Guest guest Posted April 7, 2003 Report Share Posted April 7, 2003 oh opps I didnt realise that O well never mind I was just looking around and thought it may have been good Re: Inhaling Buffered L-arginine > Hi , > > don't know where you ran about this article. Sorry, but it's stone- > old. Young, who wrote this story died in 1997 and I haven't > heard much about the use of l-arginine after that. It might be an > interesting substance, but we discussed the pros and cons several > years ago and decided that GSH is the better way to go. I am eagerly > looking forward to the results of the GSH study. > > Peace > Torsten > > > > Thought this was intersting > > O'Neill mum to Liam who has finally put on some weight!! > > > > Inhaling Buffered L-arginine > > > > While attending Brigham Young University in October, 1995 I > found quite > > by accident an article in the February, 1971 issue of > Pediatrics by Dr. > > Clive Solomons detailing a small scale study he had done using > inhaled > > l-arginine in patients with cystic fibrosis. The article is: > Solomons, > > Clive C., PhD, et al. " The Use of Buffered L-Arginine in the > Treatment > > of Cystic Fibrosis. " _Pediatrics_ Vol. 47, no. 2. (Feb., > 1971). Pages > > 384-391. > > > > I began inhaling l-arginine at the end of March, 1996. I had an > > appointment at the CF clinic five days later, and my FVC was > up about > > 10% and my FEV1 up slightly less. The most pronounced effect > was much > > better oxygen saturation: 98% at room air, despite FVC of 49% > and FEV1 > > of about 32%. After five weeks of inhaling l-arginine, my FVC > had > > increased 28% to 63% and my FEV1 had increased 16% to 41%. For > the > > previous 18 months, my FVC had been under 50% and my FEV1 > under 30%. For > > the previous six months my FVC had been under 35%, my FEV1 > under 25%. My > > small airway capacity had increased from 5% to 14%. > > > > At the time I began inhaling l-arginine, I was on oxygen, was > short of > > breath from walking at a normal pace any distance, had dropped > out of > > school, was being evaluated for a lung transplant, and was > unable to > > work. Within a couple of weeks, I was reenrolled in school, > working > > eight hours a day on my feet and lifting, and no longer > eligible for a > > lung transplant. I had much better exercise tolerance and > increased lung > > functions gave me a better appetite, and made it much easier > for me to > > do my secretion clearance treatments. > > > > To make the solution, I dissolved 0.9g of l-arginine free-base > and 15g > > of l-arginine hydrochloride in 300ml of purified water. > (Solomons used > > tap water.) This mixture should have a pH of 7.4-7.6 and > should be > > refrigerated. In Solomon's study, it was inhaled four times a > day for > > thirty minutes (I don't do it quite as much or in such even > doses). > > > > 100g of l-arginine hydrochloride lasts me eight to twelve > weeks, and > > 100g of l-arginine free base should last over two to three > years. The > > chemicals can be purchased from Advanced Scientific, in > Florida, at > > . It costs $95 for 100g bottles of both, plus > shipping. > > 1000g of l-arginine hydrochloride (enough for 2 years) costs > only two or > > three times more than 100g. The chemicals also be obtained > from Sigma > > Chemical. They supplied the chemicals for Dr. Solomon's study. > Their > > phone number or . However, they > will not > > sell to individuals, but will sell to institutions, medical > researchers > > and laboratory supply companies. They also charged much less > (as I > > remember). You may be able to order it from Sigma by asking a > chemical > > supply shop to special-order it from them for you. > > > > Sigma Chemical, which is still in business carried L-arginine > > hydrochloride (at least, that's what they said on the phone) > while I > > could only get arginine hydrochloride (no " L " ) from Advance > Scientific. > > I don't know how important this difference is, though I do > know that > > left-polarized amino-acids are more biologically efficient, > though I > > don't know if this applies to it's mucolytic action (and, even > when > > undifferentiated, I would imagine much of what I use is left- > polarized, > > too). > > > > It may not be wise to use the l-arginine found health food > stores since > > it is almost always l-arginine free base (which is very > caustic) derived > > from l-arginine hydrochloride. > > > > 16-24 hours after I began inhaling it I became extremely > congested, more > > congested than when I'm sick, and was coughing up the most > vile looking, > > foulest smelling mucous. Even when I've been sick, it doesn't > look that > > gross! And " coughing up " is an overstatement: mostly, it just > slid out > > of it's own accord. This continued for a couple of days. My > breath > > smelled REALLY bad, too, but this also went away. > > > > After inhaling it for a long time, I am sometimes short of > breath for > > 15-30 minutes afterward, but have found that adding 0.5cc of > Ventolin > > alleviates this(though I rarely do it). > > > > The article says that L-arginine has a detergent effect and > loosens > > mucous because of it's calcium and metal-ion binding effects > and by > > reducing fibril aggregation. The article also reported that > staph. > > aureus and hemophilus disappeared from the cultures of those > who inhaled > > l-arginine, although it did not affect the presence of > pseudomonas. The > > authors expected that this treatment would work best as a > preventative > > measure in patients who had not suffered much lung damage. > Despite this, > > the patients who used it averaged a 10% increase in lung > functions, as > > the l-arginine liquefied mucous plugs, although their lung > functions > > stopped increasing after about three weeks. The most > pronounced effect > > was increased arterial Po2. > > > > The article also suggests oral use of L-arginine, but their > suggested > > dose was 1g/kg/day, up to 25g, which is a lot of L-arginine. > Oral use > > resulted in weight gain, better fat absorption, and 100% > success in > > relieving ALL intestinal cramping. Since this study was done, > drugs > > treating absorption problems in CF have become more effective > and > > prevalent. The study also noted that, to achieve it's > preventative > > effects, it might be sufficient to take l-arginine orally, as > a small > > amount ends up in the bronchial fluids. > > > > Most CF doctor's haven't had a problem with using l-arginine > (although > > most didn't think it would help much, either). L-arginine has > no > > side-effects, as was confirmed in a letter to Pediatrics (I > can't > > remember the date) by Dr. Solomons two or three years after he > published > > his study. > > > > What happened to L-arginine? Apparently this treatment was > studied at > > the time but " lost " in the excitement over a related drug with > similar > > effects, N-acetylcysteine (Mucomyst). (Which, incidently, has > serious > > side-effects and is now rarely used in CF.) > > > > A Dr. reading the Cystic-L mailing list found an article in > Pediatrics > > 1975, vol. 55, p. 96 by an East German group which compared l- > arginine > > with Nacetyl cysteine and found it inferior. They did not > recommend it's > > use. Solomons wrote a rebuttal in Pediatrics, 1976, vol. 76, > p. 166 > > where he criticized the methodology of the East German study, > arguing > > that the researchers should have dissolved the l-arginine in > water, > > instead of sodium hydroxide, and that this could actually > cause lung > > inflammation and that arginine needed to buffered by its own > salt. The > > doctor who dug up this information concludes, " Since then I > can find no > > reports either in the mainstream literature or main CF > conference > > meetings. " > > > > Before trying this treatment, I would urge you to get a copy > of the > > original article. Any library should have it, or your doctor > can get it > > for you. Also, in light of the above information, l-arginine > should > > probably not be mixed with saline (which is what my own CF > doctor did > > when he researched it himself -- which produced marginal > results). Be > > careful to be sure to mix it in the proper proportions, as > inhaling it > > at the wrong pH could pose a problem. If you don't have access > to a > > scale, pocket-sized scales that can measure to 0.1g can be > purchased for > > around $100 from scale or laboratory supply shops. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.