Guest guest Posted June 2, 2003 Report Share Posted June 2, 2003 its a bit painful but think it has to be typed out into a post. > I want to post Zeb's hair analysis results. Do I do this in a > regular email or how? DDI is where the test was preformed. Thanks > ALisha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2003 Report Share Posted June 3, 2003 > I want to post Zeb's hair analysis results. Do I do this in a > regular email or how? DDI is where the test was preformed. Thanks > ALisha Probably better to post them here / Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2003 Report Share Posted June 3, 2003 cept you get sucked into group pressure to chelate which imo is not the way to go at all. > > I want to post Zeb's hair analysis results. Do I do this in a > > regular email or how? DDI is where the test was preformed. Thanks > > ALisha > > > Probably better to post them here > > / > > Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 its very hard to comment on a hair test without seeing the whole thing. scanning it to a jpg to a file of about size of about 250k will give good enough resolution without being to big. it can then be uploaded to the files section of this board and comments given. but basically it is showing an impaired sulphur metabolism which may be well occasioned by lead. antimony is the flame proofing in beds and pajamas and toxic really the rest of the hair test needs to be seen and the supplements you are giving and an indication of the area lived in(to get an idea of the local mineralisation of food and dust) is helpful > I just received results back for a hair test done on my son. Some of > the metals are outside of the reference range and I'm wondering if > anyone can shed any light on the results. These are his > results/reference range. Antimony 0.16/<=0.03, Arsenic > 0.102/<=0.082, Cadmium 0.145/<=0.106, Lead 1.756/<=1.559, Nickel > 0.848/<=0.559, Tin 0.4275/<=0.1825. Maybe these aren't even high > enough to worry about, but I have no idea. By the way, my son is 3 > years old. > > Thank you, > Kim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 , I don't have access to a scanner, so I created a word document and posted to files under test results. I labeled it on's test results. I have noted supplements used in the doc. We live in a rural area NW of Richmond, VA. We do get our water from a well--I've ordered a metals test for that, and our house is about 100 yrs. old so lead paint is a concern. Please let me know if any more info is needed. I would be grateful for your insight. Kim > > I just received results back for a hair test done on my son. Some > of > > the metals are outside of the reference range and I'm wondering if > > anyone can shed any light on the results. These are his > > results/reference range. Antimony 0.16/<=0.03, Arsenic > > 0.102/<=0.082, Cadmium 0.145/<=0.106, Lead 1.756/<=1.559, Nickel > > 0.848/<=0.559, Tin 0.4275/<=0.1825. Maybe these aren't even high > > enough to worry about, but I have no idea. By the way, my son is 3 > > years old. > > > > Thank you, > > Kim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 hes got high lead and is retaining mercury (mercury shows as very low meaning it is bound into tissue and not floating out to blood) so there is quite a severe impairment of the sulphur metabolism and the hair test is disordered. i did mention about antimony and beeding pajamas before. his lead intake may not be huge but it all gets into a snarl and get retianed rather than flushed out. thats a huge amount of dmg, much smaller more frequent doses are better imo. there such a substantial issue with sulphur impairment that to see progress you are going to have to read my web page( yes i know, this apprently is like asking to walk on razor blades or something) 'minerals i take' in the index of http://tinyurl.com/2csa3 and other things like skin vitamin d, where you live, you never get the right sun unfortunately, basically a broad based approach with metallothionein promotion to flush the heavy metlas with zinc copper selenium etc as per my web page he seems to have the genes to do quite well i think. your other option is chelation but imo it does not work as well and is destructive of large scale nueral structures in the brain which would show as developmental delays that never seem to be quite got past even though the child is healthier. the broad metallothionein promotion is quite complex but not too bad once you get the hang of it. not expensive either. whey is quite important, again a somewhat complex issue though. what is he sleeping like? r u using powder enzymes? do you have his selenium reading? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 >>Antimony 0.16/<=0.03, Arsenic > 0.102/<=0.082, Cadmium 0.145/<=0.106, Lead 1.756/<=1.559, Nickel > 0.848/<=0.559, Tin 0.4275/<=0.1825. Consider removing sources of current exposures, especially antimony, lead, and tin http://www.danasview.net/metals.htm Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 > > > what is he sleeping like? He sleeps well. Rarely has night wakings, sleeps about 10 hours a night, and an afternoon nap 1.5-3.5 hours. > > r u using powder enzymes? yes > > do you have his selenium reading? no, I do not. I will check out your website. Thanks again, Kim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 Dana, Any ideas on where the tin might be coming from? > >>Antimony 0.16/<=0.03, Arsenic > > 0.102/<=0.082, Cadmium 0.145/<=0.106, Lead 1.756/<=1.559, Nickel > > 0.848/<=0.559, Tin 0.4275/<=0.1825. > > > > Consider removing sources of current exposures, especially antimony, > lead, and tin > > http://www.danasview.net/metals.htm > > Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 - just my 2 cents worth--your daughter is excreting mercury --and that is the inportant part--what is NOT good--is that she has a lot of it--and one must look at all the other essential elements that also come with these test results--(I donot know how to read them) is she ASD? Is she eating a lot of fish? Where can she be getting mercury and uranium from? reasearch the sources--isn't uranium in the ground and higher in some areas naturally? so it would be in your water..in food grown on the soil....factories emit it.... Lucy In , " cabookmommy " <bookmommy@s...> wrote: > > I just received my 5yo daughter's hair elements results from DDI. It > came back HIGH for Mercury and Uranium. > > Mercury was in the far right of yellow (just short of red) 1.8 vs > ref range <0.40 > > Uranium just went over to red .24 vs. ref range <0.060 > > In the Essential and other Elements section, she is *HIGH* in Sodium > and Potassium and *LOW* in Magnesium, Manganese, Cobalt and > Germanium. > > Questions... > 1) What do these results mean? > 2) Should we start chelation immediately? > 3) Should we contact a doctor? Our ped is very much " old school " > (prescribes lots of drugs), so we'd have to find another doc. Anyone > know a good one in Southern CA (Orange County)? > 4) Or should we chelate ourselves? > > Feedback would be appreciated very much. I'm trying hard to pray and > not freak out! > > God bless, > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 Lucy, thanks for responding. She doesn't have an ASD diagnosis but she has definite developmental issues (auditory processing, language, etc.) We eat fish about 3-4x a month, but I suspect the mercury may also have come from vaccines when she was younger and my dental amalgams when she was in utero. I have no idea where the uranium came from. Thanks, > > > > I just received my 5yo daughter's hair elements results from DDI. It > > came back HIGH for Mercury and Uranium. > > > > Mercury was in the far right of yellow (just short of red) 1.8 vs > > ref range <0.40 > > > > Uranium just went over to red .24 vs. ref range <0.060 > > > > In the Essential and other Elements section, she is *HIGH* in Sodium > > and Potassium and *LOW* in Magnesium, Manganese, Cobalt and > > Germanium. > > > > Questions... > > 1) What do these results mean? > > 2) Should we start chelation immediately? > > 3) Should we contact a doctor? Our ped is very much " old school " > > (prescribes lots of drugs), so we'd have to find another doc. Anyone > > know a good one in Southern CA (Orange County)? > > 4) Or should we chelate ourselves? > > > > Feedback would be appreciated very much. I'm trying hard to pray and > > not freak out! > > > > God bless, > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 > 3) Should we contact a doctor? Our ped is very much " old school " > (prescribes lots of drugs), so we'd have to find another doc. Anyone > know a good one in Southern CA (Orange County)? > 4) Or should we chelate ourselves? You can chelate yourself. Or check out doctors in SoCal. http://www.danasview.net/socal.htm#physicians http://www.tacanow.com/socalresources.htm#Doctors Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 ---- Uranium also can come from factories making fertilizer or living next to a mine, or a coal fired power plant, in addition to sources I mentioned before. PLEASE find a list of good fish to eat and avoid the mercury infested-known ones--see thegreenguide.com--hope that is right--that info might be posted without even being a member--If not email me and I can get you a list of safe fish. If your girl has develop. issues--then I would test in more ways than just the hair-- there are toxic urine tests--collecting urine after a challenge dose of DMSA--or other as per doc. (some say challenges don't show-I for one think they are useless sometimes, for some things) For looking for metals/toxins--you might have to work with an agreeable non main stream doc--reg peds do not want to hear about all this, as you probably know. She could be holding other metals that you don't know of and NOT detoxing them. Vax today STILL have thimerosal no matter what everyone says--so if she got her boosters (and if so--which ones-please list) and when did you notice develop problems? Lucy > Lucy, thanks for responding. She doesn't have an ASD diagnosis but > she has definite developmental issues (auditory processing, > language, etc.) > > We eat fish about 3-4x a month, but I suspect the mercury may also > have come from vaccines when she was younger and my dental amalgams > when she was in utero. > > I have no idea where the uranium came from. > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > I just received my 5yo daughter's hair elements results from > DDI. It > > > came back HIGH for Mercury and Uranium. > > > > > > Mercury was in the far right of yellow (just short of red) 1.8 > vs > > > ref range <0.40 > > > > > > Uranium just went over to red .24 vs. ref range <0.060 > > > > > > In the Essential and other Elements section, she is *HIGH* in > Sodium > > > and Potassium and *LOW* in Magnesium, Manganese, Cobalt and > > > Germanium. > > > > > > Questions... > > > 1) What do these results mean? > > > 2) Should we start chelation immediately? > > > 3) Should we contact a doctor? Our ped is very much " old school " > > > (prescribes lots of drugs), so we'd have to find another doc. > Anyone > > > know a good one in Southern CA (Orange County)? > > > 4) Or should we chelate ourselves? > > > > > > Feedback would be appreciated very much. I'm trying hard to pray > and > > > not freak out! > > > > > > God bless, > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 Lucy, My dd is 5yo and she had ALL her vaccinations from infancy because I wasn't aware of the issues until after the fact. She has been developmentally delayed ever since I can remember...always sleeping longer than most babies and not talking until 2-1/2. We don't live near factories, so I suspect the uranium may have come from soil and/or fertilizers. I read a website that says high uranium on a hair test is inconclusive because it could have come from a dirty hair sample. That's a big possibility as my girl loves to play in the dirt in the backyard. I would love the mercury-free fish list. I found three doctors in our area who are reputable and do chelation. Only one of them takes PPO coverage, so we may have to go with him. I also ordered two more hair kits for our sons, so we may be looking at chelating three kids at one time. Thanks again, > > > > > > > > I just received my 5yo daughter's hair elements results from > > DDI. It > > > > came back HIGH for Mercury and Uranium. > > > > > > > > Mercury was in the far right of yellow (just short of red) 1.8 > > vs > > > > ref range <0.40 > > > > > > > > Uranium just went over to red .24 vs. ref range <0.060 > > > > > > > > In the Essential and other Elements section, she is *HIGH* in > > Sodium > > > > and Potassium and *LOW* in Magnesium, Manganese, Cobalt and > > > > Germanium. > > > > > > > > Questions... > > > > 1) What do these results mean? > > > > 2) Should we start chelation immediately? > > > > 3) Should we contact a doctor? Our ped is very much " old school " > > > > (prescribes lots of drugs), so we'd have to find another doc. > > Anyone > > > > know a good one in Southern CA (Orange County)? > > > > 4) Or should we chelate ourselves? > > > > > > > > Feedback would be appreciated very much. I'm trying hard to pray > > and > > > > not freak out! > > > > > > > > God bless, > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 , Fish to Avoid High mercury: Atlantic halibut, king mackerel, oysters (Gulf Coast ) pike, sea bass, shark, swordfish, tilefish (golden snapper), tuna (steaks and canned albacore). High POPs: Farmed salmon. Limit to once a month if pregnant/nursing. Check thegreenguide.com for updates on POPs in other farmed fish. Fish to Eat Moderate mercury (children and pregnant/nursing women can eat one from this list, once a month): Alaskan halibut, black cod, blue (Gulf Coast) crab, cod, dungeness crab, Eastern oysters, mahimahi, blue mussels, pollack, tuna (canned light). Low mercury (above groups can safely eat 2-3 times a week, but check fish list at thegreenguide.com for environmental impacts): anchovies, Arctic char, crawfish, Pacific flounder, herring, king crab, sanddabs, scallops, Pacific sole; tilapia, wild Alaska and Pacific salmon; farmed catfish, clams, striped bass and sturgeon. Note: low-mercury but overfished or destructively harvested species, such as Atlantic cod, shrimp, Atlantic flounder, and Atlantic sole should be avoided for the environment's sake. POPs Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)Ñneurotoxic, hormone-disrupting chemicals banned in the U.S. since 1977Ñwere found at levels seven times higher in farmed salmon than in wild ones, according to a study published in Science in January 2004. PCBs are persistent organic pollutants (POPs), which accumulate in animal fats. Because most farmed salmon are raised on feed that includes ground-up fishÑand sometimes other animals, such as cattleÑtheir bodies collect POPs. Low POPs: Wild Alaska and California salmon (fresh or canned). Check with your state's department of health for POP advisories before eating fish from local waters. Also see map1.epa.gov. Detoxing is ALWAYS a good idea--there are tons of different ways/methods all the way from herbs/foods/vits, saunas...etc..etc all the way to DMSA, DMPS. GOOD you are on your way!! personal note--my son like most here take lots of supplements and have food restrictions--important for most to stay away from is additives/preservatives--EAT ORGANIC as much as you can! One great site I like is www.parentingnaturally.net--- tell me if taht is wrong web address--good luck! Lucy Lucy, My dd is 5yo and she had ALL her vaccinations from infancy because I wasn't aware of the issues until after the fact. She has been developmentally delayed ever since I can remember...always sleeping longer than most babies and not talking until 2-1/2. We don't live near factories, so I suspect the uranium may have come from soil and/or fertilizers. I read a website that says high uranium on a hair test is inconclusive because it could have come from a dirty hair sample. That's a big possibility as my girl loves to play in the dirt in the backyard. I would love the mercury-free fish list. I found three doctors in our area who are reputable and do chelation. Only one of them takes PPO coverage, so we may have to go with him. I also ordered two more hair kits for our sons, so we may be looking at chelating three kids at one time. Thanks again, ---- Uranium also can come from factories making fertilizer or living next to a mine, or a coal fired power plant, in addition to sources I mentioned before. PLEASE find a list of good fish to eat and avoid the mercury infested- known ones--see thegreenguide.com--hope that is right--that info might be posted without even being a member--If not email me and I can get you a list of safe fish. If your girl has develop. issues--then I would test in more ways than just the hair-- there are toxic urine tests--collecting urine after a challenge dose of DMSA--or other as per doc. (some say challenges don't show-I for one think they are useless sometimes, for some things) For looking for metals/toxins--you might have to work with an agreeable non main stream doc--reg peds do not want to hear about all this, as you probably know. She could be holding other metals that you don't know of and NOT detoxing them. Vax today STILL have thimerosal no matter what everyone says--so if she got her boosters (and if so--which ones-please list) and when did you notice develop problems? Lucy > > > > > > Lucy, thanks for responding. She doesn't have an ASD diagnosis > but > > > she has definite developmental issues (auditory processing, > > > language, etc.) > > > > > > We eat fish about 3-4x a month, but I suspect the mercury may > also > > > have come from vaccines when she was younger and my dental > amalgams > > > when she was in utero. > > > > > > I have no idea where the uranium came from. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just received my 5yo daughter's hair elements results from > > > DDI. It > > > > > came back HIGH for Mercury and Uranium. > > > > > > > > > > Mercury was in the far right of yellow (just short of red) > 1.8 > > > vs > > > > > ref range <0.40 > > > > > > > > > > Uranium just went over to red .24 vs. ref range <0.060 > > > > > > > > > > In the Essential and other Elements section, she is *HIGH* > in > > > Sodium > > > > > and Potassium and *LOW* in Magnesium, Manganese, Cobalt and > > > > > Germanium. > > > > > > > > > > Questions... > > > > > 1) What do these results mean? > > > > > 2) Should we start chelation immediately? > > > > > 3) Should we contact a doctor? Our ped is very much " old > school " > > > > > (prescribes lots of drugs), so we'd have to find another > doc. > > > Anyone > > > > > know a good one in Southern CA (Orange County)? > > > > > 4) Or should we chelate ourselves? > > > > > > > > > > Feedback would be appreciated very much. I'm trying hard to > pray > > > and > > > > > not freak out! > > > > > > > > > > God bless, > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2005 Report Share Posted March 22, 2005 Consider identifying and removing/reducing sources of exposure to antimony and titanium. S <tt> <BR> Andy & Moira,<BR> <BR> Would someone be so kind as to give feedback on my son's hair test<BR> (done last August). Is he candidate for Chelation?<BR> <BR> Thanks, Vostenak, New Jersey<BR> <BR> POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS <BR> element      result   ref range   color <BR> ============================================== <BR> aluminum     17       < 8.0       yellow <BR> antimony     1.0     < .066      pink <BR> arsenic      0.21      < .08       yellow <BR> beryllium    <0.01    < 0.02      no line <BR> bismuth      0.050     < .13       green <BR> cadmium      .055     < .15       green <BR> lead         .69       < 1.0       green <BR> mercury      0.43     < 1.4       green <BR> platinum     <0.003     < .005      no line <BR> thallium     <0.001   < .01       no line <BR> thorium      <0.001   < .005      no line <BR> uranium      .010     < .06       green <BR> nickel       .25      < .4        green <BR> silver       .32      < .2        yellow <BR> tin          .67      < .3        yellow <BR> titanium     5.5      < 1.0       pink <BR> <BR> ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS <BR> element      result   ref range   color   under/over 50% <BR> ============================================================ <BR> Calcium      279      125-370     green  over 50% <BR> Magnesium    13       12-30       green  under 50% <BR> Sodium       150       12-90       yellow  over 50% <BR> Potassium    320      12-40       pink  over 50% <BR> Copper       12      8.0-16      green   over 50% <BR> Zinc         68      100-190     yellow  under 50% <BR> Manganese    .13      0.2-0.55    yellow  under 50% <BR> Chromium     .63     0.26-0.5    yellow   over 50% <BR> Vanadium     .10    0.03-0.1    green   over 50% <BR> Molybdenum   .096    0.05-0.13   green  over 50% <BR> Boron        15      0.6-4.0     pink     over 50% <BR> Iodine       1.2     0.25-1.3    green   over 50% <BR> Lithium      0.014    0.007-0.023 green   over 50% <BR> Phosphorus   180      160-250     green  under 50% <BR> Selenium     0.99     0.95-1.7    green   under 50% <BR> Strontium    0.23     0.16-1.0    green   under 50% <BR> Sulfur       49200    45500-53000 green   over 50% <BR> Barium       .33     0.16-0.8    white  over 50% <BR> Cobalt       0.010    0.013-0.035 yellow  under 50% <BR> Iron         15      8.0-19      green   over 50% <BR> Germanium    0.048    0.045-0.065 green   under 50% <BR> Rubidium     0.51    0.016-0.18  yellow  over 50% <BR> Zirconium    2.2     0.04-1.0    pink   over 50<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> </tt> <br><br> <tt> =======================================================<BR> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2005 Report Share Posted March 25, 2005 > aluminum 17 < 8.0 yellow > antimony 1.0 < .066 pink > arsenic 0.21 < .08 yellow > silver .32 < .2 yellow > tin .67 < .3 yellow > titanium 5.5 < 1.0 pink Consider removing sources of current exposures http://www.danasview.net/metals.htm > Magnesium 13 12-30 green under 50% > Zinc 68 100-190 yellow under 50% > Selenium 0.99 0.95-1.7 green under 50% My son improved when I added these. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report Share Posted August 29, 2005 Dawn R wrote: His mineral transport is very borderline for one rule. Does this mean he is probably mercury toxic? Could his mineral transport be showing as improved from functioning even worse in the past (unknown) because of the minimal biomed actions his mom has already taken (sporadic TMG and TTFD, regular mB12 shots, various supplements, etc.)? In other words, since he is low-to-mid functioning, is it possible his mom jumpstarted his natural detox system a little and now his test results are looking not as severe? His mom stopped the mB12 about 6-8 weeks before she cut his hair for the test, so I think the hair that was may have had some excretion due to the mB12 in it (or I might be completely wrong!). I think I've convinced her to chelate and I'd like her to do it your way, but Buttar's TD-DMPS seems much easier to her. What's the best thing I can tell her? Thank you SO much! You are invaluable! Dawn Rochlen The chart on page 26 of the hair test book may be helpful, but yes if he almost meets a counting rule he does probably have deranaged mineral transport, though less likely than if he does meet it. E. g. 9 in 10 vs 39 in 40. Supplements can normalize the test. This can make it harder to be sure. TD DMPS needs to be used every 8 hours for 3 days or more in a row, and minerals are given without regard for chelation. TD DMPS is a fad, but most people are very trapped in faddish sales gimmicks and need to be left to follow them for a while unless it is dangerous (which is TD use is OK, but every other day is dangerous, it has to be every 8 hours). Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report Share Posted August 29, 2005 > > I think I've convinced her to chelate and I'd like her to do it your > way, but Buttar's TD-DMPS seems much easier to her. What's the best > thing I can tell her? The regression rate for those using Buttar's schedule, from the parent reports I've seen, is pretty high. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 The good news is the lead is low and the copper is okay. You're right the mercury is low and that is what we normally find with these kids. The adrenals need help, try adrenal cortex, C, B vitamins, especially pantothenic acid or better, pantethine, and selenium is low. Try five rounds with low, frequent doses of an appropriate chelator and see if he responds. Good luck, [ ] Hair Test Results Hi, here are my son's hair test results from DDI. Would appreciate any feedback. According to what I counted, there is no mercury poisoning, however, the mercury is suspiciously low. POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS element result ref range color ==================================================== Aluminum 9.1 < 8.0 yellow Antimony 0.064 < 0.066 green Arsenic 0.041 < 0.080 green Berylium <0.01 < 0.020 no line Bismuth 0.072 < 0.13 green Cadmium 0.042 < 0.15 green Lead 0.57 < 1.0 green Mercury 0.04 < 0.40 green Platinum <0.003 < 0.005 no line Thallium <0.001 < 0.010 no line Thorium <0.001 < 0.005 no line Uranium 0.29 < 0.060 red Nickel 0.11 < 0.40 green Silver 0.06 < 0.20 green Tin 0.28 < 0.30 green Titanium 0.50 < 1.0 green TOTAL TOXIC REPRESENTATION GREEN ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS element result ref range color under/over 50% =================================================================== Calcium 108 125-370 yellow under 50% Magnesium 15 12-30 green under 50% Sodium 42 12-90 white 50th percentile Potassium 82 12-40 yellow over 50% Copper 8.5 8.0-16 green under 50% Zinc 76 100-190 yellow under 50% Manganese 0.08 0.20-0.55 red under 50% Chromium 0.32 0.26-0.50 green under 50% Vanadium 0.038 0.030-0.10 green under 50% Molybdenum 0.10 0.050-0.13 green over 50% Boron 6.2 0.60-4.0 yellow over 50% Iodine 0.76 0.25-1.3 green over 50% Lithium 0.012 0.007-0.023 green over 50% Phosphorus 168 160-250 green under 50% Selenium 0.92 0.95-1.7 green under 50% Strontium 0.34 0.16-1.0 white 50th percentile Sulfur 46100 45500-53000 green under 50% Barium 0.34 0.16-0.80 white 50th percentile Cobalt 0.006 0.013-0.035 red under 50% Iron 6.8 8.0-19 yellow under 50% Germanium 0.028 0.045-0.065 yellow under 50% Rubidium 0.067 0.016-0.18 green over 50% Zirconium 1.8 0.040-1.0 yellow over 50% ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 In a message dated 12/5/2005 9:49:02 PM Central Standard Time, Ladyshrink111@... writes: The good news is it is chelated out quite quickly. End any current exposure. Bismuth can cause neurological problems like mercury. thank u for the info....where can i find something about this in writing, like an article, etc?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 Just too much Bismuth. Bismuth is in make up and can be transferred to the baby while you are pregnant. Some people store it. Bismuth is also in Pepto Bismal and some diaper rash ointments. The good news is it is chelated out quite quickly. End any current exposure. Bismuth can cause neurological problems like mercury. [ ] Hair Test Results What does a red level of Bismuth indicate (a result of 6.8 when ref. range is < .13???? thanks much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 Sorry, I'm not familiar with elements.....which ones are the adrenals? Patty > > The good news is the lead is low and the copper is okay. You're right the mercury is low and that is what we normally find with these kids. > > The adrenals need help, try adrenal cortex, C, B vitamins, especially pantothenic acid or better, pantethine, and selenium is low. Try five rounds with low, frequent doses of an appropriate chelator and see if he responds. > > Good luck, > > > [ ] Hair Test Results > > > Hi, here are my son's hair test results from DDI. Would appreciate > any feedback. According to what I counted, there is no mercury > poisoning, however, the mercury is suspiciously low. > > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS > element result ref range color > ==================================================== > Aluminum 9.1 < 8.0 yellow > Antimony 0.064 < 0.066 green > Arsenic 0.041 < 0.080 green > Berylium <0.01 < 0.020 no line > Bismuth 0.072 < 0.13 green > Cadmium 0.042 < 0.15 green > Lead 0.57 < 1.0 green > Mercury 0.04 < 0.40 green > Platinum <0.003 < 0.005 no line > Thallium <0.001 < 0.010 no line > Thorium <0.001 < 0.005 no line > Uranium 0.29 < 0.060 red > Nickel 0.11 < 0.40 green > Silver 0.06 < 0.20 green > Tin 0.28 < 0.30 green > Titanium 0.50 < 1.0 green > TOTAL TOXIC REPRESENTATION GREEN > > > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS > element result ref range color under/over 50% > =================================================================== > Calcium 108 125-370 yellow under 50% > Magnesium 15 12-30 green under 50% > Sodium 42 12-90 white 50th percentile > Potassium 82 12-40 yellow over 50% > Copper 8.5 8.0-16 green under 50% > Zinc 76 100-190 yellow under 50% > Manganese 0.08 0.20-0.55 red under 50% > Chromium 0.32 0.26-0.50 green under 50% > Vanadium 0.038 0.030-0.10 green under 50% > Molybdenum 0.10 0.050-0.13 green over 50% > Boron 6.2 0.60-4.0 yellow over 50% > Iodine 0.76 0.25-1.3 green over 50% > Lithium 0.012 0.007-0.023 green over 50% > Phosphorus 168 160-250 green under 50% > Selenium 0.92 0.95-1.7 green under 50% > Strontium 0.34 0.16-1.0 white 50th percentile > Sulfur 46100 45500-53000 green under 50% > Barium 0.34 0.16-0.80 white 50th percentile > Cobalt 0.006 0.013-0.035 red under 50% > Iron 6.8 8.0-19 yellow under 50% > Germanium 0.028 0.045-0.065 yellow under 50% > Rubidium 0.067 0.016-0.18 green over 50% > Zirconium 1.8 0.040-1.0 yellow over 50% > > > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 Probable bismuth toxicity, depending on what the rest of the test show. Bismuth is in Pepto Bismol, some make-up, some diaper rash ointments, among other things. Check www.danasview.net for sources of exposure. S S <tt> What does a red level of Bismuth indicate (a result of 6.8 when ref. range is <BR> < .13???? thanks much<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 The first four. Cal/mag, Potassium/Sodium. If I remember correctly the first two go the opposite direction from the next two, indicating adrenal stress. Lots more information in Andy Cutler's hairtest book at http://www.noamalgam/hairtest.com [ ] Hair Test Results > > > Hi, here are my son's hair test results from DDI. Would appreciate > any feedback. According to what I counted, there is no mercury > poisoning, however, the mercury is suspiciously low. > > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS > element result ref range color > ==================================================== > Aluminum 9.1 < 8.0 yellow > Antimony 0.064 < 0.066 green > Arsenic 0.041 < 0.080 green > Berylium <0.01 < 0.020 no line > Bismuth 0.072 < 0.13 green > Cadmium 0.042 < 0.15 green > Lead 0.57 < 1.0 green > Mercury 0.04 < 0.40 green > Platinum <0.003 < 0.005 no line > Thallium <0.001 < 0.010 no line > Thorium <0.001 < 0.005 no line > Uranium 0.29 < 0.060 red > Nickel 0.11 < 0.40 green > Silver 0.06 < 0.20 green > Tin 0.28 < 0.30 green > Titanium 0.50 < 1.0 green > TOTAL TOXIC REPRESENTATION GREEN > > > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS > element result ref range color under/over 50% > =================================================================== > Calcium 108 125-370 yellow under 50% > Magnesium 15 12-30 green under 50% > Sodium 42 12-90 white 50th percentile > Potassium 82 12-40 yellow over 50% > Copper 8.5 8.0-16 green under 50% > Zinc 76 100-190 yellow under 50% > Manganese 0.08 0.20-0.55 red under 50% > Chromium 0.32 0.26-0.50 green under 50% > Vanadium 0.038 0.030-0.10 green under 50% > Molybdenum 0.10 0.050-0.13 green over 50% > Boron 6.2 0.60-4.0 yellow over 50% > Iodine 0.76 0.25-1.3 green over 50% > Lithium 0.012 0.007-0.023 green over 50% > Phosphorus 168 160-250 green under 50% > Selenium 0.92 0.95-1.7 green under 50% > Strontium 0.34 0.16-1.0 white 50th percentile > Sulfur 46100 45500-53000 green under 50% > Barium 0.34 0.16-0.80 white 50th percentile > Cobalt 0.006 0.013-0.035 red under 50% > Iron 6.8 8.0-19 yellow under 50% > Germanium 0.028 0.045-0.065 yellow under 50% > Rubidium 0.067 0.016-0.18 green over 50% > Zirconium 1.8 0.040-1.0 yellow over 50% > > > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.