Guest guest Posted December 28, 2001 Report Share Posted December 28, 2001 , Excellent analysis of the realities of both calculating " average wage " and " life expectancy " within the farmworker, or even more challenging, the migrant population(however we define that term). Do you think the collective " we " will ever retire the 49 figure when it is often so great for its jerk effect in making a case? However, I would argue the opposite, that we do an injustice to assisting this population when we continue to march out a figure that we cannot defend and which sounds unrealistic. Thanks. Alice Larson ----- Original Message ----- From: " V Bletzer " <keith.bletzer@...> < > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 7:38 AM Subject: [ ] continuation > Fascinating discussion in recent days. I add further comments. > > HOURLY WAGE. I believe it is more common, at least in the journal > literature, to characterize farmwork by annual income, for reasons > described by Alice Larson, Palandati and Hedgren. Caution is > warranted for annual estimates that are unclear on place(s) and duration of > past experience(s) of those in the sample and how this variability may > affect extremes in the range of incomes that produce an estimated annual > income. > > There are several ways to consider how farmwork earnings affect way of > life. One is a tactic I've heard labor organizers use: pay per bin, box or > bucket is compared against same pay per unit ten or twenty years ago. > Change in pay is slow to take place where efforts to improve have not been > intense. > > LIFE EXPECTANCY. Farmwork is indeed an occupation. For many / some / a > few, farmwork also is a work experience that may occur one or more times > during the course of life. How long does one have to work or have worked in > agriculture to qualify as a farmworker, and to affect, by standards of > research, one's longevity? Conversely, how much work experience outside > farmwork overrides placing one in the category of farmworker but does not > override the effect of farmwork on longevity? > > IF first public use of farmworker life expectancy at age 49 was the 1960 > airing of " Harvest of Shame " (thanks Greg), neither the pre-broadcast > context of the number 49, nor its post-broadcast popularization for more > than two decades, appears unusual. Estimate of Global Life Expectancy > reached 49 by 1960. U.S. life expectancy estimate more or less reached 49 > at the turn of the century (1899--1900) as it continued to increase in the > 1900s. Given the theme of lag in progress, introductory references in > " Harvest " liken then-contemporary U.S. farmwork to two Third World places, > followed by scattered reminders to viewer's assumed agrarian past (notably > the quote, " We no longer own slaves, we rent them " ). " Harvest " was > broadcast during a time in which, and through a medium (TV) by which, > numbers and statistics became embedded deeper in American culture (e.g., " 9 > out of 10 " as testimonial; concept of ratings). Comparing life expectancy > has been a common technique to distinguish ways of life, especially the > world's poor with wealthy nations (U.S. included). Given the mysterious > attraction held by a cipher ending in nine (consider the sales ploy of > pricing merchandise), and given that " 49 " is the last number before moving > into the second half of 100 (i.e., 50s, 60s, then 70s, as the age to which > modern peoples could expect to live), 49 can be viewed as a maneuver (among > several used in " Harvest " ) to emphasize the point that farmworkers were > unjustly outside the advantages and protections of modern America. It was > no coincidence the medium for constructing and publicizing this message was > TV or that Harvest was broadcast on Thanksgiving Day. > > Several discussants over the past week make a good case for retiring the > mythic 49. We should hope, as researchers, that we have not unwittingly > adopted the analytic research technique of replacing a missing value with a > " universal mean, " that originally may have been a journalistic gambit... > > > V Bletzer. Post-Doctoral Research Associate, Department of > Anthropology, Arizona State University. > > > > To Post a message, send it to: Groups > > To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: -unsubscribe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.