Guest guest Posted July 7, 2004 Report Share Posted July 7, 2004 Here we go again.... ------ Double-Jointed? You May Have Less Arthritis Joint Flexibility May Lessen Wear and Tear on Joints By Jeanie Lerche WebMD Medical News Reviewed By Brunilda Nazario, MD on Tuesday, July 06, 2004 July 6, 2004 -- Being double-jointed has a few uncelebrated rewards: Your arms turn inside-out. The lotus position in yoga comes easy. Now, research shows you may be less likely to develop hand osteoarthritis. A team of researchers has found that increased flexibility of the fingers -- commonly called double-jointedness -- may actually protect finger joints from osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis, also known as degenerative arthritis, is the most common form of arthritis and increases with age. " This study demonstrated a protective effect, " writes researcher V. Kraus, MD, PhD, with Duke University Medical Center, in the current issue of Arthritis & Rheumatism. Very few studies have looked at this relationship in humans, notes Kraus. However, it's been widely believed that premature osteoarthritis may be a direct result of double-jointedness -- at least in studies involving the knees. Kraus set out to investigate the link more fully -- enrolling more than 1,000 volunteers whose families had at least two siblings with osteoarthritis of at least three finger joints. Each volunteer's joints were examined and scored for the degree of double-jointedness. X-rays of the finger joints determined the existence of joint damage from osteoarthritis. Volunteers with the most flexibility in their finger joints were found to have the lowest risks of osteoarthritis of hand joints. Overall, 4% of the volunteers were double-jointed. And these people were 66% less likely to have osteoarthritis of the hands, reports Kraus. The extra joint flexibility may prevent arthritis by redistributing load on hand joints, say the researchers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOURCE: Kraus, V. Arthritis & Rheumatism, July 2004; vol 50: pp 2178-2183. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.