Guest guest Posted June 26, 2001 Report Share Posted June 26, 2001 > My sister in-law is expecting number 7 and Number 6 is only 7 months > old! She and her husband are in shock and have known for a few weeks > they have only told us tonight and so my and my hubby (her brother) > are also in shock. > > The real problem being that they live in a three bedroomed ex-council > house and cannot afford holidays or days out at present so how are > they going to manage wth yet another one! This sort of housing arrangement is very common in Israel, where anything larger than a 3 bedroomed apartment (never mind house) is considered super luxury. An average orthodox family in Jerusalem would easily have seven children or more, in two bedrooms, and move all the children from one room into the living room if they have house guests. They also don't have much money for anything, but consider it a privilege to have a large family. It's all a matter of what you are used to I suppose! Ruthie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2001 Report Share Posted June 26, 2001 > My sister in-law is expecting number 7 , 7 is way out of my comprehension. > > There is a family as DS's school in a similar situation, they have 7 children the oldest of whom is 9! They had DD1, DD2 followed by twins DDs 3 & 4, then DD5, who was then joined by DS1(quite a shock!), followed by another, DD6. They are very laid back (they would have to be!), and as they have just the one son they refer to him and Daddy as being in " testosterone corner " whenever they do " boy things " together. They are great fun to be with and all get along very well. Ruth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Share Posted June 27, 2001 > > My sister in-law is expecting number 7 , 7 is way out of my > comprehension. > > > > There is a family as DS's school in a similar situation, they have > 7 children the oldest of whom is 9! They had DD1, DD2 followed by > twins DDs 3 & 4, then DD5, who was then joined by DS1(quite a > shock!), followed by another, DD6. They are very laid back (they > would have to be!), and as they have just the one son they refer to > him and Daddy as being in " testosterone corner " whenever they do " boy > things " together. They are great fun to be with and all get along > very well. > > Ruth How lovely. I'm one of those women who'd always want more children. I'm stuck on four though, we've run out of money and space. And at 41 I'm feeling too old, but sad. Jan who should be getting dressed, and doing other morning stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Share Posted June 27, 2001 > The real problem being that they live in a three bedroomed ex-council > house and cannot afford holidays or days out at present so how are > they going to manage wth yet another one!<< A mum from my kids school has 8 kids, 6 girls and 2 boys. They also live in a 3 bedroom house. They have 3 girls in one room, 3 girls in another and the 2 boys in the 3rd room. They themselves sleep downstairs in the front room on a pull down sofa. I guess it is not ideal but they all seem really happy and laid back and not at all worried about their lack of space. The older ones help look after the younger ones, mum doesn't work at all and dad is a fireman. His shifts mean he is often around to help out. I also have another friend who has just had her 9th child - she has a 4 bedroom house. I think they both use a lot of bunk beds. At least you are very supportive of them and are congratulating them on their news. One of the worst things when I was expecting my 4th was people saying " oh no " rather than congratulations. Lorraine Mum to 10, Natasha 8, 5, ph 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Share Posted June 27, 2001 >>>My sister in-law is expecting number 7 and Number 6 is only 7 months old! She and her husband are in shock and have known for a few weeks they have only told us tonight and so my and my hubby (her brother)are also in shock. It sounds pretty tough, , but I guess if they already have 6 I'm sure they'll have enough love for a 7th too! And I guess they will have all the equipment they need already, in terms of clothes, push chair or sling, etc. Presumably also the oldest ones are getting old enough to be of some help in looking after the older ones? It's not always so much more effort to look after a crowd of children than one I think, as in many ways they amuse each other (I find that even with my two, sometimes they play for ages without talking to me at all). I guess it is the way it used to be in the olden days, anyway. all my grandparents had between 4 and 10 siblings (whereas my Dad had none and my Mum only two). Perhaps it's your sister-in-law who is sane, and the rest of us who are not... Karina Mum to Emilia (Oct 98) and Sebastian (Aug 00) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Share Posted June 27, 2001 > My sister in-law is expecting number 7 , 7 is way out of my comprehension. My BIL (DH’s brother) and his wife have 5 (in a tiny tiny house) and the oldest is about to turn 9. At one point, they said they wanted 8. After 4, they said they wanted to stop. My SIL sent me a book about natural family planning when I was pregnant with Calvin because it shocked her when I said that I would probably use the mini-pill (they’re very Catholic). Then I heard 2 months later that she was pregnant with #5. Needless to say, I haven’t paid much attention to the book she sent... Phyllis __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Share Posted June 27, 2001 > My sister in-law is expecting number 7 , 7 is way out of my comprehension. My BIL (DH’s brother) and his wife have 5 (in a tiny tiny house) and the oldest is about to turn 9. At one point, they said they wanted 8. After 4, they said they wanted to stop. My SIL sent me a book about natural family planning when I was pregnant with Calvin because it shocked her when I said that I would probably use the mini-pill (they’re very Catholic). Then I heard 2 months later that she was pregnant with #5. Needless to say, I haven’t paid much attention to the book she sent... Phyllis __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Share Posted June 27, 2001 > I'm one of those women who'd always want more children. I'm stuck on > four though, we've run out of money and space. And at 41 I'm feeling > too old, but sad. Apart from the age (I am a mere 37!) this is *exactly* me. DS4 is 13 months now, his babyhood is slipping away and I am mourning every minute that passes. I would soooo love to be pregnant again, to give birth and to cradle another newborn but, as you say, money and space don't allow it. My £1 a week on the lottery is my only hope :-( Lynda SAHM to (8), (5), Fraser (3), Callum (15/5/00) Newsletter editor, Mid-Northumberland Branch Area Rep, Region 7 www.familygarland.co.uk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.