Guest guest Posted July 27, 2003 Report Share Posted July 27, 2003 I am not surprised that no other Dr. had ever seen the pseudocyst, I recently had an MRCP and was diagnosed with an extrememly enlarged common bile duct and was told I also had a common bile duct full of stones, some measuring 3mm, after having had so many ercps I cannot remember how many and swore I would NEVER have another but I thought maybe this would help with my pain so I relented and guess what NOT ONE STONE FOUND must have been air bubbles seen on the MRCP in my common bile duct. What eles can one do but laugh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2003 Report Share Posted July 27, 2003 Keri, A pseudocyst is a collection of tissue and enzyme debris that is formed after an acute pancreatitis attack. The pseudocyst does not have a solid encapsuled wall, thus the term " pseudo " , which means false. The decisions made to drain the pseudocyst(s) usually depend upon the size and location of the pseudocyst. Normally, pseudocysts smaller than 6 cm. are not drained, and are left to resolve naturally. It is believed by most doctors that there is no benefit to interfering with the pancreas by performing an invasive procedure with smaller pseudocysts. My largest pseudocyst was the size of a soft ball and was partially drained by CT-guided fine needle aspiration two years ago. The smaller one 4 x 5 cm. was left alone to resolve. Both pseudocysts resolved to less than 2 cm., but then did fill back up again during my attack earlier this year. One is in the tail, the other buried in the head. They appear to be resolving again, and I will know more after my next scan in September. I have pasted an article on psueodcysts and accepted procedures for their treatment. MANAGEMENT OF FLUID COLLECTIONS DUE TO ACUTE PANCREATITIS BY INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES Vimal Someshwar Interventional Radiologist, Bhatia General Hospital, Mumbai. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Intra-abdominal fluid collection following pancreatitis is associated with high degree of morbidity and mortality especially when infected. Symptoms like pain, discomfort and distension of abdomen, can be quite distressing. Surgery used to be the mainstay of management of these fluid collections. Over the last 2 to 3 decades, percutaneous and endoscopy guided catheter drainage procedures, have helped improve the prognosis of this morbid condition. Wide availability of cross sectional imaging modalities like ultrasonography and CT scanning have helped early diagnosis, as also, guided percutaneous drainage procedures. Of the two modalities, CT scan is preferred, as it thoroughly and systematically helps evaluate the entire abdominal cavity. USG or CT guided percutaneous catheter drainage procedures are associated with a mortality rate of 6%. The normal anatomy is also less disrupted and therefore less morbidity is associated with this form of therapy. Two types of pancreatic fluid collections which can be drained by percutaneous techniques are : (A) Pseudocysts and ( Abscesses and necrotic collections. (A) Pseudocysts Cysts which are either large, causing pain, distension or are at high risk of rupture, require percutaneous drainage. Infection complicating a cyst needs early drainage. Various procedures considered are:- (a) Percutaneous needle aspiration ( Percutaneous catheter drainage © Percutaneous cysto-gastrostomy (d) Endoscopic cystogastrostomy (e) Endosonographic cystogastrostomy Simple needle aspiration can be performed under USG/CT guidance. 18G/16G needle is directed into the collection, as fluid is aspirated. Recurrence rate of 5% to 7% is expected following this therapy. Secondary infection and bleeding within the cyst are possible complications. Percutaneous Catheter Drainage is the most preferred method. CT guidance is preferred. Seldingers technique is used to catheterise the fluid cavity. Cure for pseudocyst by this technique is expected to be 67-80%. Communication with the pancreatic duct determines the duration for which the catheter is to be kept in place. Cystogastrostomy : The principle of this procedure is to allow formation of a mature tract between the cyst and the stomach and hence, facilitate drainage of the fluid through the fibrous tract. To achieve this fibrous tract, a catheter or stent is placed for at least 3 weeks. The procedure was first performed by the percutaneous technique. Endoscopy was found to be a better mordality, since there was no external tube placement. Endoscopic Ultrasonography/Doppler further reduced the risk of injuring a blood vessel ( Abscesses and Necrotic Tissue Aggressive approach is necessary as these abscesses are associated with a mortality rate of 70-80%. The present approach for the management of pancreatic abscesses, is to delay surgical explorations for 3 to 4 weeks. During this period percutaneous drainage is preferred. Multiple catheters placed simultaneously, draining all possible cavities, is mandatory. Drainage using large bore catheters (14 Fr. - 24 Fr.) are used. Antibiotic lavage technique, wherein, antibiotic solutions are introduced from one catheter and drained after 3 hours from another catheter, have yielded better results. However, catheter drainage may be incomplete as often, necrotic tissue may occlude the catheter. Surgery should be contemplated once the sepsis is under control. Percutaneous Interventional Technique : Salient features i. Shortest possible route to the fluid cavity should be selected, avoiding puncturing bowel or organ. ii. Gravity drainage should be facilitated, otherwise, suction drainage systems like Redivac, should be attached. iii. Try to a demonstrate communication of the cavity with hollow viscera, by injecting contrast in the cavity. iv. Catheters should be properly fixed to avoid accidental displacement. Self-retaining catheters like Pigtail, Cope-loop, Malecot's type etc., are used. Proper skin fixation and dressing helps prevent displacement. v. The caliber of the drainage tube should be wide with no reduction. Percutaneous drainage procedure play an important role in the management of acute pancreatitis. Sorry, I can't help you with questions about a PT-with auto islet transplant, but I'm sure someone else can. With hope and prayers, Heidi Heidi H. Griffeth South Carolina SC & SE Regional Rep. PAI, Intl. Note: All comments or advice are personal opinion only, and should not be substituted for professional medical consultation. I am not sure I fully understand what a pseudocyst is. What exactly is in the cyst? Do they usually require surgery? Do they often resolve on their own? I am scheduled for a CT in a little over a week to see what it looks like now. Hoping God will bless you all, Keri Beck in IL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2003 Report Share Posted July 28, 2003 Hi, Keri! My husband has two pseudocysts - and I have to state it again - from a mishap from an ERCP that created necrotizing pancreatitis (with all the ERCPs that pancreatitis sufferers undergo, I'm surprised more people don't have more problems with pancreatitis as a result of ERCPs). Anyway, the doctors prefer and recommend doing nothing with the pseudocysts (one is approximately 11 cm in size). If they are not causing pain - do not touch them! If you can wait even years to see if they shrink or dissolve, that's the way to go. One doctor wanted to aspirate them early on ... a major no no and I'm glad we didn't let anyone stick them with a needle with the possibility of creating infection. Good wishes to you! Beth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2003 Report Share Posted July 29, 2003 Good morning, Dave! Did your pseudocysts ever re-fill? Are you glad you had them aspirated? How long did you have them before they aspirated ... were they 'mature' enough with less dense fluid? How large were the pseudocysts? Did you have discomfort with them? (Am I shooting enough questions at ya?!) Hopefully they don't re-fill ... hopefully gone forever! You went through a lot. Doctors seem to have different ideas on how to handle these babies. Thanks for relaying a tiny bit of your story ... it's good to hear what others have gone through. Anything other information you'd like to relay, I'm happy to listen (read)! I wish you well, Dave! Beth > wow they aspirated mine and pounded me with anti-fungals and anti biotics i wore the j tube drain for 4 months till the drainage cleared and was way reduced in volume > dave > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.