Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 I am a huge fan of kirkman's vitamins. But when it came to enzymes, I saw no change in Austin with the enzymes. With the Houston enzymes, I saw an almost immediate response. My son had been gfcf for almost 1 year before we tried enzymes. I have heard some children react better to one enzyme than another. It just depends on the child. In a message dated 12/29/01 4:58:25 PM Pacific Standard Time, lahaina@... writes: > > > > > > anyone have a preference besides cost? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 -Hi, We use the Houston enzymes for my son and have had GREAT success with them helping his behaviors. We are currently still gf/cf and even though we are strictly on the diet we still had amaizing changes in behavior. My son was EXTREMELY agressive and obsessive to the point of causing complete mayhem in our house. He woke up angry and nasty EVERY morning and he still had some sensory issues that the diet alone did not take care of. We started him on both the pep and zyme-prime in mid OCT. and the first thing we noticed was he stopped waking up angry! Then over the course of 4 weeks we slowly noticed his disposition getting better, he started playing with his sister not attacking her and pourpously trying to irritate her. All of his sensory issues have gone for the most part and only return when he is really over tired or hungry. His extreme obsessive behavior is mostly gone also exciept he still obsesses over his cat(wont leave him alone poor kitty) but he is no longer nasty to him. He used to obsess about stuff all day long in the past. All of theese changes came after enzymes. We were STRICTLY and still are on the diet and cant have egg or soy either and It amaizes me he was still helped so much by enzymes. We had him Igg allergy tested so we were pretty positive we weren't missing any of his trigger foods. I am very greatful for Houston enzymes. We have not tried any others so I can't be a fair judge as to who's is possibly better I can only give you my experiences with what we use. My son is 3.3 years old. (at some point we plan on trying to have infractions while on the enzymes) Hope this helps, Patti -- In @y..., " lahaina63011 " <lahaina@s...> wrote: > anyone have a preference besides cost? thanks, annie's momd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2001 Report Share Posted December 30, 2001 do enzymes work right away? arnt all enzymes the same? does it matter which company you use? --- tiredmamma18042 <CFRITCH@...> wrote: > -Hi, > We use the Houston enzymes for my son and have had > GREAT success with > them helping his behaviors. We are currently still > gf/cf and even > though we are strictly on the diet we still had > amaizing changes in > behavior. My son was EXTREMELY agressive and > obsessive to the point of > causing complete mayhem in our house. He woke up > angry and nasty EVERY > morning and he still had some sensory issues that > the diet alone did > not take care of. We started him on both the pep and > zyme-prime in mid > OCT. and the first thing we noticed was he stopped > waking up angry! > Then over the course of 4 weeks we slowly noticed > his disposition > getting better, he started playing with his sister > not attacking her > and pourpously trying to irritate her. All of his > sensory issues have > gone for the most part and only return when he is > really over tired or > hungry. His extreme obsessive behavior is mostly > gone also exciept he > still obsesses over his cat(wont leave him alone > poor kitty) but he is > no longer nasty to him. He used to obsess about > stuff all day long in > the past. All of theese changes came after enzymes. > We were STRICTLY > and still are on the diet and cant have egg or soy > either and It > amaizes me he was still helped so much by enzymes. > We had him Igg > allergy tested so we were pretty positive we weren't > missing any of > his trigger foods. I am very greatful for Houston > enzymes. We have not > tried any others so I can't be a fair judge as to > who's is possibly > better I can only give you my experiences with what > we use. My son is > 3.3 years old. (at some point we plan on trying to > have infractions > while on the enzymes) > Hope this helps, > Patti > > -- In @y..., " lahaina63011 " > <lahaina@s...> wrote: > > anyone have a preference besides cost? thanks, > annie's momd > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2001 Report Share Posted December 30, 2001 >>do enzymes work right away? arnt all enzymes the same? does it matter which company you use? Hi Michele, yes, enzymes work on contact - as soon as the wet enzymes come into direct contact with the substance they break down. But each type of enzyme works only on specific foods. A lipase works on fats, not proteins, for example. Because each product is a different formulation, you need to match the food type you want digested with the right enzymes type. Different companies have different blends. Certain people have certain concerns that factor into their choice. For example, if you are truly allergic to pineapple, you need a product that does not contain bromelain. It can have other proteases, just not bromelain because bromelain comes directly from pineapple. Asking if Houston's enzymes or Kirkmans enzymes are best may not be the right question. Houston makes Peptizyde for casein/gluten/soy/meat proteins and it really does an outstanding job on those foods. They also have Zyme Prime which is a very good, strong all-purpose, broad spectrum product (did I get enough adjective in there, lol). However, Carbo is also a strong broad spectrum product, only without bromelain and papain. So is Vital Zyme Forte or EnzymAid Companion. Truly, I am not sensitive to any other foods besides casein, so I couldn't tell the difference between any of those when we used them. However, someone else may find one of these works much better for them than another. For example, the since the Carbo doesn't have the bromelain, papain or kiwi enzymes which are phenolic (I found that out for sure now), if you are sensitive to phenols, you might do much better on it that either Zyme Prime or Companion or Vital Zyme Forte which all contain bromelain, papain or both. Kirkmans makes EnzymAid for small amounts of casein/gluten. By most all accounts, Peptizyde is more effective than EnzymAid...for that matter, Complete is more effective than EnzymAid (what would be the point of Kirkman creating a new product that was less effective than one they already had!). If you compare EnzymAid Complete to Peptizyde, then capsule per capsule Peptizyde is more effective on casein/gluten/soy because it is more targeted to that group only and more concentrated. But if you say for all foods then Complete would work better because it contains the other enzymes in the same capsule. Now you could say, is Peptizyde+Zyme Prime more effective than 2 capsules of Complete for all food groups. Most everyone that has used both company's products have reported that the Houston enzymes are more effective (including my family). Not that Complete is not effective, because many people are seeing very good improvements with Complete, including when eating casein/gluten. It is just the Houstons seem to be more effective in an efficient way. A lot of people using Complete have never used the Houston ones. And someone somewhere may find the Complete more effective but I have never seen a post or heard a report saying this. Now why might this be?! Inquiring minds want to know. For one reason, a lot of people with autistic spectrum conditions have the known problem of casein/gluten/soy breakdown. So this is a primary concern and goal of a great many people looking into enzymes. Peptizyde is the more efficient product for these foods, so it is no surprise it gets overwhelming good reports. It takes three capsules of Complete to equal the same amount of DPP IV " stuff " to break down casein as is in one capsule of Peptizyde just going by the quantities on the labels. Since casein breakdown is a major concern, this is strong drawing point. Complete has a great deal more lipase than the Houston enzymes, whatever way you want to look at it. It has more lipase than most enzyme products on the market on the entire planet. If lipase deficiency and fat breakdown were a major known concern for parents - that is, parents saw their child have a major breakdown whenever they ate even a tad of fat - then I have little doubt that parents would be swarming over a product with high lipase and everyone would be saying Complete is the most effective. Kirkman also sells the DPP IV analog which is in Complete. I am not even going to comment on this because until there is official word on where this stuff comes from it is nearly impossible to evaluate (safety, allergies, interactions, etc). I know this got a little long, but the idea is to show how different people evaluate products and the concerns that go into picking one. Sometimes it just boils down to one works better than another for someone for no known reason. Price and convenience and personal preference also factor in. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.