Guest guest Posted August 13, 2006 Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 Studies in animals are important. I worked on an antiviral compound a few years ago. We had extremely promising invitro (test tube) results. We also had, albeit unintentional, human stories. No one really cared. The general science response is " eh, who cares. when's my next meeting? " Our next step, which we estimated to be about $50,000, was to do the test tube test but in a rabbits eye. (we would use herpes VI, cytomegalovirus as the model)The eyes were chosen as they are not as actively involved with the rest of the body as say an intestine or a paw. (no bodily fluids passing through on a regular basis). Studies in a living animal is the logical step to do the studies. Real > > I have to agree with Cyndi here. If his research is with lab rats then he's going to spend the 44K on EAE (experimental allergic encephalomyelitis) which has always been performed on rats. They shoot up their immune systems to make it look and act like they have MS. But an EAE is considered a " monophasic illness " happens one time and you can recover. Where MS just keeps on going and going . So even the rats will recover with or without LDN. I'm not bashing EAE's they've helped uncover quite a few things in the fight against MS. > Sincerely, > Juice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.