Guest guest Posted July 13, 2001 Report Share Posted July 13, 2001 Here's a piece out of Texas today with national ramifications on a topic I know a lot of you are closely monitoring. Mimi -- Mimi ez McKay msfwhealth@... Opinion could limit care for immigrants By Gaiutra Bahadur American-Statesman Staff Friday, July 13, 2001 Undocumented immigrants throughout Texas could lose access to care at publicly financed hospitals and clinics, except in emergencies, in the wake of an opinion by Attorney General Cornyn. In the opinion, the state's top lawyer said the County Hospital District would violate a federal welfare reform law if it provided free or discounted preventive care to undocumented immigrants. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, passed by Congress and signed by former President Clinton in 1996, bars immigrants living in the United States illegally from receiving public benefits, except for the treatment of communicable diseases or emergencies. But many clinics and hospitals that provide subsidized care for the poor nationwide have abided by a " don't ask, don't tell " policy and attended to the health needs of everyone,regardless of immigration status. Cornyn cited a section of the federal welfare law that allows states to make undocumented immigrants eligible for certain public benefits only by passing legislation explicitly stating that immigration status is moot. Texas, according to his opinion, has passed no such law. Neither have most other states, although some -- such as California in the cases of prenatal care for pregnant immigrants -- have codified other exceptions to the federal law. Cornyn's opinion, issued this week, could close doors for undocumented immigrants in Texas,but it is not an official ruling. County or local hospitals could continue serving immigrants without penalty, but they run the risk of being taken to court, in which case Cornyn's opinion would carry great weight. Clinics and hospitals in Austin and throughout the state that receive public money are now grappling with how to respond to the opinion. A. , president of the Seton Healthcare Network, said it is unclear how the opinion will affect its providers, including Brackenridge Hospital. " Whether or not (the opinion) has broader implications remains to be seen, " said Roseanna Szilak, executive director of the nonprofit People's Clinic, which receives some money from the city and the Texas Department of Health to provide charity care, such as checkups and immunizations. Even in County, officials are not sure whether they will stop providing care to undocumented immigrants, who account for about 23 percent of the visits to public clinics and hospitals. " We're not changing anything we're doing right now, " said Dinah Massie, a spokeswoman for the district. The district's board of managers might discuss the issue at its regular meeting later this month,she said. The district has long asked for proof of permanent U.S. residency or citizenship but has abided by an unofficial policy of providing care to those who had the documents and those who didn't. Allegations by clients that some clinics handled the cases differently than others, with some alerting the Immigration and Naturalization Service, led to a move to simply not ask about immigration status. Before the board could set that as policy, however, the county attorney asked for an opinion from Cornyn. Although what happens now in Texas is murky, advocates said the implications for public health are clear if government-paid preventive care for undocumented immigrants stops. More immigrants will allow their ordinary illnesses to blossom into severe problems requiring attention in emergency rooms, where it costs more to care for them, advocates and health policy analysts say. " That creates severe fiscal consequences in the long term, " said Cadena, an analyst with the Texas Immigrant and Refugee Coalition, an umbrella organization for immigrant groups. " What that means is, you take a fairly common, serious problem in the Latino community like diabetes, " said Leighton Ku, an analyst with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a Washington, D.C.-based group. " Instead of paying for a diabetes drug, you may instead find someone going into a diabetic coma, and that's a cruel and extremely expensive way to provide care. " Plascencia, a member of the Austin Commission on Immigrant Affairs, a group appointed by the City Council, said ignoring the early symptoms of some diseases could have " devastating effects on community. " The commission successfully campaigned for Austin to offer medical aid to undocumented immigrants in the same way that it did permanent residents. The city has been offering limited financial assistance to poor undocumented immigrants for primary health care since December. Rep. Garnet , D-Houston, said he plans to sponsor legislation that would explicitly allow publicly financed clinics and hospitals throughout the state to provide indigent care to undocumented immigrants. Until then, he urges publicly financed clinics and hospitals to continue serving them. He also said he would ask Gov. Rick to call a one-day special session to resolve the issue, if it becomes necessary. " It's bad public policy for counties to stop preventative and primary health care for individuals . .. . because those same counties are going to pay more money in the end, " he said. " It's penny-wise and pound foolish. " _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.