Guest guest Posted June 13, 2001 Report Share Posted June 13, 2001 Even if we want to reply or add to the " thread " of a discussion in a message to the whole listserv, we can do it by hitting " reply " but then editing out (deleting) all the superfluous or non-relevant things. For instance, I'm excerpting Bobbi's message, below, from a long message I'd rec'd from the listserv (11 messages). It would sure help if we all do something like this, or what Bobbi suggests. The messages (at least for those of us who receive them in a daily digest form) are getting terribly long. And if we ever want to look up an older message, we can do so (they're archived) at the groups website. Tina tina.castanares@... > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:26:47 -0500 > From: Bobbi Ryder <ryder@...> > Subject: Use of " forward " vs " reply " > > It has been brought to my attention that we have long trails of messages > going back and forth within this egroup,many of which have been > " replied " to by many people, multiple tims. When you receive such a > message (which takes up a lot of cyberspace) please consider starting a > new message to the group, or if appropriate, to the individual you are > responding to, instead of just hitting " reply " . > > This will take some pressure off of everyone's computer systems. > > If you need any help in setting up names in your address book in order > to facilitate this process, please let me know. We can help. > > Thank you for your participation in this dynamic egroup. It is one of > the most vital I know of. > > -- > Bobbi Ryder > CEO > > National Center for Farmworker Health > 1770 FM 967 > Buda, TX 78610 > > 512.312.2700, ext. 201 > 512.312.2600 (fax) > > http://www.ncfh.org > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.