers. has been recieving services through early on for > 1 year now, and now that he is turning 3, we move to the public > school. He will be going to the Early Childhood Special Education > Preschool class. They ofter the class 5 days a week, but he will only > be going for 2 because he goes to a private Preschool 2 days a week > and really, i just feel that 5 days a week at this age is a bit much > and i've been told that Fridays are a " Wash " anyway, meaning he > wouldn't recieve any speech therapy on that day even if he was there. > > > > My question is there - can I legally request that he recieve > services in any other setting? I do not feel that the class he is > going to is the least restrictive environment, but they aren't > offering me any options. What can I do? He does have severe verbal > apraxia, but it's in the pure form, there are no motor delays, sensory > issues, etc. He did test low on the cognitive test, but they told me > it was because it was standardized and since he couldn't verbally > answer the questions they were automatically marked missed, even > though there are no obvious cognitive delays when you speak with him. > Should i request a different test? I think that he qualified for > this class because he scored low in two area's, which meets their > requirments. > > > > > > thanks for any advice/help. > > > > u > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 The following is about the grouplist SPEDlaw which is still at until the 13th of this month. In the meantime you can still visit the group and search the archives for free. Not sure if the entire site will be down after the 13th. SPEDlaw/ " Dear Listmember: THIS IS NOT A SPAM This Group will be closing WEDNESDAY FEB 13,2008 . Please visit the ONLY Message and Inforamtion board that is supported by . the URL is http://www.websitetoolbox.com/mb/power This will bring you to a registration page. Registration is $15.00v ( only about 4 cents a day ) Once you register you will receive a Paypal statement bill directing you how to pay your membership. Once this is completed you will be " approved " and your name you have selected at registration will be Active. Thank you for your understanding and we look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, list owner email= owner at powermc.achivenet.com Or email = RC at powermc.achivenet.com . To continue to the only message board sanctioned by J.D. please visit the POWER (Parents Organizing to Win Educational Rights) site located at url powermc.achivenet.com . Sorry for any inconvenience.This is a private members site supported by user dues. From that site a recent messaage about being home and getting services in the state just talked about -NY: Jan 24th 2008 " New York tells districts to stop services for home-schooled children Home-schooled children in New York are no longer eligible for special education services, according to statewide special ed coordinator DeLorenzo. " The IDEA requires that home-schooled students receive special education services to the same extent that other parentally placed private school students receive services only if the home schools are recognized under state law as private elementary or secondary schools, " DeLorenzo said in a memo dated January 2008. Since New York does not recognize home schools as private elementary or secondary schools, he continued, " it was determined that the provision of IEP services by a public school district to students with disabilities who are home schooled ... is not authorized under IDEA or New York state law. " New York officials were within their rights to remove special ed services for home-schooled children, OSEP Acting Director Patty Guard said in a statement. She emphasized, however, the state was not obliged to take this step under federal law or regulation. Develop task force to address service delivery, highlight resources A steep rise in autism cases during the past few years prompted Langlieb Greer to take action. The Miami-Dade County (Fla.) Public Schools board member saw her district struggling to keep up with the demand for services. At the same time, she saw parents struggling to understand their children's diagnoses and work with -- rather than against -- educators and administrators. To change the tenor of the time, Greer suggested the district set up a multifaceted task force to determine how best to serve children with autism and support their families. You might consider joining with other members of your community to develop a similar autism task force to strengthen your early childhood autism services and network of resources. " SPEDlaw/message/34795 ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.