Guest guest Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Hi all I was looking around on the MDA website, and got annoyed at a few points re their disease descriptions for mito. Just FYI I sent the below, to mda@... but I don't have much hope of any change. Another " nit " is at http://www.mdausa.org/disease/mito.cfm where it defines mito (for their purposes) as one of a short list of named symptom-clusters, which therefore misses a lot of unnamed anomalies. I guess they can define mito however they want. However, Dr. Didier Cros, an author of a Sept. 03 article in the Journal of Clinical Neuromuscular Disease, describing two cases of Multiple Symmetrical Lipomatosis (and reviewing the literature of same) believes I have MSL (diagnosed in 272 cases world-wide in all of medical history) and furthermore " ALL the typical signs of mito " . Nonetheless that's not good enough for the MDA, which apparently won't even send me Quest for free because I'm " not on their list " . All this because MSL patients only sometimes (28%) have a PROVEN KNOWN mutation (usually MERRF). BTW re my reference below to a doctor who wouldn't (at first) believe my diagnosis, he later believed me ( and that of Dr. Cros, same Neurology group at MGH) when he saw the very odd needle-EMG results that he and another doc determined, in that visit. But it was this second doc that " saved the day " for me, and convinced this first doc to continue the exam. Bedside manner between these two was like pitch-dark night and bright-sunny day. After the second doc left the room, I asked the first doc what the second doc's name was, to which he said " Mr. Football-head " . I've never heard one doctor put another down like that, it was so human. The tech across the room chuckled, as if this was some kind of standing joke. My neuro specialist Dr. Cros is very rarely in the country let alone his office, and his office staff frequently won't call me back after they've said they would. So recently when they called to schedule the EMG, I suggested that I " had thought " that my doctor wanted me to have certain other tests. This was a major exaggeration on my part, but what the heck, I had been TRYING to get him to order these other tests for MONTHS, and never really heard back from HIM at all. The office person (who has apparently not yet been fired for this) was kind enough to say that she would book these other tests (all on the same day, because I was coming from a distance) and THEN check with the doctor. Heh, heh, I bet THEY were never able to reach him either. So I guess I should be happy that I FINALLY conned the system a bit and got a really full EMG (with the bonus needle variant, too, boy was that 3 1/2 hours a load of fun), blood sent to Athena for their full (and hopefully not useless) mtDNA panel, and a brain MRI (very CLOSED and a bit creepy, but I managed just fine). All in one very long day, Monday, at Mass General Hospital in Boston. Please wish me luck with the test results, though I must admit I don't know if hoping for " positive " is a smart thing. Pardon the length of this post (as usual from me) but I really have a hard time forgiving our bizarre dysfunctional medical system. It's very tiring (as if we all have a lot of energy for this) trying to get the tests and visits. Regards Steve D. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Enclosed are a couple of points regarding medical content on your site on the subject of mitochondrial myopathies. Please forward as appropriate. 1) In the " list of 40 " at http://www.mdausa.org/disease/40list.html in the section entitled Mitochondrial Myopathy (MITO) there is this sentence under Symptoms: " Generalized muscle weakness, flaccid neck muscles and inability to walk. " Regarding " muscle weakness " , I would add " and exercise intolerance " . While this may seem a small point, it matters a lot. I just saw a doctor who specializes in neuromuscular myopathies, who was convinced that my previous much-supported diagnosis of Mitochondrial Myopathy must have been wrong, BECAUSE MY MUSCLES ARE RATHER STRONG. As it happens, my muscle strength rapidly deteriorates upon a very small amount of exercise (and I then also develop other symptoms such as dizziness). But even within his specialty, this doctor had very little experience with mito, and hence relied on the very brief statement he had learned regarding WEAKNESS. So hopefully you can see this small point could be important in diagnosis and treatment of this still-poorly-understood category. 2) In the same section as above, under Inheritance it says " Maternal mitochondrial gene (mtDNA). " While this is typically quite true, there are also a LARGE percentage of occurences where the underlying cause appears to be spontaneous mitochondrial mutations, which are not inherited. I think the way your statement reads, one could infer that it is mostly or always inherited. One large category of Mitochondrial Myopathy is possibly triggered by large-scale and/or long-term chemical exposure. Some strongly implicated substances are alcohol, certain pesticides, and anti-HIV drugs, and there are many other possibilities. In my case, extended use of prescribed valproic acid (Depakote) is suspected. So I would suggest re-wording to say for example " Frequently but not always maternal mitochondrial gene (mtDNA). " I hope that these little nits will be appreciated as nonetheless important. Would the person who eventually acts on this, or decides not to, please give me a little feedback so I at least know it was read. Thanks in advance. Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.