Guest guest Posted June 29, 2003 Report Share Posted June 29, 2003 Hello, I have hesitated much in responding to this thread because I do not want to say anything that could possibly have a negative impact on someone, or cause someone to elect to not have a surgery they need. So please keep that in mind when you read this, this is nothing but a non-medical professional's opinion and belief and it could be and might be totally bad, dangerous, wrong, or silly. I elected to have a total pancreatectomy and islet cell transplant when it was clear to me that my pancreatitis would never end. 15 or 16 attacks in less than 3 years made that clear; 8 in 4 months most recently showed me it was accelerating and I was certain if nothing was done it not be long before I would be rendered to sick to live the quality of life I will accept. I spoke to surgeons who treat all manner of GI tract problems and other such surgerical procedures. They wanted me to undergo a sphincteroplasty. I spoke with doctors that do nothing but treat pancreas, and liver problems and they told me that in a significant amount of people who undergo procedures like sphcinteroplasty, puestow, and to a lesser degree partial pancreatectomies (whipple, distal) that the surgery is NOT a permanent fix. It merely buys you some time, between 6 months and 2 years on average, before attacks resume. Since they can do the total pancreatectomy where I live they suggested it to me. It is risky. The benefits of the other surgeries is that you do not risk complete and utter diabetes. You in fact will probably not have any issues with insulin production at all. With a pancreatectomy that's it, its all gone, and so is your insulin production. The islet cell transplant is the blessing, and if it works then you are good to go. But it doesn't always work, and no one knows how someone will do 40 years down the road, and actually there haven't been that many people to have it to have a good sense of how people do 15 years down the road. But so far signs point to the patients remaining stable with their level of insulin production as to the level it settles to at about 8 months after the surgery. Ok so I am rambling. But it is my opinion that unless there is the clearest proof that the sphicteroplasty will repair the problem, I would not consider it. In my case there was no indication where the problem was at all. I did not have a divisum, I did not have stones or any kind of blockage. My pancreas simply decided to destroy itself. So for me the only clear thing to do was get all the islet cells I could while I had them and get that utterly destructive organ out of my body. I have read on this board and some of the other pancreatitis boards many many tales of multiple surgeries and eventual return of pancreatitis. Any surgery on the pancreas is incredibly painful and difficult and has high risk. Who wants to have to face several surgeries? Please know this is all my opinion. I am NOT a medical professional. I do not have personal experience with the sphincteroplasty. I could be so wrong its not funny. But this is what I believe and felt compelled to share. Whatever you do, do so with all the facts and multiple opinions. When/if you undergo any surgery, do so only if you feel your surgeon is highly skilled, and do so only after carefully weighing all your options. Good luck to you, Bert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.