Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 I did the testing before we started the diet and the results for casomorphin was 61.3 when I called they told me to try the diet and see if it helped because he wasnt that elavated. I hate to reintroduce milk after him making so much progress. Friday he asked me for a cookie by saying " cookie plea " that was the first time he has ever asked for anything. He sometimes repeats words though. Re: Some Advice Please > Your child may not be ALLERGIC to milk, but he may have a casein > intolerance. I would do the peptide testing at Great Plains before > reintroducing milk. That will tell you if you need to stay away from > casein. > > > > > Hi list members! > > > > I don't usually post but I have been a member for a few months now > and I don't know what I would do without all of you! We have had our > son on the diet for 5 months now and have seen huge improvements. We > are only gfcf as of right now but we just got our sons test results > back today and he tested alergic to wheat, nuts and soy. We have > always known he was allergic to nuts because he gets a rash from it > but we haven't seen any reactions from the soy. The doctor said he > was mildy alergic to it and as long as we are not seeing reactions to > it then it would be ok to continue using soy. He was not alergic to > milk though. So my question is do we just go wheat/gluten/soy free or > what? > > > > Thanks, > > Elliott > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 Your child may not be ALLERGIC to milk, but he may have a casein intolerance. I would do the peptide testing at Great Plains before reintroducing milk. That will tell you if you need to stay away from casein. > Hi list members! > > I don't usually post but I have been a member for a few months now and I don't know what I would do without all of you! We have had our son on the diet for 5 months now and have seen huge improvements. We are only gfcf as of right now but we just got our sons test results back today and he tested alergic to wheat, nuts and soy. We have always known he was allergic to nuts because he gets a rash from it but we haven't seen any reactions from the soy. The doctor said he was mildy alergic to it and as long as we are not seeing reactions to it then it would be ok to continue using soy. He was not alergic to milk though. So my question is do we just go wheat/gluten/soy free or what? > > Thanks, > Elliott > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 I am uncertain if your child is 100% GFCF since many people get this confused. Is your child 100% Gluten Free which means no wheat, oats, barley, whey, etc. or does he eat wheat? Your message sounds as though he still eats wheat. Could you elaborate on this thanks. Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 Did you do an IgG allergy test, or IgA (I think I have the abbreviations correct)....the first is for latent allergies, which are the most problematic for many of these kids, since you can't " see " the obvious reactions all the time. the second is just the obvious immediate reactions. My son was hardly allergic to anything at all on the second, and is allergic to " everything " according to the first test! So we're going by THAT one. Now I notice little things I never noticed before, like nose bleeds for a REASON, soon after a certain food, and behavior changes, which I was never aware of before. His red ears have gone away. I never knew what caused them. So if you didn't do that kind of test, I would recommend it highly. And maybe finding a doctor who would be more cautious as opposed to saying it's ok if there's no big reaction, might be a good idea, too. On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:24:33 -0500 " & Elliott " writes: > Hi list members! > > I don't usually post but I have been a member for a few months now > and I don't know what I would do without all of you! We have had > our son on the diet for 5 months now and have seen huge > improvements. We are only gfcf as of right now but we just got our > sons test results back today and he tested alergic to wheat, nuts > and soy. We have always known he was allergic to nuts because he > gets a rash from it but we haven't seen any reactions from the soy. > The doctor said he was mildy alergic to it and as long as we are not > seeing reactions to it then it would be ok to continue using soy. He > was not alergic to milk though. So my question is do we just go > wheat/gluten/soy free or what? > > Thanks, > Elliott > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 No our son is wheat free. He has been that way since febuary but we took him off the diet for a week to see what would happen and he started alot of the symptoms we hadnt seen in along time. Re: Some Advice Please > I am uncertain if your child is 100% GFCF since many people get this confused. > Is your child 100% Gluten Free which means no wheat, oats, barley, whey, etc. > or does he eat wheat? > Your message sounds as though he still eats wheat. > Could you elaborate on this thanks. > Sharon > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2001 Report Share Posted June 19, 2001 If you have seen results on the GFCF diet alone, I would stick to it the way you have been doing so for 5 months. Just because he is not " allergic " to these things does not mean he is not " sensitive " or " intolerant " to the offending foods. Best regards, Cheri**** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2003 Report Share Posted May 14, 2003 Sandy My heart is breaking. You said he is the last Dr on your insurance list. What about a Dr in another area of your state or another state. I know that many insuance companies cover several states. Do you have an option there? I truley believe that it is a conflict of interest for him to treat and review the same person. If your insurance is going to do a review demand he not be included. You may want to pull a fast one and ask if he'd be willing to testify on your behalf at malprcatice trials for the other Dr's that treated you after all if you don't have pancreatitis then those surgeries were unnecessary and could have put you in great danger. And they put great physical and mental strain on you and your families. You may find that he is willing to rethink his diagnosis after being asked to go against his peers. When we took Cassie to Boston,we spent 45 minutes with Dr Fox the specialist at Boston childrens - Our whole 45 minutes was an intense medical history on Cassie - starting with my pregnancy. He spent no time at that point looking at her existing medical records. He was interested like I said in her medical historywhen I questioed this his comment was I have found that others Dr's never seem to ask the right questions for me or they make interputaions instead of writing the fact. I ask well what about the 2 " if records I brought you and the 15 pound of films. He told us at `that time the he qould go ever her tests and records alone, on his own. He would then have his coleagues reveiw them also. After that, her films would be reviewed by his radiologist, her labs by his pathologist and then they would all hgave a conference on her case. After that A report would be made to her Local GI and her pediatrician, any and all corespondences and reports to them would also be sent to us. That's just what we got We tease and call it the $2500 Office visit. By the time all these guys got paid, that's what it cost. Durng the 1st few weeks after we all felt a big disappointment. Cassie kept saying sorry I wastd your time. But now 6 month later and 5 months after we got his report we do feel it was well worth it. Just a few things we did get told at the time. 1st and foremost if your ideopathic it means that we are to stupid to figure out your problem, alot of good our high $ med school degree does you. 2) each and every attack will do some type of damage though it may still be only at the cellular level invisible to the human eye nomatter what the test. 3) that damage is non-repairable by man or nature, the pancreas is unable to fix itself. 4) our goal should be to prevent future damage not trying to fix the unfixable. 5) what does not bother her today or next week may cause her incredible pain a month or a year from now. We are starting to see that now with Cassie so we find her dietary requirements are in constant change. 6) he said to always remember that people have differant levels of what is to be considered tolerable pain and as a person lives with pain they become used to it. Thus enabling them to wait longer before they must take medications to relieve it. He went on to say that it is a very dangerous thing - pain indicates a problem - and should be taken very seriously even if her labs show no elevations. About 2 months ago I came across a book at our library called Special Kids Need Special Parents. I picked it up because it had a chapter dealing with chronic pain. After reading the 1st page of the intro I was in tears and Mike wanted to know what was wong so I ended up reading aloud to him then we were both crying. Everything we had felt for the past 3 years was on those pages, and all our emotions just came pouring out, neither one of us had had realized how much we were holding in. We then shared this with Cassie and it started all over again, the 3 of us crying and holding each other. It did us all good. My 3 yr old was not included in this because he still does not understand. Every time Cassie has an attack he just want to go give blood to make his Sissy better. Anyway my point with this is I tried to share this with my family. Out of the 6 other brothers and sisters and my parents only 2 of my older brothers read it. They have a much greater understanding of what we are going thru. Both live in other states but both are willing to spend hrs now IMing back and forth when I feel the need for extra emotional support. The rest of the family wont read it. Though yoi may think you are an adult now you will always be your parents child, no matter how old. So.. you are that special kid and you do need special parents. Good luck, and god Bless Patty Hurst Bangor, ME Maine State Rep PAI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2003 Report Share Posted May 14, 2003 Cassie's last ultra sound which was on the 1st of this month indicated no problems yet her Dr did not say she was cured. He told me point blank - we couldn't even view more than 1/2 the pancreas - the tail was completey obscured by other organs. and much seemed blurry - so I know where your coming from with that. Something new though that we were just made aware of then was her kidney's. He says that this report came back saying that again her left kidney was significantly larger than the right one. Yikes! What do you mean again? He then told us every ultra sound and CT has indictaed this but the radiologist has always said it was equipment issues. We now have a new area of worry with her - my mom has 2 different forms of kidney disease, less than 30% function of both - cause unknown. So he will now be investigating this. he said he could see Her 1st and second series which were doen withing a 6 week time period maybe being equipment issues but 3 tiems in a row. the 3rd one being 18 months after the last series done no way. Does anyone else out there have kidney problems? The only thing that comes to mind with Cassie now is her constant frequent need to pee. She has never ever slept thru the night without having to get up to pee since she was potty trained. Some nights it's 3 or 4 times. Except the night she had her appendex out in 2000 and she was so ashamed cause she wet her bed 3 tiems that night. I'm not supose to tell. that one. We have always put her need to pee on my constant push of fluids on my family. We each drink at least a gallon of water daily and that's before milk, juices etc.. Patty Hurst Bangor, ME Maine State Rep PAI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2003 Report Share Posted May 14, 2003 Dear Sandy: NO, NO, NO! You don't have to take pain meds every day. I have chronic pancreatitis and I have been as sick in the past as anybody on here and I DO NOT TAKE PAIN MEDS EVERY DAY! You can tell him I said so too! My attacks have shrunk to an acute attack every now and then and it hospitalizes me. I don't know which is worse to tell you the truth. This guy sounds like a total idiot. What you need to understand is that there are a lot of politics in medicine. I don't know what this guy would be gaining by misdiagnosing you except maybe some kind of " perk " from the insurance company he is on the review board with. The docs who made the diagnosis in the first place with subjective tests are the ones you believe. You say there is no GI doc that will accept you as a regular patient. I assume these docs you are going to are " pancreas specialists? " Also because the guy is a teaching professor and head of the department doesn't mean he is any good. If he is in there for reasons of advancing his own career he may not even be paying attention to the patients! I know it sounds bad and I think (I hope) the percentage of docs that do this are low but they do do it. What part of the country do you live in? As far as family, you probably have figured out family can be the most unsupportive group. I have come to ignore them all. If you have to bring a sandwich with you, bring it. If it causes you so much stress, don't go. They will probably see it as rude but, you GOTTA LOOK OUT FOR YOU! Believe me I had to learn it the hard way. nothing is 100% accurate. If the CT scan didn't show it, the CT scan didn't show it. Doesn't mean it wasn't there. It just means it couldn't be seen or the doc interpreting the films DIDN'T see it. If these docs have seen your abnormalities especially on ERCP which is the most conclusive as it allows a doc to to actually see the abnormality, then go with that. This last guy sounds like a turkey to me. If you have any more questions just ask. If I can help you please let me know. I would like to. BTW, I am glad you don't have to take pain meds every day. Kaye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2003 Report Share Posted May 14, 2003 he hasdecided that the 2 previous University doctors were wrong in their diagnosis and I DO NOT have ANYTHING wrong with me. He has never examined me ....That my pancreas has " healed " on it's own and that I need no treatment for it. I am worried for my meds, enzyme suppliments and for proper future treatment. The other doctors made their findings through surgery, blood work,fecal fat test, amalyse and lipase levels that never rise anymore andother tests to come to their conclusions. Just because a CT Scan doesn't show any abnormalities...well, does that necessarily mean there is nothing wrong with it? How accurate is a CT Scan? I am so confused and feeling very lonely here. If this doctor is right, then all the surgery's I have gone through were for nothing. Oh, may I add that this 3rd doctor also said he based this finding on the fact that I DO NOT take pain meds everyday. Sandy Sandy, This report makes me just steam...... Guess what? First of all, I don't take pain medication every day, yet I have a burned out pancreas, two pseudocysts, calification in massive quantities, and chronic pancreatitis that has developed in diabetes mellitus type 1. I suppose this doctor would say I was " cured " , huh? You have the reports, blood tests, surgeries, extensive paper documentation, fecal fat tests and ERCP's from the earlier doctors to back up your diagnosis of chronic idiopathic pancreatitis. While the lack of calicification or abnormalties would possibly remove the label of " severe " from the diagnosis, it certainly shouldn't change the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. And we all know, the pancreas DOES NOT heal itself. And I would venture to say that a CT-scan COULD be wrong, or not read correctly. Remember, I just had an ultrasound and an MRCP done, both of which FAILED to report a pseudocyst the size of a softball in the tail of my pancreas. The radiologist concentrated on my other pseudocyst in the head which is only a third of that size, and completely overlooked the larger one in the tail. So, yes, IMHO, a CT-scan could be incorrect. I had to go back again, yesterday, for a repeat CT-scan because of the radiologist's failure to read the earlier reports correctly! As far as this doctor goes, I think his diagnosis should be refuted, mainly because it affects your insurance coverage, but I don't know how to go about it. Maybe someone else here with have some suggestions.....it's really put you in a difficult position as far as getting the coverage you need for your meds, enzymes and treatment. Let me think on that one. You may have to go back to surgery happy doctor #2, if only to get regular followup exams and prescriptions for your meds. Stand firm and just tell him you won't have further surgery, he can't MAKE you have it. I now this is difficult because he probably makes each appointment uncomfortable by pressuring for surgery, but right now I don't see what other options you have......UNLESS, you could find a Pain Management Clinic that is permitted by your insurance and get an appointment with them. I met with a pain management doctor here and he was more than willing to prescribe the meds I was using to keep me out of pain with my cp. As far as your family goes, I'm really very sorry that they are making you feel like a martyr. They seem pretty insensitive to your situation....but only you knows your own body and how it feels. If I can think of any other suggestions, I'll write again. I have to hurry to leave for a doctor's appointment of my own, but I just wanted to get this email out to you to let you know that I'm outraged at what happened and thinking of you. We've been side by side on a few pancreatitis forums together, sharing advice and support for others, and I didn't want you to feel abandoned and alone with this bizarre diagnosis. I hope someone else in the group can offer some good suggestions for you, too. With hope and prayers, Heidi Heidi H. Griffeth Bluffton, SC State and Regional Representative Pancreatitis Association, International Note: All comments are personal opinion only, and should not be a substitute for professional medical consultation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2003 Report Share Posted May 14, 2003 Sandy, you can have chronic pancreatitis without having everyday pain. I was diagnosed as chronic 3 years before my pain became an everyday thing. If the doctor hasn't even examined you, how can he possibly tell what you do and do not have. It definitely sounds like he has a conflict of interest. I would make a complaint to the CA medical association. I wish I could help more. He has too much of a reason to find you healthy with no problems. Hopefully other will have more ideas to help you.I wonder if you could possibly see a lawyer about possible malpractice issue due to negligence/conflict of interest. I would trust the result of the surgeries and ERCP's over the CT Scan. Kimber -- Kimber Vallejo, CA hominid2@... Note: All advice given is personal opinion, not equal to that of a licensed physician or health care professional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2003 Report Share Posted May 14, 2003 Sandy, No, it is not true that everyone who had chronic pancreatitis takes pain meds every day. I am one of the extremely luck individuals that doesn't have to. I have a standing prescription, my dr. renews without question, as I don't need to take them daily, and my refills show that there is certainly no abuse going on. But I still have to be careful. If i don't stay on the diet, or make sure to get enough rest, I can aount on a recurrance. They son't send me to the hospital every time, but tha's because I take my meds, and HAVE the meds that I need. I don't know what insurance plan you have, so I can't help there. According to my GI specialist (whom I LOVE nad trust), my condition will never go away. I can help keep it in remission by being a good girl, but I can't get rid of it, and he can't cure it. He did tell me that the cysts can go away on their own, if the pancreas can be kept " cool " enough. Mine did, and I thank God daily for a dr. that listened to me, educated me, and explained things to my husband in a way that makes his understanding of my illness and its symtoms that he is not only much more patient, but actually sees the attack comiong before I do sometimes, just from my complexion and the look in my eyes. My suggestion is that you continue to behave as if you were on the verge of an attack. Take your enzymes, stick to the diet, and monitor closely how your body reacts on those occassions wherre lowfat eating is impossible. And in the meantime, enjoy to fact that you aren't in constant pain. Hang in there, before I found my current dr, I had the same problems with disbelief. And multiple, close together, violent attacks. Since he's been treating me(Six months now), I haven't had a single attack that I couldn't get rid of by switching to an Ensure diet. I do use the grocery store brand. We have H E B's here, and their brand is really good and really inexpensive. Point is, it does get better. With prayers, Anne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2003 Report Share Posted May 14, 2003 Hey! I feel better after reading your note. Tell Cassie, yes!, others do have problems. I've had the same problems, but only for about the last 18 months, since I had a catheter in the hospital. I thought I was just getting old (which may still be the case!). Please let her know she is not alone. And it might not be the pancreatitis. My 13 year old (then 8) was having real problems at night, to the point that she wouldn't spend the night at friends. Her pediatrician ran some tests, and said she just had a small bladder, and to cut off liquids about an hour and a half before bed, and make the bathroom the last stop before she went to sleep. It has helped, but she still gets up almost every night. Hope this helps, Anne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2003 Report Share Posted May 17, 2003 Patti...has Cassie been tested for diabetes? > Does anyone else out there have kidney problems? The only thing that comes > to mind with Cassie now is her constant frequent need to pee. She has never > ever slept thru the night without having to get up to pee since she was potty > trained. Some nights it's 3 or 4 times. > Patty Hurst Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2003 Report Share Posted May 17, 2003 No she hasn't It is a constant worry of ours for her and one we are constantly ignored about. Cassie's physical in next Friday and we will try again there to see if hell order testing if no then well try with her GI when we see him in june. Both Mike and I have been saying for about 2 months we feel she should be tested and would like her working in advance with a diabeties specialist prior to onset as a posible preventitive measure. You know aditional diet control. WE'll se how it goes. Thanks for the suggestion. Patty Hurst Bangor, ME Maine State Rep PAI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.