Guest guest Posted June 13, 2004 Report Share Posted June 13, 2004 > Trans fats down but not out > By Kim Severson > > The fight over the amount of trans fat in America's diet is hotter than > ever -- both on supermarket shelves and in the halls of the federal > government. > > A food advocacy group petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to > completely ban food made with trans fat. That would spell an end to > plenty of products that use partially hydrogenated vegetable oils -- the > substance that contains unhealthy trans fats. > > Producers of cookies, crackers, microwave popcorn and most supermarket > cakes make regular use of shortening and other forms of partially > hydrogenated oils because they extend shelf life and add crispness or > creaminess, depending on the product. The fat also is bubbling in most > deep-fat fryers at fast-food and family-style restaurants. > > Nutritionists and lipid researchers agree that the artificially produced > trans fat is the most dangerous fat in the food supply, increasing bad > cholesterol levels faster than saturated fat and interfering with the > body's metabolic process. The National Academies' Institute of Medicine > last year concluded that there is no safe level of trans fat in the > diet. > > Food manufacturers don't have to disclose trans fat amounts on food > labels until 2006, when a new federal law kicks in. > > That deadline has already had a strong effect on the market, with major > food processors such as Frito-Lay and Oreo maker Kraft searching for > substitutes so they don't have to list trans fat on their packages. > Earlier this spring, 's introduced a version of its Pepperidge > Farms Goldfish crackers without trans fat. Within the next couple of > weeks, Crisco, a product that became synonymous with the unhealthy fat, > will be available in a trans-fat-free version. > > Still, the Center for Science in the Public Interest says this isn't > enough. The consumer group, which started the effort to require > trans-fat labeling in the 1990s, jumped back into the battle in May and > asked the FDA to ban the fat. > > " There has been more and more evidence indicating that trans fat is much > worse than was thought originally, " says son, CSPI > executive director. " There is no need to have this noxious fat in the > food supply. We're saying treat this as a substance that causes > tremendous harm, probably tens of thousands of deaths a year. " > > Food manufacturers immediately criticized the request for the ban as the > wrong way to address the problem. > > " Nutrition experts -- including the FDA -- have called for consumers to > choose diets low in trans fats, not to eliminate them, " says Regina > Hildwine, a spokeswoman for the National Food Processors Association. > She adds that efforts to eliminate trans fats might lead consumers to > replace trans fats with more saturated fats, which can also lead to > heart disease. > > son says his group didn't ask for an all-out ban a decade ago when > the request for better trans fat labeling went to the FDA because it > wasn't clear that any good alternatives existed. But all that's changed. > > " It's quite clear it can be replaced in every function. There are safer > substitutes, " he says. > > The new trans-fat-free Crisco is one of those examples. The product, > which parent company J.M. Smucker says can be used just like original > Crisco, is made from fully hydrogenated cottonseed oil. Original Crisco > has four grams of trans fat per tablespoon. Completely hydrogenating > oil -- a process that changes the chemical composition of vegetable oil > by using heat and a metal catalyst -- eliminates trans fat but makes a > fat that is so hard it is impossible to cook with. To soften it, the > maker of Crisco blends it with sunflower and soybean oil. > > Tests in The Chronicle kitchen found that the new Crisco does perform > almost the same as original Crisco. It doesn't look the same, exactly. > The new product is not as soft or glossy, and has a starker white color. > > We compared pie doughs made with each Crisco. The one made with the > trans-fat-free shortening was a little stiffer, but slightly easier to > work with. > > The blind-baked crusts weren't that different, but the trans-fat-free > Crisco version was a little more cracker-like. The beauty of using > Crisco is that it is more forgiving than butter when making a pie crust > and can offer a sturdier crust -- helpful if your recipe calls for a > soupier filling. The problem is people wrongly believe Crisco is a > healthier option than butter. The new trans-fat-free version is a > solution. > > The best of both worlds -- manageability and flavor -- may be best > achieved using half butter and half trans-fat-free shortening. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.