Guest guest Posted January 31, 2003 Report Share Posted January 31, 2003 This has been on the news today. I thought it was interesting. Kaiser is not allowing their nurses to wear acrylic nails anymore. Take care, from Southern CA Nurses' Artificial Nails Pose Infection Hazard NEW YORK, Sep 29 (Reuters Health) -- Nurses with acrylic fingernails are more likely to have harmful bacteria on their nails than other nurses, even after handwashing, according to researchers. " The use of artificial nails by nurses may increase the chances that harmful bacteria will be transmitted to patients and cause infection, " report investigators led by Dr. Carol Kauffman of the Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Michigan. They presented the findings to attendees at the 39th Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, held this week in San Francisco. Kauffman and colleagues explain that " as the use of artificial acrylic fingernails has become more fashionable, more and more nurses have begun wearing them. " Because hand-to-hand transmission is a major source of bacterial infection, the researchers speculated that acrylic nails might raise bacterial transmission risks between nurses and patients. To test this theory, they compared the amount and type of bacteria on the nails of 21 nurses who wore artificial nails with the bacteria found on the fingernails of 20 nurses who did not wear artificial nails. " Before handwashing, 73% of nurses with artificial nails compared with only 32% of nurses without had harmful bacteria present on their nails, " the authors report. These numbers dropped to 68% and 26%, respectively, after the nurses washed their hands. Based on these findings, the researchers urge that " hospital infection control policies should discourage the use of artificial fingernails by all healthcare workers. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2003 Report Share Posted January 31, 2003 from So Cal, I used to wear acrylic nails and loved them so much I learned the process and even took the test to get my license to do acrylic nails. I would not recommend acrylic nails to anyone. The problem with bacteria growing is very real. Even if it is not bad enough to cause permanent fingernail damage, it is there and spreading germs everywhere you go. Healthcare workers and food handlers should never be allowed to wear acrylic nails. I was taught to use very sanitary precautions to prevent the spreading of fungus but most nail techs will take one person right after another without even wiping down the table. I know it is a great feeling being pampered but the chance of getting bacteria and fungus is very real. And germs really love those acrylic nails. Just wanted to let everybody know. Love, Aunt B Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2003 Report Share Posted February 1, 2003 > " Before handwashing, 73% of nurses with artificial nails compared > with only 32% of nurses without had harmful bacteria present on their > nails, " the authors report. These numbers dropped to 68% and 26%, > respectively, after the nurses washed their hands. Wow, I find it disturbing that 26% of the nurses without artificial nails still had harmful bacteria present on their nails after handwashing. I would have thought that number to be lower. Now I'm wondering what I need to do to keep the nurses' germy hands away from my child during exams. I wonder if it would be out-of-the ordinary for a parent to insist that they " glove-up " before touching? Some of them give me *the look* when I insist on handwashing. Maybe this is even too lax? This has been in the news before. I can't remember where, but there was a hospital that had some infants in the PICU die of infections that were traced back to the artificial nails of nurses. Pub Med http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi has some info. I have copied a couple of the abstracts below. Note the dates. It makes you wonder how " cutting edge " our hospitals are if they are just now implementing guidelines about this. ~ mommy of 3, 1 with cf ____ 1: Curr Opin Infect Dis 2001 Aug;14(4):449-53 Links Infection control in pediatric hospitals. Neely M, Toltzis P. Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA. Important characteristics of hospital infection control are specific to pediatric facilities. For example, colonization and infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci, which are widely spread in many units housing adult patients, are uncommon in children, especially in the neonatal intensive care unit where vancomycin use is heavy. Characteristics of the neonatal intensive care unit, such as the insulated environment and infrequent treatment with antibiotics with broad anaerobic activity, likely account for this finding. Artificial fingernails have been discovered to promote colonization with potential pathogens; their implication in recent nursery epidemics emphasizes the need to prohibit their use in this environment in particular. Finally, nosocomial viral infections occur with regularity in pediatric hospitals. Programs that successfully and cost-effectively control hospital spread of respiratory syncytial virus, however, demonstrate that rational, multifaceted interventions can nearly eliminate transmission of certain viral pathogens on the pediatric wards. Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 11964864 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] ------------- 1: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000 Feb;21(2):80-5 Links Comment in: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;21(2):77-9. A prolonged outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neonatal intensive care unit: did staff fingernails play a role in disease transmission? Moolenaar RL, Crutcher JM, San Joaquin VH, Sewell LV, Hutwagner LC, Carson LA, Robison DA, ee LM, Jarvis WR. Acute Disease Division, Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, USA. OBJECTIVES: To describe an outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (BSI) and endotracheal tube (ETT) colonization in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), determine risk factors for infection, and make preventive recommendations. DESIGN: A 15-month cohort study followed by a case-control study with an environmental survey and molecular typing of available isolates using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Neonates in the NICU of a university-affiliated children's hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Improved hand washing and restriction of use of long or artificial fingernails. RESULTS: Of 439 neonates admitted during the study period, 46 (10.5%) acquired P aeruginosa; 16 (35%) of those died. Fifteen (75%) of 20 patients for whom isolates were genotyped had genotype A, and 3 (15%) had genotype B. Of 104 healthcare workers (HCWs) from whom hand cultures were obtained, P aeruginosa was isolated from three nurses. Cultures from nurses A-1 and A-2 grew genotype A, and cultures from nurse B grew genotype B. Nurse A-1 had long natural fingernails, nurse B had long artificial fingernails, and nurse A-2 had short natural fingernails. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, exposure to nurse A-1 and exposure to nurse B were each independently associated with acquiring a BSI or ETT colonization with P aeruginosa, but other variables, including exposure to nurse A-2, were not. CONCLUSION: Epidemiological evidence demonstrated an association between acquiring P aeruginosa and exposure to two nurses. Genetic and environmental evidence supported that association and suggested, but did not prove, a possible role for long or artificial fingernails in the colonization of HCWs' hands with P aeruginosa. Requiring short natural fingernails in NICUs is a reasonable policy that might reduce the incidence of hospital- acquired infections. PMID: 10697282 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2003 Report Share Posted February 2, 2003 In a message dated 1/31/03 8:06:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, LAzstars@... writes: > This has been on the news today. I thought it was interesting. > Kaiser is not allowing their nurses to wear acrylic nails anymore We were told last year that any parents; relatives; caregivers of our cf children were to remove the fake nails. My sister and I both removed ours immediately. - Sally - Mom of Bri 14 JV All star amazing best cheerleader 12w/asthma 9w/cf & ds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2003 Report Share Posted February 2, 2003 In a message dated 2/1/03 3:27:26 AM Eastern Standard Time, ma8169@... writes: > I wonder if it would be out-of-the ordinary > for a parent to insist that they " glove-up " before touching? Doesn't everyone glove up before touching your children? They do here. I'm beginning to think some of these centers are little to lax in the infectious part of cf. - Sally - Mom of Bri 14 JV All star amazing best cheerleader 12w/asthma 9w/cf & ds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.