Re: Re: Fw: FW: I want this back!/AGREE WITH THIS

[Guest guest]

One does wonder why anyone posts this kind of thing on a list such as

this; I agree; it is indeed inappropriate, and I gree with Law; stuff

labeled to " Undisclosed recipients " should be deleted by the webmaster;

moreover, we have agreed, indeed contracted not to have

religious discussions on this list and this is a direct violation of that.

I guess we are just a captive audience for predators!

I do feel rather strongly about this, and do not want to see more of it on

this wonderful list.

Love to all at cfparents,

n Rojas, who is up earlier than usual this morning, which may ex

plain a lot!

[Guest guest]

Sorry about the post; no one can nor should censor everything anyway!

And I do know that you to do your best for us daily. No offense!

Love to all at cfparents, parents, kids, family members, neighbors!

n Rojas

[Guest guest]

Hi n,

I absolutely agree that chain letters are inappropriate here, especially

those that include bad-luck wishes. I am as upset as you are, but there is

no way that or I can keep this away from the list. We can't (and we

don't want to) censor every single message. Stupid things happen and on

large lists there is a bigger chance for them to happen.

Peace

Torsten, dad of Fiona 6wcf

e-mail: torstenkrafft@...

Re: Re: Fw: FW: I want this back!/AGREE WITH THIS

> One does wonder why anyone posts this kind of thing on a list such as

> this; I agree; it is indeed inappropriate, and I gree with Law;

stuff

> labeled to " Undisclosed recipients " should be deleted by the webmaster;

> moreover, we have agreed, indeed contracted not to have

> religious discussions on this list and this is a direct violation of that.

> I guess we are just a captive audience for predators!

> I do feel rather strongly about this, and do not want to see more of it on

> this wonderful list.

> Love to all at cfparents,

> n Rojas, who is up earlier than usual this morning, which may ex

> plain a lot!