Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Well Dan, during the prohibition era in the USA a lot of people made a lot of money too but that didn't make it right either. Sure the US economy has benefitted, in a sense, from the production and marketing of tobacco but consider the costs that are usually left out of the equation. The increased cost of health care due to extended and more complex treatment necessary is borne (in Australia) by the tax payer. Premature death robs the economy of productive human beings and diverts valuable resources away from other important areas. My mother spent 14 weeks, including 2 weeks in intensive care, in hospital recovering from post operative complications and was in hospital every winter for seven years for up to 4 weeks at a time because she couldn't breathe. My brother-in-law spent 3 months in hospital. The cost to my family (paid by the tax payers of Australia) - well over $200,000. I have no doubt if the tobacco industry had been forced to pay for their treatment it would have had a very big loss against these two customers. The emotional cost my family suffered was enormous too and you cannot put a dollar figure against the suffering. The economic benefit argument does not hold up to close scrutiny when the cost/benefits are properly considered. You may think smoking is cool, you may think it shows an independance of action but I urge you to visit an oncology (cancer) ward or pulmonary (lung) function ward in a large hospital to see first hand where smokers end up. It is not a pretty sight. When I was your age I used to smoke and think it was cool too - until I investigated the smoking related health problems for myself. When I learnt about the amputations, emphysema, heart disease and all the cancers caused by smoking I gave up immediately (aged 22) but ironically I could not convince my mother to do likewise. When she was my current age (60) she already had acute and severe emphysema and my brother-in-law was already dead 6 years from multiple cancers (dead at 54). My mother suffered bronchial pneumonia 4-5 times a year for most of the time I could remember - all because of smoking and often required multiple home visits from the doctor or hospitalization. None of this is factored into the cost of a packet of fags. Don't think you are helping the economy by smoking. The only economy being helped is that of the cigarette company and they don't give a dam about you. Good luck in your studies at school but please think about your smoking. Rod > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Well Dan, during the prohibition era in the USA a lot of people made a lot of money too but that didn't make it right either. Sure the US economy has benefitted, in a sense, from the production and marketing of tobacco but consider the costs that are usually left out of the equation. The increased cost of health care due to extended and more complex treatment necessary is borne (in Australia) by the tax payer. Premature death robs the economy of productive human beings and diverts valuable resources away from other important areas. My mother spent 14 weeks, including 2 weeks in intensive care, in hospital recovering from post operative complications and was in hospital every winter for seven years for up to 4 weeks at a time because she couldn't breathe. My brother-in-law spent 3 months in hospital. The cost to my family (paid by the tax payers of Australia) - well over $200,000. I have no doubt if the tobacco industry had been forced to pay for their treatment it would have had a very big loss against these two customers. The emotional cost my family suffered was enormous too and you cannot put a dollar figure against the suffering. The economic benefit argument does not hold up to close scrutiny when the cost/benefits are properly considered. You may think smoking is cool, you may think it shows an independance of action but I urge you to visit an oncology (cancer) ward or pulmonary (lung) function ward in a large hospital to see first hand where smokers end up. It is not a pretty sight. When I was your age I used to smoke and think it was cool too - until I investigated the smoking related health problems for myself. When I learnt about the amputations, emphysema, heart disease and all the cancers caused by smoking I gave up immediately (aged 22) but ironically I could not convince my mother to do likewise. When she was my current age (60) she already had acute and severe emphysema and my brother-in-law was already dead 6 years from multiple cancers (dead at 54). My mother suffered bronchial pneumonia 4-5 times a year for most of the time I could remember - all because of smoking and often required multiple home visits from the doctor or hospitalization. None of this is factored into the cost of a packet of fags. Don't think you are helping the economy by smoking. The only economy being helped is that of the cigarette company and they don't give a dam about you. Good luck in your studies at school but please think about your smoking. Rod > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Well Dan, during the prohibition era in the USA a lot of people made a lot of money too but that didn't make it right either. Sure the US economy has benefitted, in a sense, from the production and marketing of tobacco but consider the costs that are usually left out of the equation. The increased cost of health care due to extended and more complex treatment necessary is borne (in Australia) by the tax payer. Premature death robs the economy of productive human beings and diverts valuable resources away from other important areas. My mother spent 14 weeks, including 2 weeks in intensive care, in hospital recovering from post operative complications and was in hospital every winter for seven years for up to 4 weeks at a time because she couldn't breathe. My brother-in-law spent 3 months in hospital. The cost to my family (paid by the tax payers of Australia) - well over $200,000. I have no doubt if the tobacco industry had been forced to pay for their treatment it would have had a very big loss against these two customers. The emotional cost my family suffered was enormous too and you cannot put a dollar figure against the suffering. The economic benefit argument does not hold up to close scrutiny when the cost/benefits are properly considered. You may think smoking is cool, you may think it shows an independance of action but I urge you to visit an oncology (cancer) ward or pulmonary (lung) function ward in a large hospital to see first hand where smokers end up. It is not a pretty sight. When I was your age I used to smoke and think it was cool too - until I investigated the smoking related health problems for myself. When I learnt about the amputations, emphysema, heart disease and all the cancers caused by smoking I gave up immediately (aged 22) but ironically I could not convince my mother to do likewise. When she was my current age (60) she already had acute and severe emphysema and my brother-in-law was already dead 6 years from multiple cancers (dead at 54). My mother suffered bronchial pneumonia 4-5 times a year for most of the time I could remember - all because of smoking and often required multiple home visits from the doctor or hospitalization. None of this is factored into the cost of a packet of fags. Don't think you are helping the economy by smoking. The only economy being helped is that of the cigarette company and they don't give a dam about you. Good luck in your studies at school but please think about your smoking. Rod > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 I never did take in to consideration that all of the packs of cigarettes that my father paid for that ultimately caused his death when I was 9 years old, was actually boosting our economy! Wow! I guess when you look at it that way. Every kid should have his or hers parents killed by tobacco products just so we can support the economy....... > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 I never did take in to consideration that all of the packs of cigarettes that my father paid for that ultimately caused his death when I was 9 years old, was actually boosting our economy! Wow! I guess when you look at it that way. Every kid should have his or hers parents killed by tobacco products just so we can support the economy....... > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 I never did take in to consideration that all of the packs of cigarettes that my father paid for that ultimately caused his death when I was 9 years old, was actually boosting our economy! Wow! I guess when you look at it that way. Every kid should have his or hers parents killed by tobacco products just so we can support the economy....... > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 First, I want to apologize to everyone on this site for this post, but I feel a need to say this and I will leave the subject alone after this - promise. Dan, I don't mean to be so callous, but HOGWASH!! We kill off millions of people to make money? That's what this is saying to me. Look at all the money that has been and still is being spent on medicines and medical procedures, fires, funerals of smokers and those who have contracted " second-hand smoke " , etc., and such to help those who are " working for America " - more like " working to kill off America " . Sorry, didn't mean to go off on a tangent, but you must understand, I've seen the damage that tobacco can do to people first hand and now I'm watching it happen to my own family. This article says to me that it all boils down to $$$ vs. lives and the $$$ seem to be more important. Notice this article says nothing about all the $$$ that have been and still is being spent because of all the damage that has been caused by tobacco. Please don't give me the " there-are-more-problems-in-America " spiel. I know that tobacco is not the only problem in America, but this is what we're talking about right now so please don't try to compare it to anything else. Please, Dan, quit while you can - NOW! Smooches Re: quitting smoking for surgery the other biased side I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 - very well put. Smooches Re: quitting smoking for surgery the other biased side I never did take in to consideration that all of the packs of cigarettes that my father paid for that ultimately caused his death when I was 9 years old, was actually boosting our economy! Wow! I guess when you look at it that way. Every kid should have his or hers parents killed by tobacco products just so we can support the economy....... > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Let me preface my forthcoming blunt remarks by saying that I am an ex-smoker, so I can sympathize with the difficulties in quitting. That said.... I'm afraid economics alone is not, to me, an acceptable argument for doing something that hurts people. Maybe the US wouldn't be what it is today economically without tobacco. It also wouldn't be what it is today if there hadn't been slavery. Good economically does not necesssarily mean GOOD. And America's tobacco companies are marketing their products overseas to poorer, less educated populations that don't have the resources you do to make a smart choice. You can say that here in the US you are warned everywhere about the dangers of smoking, but that is not true in parts of Asia, South America and Africa. So I don't think it's worth it for America to boost our economy while we are addicting and killing people in other parts of the world. > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Let me preface my forthcoming blunt remarks by saying that I am an ex-smoker, so I can sympathize with the difficulties in quitting. That said.... I'm afraid economics alone is not, to me, an acceptable argument for doing something that hurts people. Maybe the US wouldn't be what it is today economically without tobacco. It also wouldn't be what it is today if there hadn't been slavery. Good economically does not necesssarily mean GOOD. And America's tobacco companies are marketing their products overseas to poorer, less educated populations that don't have the resources you do to make a smart choice. You can say that here in the US you are warned everywhere about the dangers of smoking, but that is not true in parts of Asia, South America and Africa. So I don't think it's worth it for America to boost our economy while we are addicting and killing people in other parts of the world. > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Let me preface my forthcoming blunt remarks by saying that I am an ex-smoker, so I can sympathize with the difficulties in quitting. That said.... I'm afraid economics alone is not, to me, an acceptable argument for doing something that hurts people. Maybe the US wouldn't be what it is today economically without tobacco. It also wouldn't be what it is today if there hadn't been slavery. Good economically does not necesssarily mean GOOD. And America's tobacco companies are marketing their products overseas to poorer, less educated populations that don't have the resources you do to make a smart choice. You can say that here in the US you are warned everywhere about the dangers of smoking, but that is not true in parts of Asia, South America and Africa. So I don't think it's worth it for America to boost our economy while we are addicting and killing people in other parts of the world. > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 A very valid and powerful point. On the negative economic side health costs for treating those who die from smoking induced disease is conservatively $2.5billion a yearin the US and this is not counting the costs of increased illnesses due to smoking and lost commercial activity due to increased absenteeism from work. > > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Here's some " truthful advertising " from my parents' generation, no wonder they were enticed to start smoking if you check out some of these magazine ads. From the 1950s Medical professionals are on your side .... " A responsible consulting organization reports a study by a competent medical specialist and staff on the effects of smoking " : http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/chesterfield1.html Buying by the carton will really help keep your smoking moderate ..... " ... the filter that gives you high filtration to help you keep your smoking moderate... If you really like to smoke a lot, why not make the change to Kent, today? And why not start with a carton? " : http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/kent1.html From the 1940s Eminent doctors findings ... " Take this to heart! When you inhale - and all smokers do, some of the time - there's increased chance of irritation. So, be guided by the findings of eminent doctors. They discovered: on comparing - the irritant quality in the smoke of the four other leading brands was found to average more than three times that of the strikingly contrasted Philip ... and the irritation lasts more than five times as long! " http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/phillipmorris2_40.html You can smoke all you want if you just find that right cigarette ... Here's how to smoke all you want- If you really enjoy smoking, yet feel you smoke too much, you don't have to cut down and deprive yourself of smoking pleasure! Follow the lead of thousands of others - switch to new Julep Cigarettes. Smoke all you want without unpleasant symptoms of oversmoking! A smoking miracle? Yes, it's the triple miracle of mint. (1) Your mouth doesn't get smoke-weary! (2) Your throat doesn't get that harsh, hacking feeling! (3) Your breath avoids tobacco-taint! Get Juleps today - get more joy out of smoking! 1. No 'stale-tasting' mouth: New miracle mint in Juleps freshens the mouth at every puff. Even if you chain-smoke, your mouth feels clean, sparkling all day long. 2. No raw 'burned-out' throat: Miracle mint stays in the smoke of Juleps, refreshes the throat. No " dry-as-dust " rawness, even if you smoke 20-40-60 Juleps a day. 3. No heavy 'tobacco-breath': Unpleasant tobacco-breath is a common form of halitosis. But... the hint of mint in Juleps lingers, leaves your breath pleasant and inviting. " http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/julep1_40.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Here's some " truthful advertising " from my parents' generation, no wonder they were enticed to start smoking if you check out some of these magazine ads. From the 1950s Medical professionals are on your side .... " A responsible consulting organization reports a study by a competent medical specialist and staff on the effects of smoking " : http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/chesterfield1.html Buying by the carton will really help keep your smoking moderate ..... " ... the filter that gives you high filtration to help you keep your smoking moderate... If you really like to smoke a lot, why not make the change to Kent, today? And why not start with a carton? " : http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/kent1.html From the 1940s Eminent doctors findings ... " Take this to heart! When you inhale - and all smokers do, some of the time - there's increased chance of irritation. So, be guided by the findings of eminent doctors. They discovered: on comparing - the irritant quality in the smoke of the four other leading brands was found to average more than three times that of the strikingly contrasted Philip ... and the irritation lasts more than five times as long! " http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/phillipmorris2_40.html You can smoke all you want if you just find that right cigarette ... Here's how to smoke all you want- If you really enjoy smoking, yet feel you smoke too much, you don't have to cut down and deprive yourself of smoking pleasure! Follow the lead of thousands of others - switch to new Julep Cigarettes. Smoke all you want without unpleasant symptoms of oversmoking! A smoking miracle? Yes, it's the triple miracle of mint. (1) Your mouth doesn't get smoke-weary! (2) Your throat doesn't get that harsh, hacking feeling! (3) Your breath avoids tobacco-taint! Get Juleps today - get more joy out of smoking! 1. No 'stale-tasting' mouth: New miracle mint in Juleps freshens the mouth at every puff. Even if you chain-smoke, your mouth feels clean, sparkling all day long. 2. No raw 'burned-out' throat: Miracle mint stays in the smoke of Juleps, refreshes the throat. No " dry-as-dust " rawness, even if you smoke 20-40-60 Juleps a day. 3. No heavy 'tobacco-breath': Unpleasant tobacco-breath is a common form of halitosis. But... the hint of mint in Juleps lingers, leaves your breath pleasant and inviting. " http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/julep1_40.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Here's some " truthful advertising " from my parents' generation, no wonder they were enticed to start smoking if you check out some of these magazine ads. From the 1950s Medical professionals are on your side .... " A responsible consulting organization reports a study by a competent medical specialist and staff on the effects of smoking " : http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/chesterfield1.html Buying by the carton will really help keep your smoking moderate ..... " ... the filter that gives you high filtration to help you keep your smoking moderate... If you really like to smoke a lot, why not make the change to Kent, today? And why not start with a carton? " : http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/kent1.html From the 1940s Eminent doctors findings ... " Take this to heart! When you inhale - and all smokers do, some of the time - there's increased chance of irritation. So, be guided by the findings of eminent doctors. They discovered: on comparing - the irritant quality in the smoke of the four other leading brands was found to average more than three times that of the strikingly contrasted Philip ... and the irritation lasts more than five times as long! " http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/phillipmorris2_40.html You can smoke all you want if you just find that right cigarette ... Here's how to smoke all you want- If you really enjoy smoking, yet feel you smoke too much, you don't have to cut down and deprive yourself of smoking pleasure! Follow the lead of thousands of others - switch to new Julep Cigarettes. Smoke all you want without unpleasant symptoms of oversmoking! A smoking miracle? Yes, it's the triple miracle of mint. (1) Your mouth doesn't get smoke-weary! (2) Your throat doesn't get that harsh, hacking feeling! (3) Your breath avoids tobacco-taint! Get Juleps today - get more joy out of smoking! 1. No 'stale-tasting' mouth: New miracle mint in Juleps freshens the mouth at every puff. Even if you chain-smoke, your mouth feels clean, sparkling all day long. 2. No raw 'burned-out' throat: Miracle mint stays in the smoke of Juleps, refreshes the throat. No " dry-as-dust " rawness, even if you smoke 20-40-60 Juleps a day. 3. No heavy 'tobacco-breath': Unpleasant tobacco-breath is a common form of halitosis. But... the hint of mint in Juleps lingers, leaves your breath pleasant and inviting. " http://www.chickenhead.com/truth/julep1_40.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 and boy, oh boy, I really want to kiss somebody who's had 60 cigarettes ... NOT! ~~No " dry-as-dust " rawness, even if you smoke 20-40-60 Juleps a day. No heavy 'tobacco-breath': Unpleasant tobacco-breath is a common form of halitosis. But... the hint of mint in Juleps lingers, leaves your breath pleasant and inviting.~~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 and boy, oh boy, I really want to kiss somebody who's had 60 cigarettes ... NOT! ~~No " dry-as-dust " rawness, even if you smoke 20-40-60 Juleps a day. No heavy 'tobacco-breath': Unpleasant tobacco-breath is a common form of halitosis. But... the hint of mint in Juleps lingers, leaves your breath pleasant and inviting.~~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Dan Have a look at this web site and the associated links at the bottom of the page. I hope it gets you thinking. http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Smoking _and_heart_disease_the_facts?OpenDocument BTW 19000 Australians die each year from smoking induced disease and this equates to around 250,000 Americans - the equivalent of a small city. Sobering statistic is it not? Rod > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Dan Have a look at this web site and the associated links at the bottom of the page. I hope it gets you thinking. http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Smoking _and_heart_disease_the_facts?OpenDocument BTW 19000 Australians die each year from smoking induced disease and this equates to around 250,000 Americans - the equivalent of a small city. Sobering statistic is it not? Rod > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Dan Have a look at this web site and the associated links at the bottom of the page. I hope it gets you thinking. http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Smoking _and_heart_disease_the_facts?OpenDocument BTW 19000 Australians die each year from smoking induced disease and this equates to around 250,000 Americans - the equivalent of a small city. Sobering statistic is it not? Rod > I understand what everyone has said and I take it to heart. I > understand what is being explained. But rather then trying to make > people aware through my own words ill link everyone to a site. > > http://fujipub.com/fot/working.html > > Took me a few minutes to find on google, but it supports what I would > be talking about. It's geting late and I have to return to school on > day 10 post op. My only goal here is to show the other sides to this > argument. Basicly saying without this 'horrible' crop it is likley > that America wouldn't even be here today. Just something to think > about. Being a smoker I had to have my input. Good night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.