Guest guest Posted March 4, 2003 Report Share Posted March 4, 2003 Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2002, p. 26-30, Vol. 40, No. 1 Copyright ? 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Comparison of Two Culture Methods for Detection of Tobramycin-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms in the Sputum of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Jill M. Van Dalfsen,1 R. Stapp,2 Phelps,1, ,1, and Jane L. Burns2* Chiron Corporation, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington,Children?s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington,1Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, University ofWashington, Children?s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle,Washington2 A culture method utilizing quantitative plating on antibiotic-containing media has been proposed as a technique for the detection of tobramycin-resistant organisms that is more sensitive than standard methods. Typical sputum culture methods quantitate the relative amounts of each distinct morphotype, followed by antibiotic susceptibility testing of a single colony of each morphotype. Sputum specimens from 240 cystic fibrosis patients were homogenized, serially diluted, and processed in parallel by the standard method (MacConkey agar and OF basal medium with agar, polymyxin, bacitracin, and lactose) and by plating on antibiotic-containing media (MacConkey agar with tobramycin added at 25 ?g/ml [MAC-25] and 100 ?g/ml [MAC-100]). MICs of tobramycin were determined for all Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates by broth microdilution. Growth of P. aeruginosa on MAC-25 was considered to be equivalent to a tobramycin MIC of 16 ?g/ml, and growth on MAC-100 was considered to be equivalent to a tobramycin MIC of 128 ?g/ml. Analysis of method-specific detection rates showed that tobramycin-containing medium was more sensitive than the standard method for the detection of tobramycin-resistant P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Achromobacter xylosoxidans but was less sensitive for the detection of Burkholderia cepacia than the standard method. When MICs for P. aeruginosa that grew on tobramycin-containing medium were tested by broth microdilution, the MICs for 28 of 121 strains (23%) growing on M AC-25 and 22 of 56 strains (39%) growing on MAC-100 were MICs <16 and <128 ?g/ml, respectively. Addition of a tobramycin-containing MacConkey plate to the routine media for sputum culture may provide additional, clinically relevant microbiologic Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) typically harbor multiple morphologically distinct strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in their sputum. These morphotypes contribute in different degrees to the total sputum density of P. aeruginosa, and each may have a different level of antibiotic susceptibility. Typical CF sputum culture methods quantitate the relative amounts of each distinct morphotype, followed by antibiotic susceptibility testing of a pure culture of each morphotype. This methodology assumes that the MIC result for a single clone accurately represents the susceptibility of the entire population of that morphotype and that all morphotypes will be represented even if present in small numbers relative to the predominant morphotype. It is possible that this methodology underrepresents the number of antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa clones within the sputum sample. Following the reported efficacy of inhaled tobramycin in CF patients (3, 14) the question of increasing tobramycin resistance among sputum isolates of P. aeruginosa and other gram-negative organisms gained importance. If antibiotic selection occurs related to the chronic use of inhaled drug, the ability to detect even small numbers of tobramycin-resistant isolates in sputum may be significant. As noted above, the methods currently in use may underrepresent tobramycin resistance. Thus, development of a technique that would sample the resistance phenotype of all of the organisms present in a given sputum sample was proposed. A previous study by Maduri-Traczewski et al. utilized a culture method in which each P. aeruginosa clone was tested individually for susceptibility, by directly plating sputum to antibiotic-containing medium (12). They concluded that utilization of antibiotic-containing primary media accurately and promptly detectedantibiotic-resistant organisms compared to standard quantitative culturesfrom which colonies were selected for subsequent MIC testing. The currentstudy specifically examines the utility of tobramycin-containing primarymedia for the detection of tobramycin-resistant organisms from the sputumof CF patients. (This work was presented in part at the 14th Annual North American CysticFibrosis Conference, 9 to 12 November 2000, Baltimore, Md.) Specimen collection and processing. Sputum specimens were collected from240 CF patients from seven CF clinics across the United States during1999. All participants and their families gave informed consent inaccordance with experimental guidelines of the US Department of Healthand Human Services and the institutions at which the study was performed.To be eligible for the study, patients were required to be able toproduce sputum, to have a history of P. aeruginosa in the lowerrespiratory tract, and, if they were currently receiving aerosolizedantibiotics, the specimen had to be collected at least 12 h after theirlast dose. Sputum was processed as described in Fig. 1. Briefly, eachsputum sample was homogenized using dithiothreitol (Sputolysin;Calbiochem-Behring, La Jolla, Calif.) and serially diluted in sterilephysiologic saline, and 0.1-ml aliquots of each dilution were plated to MacConkey agar (MAC), MacConkey agar with tobramycin at 25 ?g/ml (MAC-25)and 100 ?g/ml (MAC-100), and a selective agar for Burkholderia cepacia(OFPBL [19]) (media were purchased from Remel, Lenexa, Kans.). All plateswere incubated at 37°C for at least 72 h. Quantitation of allgram-negative bacilli was performed on all medium types. Eachmorphologically distinct isolate (texture [mucoid, rough versus smooth],colony size, color) of P. aeruginosa was enumerated separately and subcultured for MIC determination. Broth microdilution tobramycin (0.12to 512 ?g/ml) susceptibility testing was performed on all gram-negativebacilli using a semiautomated system (Sensititre; Trek Diagnostics,Westlake, Ohio) and manual reading of end points following 18 to 24 h ofincubation (3). Organisms were identified by standard techniques,including the use of a biochemical panel for the identification of non-P.aeruginosa, gram-negative, non-lactose fermenters (16). FIG. 1. Diagram of the processing of sputum from 240 patients at sevenCF centers in the United States. All samples were sent to a singlelaboratory (Children?s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle,Wash.), where they were processed by both the standard method and theantibiotic-containing-medium method (MAC-25 and MAC-100). Tobramycin MICswere determined for all morphologically distinct P. aeruginosa isolatesand for all other non-lactose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli. Statistical analysis. Preliminary range finding experiments using strainsof P. aeruginosa with known tobramycin MICs showed that MacConkey agarcontaining tobramycin at 25 ?g/ml would inhibit the growth of 93% of P.aeruginosa isolates for which the tobramycin MICs were <16 ?g/ml andsupport the growth of more than 75% of P. aeruginosa isolates for whichthe tobramycin MICs were 16 ?g/ml. Similarly, MAC-100 would suppress thegrowth of most P. aeruginosa isolates for which the tobramycin MICs are<128 ?g/ml while supporting the growth of most P. aeruginosa isolates forwhich the tobramycin MICs are 128 ?g/ml. Thus, growth of P. aeruginosa onMAC-25 was considered to be equivalent to a tobramycin MIC of 16 ?g/ml,and growth of P. aeruginosa on MAC-100 was considered to be equivalent toa tobramycin MIC of 128 ?g/ml. The method-specific detection rate for each method (standard method [MAC and OFPBL], MAC-25, and MAC-100) wascalculated by dividing the number of patients with a given organismdetected by that method by the number of patients with that organismdetected by all methods. The percentage of patients whose sputum grew tobramycin-resistant P.aeruginosa detected by the standard method (broth microdilution MIC, 16?g/ml) was compared with the percentage of patients whose sputum grew P.aeruginosa on MAC-25 by using a two-sided, one-sample McNemar test. Patient population. The study included an equal number of male and femalepatients; the mean age was 20.4 years. Overall, 59.6% of patientsreceived aminoglycosides by either the intravenous or aerosol routewithin the 8 weeks prior to providing sputum for this study (Table 1).Two hundred eighteen of 240 patients had P. aeruginosa detected fromtheir sputum on MacConkey agar without added tobramycin. Mean P.aeruginosa density in sputum for these patients was 7.1 log10 CFU/g(standard deviation, 1.5 log10 CFU/g). Detection of tobramycin-resistant organisms. By all methods, 124 of 240(52%) patients had a tobramycin-resistant P. aeruginosa detected.However, using standard methodology alone, only 58 of 240 (24%) had P.aeruginosa isolates for which the MIC was 16 ?g/ml. For the 58 patientswith resistant P. aeruginosa detected on MAC, the resistant coloniesrepresented, on average, 70% of the total CFU count (median, 97%; range,0.2 to 100%). Tobramycin-containing medium was much more sensitive forthe detection of resistant P. aeruginosa at both the 16-?g/ml level(MAC-25 versus MAC, 98 versus 47%) and the 128-?g/ml levels (MAC-100 versus MAC, 100 versus 21%) (Table 2). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia andAchromobacter xylosoxidans were also detected more frequently ontobramycin-containing media. Conversely, B. cepacia was detected morefrequently by the standard method (MAC or OFPBL) than on either MAC-25 or MAC-100. Becki YOUR FAVORITE LilGooberGirl YOUNGLUNG EMAIL SUPPORT LIST www.topica.com/lists/younglung Pediatric Interstitial Lung Disease Society http://groups.yahoo.com/group/InterstitialLung_Kids/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.