Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 Within each age group, the median value for the FE[V.sub.1] percent predicted in each age group at each site was calculated, and the sites were ranked from lowest to highest according to this median value. The sites then were divided into quartiles so that those with the highest values (upper quartile) could be compared with those having the lowest values (lower quartile). For comparisons of practices and interventions between the quartiles, which are markedly affected by disease severity, patients within each quartile were pooled and stratified by disease severity based on FE[V.sub.1] (ie, < 40% of predicted, 40 to 69% of predicted, 70 to 99% of predicted, and [greater than or equal to] 100% of predicted). This allowed the sites in the upper and lower quartiles to be compared based on their practices within groups of patients with similar lung health. Statistical Methods For each possible pair of the three age groups, the consistency of site rankings between the two age groups was assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Statistical comparison of upper quartile sites with lower quartile sites were done using Mantel-Haenszel tests for dichotomous variables and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for counts of events or durations of therapy, with stratification by FE[V.sub.1] (ie, < 40% of predicted, 40 to 69% of predicted, 70 to 99% of predicted, and [greater than or equal to] 100% of predicted) so that practices were compared within patients of a similar severity level Stratified descriptive statistics included either proportions for dichotomous variables, means for counts of events or medians for duration of therapy The quartiles also were compared globally on the overall mean FE[V.sub.1] percent predicted and weight for age percentile using t tests. RESULTS Of the 194 participating sites in the ESCF, 132 with 8,125 patients met the eligibility criteria for this analysis. For the 6 to 12-year-old age group, 112 sites with 3,361 patients (mean, 30 patients per site; SD, 19 patients per site) were eligible. For the adolescent age group (13 to 17 years of age), 84 sites with 1,734 patients (mean, 21 patients per site; SD, 11 patients per site) were eligible. For the adult group ([greater than or equal to] 18 years of age), 103 sites with 3,030 patients (mean, 29 patients per site; SD, 24 patients per site) were eligible. The observation that a consistent trend of monitoring and intervention was observed across the four quartiles (ie, that the middle quartiles fell between the upper and lower extremes) allowed the subsequent analysis to be restricted to the upper and lower quartiles. For sites that qualified with at least two age groups, the rankings of sites tended to be consistent across the age groups with Spearman rank correlation coefficients of 0.30 for ages 6 to 12 years and 13 to 17 years (p = 0.007; 80 patients), 0.29 for ages 6 to 12 years and [greater than or equal to] 18 years (p 0.007; 84 patients), and 0.17 for ages 13 to 17 years and [greater than or equal to] 18 years (p = 0.17; 69 patients). Considering each pair of age groups, very few sites (six or fewer) were in the upper quartile in one age group and the lower quartile in the other age group. The observed differences between upper and lower quartile sites in disease severity, as characterized by FE[V.sub.1] percent predicted, were substantial, ranging from 15 to 23% of age points (Table 1). Comparing patients within each of the severity groups, the monitoring of events (ie, number of visits, spirometry testing, and cultures) Occurred more frequently at upper quartile sites (Table 2). These trends were highly statistically significant in each age group. The greatest differences in the number of cultures were seen in the youngest age group, which had 40 to 77% more cultures performed at upper quartile sites than at lower quartile sites. Certain microorganisms were reported more frequently at upper quartile sites (Table 3). Compared with the lower quartile sites, there was a higher incidence of patients with at least one culture positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and for at least one strain of this organism that was reported as " multiply resistant. " Also, compared with the lower quartile sites, there were more patients with at least one culture positive for Burkholderia cepacia, and for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at the upper quartile sites. Some therapies were used more frequently at the upper quartile sites (Table 4). Upper quartile sites administered oral corticosteroids and inhaled cromolyn or nedocromil more frequently than did lower quartile sites consistently across all age and disease-severity groups. Very large differences were seen in the use of inhaled cromolyn and nedocromil, ranging from 10 to 42% (p < 0.001). Oral nonquinolone antibiotics also were used more frequently in upper quartile sites. Prophylactic inhaled antibiotics (ie, aminoglycoside and quinolones) were used more frequently in young pediatric patients. Among other routine therapies, substantial and significant differences were observed only in adults. In this age group, upper quartile sites administered more inhaled bronchodilators, more inhaled corticosteroids, and more dornase alfa than lower quartile sites (Table 4). No differences were seen in the use of pancreatic enzymes and airway clearance techniques, which were used by > 90% of patients in almost all age and disease-severity groups. No attempts were made to quantify airway clearance techniques. For patients who were < 18 years of age, upper quartile sites tended to report more frequent treatments of exacerbations with IV antibiotics (Table 5). These differences were proportionately largest in the relatively healthy patients, particularly in the age group of 13 to 17 years. Upper quartile sites also tended to treat patients for longer periods, regardless of disease severity. This trend was particularly strong in adult patients, for whom the increased duration was highly significant (p < 0.001). Upper quartile sites also reported more frequent treatments of exacerbations with inhaled antibiotics in patients < 18 years, with differences once again proportionately largest in the relatively healthy patients. In contrast, in patients < 18 years of age the reported use of oral quinolones for the treatment of exacerbations tended to be greater in lower quartile sites, except in the youngest, sickest patients (6 to 12 years of age, < 40% predicted FE[V.sub.1]). In adults, there was no significant difference between upper and lower quartile sites for the use of inhaled antibiotics or oral quinolones. Because of less accurate documentation of stop dates for inhaled antibiotics and oral quinolones, the duration of treatment could not be reliably assessed. Becki YOUR FAVORITE LilGooberGirl YOUNGLUNG EMAIL SUPPORT LIST www.topica.com/lists/younglung Pediatric Interstitial Lung Disease Society http://groups.yahoo.com/group/InterstitialLung_Kids/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.