Subject: 4 year old shots

[Guest guest]

I consider all shots dangerous at this point. I have a 4 and 2 1/2

year old and have been told by two doctors I saved my second son's life

by intervening early (because of my older child's problems). While my

second son is NT (his labs at one year old looked like that of an

autistic kid). By doing the diet and supplements and stopping vaccines

I have avoided injury to his body and brain. I still don't feel that I

am out of the woods with him and would never give him a vaccine unless

(i) it had no aluminum or mercury and (ii) I felt it was absolutely

critical.

From being on these lists for the last 2 years, I have heard from many

parents coming back on the list after having vaccinated an older kid

and having a recurrence of symptoms. How disheartening would that be?

Don't let anyone convince you to take this chance with your kids. Even

if the vaccines do not have mercury, they are an insult to the body and

the body has to respond to the vaccine itself. If you believe in

BIOSET or NAET, you can see that most of us have a negative reaction to

the substances with which we have been vaccinated. I am not sure that

vaccinating your child would be a good idea, especially if he is still

symptomatic (i.e., autism). Even the non-symptomatic kids (e.g., my 2

1/2 year old) probably would not be able to handle a vaccine.

Maureen

> From: " mwsgts " <mwsgts@...>

>

>

> Hello! This is my first time posting--so excuse my ignorance! I

> understand the harmful effects of thimerosol in vaccines. Are there

> also harmul effects of vaccines w/out thimerosol? My son will be due

> to get some vaccines on his 4th birthday March. He has autism, and I

> am wondering whether I should continue his vaccinations. I guess what

> I am asking is: if the vaccines are thimerosol free, can they still

> be harmful to an autistic individual? Have other parents chosen not

> to vaccinate their children? Can you do this legally? Thanks so much

> for any info!

>

> Maureen