Guest guest Posted July 27, 2004 Report Share Posted July 27, 2004 Ken, During my appeal hearing one of the legal people representing my HMO told me that it was up to them to determine whether or not it is a medical necessity. It's their catch 22. It would probably be better for you to have the referral from an OS who is supportive of resurfacing for active OA patients. Have them list the limitations of a THR that you would not have with resurfacing. Stress quality of life of resurfacing vs tentative or lack of quality of life with a THR. Best of luck, Fred Dr. Gross, C2K 1/21/04 > Hi Everyone, > > I need to get a referral from my primary care phys to get the ball > rolling. It's for an out of state waiver, which I think is doable if > what I am going for is not offered in State and is a medical > necessity. Searched on here found the question raised a few times but > no real responses. My prim care phys has no clue what to put because > he found about resurfacing from me. (FYI - through my explaination > and what he has read he thinks it's great.) Has anyone had any > sucessful experence with this? I think the biggest hangup is going to > be why this is a medical necessity vs a THR. I am sure they will > counter with something like - you can have a nice 'ole THR right here > in MA. > > Thanks, > > Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2004 Report Share Posted July 27, 2004 At 08:21 PM 7/27/2004 +0000, you wrote: >Stress quality of life of resurfacing vs tentative or >lack of quality of life with a THR. Or better yet, stress how much more money you are likely to save them with resurfacing than with THR's, assuming that THR's will wear out faster and have to be replaced more quickly. If you dislocate a THR, there may be another surgery and hospital stay involved to reduce the dislocation, and possible revision to correct the reason it dislocated. In my case, I pointed out the longevity of the women in my family and stated statistics for revisions and dislocations as they apply to dysplastic hips, and how medical costs for other items would likely increase as well, since if I didn't have a good hip, I would likely be more unhealthy and unfit. Cindy C+ 5/25/01 and 6/28/01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2004 Report Share Posted July 27, 2004 At 08:21 PM 7/27/2004 +0000, you wrote: >Stress quality of life of resurfacing vs tentative or >lack of quality of life with a THR. Or better yet, stress how much more money you are likely to save them with resurfacing than with THR's, assuming that THR's will wear out faster and have to be replaced more quickly. If you dislocate a THR, there may be another surgery and hospital stay involved to reduce the dislocation, and possible revision to correct the reason it dislocated. In my case, I pointed out the longevity of the women in my family and stated statistics for revisions and dislocations as they apply to dysplastic hips, and how medical costs for other items would likely increase as well, since if I didn't have a good hip, I would likely be more unhealthy and unfit. Cindy C+ 5/25/01 and 6/28/01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.