Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

20/20

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

In a message dated 11/06/2002 10:44:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,

rudnicki@... writes:

> the majority of us are

I was not aware that the majority of grads are anemic. Please someone

explain. Fay Bayuk 300/182 10/23/01

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Faye,

I dont know about the majority of grads becoming anemic, but I am very

distal and having to work at keeping all my levels within normal limits. I do

know that it is very important to take your vitamins, minerals and drink your

protein supplements if you are distal... or you risk becoming very ill within

time. I am currently iron deficient anemic, and taking additional iron each

day.

To those I have talked with about my current situation, we are mostly in

agreement that I am having a tougher time staying within normal limitis

because I was so very ill before my third surgery, second revision, performed

last Feb.

Hang in there.. and take care

Hugs,

from GA

open RNY 12/12/00

Revision 04/18/01

Revision 02/07/02

St wt.... 392

Cw.......187

Wt loss..-205

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/7/02 8:44:04 AM West Asia Standard Time,

rudnicki@... writes:

<< she says she went for a physical, finds out she's severely anemic and in

doing more tests they find the colon cancer.

now its no secret that she had lap band surgery in like '99 and dropped

100lbs. and so why wouldnt' she be anemic? the majority of us are.

--------------------------------

The majority of us are anemic? What are the lab values that tell me if I'm

anemic or not. This is the first time I've heard most of us are this way.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@

but can some of the medical folks out there explain the link between being

anemic and colon cancer. >>

------------------------------

I'm not a medical folk, but I just read today in " Beyond Change " that cancer

can be one of the CAUSES of anemia (rather than the other way

around)...........

Carol A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/7/02 8:44:04 AM West Asia Standard Time,

rudnicki@... writes:

<< she says she went for a physical, finds out she's severely anemic and in

doing more tests they find the colon cancer.

now its no secret that she had lap band surgery in like '99 and dropped

100lbs. and so why wouldnt' she be anemic? the majority of us are.

--------------------------------

The majority of us are anemic? What are the lab values that tell me if I'm

anemic or not. This is the first time I've heard most of us are this way.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@

but can some of the medical folks out there explain the link between being

anemic and colon cancer. >>

------------------------------

I'm not a medical folk, but I just read today in " Beyond Change " that cancer

can be one of the CAUSES of anemia (rather than the other way

around)...........

Carol A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/7/2002 4:15:44 AM Eastern Standard Time,

rudnicki@... writes:

> I was watching 20/20 tonight as barbara walters was interviewing the

> osbournes. mostly sharon since she holds the family together is ozzie's

> business manager and a lot about her recent colon cancer. she says she

> went for a physical, finds out she's severely anemic and in doing more

> tests they find the colon cancer.

> now its no secret that she had lap band surgery in like '99 and dropped

> 100lbs. and so why wouldnt' she be anemic? the majority of us are.

*******************************

I was under the impression that the symptoms started before the lapband

surgery. Her daughter, Amy, was saying she knew something was wrong, and was

trying to get her mother to go for a checkup for a couple of years before she

actually did. What a family, they're so disfuntional, but so endearing,

aren't they?

Also, I don't think the majority of us are anemic. I know many are, but the

majority?

BTW, Sue, thank you for setting up the polls.

in NJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/7/2002 4:15:44 AM Eastern Standard Time,

rudnicki@... writes:

> I was watching 20/20 tonight as barbara walters was interviewing the

> osbournes. mostly sharon since she holds the family together is ozzie's

> business manager and a lot about her recent colon cancer. she says she

> went for a physical, finds out she's severely anemic and in doing more

> tests they find the colon cancer.

> now its no secret that she had lap band surgery in like '99 and dropped

> 100lbs. and so why wouldnt' she be anemic? the majority of us are.

*******************************

I was under the impression that the symptoms started before the lapband

surgery. Her daughter, Amy, was saying she knew something was wrong, and was

trying to get her mother to go for a checkup for a couple of years before she

actually did. What a family, they're so disfuntional, but so endearing,

aren't they?

Also, I don't think the majority of us are anemic. I know many are, but the

majority?

BTW, Sue, thank you for setting up the polls.

in NJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what its worth, I am anemic, compounded by recent pregnancy and birth.

So I have to watch my levels of iron and B12. I know for me that with ANY

health stress I must be diligent with my vitals...

As an added note, since I upped my protein intake (proscore100) I have

dropped all pregnancy weight gain (18 lbs) plus another 22 lbs the first four

weeks after giving birth. So I am back to losing weight again, after 2 1/2

years, wahoo!

J.J.

Medial Lap RNY

May 10, 2000

Tricare, Navy Dr. Spencer

300/185/160

Baby Girl by C-Section 9/12/02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what its worth, I am anemic, compounded by recent pregnancy and birth.

So I have to watch my levels of iron and B12. I know for me that with ANY

health stress I must be diligent with my vitals...

As an added note, since I upped my protein intake (proscore100) I have

dropped all pregnancy weight gain (18 lbs) plus another 22 lbs the first four

weeks after giving birth. So I am back to losing weight again, after 2 1/2

years, wahoo!

J.J.

Medial Lap RNY

May 10, 2000

Tricare, Navy Dr. Spencer

300/185/160

Baby Girl by C-Section 9/12/02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> I was under the impression that the symptoms started before the lapband

> surgery. Her daughter, Amy, was saying she knew something was wrong, and

was trying to get her mother to go for a checkup for a couple of years

before she actually did. What a family, they're so disfuntional, but so

endearing, aren't they?

*** she had lap band in '98 or '99 but for the last 2yr. was sick and

wouldn't go to the doc. they finally convinced her to. i think for " US " that

no medical care, bloodwork, etc. for two years is a nightmare waiting to

happen.

> Also, I don't think the majority of us are anemic. I know many are, but

the majority?

*** OK, I'll take back my majority and just say Many of us are anemic. we

could do a poll but how many would really take the time to answer it? just

the anemics probably. anyhow it seems that no one is exempt from being

anemic - not a short proximal as I was and still became anemic by 6mo.post

op, not post menopausal women as there are many on the list and not men.

seems like some folks get so anemic they have to do injections and IV even.

I suppose its no different than carbonate working for some folks and no

protein supplementation working for some folks. we know what 8 vits are no

longer absorbed at the duodenum once it was bypassed and theoretically we

should have to supplement those 8 - iron being one of them.

sue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> I was under the impression that the symptoms started before the lapband

> surgery. Her daughter, Amy, was saying she knew something was wrong, and

was trying to get her mother to go for a checkup for a couple of years

before she actually did. What a family, they're so disfuntional, but so

endearing, aren't they?

*** she had lap band in '98 or '99 but for the last 2yr. was sick and

wouldn't go to the doc. they finally convinced her to. i think for " US " that

no medical care, bloodwork, etc. for two years is a nightmare waiting to

happen.

> Also, I don't think the majority of us are anemic. I know many are, but

the majority?

*** OK, I'll take back my majority and just say Many of us are anemic. we

could do a poll but how many would really take the time to answer it? just

the anemics probably. anyhow it seems that no one is exempt from being

anemic - not a short proximal as I was and still became anemic by 6mo.post

op, not post menopausal women as there are many on the list and not men.

seems like some folks get so anemic they have to do injections and IV even.

I suppose its no different than carbonate working for some folks and no

protein supplementation working for some folks. we know what 8 vits are no

longer absorbed at the duodenum once it was bypassed and theoretically we

should have to supplement those 8 - iron being one of them.

sue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>> explain the link between being anemic and colon cancer. <<

colon cancer, even in its pre-cancerous stages causes bleeding. It can even be

microscopic bleeding (amounts too small to be seen by the normal eye). I'm sure

many of us have heard of or have had a colon cancer test in which a very small

amount of stool is tested for blood. This is the link to the anemia. Blood loss

in the stool leads to the anemia. If you have heard about colon polyps - which

can lead to colon cancer, they can cause bleeding (which can lead to anemia).

As a physician, one of the first things we are taught to think about in an

adult with anemia (after menstrual bleeding and other gyn sources in a female)

is a GI (gastrointestinal) source - hemorrhoids, colon cancer, or now (with

easier access to prevacid, tagamet, etc) less likely ulcers.

doc carolyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe not the majority, but many. This is because the positioning of the bypass

causes us to malabsorb iron as well as the other things we malabsorb. Thus

causing anemia.

doc carolyn

> the majority of us are

I was not aware that the majority of grads are anemic. Please someone

explain. Fay Bayuk 300/182 10/23/01

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was watching 20/20 tonight as barbara walters was interviewing the

osbournes. mostly sharon since she holds the family together is ozzie's

business manager and a lot about her recent colon cancer. she says she went

for a physical, finds out she's severely anemic and in doing more tests they

find the colon cancer.

now its no secret that she had lap band surgery in like '99 and dropped

100lbs. and so why wouldnt' she be anemic? the majority of us are.

but can some of the medical folks out there explain the link between being

anemic and colon cancer. perhaps there is none, its just her random testing

that in her case linked one to the other.

makes me wonder what kind of aftercare/follow up she has had since

surgery...........

sue

I saw the program too, and wondered the same. Might be that she had

accompanied rectal bleeding, and didn't mention that. More than likely she

did..if her cancer was that advanced. Also wonder how much care she was

taking of herself....since she seems to be the ..umm...caretaker in that

" family. " Ozzie's brain is so fried that he goes into a panic thinking of

being without her. Sad.

Regards~

´¨¨)) -:¦:-

¸.·´ .·´¨¨))

((¸¸.·´ ..·´ -:¦:- Jacque

-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*

www.jacquemiller.gasupusa.com

Discount Gasoline! Save 21%

with a Costco-like membership!

Ask me how!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
Guest guest

In a message dated 4/15/2003 9:58:12 AM Central Daylight Time,

kathsspace@... writes:

> My only point is that just because someone mentions personal

> responsibility is not a reason to jump to a conclussion. We don't

> even know what the story is about.

------------------------------------

I DID say I'm waiting till I see the show to complete the letter! If you had

heard the advertising for the show, you would get the idea that this is going

to be one colossal blame-fest. But I'm waiting 2c if that's the case.

There are many reasons for morbid obesity. Some of them have to do with

choice and some of them do not. The tendency of the " normal " world is to lump

us all together, and point the finger at us all and say " you did it to

yourself. " You are apparently one of those lucky ones who got to where you

were by choice, and so by choice, could undo what you did. Doesn't always

work that way for all of us, and much recent research has proven that to be

true.

Please don't YOU jump to conclusions either and hop on the " blame the fat

gal " bandwagon until the program has aired.

Carol A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Maybe it's just me, but why in the world would you start a letter

before even seeing the show. Talk about jumping to conclussions.

Am I the only one who take complete responsibility for my being fat?

I did make a choice to not be fat, the choice was made by way of

WLS. I can also make the choice to be fat again by eating my way

back to my former weight.

My only point is that just because someone mentions personal

responsibility is not a reason to jump to a conclussion. We don't

even know what the story is about.

KathyM

> Stossel can be a real jerk when it comes to

> anything involving health issues. I figure he's

> obsessed with weight and image.

>

> Another case of someone who has never had a weight

> problem telling the rest of us how to live.

>

> Jerk

>

> Connie

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

UH-OH.........I feel ALOT of dialog is about to immerge !Should lead to some

interesting reading-----let me pull up a chair.BJ in Va

phxkath kathsspace@...> wrote: Maybe it's just me, but why in the

world would you start a letter

before even seeing the show. Talk about jumping to conclussions.

Am I the only one who take complete responsibility for my being fat?

I did make a choice to not be fat, the choice was made by way of

WLS. I can also make the choice to be fat again by eating my way

back to my former weight.

My only point is that just because someone mentions personal

responsibility is not a reason to jump to a conclussion. We don't

even know what the story is about.

KathyM

> Stossel can be a real jerk when it comes to

> anything involving health issues. I figure he's

> obsessed with weight and image.

>

> Another case of someone who has never had a weight

> problem telling the rest of us how to live.

>

> Jerk

>

> Connie

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I saw the program last night which expanded on the whole theory that addiction

is a choice not a disease. With regard to food addiction and compulsion to eat,

which I had prior to WLS (and can still get on a role with if I eat the wrong

foods) I can definitely say that being overweight was not a choice I made. I am

glad that I have been able to have WLS and am granted the chance to be " normal "

whatever that is. As long as I stay in touch with my body and don't overeat, I

will stay healthy. I have lost 70% of my excess body weight since my 1/8/02

BPD/DS surgery and for my goal, have 30 lbs. more to go.

I have started back on my protein shakes as of yesterday and from reading the

posts on the group, feel very motivated and hopeful that this last 30 lbs. will

come off.

Does anyone have some good ideas for non-dairy protein shakes? I am severely

lactose intolerant and have trouble with some of the whey content in many of the

shakes.

Thanks to all on the group who have helped me by their posts.

Barbara in MD(Barbara Helene, not Barbara Jean LOL!!) Message: 17

Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:31:04 EDT

From: tuesdynite@...

Subject: 20/20

Well, did anyone have time (amidst the Easter/Passover preps) to catch

the

Stossel report on obesity on 20/20 Friday night? Anyone have a

comment?

Carol A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I didn't miss it. I saw it. The url u posted is pretty much everything that

was covered in the 20/20 segment on obesity.

This quote in particular really incensed me:

" Schaler, author of Addiction Is a Choice, disagrees: " These people

are playing or pretending to be helpless. If they want real help, they need

to confront the fact that they're lying when they say they can't do

something that they can do. "

Schaler says we're stronger than we think, and that overeating, smoking and

other so-called addictions are all things we can choose to control. Our

genes are not in charge, he says, we are.

Schaler says people may process food differently because of their genes.

But, he says, " 'The activity of eating is not controlled by a gene.' "

-----------------

I do not consider myself helpless and I have spent an entire lifetime (I'm

61) proving I'm not helpless. I've gone on diet after diet and have lost

hundreds of pounds over the years. But at some point, some DEMON would

possess me and make me eat my way back up again to an even higher weight.

And I do mean demon. I remember describing it to people just that way, that

SOMEthing just seemed to take me over and make me eat even if I didn't WANT

to eat.

I successfully kicked a 3-pack-a-day smoking habit in 1989 after a half

dozen attempts that never " took " permanently. I had smoked for 35 years. To

THIS DAY, I will at times of stress, chew on toothpicks and straws as

substitutes. Maybe I wasn't addicted to the nicotine, but I was certainly

addicted to having something in my mouth, and apparently still am. But I

think what this proves is that some people can be strong about some things

and not necessarily about others.

One thing that's missing from the summary of the segment on obesity is an

opening quote from one of the belly dancers, who said that she'd never

found anything that worked for her to keep the weight off once she'd lost

it. Like me, she'd lost and regained and lost and regained many times over

her life, and each regain ended her up heavier than ever before. And that

is my biggest criticism of this " study " -- that Stossel never addressed

that issue of obesity, that people do exercise their strength at times and

do lose weight, but are not able to hang on to the loss. When someone finds

the secret to conquering that problem, I think the problem of obesity in

general will be conquered. Is there even ONE person on this list who has

never tried to lose weight? There are a lot of things that cause us to

" choose " to eat rather than control our eating. It's a lot more complex

than this program makes things out to be.

Carol A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I didn't miss it. I saw it. The url u posted is pretty much everything that

was covered in the 20/20 segment on obesity.

This quote in particular really incensed me:

" Schaler, author of Addiction Is a Choice, disagrees: " These people

are playing or pretending to be helpless. If they want real help, they need

to confront the fact that they're lying when they say they can't do

something that they can do. "

Schaler says we're stronger than we think, and that overeating, smoking and

other so-called addictions are all things we can choose to control. Our

genes are not in charge, he says, we are.

Schaler says people may process food differently because of their genes.

But, he says, " 'The activity of eating is not controlled by a gene.' "

-----------------

I do not consider myself helpless and I have spent an entire lifetime (I'm

61) proving I'm not helpless. I've gone on diet after diet and have lost

hundreds of pounds over the years. But at some point, some DEMON would

possess me and make me eat my way back up again to an even higher weight.

And I do mean demon. I remember describing it to people just that way, that

SOMEthing just seemed to take me over and make me eat even if I didn't WANT

to eat.

I successfully kicked a 3-pack-a-day smoking habit in 1989 after a half

dozen attempts that never " took " permanently. I had smoked for 35 years. To

THIS DAY, I will at times of stress, chew on toothpicks and straws as

substitutes. Maybe I wasn't addicted to the nicotine, but I was certainly

addicted to having something in my mouth, and apparently still am. But I

think what this proves is that some people can be strong about some things

and not necessarily about others.

One thing that's missing from the summary of the segment on obesity is an

opening quote from one of the belly dancers, who said that she'd never

found anything that worked for her to keep the weight off once she'd lost

it. Like me, she'd lost and regained and lost and regained many times over

her life, and each regain ended her up heavier than ever before. And that

is my biggest criticism of this " study " -- that Stossel never addressed

that issue of obesity, that people do exercise their strength at times and

do lose weight, but are not able to hang on to the loss. When someone finds

the secret to conquering that problem, I think the problem of obesity in

general will be conquered. Is there even ONE person on this list who has

never tried to lose weight? There are a lot of things that cause us to

" choose " to eat rather than control our eating. It's a lot more complex

than this program makes things out to be.

Carol A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

--On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 2:12 AM -0400 Tuesdynite@... wrote:

> I didn't miss it. I saw it. The url u posted is pretty much everything

> that was covered in the 20/20 segment on obesity.

That's pretty pathetic - what a piece of fluff!

> This quote in particular really incensed me:

>

> " Schaler, author of Addiction Is a Choice, disagrees: " These

> people are playing or pretending to be helpless. If they want real help,

> they need to confront the fact that they're lying when they say they

> can't do something that they can do. "

>

> Schaler says we're stronger than we think, and that overeating, smoking

> and other so-called addictions are all things we can choose to control.

> Our genes are not in charge, he says, we are.

>

> Schaler says people may process food differently because of their genes.

> But, he says, " 'The activity of eating is not controlled by a gene.' "

> -----------------

Very smug sounding, isn't it. Maybe it isn't controlled by a single gene -

but I'm betting there is probably some combination of genes that when you

add them all up equate to food addictions or a propensity toward

super-efficiency at retaining calories. Not to mention that dieting seems

to throw people's metabolisms really out of whack in what would appear to

be an almost a permanent way. It's like this person just decided to ignore

volumes of research to the contrary when he made his little proclamation.

> I do not consider myself helpless and I have spent an entire lifetime

> (I'm 61) proving I'm not helpless. I've gone on diet after diet and have

> lost hundreds of pounds over the years. But at some point, some DEMON

> would possess me and make me eat my way back up again to an even higher

> weight. And I do mean demon. I remember describing it to people just that

> way, that SOMEthing just seemed to take me over and make me eat even if I

> didn't WANT to eat.

I feel the same way - I consider myself a very strong person who has

overcome many forms of adversity in my life. I have been successful at

everything I have attempted - with the one exception of losing weight and

keeping it off (well, that and bowling ;o). I lost it time and time again,

but then I just couldn't maintain it. I was an anorexic in high school -

obessively keeping my caloric intake to a mere 300 calories a day for

nearly a year and exercising every chance I got - when I wasn't sitting in

class or sleeping, I was running or doing sit-ups. My health suffered from

it, but you know how much I lost? About 2 lbs a week, if I was lucky. But

no, it's not genetic. It was my fault for eating too much and not moving

enough, right? Bullhockey.

> One thing that's missing from the summary of the segment on obesity is an

> opening quote from one of the belly dancers, who said that she'd never

> found anything that worked for her to keep the weight off once she'd lost

> it. Like me, she'd lost and regained and lost and regained many times

> over her life, and each regain ended her up heavier than ever before. And

> that is my biggest criticism of this " study " -- that Stossel never

> addressed that issue of obesity, that people do exercise their strength

> at times and do lose weight, but are not able to hang on to the loss.

I think that is the real issue - there is the person who gains 5 lbs from

overeating on a cruise, and then there are people who struggle with over

100 lbs of excess weight - apples and oranges, in my book. Part of me

wishes that people who are so smug about " just eat less and move more " be

cursed with morbid obesity so they truly understand that it's not just that

simple. But then, I wouldn't wish MO on my worst enemy.

Sally

298 (BMI 49)/-117/181

Goal: 150

lap RNY 7/10/02

Dr. Quinlin/Pittsburgh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

--On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 2:12 AM -0400 Tuesdynite@... wrote:

> I didn't miss it. I saw it. The url u posted is pretty much everything

> that was covered in the 20/20 segment on obesity.

That's pretty pathetic - what a piece of fluff!

> This quote in particular really incensed me:

>

> " Schaler, author of Addiction Is a Choice, disagrees: " These

> people are playing or pretending to be helpless. If they want real help,

> they need to confront the fact that they're lying when they say they

> can't do something that they can do. "

>

> Schaler says we're stronger than we think, and that overeating, smoking

> and other so-called addictions are all things we can choose to control.

> Our genes are not in charge, he says, we are.

>

> Schaler says people may process food differently because of their genes.

> But, he says, " 'The activity of eating is not controlled by a gene.' "

> -----------------

Very smug sounding, isn't it. Maybe it isn't controlled by a single gene -

but I'm betting there is probably some combination of genes that when you

add them all up equate to food addictions or a propensity toward

super-efficiency at retaining calories. Not to mention that dieting seems

to throw people's metabolisms really out of whack in what would appear to

be an almost a permanent way. It's like this person just decided to ignore

volumes of research to the contrary when he made his little proclamation.

> I do not consider myself helpless and I have spent an entire lifetime

> (I'm 61) proving I'm not helpless. I've gone on diet after diet and have

> lost hundreds of pounds over the years. But at some point, some DEMON

> would possess me and make me eat my way back up again to an even higher

> weight. And I do mean demon. I remember describing it to people just that

> way, that SOMEthing just seemed to take me over and make me eat even if I

> didn't WANT to eat.

I feel the same way - I consider myself a very strong person who has

overcome many forms of adversity in my life. I have been successful at

everything I have attempted - with the one exception of losing weight and

keeping it off (well, that and bowling ;o). I lost it time and time again,

but then I just couldn't maintain it. I was an anorexic in high school -

obessively keeping my caloric intake to a mere 300 calories a day for

nearly a year and exercising every chance I got - when I wasn't sitting in

class or sleeping, I was running or doing sit-ups. My health suffered from

it, but you know how much I lost? About 2 lbs a week, if I was lucky. But

no, it's not genetic. It was my fault for eating too much and not moving

enough, right? Bullhockey.

> One thing that's missing from the summary of the segment on obesity is an

> opening quote from one of the belly dancers, who said that she'd never

> found anything that worked for her to keep the weight off once she'd lost

> it. Like me, she'd lost and regained and lost and regained many times

> over her life, and each regain ended her up heavier than ever before. And

> that is my biggest criticism of this " study " -- that Stossel never

> addressed that issue of obesity, that people do exercise their strength

> at times and do lose weight, but are not able to hang on to the loss.

I think that is the real issue - there is the person who gains 5 lbs from

overeating on a cruise, and then there are people who struggle with over

100 lbs of excess weight - apples and oranges, in my book. Part of me

wishes that people who are so smug about " just eat less and move more " be

cursed with morbid obesity so they truly understand that it's not just that

simple. But then, I wouldn't wish MO on my worst enemy.

Sally

298 (BMI 49)/-117/181

Goal: 150

lap RNY 7/10/02

Dr. Quinlin/Pittsburgh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

--On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 2:12 AM -0400 Tuesdynite@... wrote:

> I didn't miss it. I saw it. The url u posted is pretty much everything

> that was covered in the 20/20 segment on obesity.

That's pretty pathetic - what a piece of fluff!

> This quote in particular really incensed me:

>

> " Schaler, author of Addiction Is a Choice, disagrees: " These

> people are playing or pretending to be helpless. If they want real help,

> they need to confront the fact that they're lying when they say they

> can't do something that they can do. "

>

> Schaler says we're stronger than we think, and that overeating, smoking

> and other so-called addictions are all things we can choose to control.

> Our genes are not in charge, he says, we are.

>

> Schaler says people may process food differently because of their genes.

> But, he says, " 'The activity of eating is not controlled by a gene.' "

> -----------------

Very smug sounding, isn't it. Maybe it isn't controlled by a single gene -

but I'm betting there is probably some combination of genes that when you

add them all up equate to food addictions or a propensity toward

super-efficiency at retaining calories. Not to mention that dieting seems

to throw people's metabolisms really out of whack in what would appear to

be an almost a permanent way. It's like this person just decided to ignore

volumes of research to the contrary when he made his little proclamation.

> I do not consider myself helpless and I have spent an entire lifetime

> (I'm 61) proving I'm not helpless. I've gone on diet after diet and have

> lost hundreds of pounds over the years. But at some point, some DEMON

> would possess me and make me eat my way back up again to an even higher

> weight. And I do mean demon. I remember describing it to people just that

> way, that SOMEthing just seemed to take me over and make me eat even if I

> didn't WANT to eat.

I feel the same way - I consider myself a very strong person who has

overcome many forms of adversity in my life. I have been successful at

everything I have attempted - with the one exception of losing weight and

keeping it off (well, that and bowling ;o). I lost it time and time again,

but then I just couldn't maintain it. I was an anorexic in high school -

obessively keeping my caloric intake to a mere 300 calories a day for

nearly a year and exercising every chance I got - when I wasn't sitting in

class or sleeping, I was running or doing sit-ups. My health suffered from

it, but you know how much I lost? About 2 lbs a week, if I was lucky. But

no, it's not genetic. It was my fault for eating too much and not moving

enough, right? Bullhockey.

> One thing that's missing from the summary of the segment on obesity is an

> opening quote from one of the belly dancers, who said that she'd never

> found anything that worked for her to keep the weight off once she'd lost

> it. Like me, she'd lost and regained and lost and regained many times

> over her life, and each regain ended her up heavier than ever before. And

> that is my biggest criticism of this " study " -- that Stossel never

> addressed that issue of obesity, that people do exercise their strength

> at times and do lose weight, but are not able to hang on to the loss.

I think that is the real issue - there is the person who gains 5 lbs from

overeating on a cruise, and then there are people who struggle with over

100 lbs of excess weight - apples and oranges, in my book. Part of me

wishes that people who are so smug about " just eat less and move more " be

cursed with morbid obesity so they truly understand that it's not just that

simple. But then, I wouldn't wish MO on my worst enemy.

Sally

298 (BMI 49)/-117/181

Goal: 150

lap RNY 7/10/02

Dr. Quinlin/Pittsburgh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...