Guest guest Posted September 5, 2003 Report Share Posted September 5, 2003 Hi Donna: I'm sorry that noone has gotten back to you regarding the info. you requested. And I'm not sure I can be of much help, other than to say that the doctor who performed my ERCP's said that the fact that my enzyme levels were normal, did NOT mean that I did not have pancreatitis. I had recently been in the hospital for an acute attack, a local hospital, where they spent 5 days ruling out that I had pancreatitis. When I went to see him, and told him this, he said due to the fact that he had actually been inside my pancreas, he has no doubt that I do have cp, and not to pay too much attention to these other doctors, who are not experts. Have you had an ERCP? And why are you asking about a Whipple? Have you had one, or are you scheduled for one? I recently saw a surgeon who said he would not perform either the pseustow (sp?) or Whipple since my stricture is not that bad. The recovery sounds horrible, and I am lucky that I have a pain doctor who has really helped manage my pain. Maybe if you gave a little more info. you could get some response? I hope I have been of some help! Hang in there! Robin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2003 Report Share Posted September 8, 2003 Hi Donna Both of your explanations concerning your CT are right on in my experience. For the CT itself, you will have to drink the contrast so that your GI tract can be imaged. The enema is for the same thing but to show the lower GI tract. The IV contrast is to allow the organs to show up (the blood vessels will be highlighted). This is a very, very good way to look at everything inside of your abdomen - to look for inflammation, calcification, masses, abnormalities in your bile duct, etc - it shows you in three dimensions and in great detail! From what you report, your doctor is suspecting that your incision has become infected and the mass that is felt may be the abscess. If that is the case, then this abscess may be drained using the CT pictures as a guide for the radiologist (to make sure that he / she gets to the right place without causing harm to organs or other structures). This is a very common procedure and it should not be too difficult to endure. If the catheter is left in, that is so the abscess can continue to drain, without having to bring you back to the CT room. I had multiple abdominal abscesses diagnosed by this procedure and it was not a difficult exam to go through. I have not personally had them drained this way (I had to go into surgery) but I have observed this done to other people. It is not that bad to go through. Also, I understand that it is not uncommon to still have gall stones even if you no longer have a gall bladder. It is just a lazy way to say biliary stones - it is semantics, not literal. These stones may be residual from when you had a gall bladder or they can still be forming within the common bile duct or other bile ducts. Hope that this helps you understand a little more what may be going on with your case. Laurie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2003 Report Share Posted September 8, 2003 Dear Donna, First of all, please let me say that I'm sorry to hear of this new problem, especially after hearing that you had been doing so well. Hopefully this procedure will be precisely what you need to get your problems straightened out. Secondly, I wanted to tell you that I have had this procedure done and would, without hesitation, do it again anytime that was necessary. In my case it was done to biopsy a mass in my abdomen, and then drain it. The " mass " turned out to be a collection of pseudocysts in the tail of my pancreas, just to the left of the navel. The type of scanning machine they will be using is called a spiral CT-scan, and it is the latest in scanning technology of this type. This machine takes pictures in slices, and has great clarity, and will show everything like they told you it would. My procedure was done on an out-patient basis. After drinking the solution the night before and fasting, I went to the hospital early in the a.m. and after filling out forms and going through the nurse's admitting questions, put on a gown and was placed in a movable bed. Some time before I was supposed to go into the scan room they gave me sedation by IV. I was woosily awake and able to talk through the whole procedure. They also injected a numbing medication at the site before they inserted the large aspiration needle into my abdomen near my navel for the aspiration. I cannot say that it was entirely painless, but they were very gentle and worked hard to make me comfortable. Afterward I spent several hours in the out-patient area in my own private cubicle with my husband and was released late in the afternoon. If you want all the full details, post again and I can explain more. There was some rather severe residual pain for a couple days, and I was taking hydrocodone for that, and I was back to normal within a few days. If you want more details, post again and I can explain more. I just wanted to reassure you that there isn't anything to worry about, as far as the procedure goes. With hope and prayers, Heidi Heidi H. Griffeth South Carolina SC & SE Regional Rep. PAI, Intl. Note: All comments and advice are personal opinion only, and should not be substituted for professional medical consultation. " What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. " - Ralph Waldo Emerson > So here we go again, I scheduled to go into the hospital on Thursday Sept 11, 2003 for what they cala CT ABDOMEN/PELVIS WITH CONTRAST. DONNA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.